HRWiki:Talk page etiquette - Revision history

The Cheatbot: autoreplace: — → {{--}}

2022-11-04T04:12:57Z

autoreplace: — → {{--}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:12, 4 November 2022
Line 12:		Line 12:
	=== User talk ===		=== User talk ===

-	User talk pages are used to '''communicate with the user.''' In general, your contributions to your own user talk page should be in response to other people's comments ~~—~~ avoid stuff that would be better placed on your [[HRWiki:User space\|user page]].	+	User talk pages are used to '''communicate with the user.''' In general, your contributions to your own user talk page should be in response to other people's comments {{--}} avoid stuff that would be better placed on your [[HRWiki:User space\|user page]].

	A user's talk page '''should not be used for chit-chat''' among users, especially when email, IM, [[HRWiki:IRC channel\|IRC]], or some other method of communicating would be appropriate. In general, please keep discussion geared toward furthering the goals of the wiki.		A user's talk page '''should not be used for chit-chat''' among users, especially when email, IM, [[HRWiki:IRC channel\|IRC]], or some other method of communicating would be appropriate. In general, please keep discussion geared toward furthering the goals of the wiki.

Stux: undid revision 725037;rv. spam.

2011-09-16T01:12:51Z

undid revision 725037;rv. spam.

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:12, 16 September 2011
Line 12:		Line 12:
	=== User talk ===		=== User talk ===

		+	User talk pages are used to '''communicate with the user.''' In general, your contributions to your own user talk page should be in response to other people's comments — avoid stuff that would be better placed on your [[HRWiki:User space\|user page]].

-	~~In order that the legs will look longer and leaner~~, ~~one must consider buying a stretchy fabric~~, ~~which clings well to the legs. Darker shades also make the legs look leaner. One may don skinny~~ or ~~straight cut http://www.toptruereligionjeans.com/Bootcut-Jeans_2_1.htm Buy Mens True Religion Bootcut Jeans and avoid baggy ones. One must remember that the cuffs give the legs a look~~ of ~~being shorter~~. ~~Also~~, ~~a higher waistline produces longer legs. It is further more suggested that~~ the ~~length~~ of ~~your http://www.toptruereligionjeans.com/Straight-Leg-Jeans_6_1.htm Mens True Religion Straight Leg Jeans should fall a little below~~ the ~~ankle~~.	+	A user's talk page '''should not be used for chit-chat''' among users, especially when email, IM, [[HRWiki:IRC channel\|IRC]], or some other method of communicating would be appropriate. In general, please keep discussion geared toward furthering the goals of the wiki.

-	~~For~~ the ~~butt and thighs~~ not ~~to look extra large~~, ~~one should consider having a pair of http://www.toptruereligionjeans.com/Corduroy-Jeans_3_1.htm Mens True Religion Corduroy Jeans with back pockets that~~ are ~~not too small or situated far apart from each~~ other ~~as they have~~ the ~~tendency~~ to ~~make the butt look bigger. They should also not~~ be ~~situated too low on the behind. Also~~, ~~one~~ should avoid buying a set of http://www.toptruereligionjeans.com/Skinny-Jeans_5_1.htm Mens True Religion Skinny Jeans with a lot of detailing at the waist. One should also consider wearing http://www.toptruereligionjeans.com/Flare-Jeans_4_1.htm Mens True Religion Flare Jeans.	+	If it '''does not involve the user''' whose user space you are on, do not post it there. In particular, if the discussion is between you and another user, and the talk page you are using is neither yours nor the other user's, move the conversation elsewhere.
		+
		+	Also note that '''posting the same message''' to multiple users' talk pages may be considered spamming (unless you are informing various users about a wiki policy, for instance) and should be avoided.

	=== IP user talk ===		=== IP user talk ===

Jeansxee: Mens True Religion Flare Jeans

2011-09-16T01:09:46Z

Mens True Religion Flare Jeans

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:09, 16 September 2011
Line 12:		Line 12:
	=== User talk ===		=== User talk ===

-	User talk pages are used to '''communicate with the user.''' In general, your contributions to your own user talk page should be in response to other people's comments — avoid stuff that would be better placed on your [[HRWiki:User space\|user page]].

-	~~A user's talk page '''should not be used for chit-chat''' among users~~, ~~especially when email, IM, [[HRWiki:IRC channel\|IRC]]~~, or ~~some other method~~ of ~~communicating would be appropriate~~. ~~In general~~, ~~please keep discussion geared toward furthering~~ the ~~goals~~ of the ~~wiki~~.	+	In order that the legs will look longer and leaner, one must consider buying a stretchy fabric, which clings well to the legs. Darker shades also make the legs look leaner. One may don skinny or straight cut http://www.toptruereligionjeans.com/Bootcut-Jeans_2_1.htm Buy Mens True Religion Bootcut Jeans and avoid baggy ones. One must remember that the cuffs give the legs a look of being shorter. Also, a higher waistline produces longer legs. It is further more suggested that the length of your http://www.toptruereligionjeans.com/Straight-Leg-Jeans_6_1.htm Mens True Religion Straight Leg Jeans should fall a little below the ankle.

-	~~If it '''does not involve~~ the ~~user''' whose user space you are on, do~~ not ~~post it there. In particular~~, ~~if the discussion is between you and another user, and the talk page you~~ are ~~using is neither yours nor the~~ other ~~user's, move~~ the ~~conversation elsewhere.~~	+	For the butt and thighs not to look extra large, one should consider having a pair of http://www.toptruereligionjeans.com/Corduroy-Jeans_3_1.htm Mens True Religion Corduroy Jeans with back pockets that are not too small or situated far apart from each other as they have the tendency to make the butt look bigger. They should also not be situated too low on the behind. Also, one should avoid buying a set of http://www.toptruereligionjeans.com/Skinny-Jeans_5_1.htm Mens True Religion Skinny Jeans with a lot of detailing at the waist. One should also consider wearing http://www.toptruereligionjeans.com/Flare-Jeans_4_1.htm Mens True Religion Flare Jeans.
-		+
-	~~Also note that '''posting the same message'''~~ to ~~multiple users' talk pages may~~ be ~~considered spamming (unless you are informing various users about a wiki policy~~, ~~for instance) and~~ should ~~be avoided~~.	+

	=== IP user talk ===		=== IP user talk ===

Wbwolf: undid revision 686648; rv; vandalism + spam = no one likes your style

2009-11-18T01:14:38Z

undid revision 686648; rv; vandalism + spam = no one likes your style

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:14, 18 November 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~WatchForeclosure~~.~~com provides~~ free <a ~~href~~="~~http~~://~~www~~.~~watchforeclosure~~.~~com~~/">~~foreclosure listings~~</a> on ~~bank owned properties~~, ~~government foreclosures~~, ~~hud homes and~~ <a ~~href~~="~~http~~:/~~/www~~.~~watchforeclosure~~.~~com~~/">~~foreclosed homes~~</a>	+	[[Image:Town Meetin.png\|thumb\|400px\|"We must try and understand this creature!"]]
		+	{{shortcut\|TALK}}
		+
		+	== Purpose of the talk page ==
		+
		+	Editors at the Homestar Runner Wiki communicate with each other on '''talk pages''' concerning edits to articles, the right way to describe something, helping users with a particular wiki policy or editing information, and a wealth of other topics. These guidelines are meant to indicate which kinds of talk page edits are the most helpful, and which are seen as undesirable for a variety of reasons.
		+
		+	=== Main namespace talk ===
		+
		+	The talk page for a main namespace article is for '''discussing edits to that article,''' and discussion should be restricted to that topic. In particular, users should not make edits expressing personal opinions or theories which would be more appropriate on one's user page or in the {{pl\|l=http://forum.hrwiki.org Forum}}.
		+
		+	=== User talk ===
		+
		+	User talk pages are used to '''communicate with the user.''' In general, your contributions to your own user talk page should be in response to other people's comments — avoid stuff that would be better placed on your [[HRWiki:User space\|user page]].
		+
		+	A user's talk page '''should not be used for chit-chat''' among users, especially when email, IM, [[HRWiki:IRC channel\|IRC]], or some other method of communicating would be appropriate. In general, please keep discussion geared toward furthering the goals of the wiki.
		+
		+	If it '''does not involve the user''' whose user space you are on, do not post it there. In particular, if the discussion is between you and another user, and the talk page you are using is neither yours nor the other user's, move the conversation elsewhere.
		+
		+	Also note that '''posting the same message''' to multiple users' talk pages may be considered spamming (unless you are informing various users about a wiki policy, for instance) and should be avoided.
		+
		+	=== IP user talk ===
		+
		+	Users who are not logged in appear as an IP address. The wiki allows these users to receive messages and reply on their '''IP talk pages'''. However, one should restrict communications to an IP user to specific targeted messages such as inviting a good editor to get an account, offering a resource to help the user, or other positive and purposeful interaction. Administrators may deliver official messages to anonymous users through these pages as well. Please do not create talk pages for trolls and vandals. They will be deleted, as they only tend to encourage them.
		+
		+	=== General ===
		+
		+	In general, any user may post on any talk page in any namespace provided the post is on topic for that talk page. If a discussion should evolve to outgrow the scope of the talk page, it should be '''continued in a more appropriate location,''' such as another article's talk page, the {{p\|l=http://forum.hrwiki.org/ Forum}}, or [[HRWiki:IRC channel\|IRC]].
		+
		+	You should '''use edit summaries.''' Many users look at the edits through the Recent Changes page or through the page's history for a variety of reasons. A brief summary of your post or a subtextual comment will be a great help. (In your [[Special:Preferences\|preferences]], under the "Editing" category, you can request the wiki to remind you "when entering a blank edit summary".)
		+
		+	'''Editing the talk posts of others''' is generally frowned upon. It's more respectful in most cases to leave a followup post with corrections. In general, allow posters' words to stand unless there exist compelling reasons to alter or remove them.
		+
		+	You may wish to '''archive''' older threads when you have amassed a large number of threads on your user talk page. The usual way to do this is:
		+
		+	#Create a subpage in your userspace called "Talk Archive" or similar.
		+	#Copy the oldest threads from your talk page to this archive page.
		+	#*Do not move any threads which are currently active to an archive.
		+	#*Leave all threads entirely intact in the archive. Do not omit any material.
		+	#Include a link to the archive on your talk page so these threads are still accessible.
		+
		+	<span id="deleteposts"></span>'''Completely deleting posts from your talk page is usually frowned upon,''' especially when these are posts which are legitimately critical of your actions. Your removing these posts may be seen as an effort to hide your mistakes. A better solution is to reply to these criticisms with an appropriate response and let them stand, whether on your talk page or in an archive.
		+
		+	There are times when talk page posts can and should be unceremoniously removed, such as when they are clearly not on topic, or when they are vandalism, spam or plain insults. Also, feel free to remove any posts which you have moved to a location where they should have been posted to in the first place.
		+
		+	== How to format talk posts ==
		+
		+	When you are '''beginning a new thread''' of discussion on a talk page, you should use the "+" tab on the top of the page to start a new thread. Enter the thread title in the small box and your post in the large box. Sign your talk post by typing a space, then <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> at the end of your post. The wiki will turn this into a signature and a timestamp.
		+
		+	When you are '''replying to a post,''' do not start a new thread. Use the edit link to the right of the thread title (or, if it is not under a thread title, use the edit tab at the top of the page). Under the post, type a colon (:) and your reply. The colon indents the post - this makes it easier to follow the conversation. Again, conclude your post by typing a space, then <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>.
		+
		+	Example:
		+	<pre>== Delete? ==
		+	I think the page should be deleted. User 03:00, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
		+	:I agree. User2 03:05, 1 January 2007 (UTC)</pre>
		+
		+	('''Note:''' The above is correct formatting, but for purposes of brevity it is not the ideal way to argue for deletion. See [[#Posting on Talk for Articles for Discussion\|below]].)
		+
		+	If you are replying under a comment with one colon, use ''two'' colons for yours. Add a colon for each subsequent comment. (If the thread is extremely long, a user may opt to not indent the post (use no colons), essentially resetting the indenting.)
		+
		+	There are times when this format might not be strictly followed; feel free to go against this method of sequential indentation in cases where it will lead to clearer comprehension of the thread by other users. However, following sequential indentation is usually preferred.
		+
		+	==Posting on Talk for Articles for Discussion==
		+
		+	When proposing, supporting, or arguing against an article marked for discussion, be sure to remember a few important points.
		+
		+	*Give a '''rationale''' for your suggestion. Merely stating "delete" or "merge" is a weak suggestion. If the argument you would have raised has already been presented, refer to it in your post unless it is obvious.
		+	*Do your best to '''ground your arguments''' in the [[:Category:HRWiki Policy\|policies]] and [[:Category:HRWiki Guidelines\|guidelines]] of the wiki. Remember that these are not votes, but discussions. If more users support one action with a weak argument supporting it, but the other users support another action which is argued more effectively, the latter action could still win consensus.
		+	*Many users choose to '''boldface''' their recommendation, such as '''delete''', '''merge''', '''redirect''', or '''keep'''. This helps others in determining consensus.
		+
		+	== Talk post content ==
		+
		+	It is important to remember that your post is going to be read by many people. Each of these people will interpret what you are saying in their own way unless you are careful to be clear. Here are some basic guidelines which will decrease your chances of being misunderstood, as well as improve your relations with other editors.
		+
		+	*<span id="same_page"></span>'''Always reply to a post on the same page the post is on.''' In some online communities like Wikipedia or MySpace, users reply by posting to other users' pages. This is not necessary here. In cases where you wish to move the conversation elsewhere, leave a post to indicate where you are moving discussion.
		+	*<span id="not_malice"></span>'''Never attribute to malice what can be attributed to stupidity or ignorance.''' This simply means that when someone says something which gets you upset in any way, assume they did not mean it intentionally and respond as if they were not aware they could have upset you. In most cases, that's the truth.
		+	*<span id="no_obscenity"></span>'''No obscenity of any kind is permitted on talk pages,''' as we have many, many users under the age of 18. (There are exceptions to this rule; for example, when a talk page discusses profanity used by The Brothers Chaps themselves. These exceptions are rare, and discussion in these cases is to be handled in a dignified and mature manner.)
		+	*<span id="no_personal_attacks"></span>'''Personal attacks of any kind or severity are forbidden.''' Each user shall be treated with dignity and respect at all times, with no exceptions. Even if a user has vandalized the wiki with the most vile content, that person shall be dealt with based on the facts of their actions and never with personal opinions or insults.
		+	*<span id="on_topic"></span>'''All talk page posts should be on topic.''' If you think the post (or part of a post) might be better suited for the Forum or a chat room, you're probably right. Also, if you think it might not need to be said, don't say it. However, do not feel as if you should not post something which might be of importance to the article. Every user's contributions are equally welcome in talk pages.
		+	*<span id="edit-conflict"></span>'''It's usually not necessary to indicate that you were edit-conflicted''' in your post. Remember: nearly all users get edit conflicts from time to time. It's certainly frustrating, and you might be wishing to vent, but noting a conflict is almost always unnecessary information, and it's arguable whether users benefit from its inclusion, especially on a long-term basis. Instead of noting a conflict, you can often just add an extra colon and post it below. You might even want to indicate your reaction to the intervening post. Or, you might simply note that your post is in reply to a particular user's post. If the post that caused the edit conflict made your post obsolete, don't send your post again.
		+	*<span id="be_bold"></span>'''Be bold''' and change the article (including an appropriate edit summary), rather than posting on an article's talk page regarding an error or omission in the article. If it is reverted, then at that point you should post on the talk page about it. (Note also [[HRWiki:Standards#Be bold, but know when not to be\|when '''not''' to be bold]].)
		+	*<span id="dead_conversations"></span>'''Replying to dead conversations is generally futile.''' Many talk pages are quite old, and you will find conversations from years past. If you feel a very old topic should be revisited, normally you should start a new thread and begin it there, saying something along the lines of "Bringing up an old discussion...". There are times, however, when there may be a legitimate reason to post within an old thread (where a consensus was sought on a topic but never reached, for example); use your discretion.
		+	*<span id="archived_page"></span>'''You should never reply to items on an archived page.''' However, if a revisiting of the topic is warranted, create a new thread on the active talk page, quote the relevant text in a [[Help:Format#Logical and Physical Tags\|blockquote]], and reply following.
		+	*<span id="descriptive_title"></span>'''Choose a descriptive title when beginning a new thread.''' Try to be as specific as possible. Avoid generic titles like "Question", "Huh?", or "My thoughts", and avoid making the title be a whole sentence (or a sentence that begins in the subject and concludes in the first post).
		+	*<span id="removing_posts"></span>'''Do not remove posts from a talk page''' unless it is your user talk page (but see [[#deleteposts\|above]]) or there is a clear, compelling reason the post must be removed. Changing or deleting the words of others is opposite to the purpose of talk pages, not to mention that it's rude.
		+
		+	[[Category:Help\|{{PAGENAME}}]]
		+	[[Category:HRWiki Guidelines\|{{PAGENAME}}]]

Jaiman: replaced the page with 'WatchForeclosure.com provides free foreclosure listings on bank owned properties, government foreclosures, hud homes and
2009-11-18T01:07:45Z

replaced the page with 'WatchForeclosure.com provides free <a href="http://www.watchforeclosure.com/">foreclosure listings</a> on bank owned properties, government foreclosures, hud homes and <a hr…'

← Older revision Revision as of 01:07, 18 November 2009

Line 1: Line 1:

-
[[Image:Town Meetin.png|thumb|400px|"We must try and understand this creature!"]]
+
WatchForeclosure.com provides free <a href="http://www.watchforeclosure.com/">foreclosure listings</a> on bank owned properties, government foreclosures, hud homes and <a href="http://www.watchforeclosure.com/">foreclosed homes</a>

-
{{shortcut|TALK}}
+

-

+

-
== Purpose of the talk page ==
+

-

+

-
Editors at the Homestar Runner Wiki communicate with each other on '''talk pages''' concerning edits to articles, the right way to describe something, helping users with a particular wiki policy or editing information, and a wealth of other topics. These guidelines are meant to indicate which kinds of talk page edits are the most helpful, and which are seen as undesirable for a variety of reasons.
+

-

+

-
=== Main namespace talk ===
+

-

+

-
The talk page for a main namespace article is for '''discussing edits to that article,''' and discussion should be restricted to that topic. In particular, users should not make edits expressing personal opinions or theories which would be more appropriate on one's user page or in the {{pl|l=http://forum.hrwiki.org Forum}}.
+

-

+

-
=== User talk ===
+

-

+

-
User talk pages are used to '''communicate with the user.''' In general, your contributions to your own user talk page should be in response to other people's comments — avoid stuff that would be better placed on your [[HRWiki:User space|user page]].
+

-

+

-
A user's talk page '''should not be used for chit-chat''' among users, especially when email, IM, [[HRWiki:IRC channel|IRC]], or some other method of communicating would be appropriate. In general, please keep discussion geared toward furthering the goals of the wiki.
+

-

+

-
If it '''does not involve the user''' whose user space you are on, do not post it there. In particular, if the discussion is between you and another user, and the talk page you are using is neither yours nor the other user's, move the conversation elsewhere.
+

-

+

-
Also note that '''posting the same message''' to multiple users' talk pages may be considered spamming (unless you are informing various users about a wiki policy, for instance) and should be avoided.
+

-

+

-
=== IP user talk ===
+

-

+

-
Users who are not logged in appear as an IP address. The wiki allows these users to receive messages and reply on their '''IP talk pages'''. However, one should restrict communications to an IP user to specific targeted messages such as inviting a good editor to get an account, offering a resource to help the user, or other positive and purposeful interaction. Administrators may deliver official messages to anonymous users through these pages as well. Please do not create talk pages for trolls and vandals. They will be deleted, as they only tend to encourage them.
+

-

+

-
=== General ===
+

-

+

-
In general, any user may post on any talk page in any namespace provided the post is on topic for that talk page. If a discussion should evolve to outgrow the scope of the talk page, it should be '''continued in a more appropriate location,''' such as another article's talk page, the {{p|l=http://forum.hrwiki.org/ Forum}}, or [[HRWiki:IRC channel|IRC]].
+

-

+

-
You should '''use edit summaries.''' Many users look at the edits through the Recent Changes page or through the page's history for a variety of reasons. A brief summary of your post or a subtextual comment will be a great help. (In your [[Special:Preferences|preferences]], under the "Editing" category, you can request the wiki to remind you "when entering a blank edit summary".)
+

-

+

-
'''Editing the talk posts of others''' is generally frowned upon. It's more respectful in most cases to leave a followup post with corrections. In general, allow posters' words to stand unless there exist compelling reasons to alter or remove them.
+

-

+

-
You may wish to '''archive''' older threads when you have amassed a large number of threads on your user talk page. The usual way to do this is:
+

-

+

-
#Create a subpage in your userspace called "Talk Archive" or similar.
+

-
#Copy the oldest threads from your talk page to this archive page.
+

-
#Do not move any threads which are currently active to an archive.
+

-
#Leave all threads entirely intact in the archive. Do not omit any material.
+

-
#Include a link to the archive on your talk page so these threads are still accessible.
+

-

+

-
'''Completely deleting posts from your talk page is usually frowned upon,''' especially when these are posts which are legitimately critical of your actions. Your removing these posts may be seen as an effort to hide your mistakes. A better solution is to reply to these criticisms with an appropriate response and let them stand, whether on your talk page or in an archive.
+

-

+

-
There are times when talk page posts can and should be unceremoniously removed, such as when they are clearly not on topic, or when they are vandalism, spam or plain insults. Also, feel free to remove any posts which you have moved to a location where they should have been posted to in the first place.
+

-

+

-
== How to format talk posts ==
+

-

+

-
When you are '''beginning a new thread''' of discussion on a talk page, you should use the "+" tab on the top of the page to start a new thread. Enter the thread title in the small box and your post in the large box. Sign your talk post by typing a space, then <nowiki></nowiki> at the end of your post. The wiki will turn this into a signature and a timestamp.
+

-

+

-
When you are '''replying to a post,''' do not start a new thread. Use the edit link to the right of the thread title (or, if it is not under a thread title, use the edit tab at the top of the page). Under the post, type a colon (:) and your reply. The colon indents the post - this makes it easier to follow the conversation. Again, conclude your post by typing a space, then <nowiki></nowiki>.
+

-

+

-
Example:
+

-
<pre>== Delete? ==
+

-
I think the page should be deleted. User 03:00, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
+

-
:I agree. User2 03:05, 1 January 2007 (UTC)</pre>
+

-

+

-
('''Note:''' The above is correct formatting, but for purposes of brevity it is not the ideal way to argue for deletion. See [[#Posting on Talk for Articles for Discussion|below]].)
+

-

+

-
If you are replying under a comment with one colon, use ''two'' colons for yours. Add a colon for each subsequent comment. (If the thread is extremely long, a user may opt to not indent the post (use no colons), essentially resetting the indenting.)
+

-

+

-
There are times when this format might not be strictly followed; feel free to go against this method of sequential indentation in cases where it will lead to clearer comprehension of the thread by other users. However, following sequential indentation is usually preferred.
+

-

+

-
==Posting on Talk for Articles for Discussion==
+

-

+

-
When proposing, supporting, or arguing against an article marked for discussion, be sure to remember a few important points.
+

-

+

-
Give a '''rationale''' for your suggestion. Merely stating "delete" or "merge" is a weak suggestion. If the argument you would have raised has already been presented, refer to it in your post unless it is obvious.
+

-
Do your best to '''ground your arguments''' in the [[:Category:HRWiki Policy|policies]] and [[:Category:HRWiki Guidelines|guidelines]] of the wiki. Remember that these are not votes, but discussions. If more users support one action with a weak argument supporting it, but the other users support another action which is argued more effectively, the latter action could still win consensus.
+

-
Many users choose to '''boldface''' their recommendation, such as '''delete''', '''merge''', '''redirect''', or '''keep'''. This helps others in determining consensus.
+

-

+

-
== Talk post content ==
+

-

+

-
It is important to remember that your post is going to be read by many people. Each of these people will interpret what you are saying in their own way unless you are careful to be clear. Here are some basic guidelines which will decrease your chances of being misunderstood, as well as improve your relations with other editors.
+

-

+

-
'''Always reply to a post on the same page the post is on.''' In some online communities like Wikipedia or MySpace, users reply by posting to other users' pages. This is not necessary here. In cases where you wish to move the conversation elsewhere, leave a post to indicate where you are moving discussion.
+

-
'''Never attribute to malice what can be attributed to stupidity or ignorance.''' This simply means that when someone says something which gets you upset in any way, assume they did not mean it intentionally and respond as if they were not aware they could have upset you. In most cases, that's the truth.
+

-
'''No obscenity of any kind is permitted on talk pages,''' as we have many, many users under the age of 18. (There are exceptions to this rule; for example, when a talk page discusses profanity used by The Brothers Chaps themselves. These exceptions are rare, and discussion in these cases is to be handled in a dignified and mature manner.)
+

-
'''Personal attacks of any kind or severity are forbidden.''' Each user shall be treated with dignity and respect at all times, with no exceptions. Even if a user has vandalized the wiki with the most vile content, that person shall be dealt with based on the facts of their actions and never with personal opinions or insults.
+

-
'''All talk page posts should be on topic.''' If you think the post (or part of a post) might be better suited for the Forum or a chat room, you're probably right. Also, if you think it might not need to be said, don't say it. However, do not feel as if you should not post something which might be of importance to the article. Every user's contributions are equally welcome in talk pages.
+

-
'''It's usually not necessary to indicate that you were edit-conflicted''' in your post. Remember: nearly all users get edit conflicts from time to time. It's certainly frustrating, and you might be wishing to vent, but noting a conflict is almost always unnecessary information, and it's arguable whether users benefit from its inclusion, especially on a long-term basis. Instead of noting a conflict, you can often just add an extra colon and post it below. You might even want to indicate your reaction to the intervening post. Or, you might simply note that your post is in reply to a particular user's post. If the post that caused the edit conflict made your post obsolete, don't send your post again.
+

-
'''Be bold''' and change the article (including an appropriate edit summary), rather than posting on an article's talk page regarding an error or omission in the article. If it is reverted, then at that point you should post on the talk page about it. (Note also [[HRWiki:Standards#Be bold, but know when not to be|when '''not''' to be bold]].)
+

-
'''Replying to dead conversations is generally futile.''' Many talk pages are quite old, and you will find conversations from years past. If you feel a very old topic should be revisited, normally you should start a new thread and begin it there, saying something along the lines of "Bringing up an old discussion...". There are times, however, when there may be a legitimate reason to post within an old thread (where a consensus was sought on a topic but never reached, for example); use your discretion.
+

-
'''You should never reply to items on an archived page.''' However, if a revisiting of the topic is warranted, create a new thread on the active talk page, quote the relevant text in a [[Help:Format#Logical and Physical Tags|blockquote]], and reply following.
+

-
'''Choose a descriptive title when beginning a new thread.''' Try to be as specific as possible. Avoid generic titles like "Question", "Huh?", or "My thoughts", and avoid making the title be a whole sentence (or a sentence that begins in the subject and concludes in the first post).
+

-
'''Do not remove posts from a talk page''' unless it is your user talk page (but see [[#deleteposts|above]]) or there is a clear, compelling reason the post must be removed. Changing or deleting the words of others is opposite to the purpose of talk pages, not to mention that it's rude.
+

-

+

-
[[Category:Help|{{PAGENAME}}]]
+

-
[[Category:HRWiki Guidelines|{{PAGENAME}}]]
+

Soiled Bargains: Undo'd!; Vandalism.

2009-11-07T17:46:40Z

Undo'd!; Vandalism.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:46, 7 November 2009
Line 69:		Line 69:
	*Many users choose to '''boldface''' their recommendation, such as '''delete''', '''merge''', '''redirect''', or '''keep'''. This helps others in determining consensus.		*Many users choose to '''boldface''' their recommendation, such as '''delete''', '''merge''', '''redirect''', or '''keep'''. This helps others in determining consensus.

-	-=0=9-=~~98-098~~=~~-0-9=./\n.,v/,./-=0-=90/.,./,./,./,.=-079560938935417451959-706 u 8 9-=7809 60=0======--0=0=-0=0-90897~~	+	== Talk post content ==

		+	It is important to remember that your post is going to be read by many people. Each of these people will interpret what you are saying in their own way unless you are careful to be clear. Here are some basic guidelines which will decrease your chances of being misunderstood, as well as improve your relations with other editors.

		+	*<span id="same_page"></span>'''Always reply to a post on the same page the post is on.''' In some online communities like Wikipedia or MySpace, users reply by posting to other users' pages. This is not necessary here. In cases where you wish to move the conversation elsewhere, leave a post to indicate where you are moving discussion.
		+	*<span id="not_malice"></span>'''Never attribute to malice what can be attributed to stupidity or ignorance.''' This simply means that when someone says something which gets you upset in any way, assume they did not mean it intentionally and respond as if they were not aware they could have upset you. In most cases, that's the truth.
		+	*<span id="no_obscenity"></span>'''No obscenity of any kind is permitted on talk pages,''' as we have many, many users under the age of 18. (There are exceptions to this rule; for example, when a talk page discusses profanity used by The Brothers Chaps themselves. These exceptions are rare, and discussion in these cases is to be handled in a dignified and mature manner.)
		+	*<span id="no_personal_attacks"></span>'''Personal attacks of any kind or severity are forbidden.''' Each user shall be treated with dignity and respect at all times, with no exceptions. Even if a user has vandalized the wiki with the most vile content, that person shall be dealt with based on the facts of their actions and never with personal opinions or insults.
		+	*<span id="on_topic"></span>'''All talk page posts should be on topic.''' If you think the post (or part of a post) might be better suited for the Forum or a chat room, you're probably right. Also, if you think it might not need to be said, don't say it. However, do not feel as if you should not post something which might be of importance to the article. Every user's contributions are equally welcome in talk pages.
		+	*<span id="edit-conflict"></span>'''It's usually not necessary to indicate that you were edit-conflicted''' in your post. Remember: nearly all users get edit conflicts from time to time. It's certainly frustrating, and you might be wishing to vent, but noting a conflict is almost always unnecessary information, and it's arguable whether users benefit from its inclusion, especially on a long-term basis. Instead of noting a conflict, you can often just add an extra colon and post it below. You might even want to indicate your reaction to the intervening post. Or, you might simply note that your post is in reply to a particular user's post. If the post that caused the edit conflict made your post obsolete, don't send your post again.
		+	*<span id="be_bold"></span>'''Be bold''' and change the article (including an appropriate edit summary), rather than posting on an article's talk page regarding an error or omission in the article. If it is reverted, then at that point you should post on the talk page about it. (Note also [[HRWiki:Standards#Be bold, but know when not to be\|when '''not''' to be bold]].)
		+	*<span id="dead_conversations"></span>'''Replying to dead conversations is generally futile.''' Many talk pages are quite old, and you will find conversations from years past. If you feel a very old topic should be revisited, normally you should start a new thread and begin it there, saying something along the lines of "Bringing up an old discussion...". There are times, however, when there may be a legitimate reason to post within an old thread (where a consensus was sought on a topic but never reached, for example); use your discretion.
		+	*<span id="archived_page"></span>'''You should never reply to items on an archived page.''' However, if a revisiting of the topic is warranted, create a new thread on the active talk page, quote the relevant text in a [[Help:Format#Logical and Physical Tags\|blockquote]], and reply following.
		+	*<span id="descriptive_title"></span>'''Choose a descriptive title when beginning a new thread.''' Try to be as specific as possible. Avoid generic titles like "Question", "Huh?", or "My thoughts", and avoid making the title be a whole sentence (or a sentence that begins in the subject and concludes in the first post).
		+	*<span id="removing_posts"></span>'''Do not remove posts from a talk page''' unless it is your user talk page (but see [[#deleteposts\|above]]) or there is a clear, compelling reason the post must be removed. Changing or deleting the words of others is opposite to the purpose of talk pages, not to mention that it's rude.

-		+	[[Category:Help\|{{PAGENAME}}]]
-		+	[[Category:HRWiki Guidelines\|{{PAGENAME}}]]
-		+
-		+
-	~~'''VIRUS DETECTED!!!!!!!VIRUS DETECTED!!!!!!!!!'''~~	+

Fjdgeuf: VIRUS VIRUS VIRUS VIRUS VIRUS VIRUS VI RA US! VIRUS VA A I A RUS ARUS ARUS -09=-090=790-7=907=-0879=-6790-06=-80=609-0P[0P;'/;P['P[;0P';0[P'0[

2009-11-07T17:38:28Z

VIRUS VIRUS VIRUS VIRUS VIRUS VIRUS VI RA US! VIRUS VA A I A RUS ARUS ARUS -09=-090=790-7=907=-0879=-6790-06=-80=609-0P[0P;'/;P['P[;0P';0[P'0[

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:38, 7 November 2009
Line 69:		Line 69:
	*Many users choose to '''boldface''' their recommendation, such as '''delete''', '''merge''', '''redirect''', or '''keep'''. This helps others in determining consensus.		*Many users choose to '''boldface''' their recommendation, such as '''delete''', '''merge''', '''redirect''', or '''keep'''. This helps others in determining consensus.

-	== ~~Talk post content~~ ==	+	-=0=9-=98-098=-0-9=./\n.,v/,./-=0-=90/.,./,./,./,.=-079560938935417451959-706 u 8 9-=7809 60=0======--0=0=-0=0-90897

-	It is important to remember that your post is going to be read by many people. Each of these people will interpret what you are saying in their own way unless you are careful to be clear. Here are some basic guidelines which will decrease your chances of being misunderstood, as well as improve your relations with other editors.

-	*<span id="same_page"></span>'''Always reply to a post on the same page the post is on.''' In some online communities like Wikipedia or MySpace, users reply by posting to other users' pages. This is not necessary here. In cases where you wish to move the conversation elsewhere, leave a post to indicate where you are moving discussion.
-	*<span id="not_malice"></span>'''Never attribute to malice what can be attributed to stupidity or ignorance.''' This simply means that when someone says something which gets you upset in any way, assume they did not mean it intentionally and respond as if they were not aware they could have upset you. In most cases, that's the truth.
-	*<span id="no_obscenity"></span>'''No obscenity of any kind is permitted on talk pages,''' as we have many, many users under the age of 18. (There are exceptions to this rule; for example, when a talk page discusses profanity used by The Brothers Chaps themselves. These exceptions are rare, and discussion in these cases is to be handled in a dignified and mature manner.)
-	*<span id="no_personal_attacks"></span>'''Personal attacks of any kind or severity are forbidden.''' Each user shall be treated with dignity and respect at all times, with no exceptions. Even if a user has vandalized the wiki with the most vile content, that person shall be dealt with based on the facts of their actions and never with personal opinions or insults.
-	*<span id="on_topic"></span>'''All talk page posts should be on topic.''' If you think the post (or part of a post) might be better suited for the Forum or a chat room, you're probably right. Also, if you think it might not need to be said, don't say it. However, do not feel as if you should not post something which might be of importance to the article. Every user's contributions are equally welcome in talk pages.
-	*<span id="edit-conflict"></span>'''It's usually not necessary to indicate that you were edit-conflicted''' in your post. Remember: nearly all users get edit conflicts from time to time. It's certainly frustrating, and you might be wishing to vent, but noting a conflict is almost always unnecessary information, and it's arguable whether users benefit from its inclusion, especially on a long-term basis. Instead of noting a conflict, you can often just add an extra colon and post it below. You might even want to indicate your reaction to the intervening post. Or, you might simply note that your post is in reply to a particular user's post. If the post that caused the edit conflict made your post obsolete, don't send your post again.
-	*<span id="be_bold"></span>'''Be bold''' and change the article (including an appropriate edit summary), rather than posting on an article's talk page regarding an error or omission in the article. If it is reverted, then at that point you should post on the talk page about it. (Note also [[HRWiki:Standards#Be bold, but know when not to be\|when '''not''' to be bold]].)
-	*<span id="dead_conversations"></span>'''Replying to dead conversations is generally futile.''' Many talk pages are quite old, and you will find conversations from years past. If you feel a very old topic should be revisited, normally you should start a new thread and begin it there, saying something along the lines of "Bringing up an old discussion...". There are times, however, when there may be a legitimate reason to post within an old thread (where a consensus was sought on a topic but never reached, for example); use your discretion.
-	*<span id="archived_page"></span>'''You should never reply to items on an archived page.''' However, if a revisiting of the topic is warranted, create a new thread on the active talk page, quote the relevant text in a [[Help:Format#Logical and Physical Tags\|blockquote]], and reply following.
-	*<span id="descriptive_title"></span>'''Choose a descriptive title when beginning a new thread.''' Try to be as specific as possible. Avoid generic titles like "Question", "Huh?", or "My thoughts", and avoid making the title be a whole sentence (or a sentence that begins in the subject and concludes in the first post).
-	*<span id="removing_posts"></span>'''Do not remove posts from a talk page''' unless it is your user talk page (but see [[#deleteposts\|above]]) or there is a clear, compelling reason the post must be removed. Changing or deleting the words of others is opposite to the purpose of talk pages, not to mention that it's rude.

-	~~[[Category:Help\|{{PAGENAME}}]]~~	+
-	~~[[Category:HRWiki Guidelines\|{{PAGENAME}}]]~~	+
		+
		+
		+	'''VIRUS DETECTED!!!!!!!VIRUS DETECTED!!!!!!!!!'''

Wbwolf: undid revision 684534;rv/v (you just violated the rules of talk page etiquette...)

2009-11-07T17:31:22Z

undid revision 684534;rv/v (you just violated the rules of talk page etiquette...)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:31, 7 November 2009
Line 61:		Line 61:
	There are times when this format might not be strictly followed; feel free to go against this method of sequential indentation in cases where it will lead to clearer comprehension of the thread by other users. However, following sequential indentation is usually preferred.		There are times when this format might not be strictly followed; feel free to go against this method of sequential indentation in cases where it will lead to clearer comprehension of the thread by other users. However, following sequential indentation is usually preferred.

-	~~Hey! I~~'~~m new~~ and, ~~um uh~~. ~~WHAT STARTS WITH F AND ENDS IN UCK? SEE ANSWER IN STRONG BAD EMAIL! -Fjdgeuf~~	+	==Posting on Talk for Articles for Discussion==
		+
		+	When proposing, supporting, or arguing against an article marked for discussion, be sure to remember a few important points.
		+
		+	*Give a '''rationale''' for your suggestion. Merely stating "delete" or "merge" is a weak suggestion. If the argument you would have raised has already been presented, refer to it in your post unless it is obvious.
		+	*Do your best to '''ground your arguments''' in the [[:Category:HRWiki Policy\|policies]] and [[:Category:HRWiki Guidelines\|guidelines]] of the wiki. Remember that these are not votes, but discussions. If more users support one action with a weak argument supporting it, but the other users support another action which is argued more effectively, the latter action could still win consensus.
		+	*Many users choose to '''boldface''' their recommendation, such as '''delete''', '''merge''', '''redirect''', or '''keep'''. This helps others in determining consensus.

	== Talk post content ==		== Talk post content ==

Fjdgeuf: RIDDLE

2009-11-07T17:28:23Z

RIDDLE

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:28, 7 November 2009
Line 61:		Line 61:
	There are times when this format might not be strictly followed; feel free to go against this method of sequential indentation in cases where it will lead to clearer comprehension of the thread by other users. However, following sequential indentation is usually preferred.		There are times when this format might not be strictly followed; feel free to go against this method of sequential indentation in cases where it will lead to clearer comprehension of the thread by other users. However, following sequential indentation is usually preferred.

-	~~==Posting on Talk for Articles for Discussion==~~	+	Hey! I'm new and, um uh. WHAT STARTS WITH F AND ENDS IN UCK? SEE ANSWER IN STRONG BAD EMAIL! -Fjdgeuf
-		+
-	~~When proposing, supporting, or arguing against an article marked for discussion, be sure to remember a few important points.~~	+
-		+
-	*Give a '''rationale''' for your suggestion. Merely stating "delete" or "merge" is a weak suggestion. If the argument you would have raised has already been presented, refer to it in your post unless it is obvious.	+
-	*Do your best to '''ground your arguments''' in the [[:Category:HRWiki Policy\|policies]] and ~~[[:Category:HRWiki Guidelines\|guidelines]] of the wiki. Remember that these are not votes~~, but discussions. If more users support one action with a weak argument supporting it, but the other users support another action which is argued more effectively, the latter action could still win consensus.	+
-	*Many users choose to '''boldface''' their recommendation, such as '''delete''', '''merge''', '''redirect''', or '''keep'''. This helps others in determining consensus.	+

	== Talk post content ==		== Talk post content ==

JCM: so it doesn't overlap the TOC

2009-01-20T16:38:50Z

so it doesn't overlap the TOC

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:38, 20 January 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	[[Image:Town Meetin.png\|thumb\|~~500px~~\|"We must try and understand this creature!"]]	+	[[Image:Town Meetin.png\|thumb\|400px\|"We must try and understand this creature!"]]
	{{shortcut\|TALK}}		{{shortcut\|TALK}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:07, 18 November 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~[[Image:Town Meetin~~.~~png\|thumb\|400px\|"We must try and understand this creature!"]]~~	+	WatchForeclosure.com provides free <a href="http://www.watchforeclosure.com/">foreclosure listings</a> on bank owned properties, government foreclosures, hud homes and <a href="http://www.watchforeclosure.com/">foreclosed homes</a>
-	~~{{shortcut\|TALK}}~~	+
-		+
-	~~== Purpose of the talk page ==~~	+
-		+
-	Editors at the Homestar Runner Wiki communicate with each other on '''talk pages''' concerning edits to articles, the right way to describe something, helping users with a particular wiki policy or editing information, and a wealth of other topics. These guidelines are meant to indicate which kinds of talk page edits are the most helpful, and which are seen as undesirable for a variety of reasons.	+
-		+
-	~~=== Main namespace talk ===~~	+
-		+
-	The talk page for a main namespace article is for '''discussing edits to that article,''' and discussion should be restricted to that topic. In particular, users should not make edits expressing personal opinions or theories which would be more appropriate on one's user page or in the {{pl\|l=http://forum.hrwiki.org Forum}}.	+
-		+
-	~~=== User talk ===~~	+
-		+
-	User talk pages are used to '''communicate with the user.''' In general, your contributions to your own user talk page should be in response to other people's comments — avoid stuff that would be better placed on your [[HRWiki:User space\|user page]].	+
-		+
-	A user's talk page '''should not be used for chit-chat''' among users, especially when email, IM, [[HRWiki:IRC channel\|IRC]], or some other method of communicating would be appropriate. In general, please keep discussion geared toward furthering the goals of the wiki.	+
-		+
-	If it '''does not involve the user''' whose user space you are on, do not post it there. In particular, if the discussion is between you and another user, and the talk page you are using is neither yours nor the other user's, move the conversation elsewhere.	+
-		+
-	~~Also note that '''posting the same message''' to multiple users' talk pages may be considered spamming (unless you are informing various users about a wiki policy, for instance) and should be avoided.~~	+
-		+
-	~~=== IP user talk ===~~	+
-		+
-	Users who are not logged in appear as an IP address. The wiki allows these users to receive messages and reply on their '''IP talk pages'''. However, one should restrict communications to an IP user to specific targeted messages such as inviting a good editor to get an account, offering a resource to help the user, or other positive and purposeful interaction. Administrators may deliver official messages to anonymous users through these pages as well. Please do not create talk pages for trolls and vandals. They will be deleted, as they only tend to encourage them.	+
-		+
-	~~=== General ===~~	+
-		+
-	In general, any user may post on any talk page in any namespace provided the post is on topic for that talk page. If a discussion should evolve to outgrow the scope of the talk page, it should be '''continued in a more appropriate location,''' such as another article's talk page, the {{p\|l=http://forum.hrwiki.org/ Forum}}, or [[HRWiki:IRC channel\|IRC]].	+
-		+
-	You should '''use edit summaries.''' Many users look at the edits through the Recent Changes page or through the page's history for a variety of reasons. A brief summary of your post or a subtextual comment will be a great help. (In your [[Special:Preferences\|preferences]], under the "Editing" category, you can request the wiki to remind you "when entering a blank edit summary".)	+
-		+
-	'''Editing the talk posts of others''' is generally frowned upon. It's more respectful in most cases to leave a followup post with corrections. In general, allow posters' words to stand unless there exist compelling reasons to alter or remove them.	+
-		+
-	~~You may wish to '''archive''' older threads when you have amassed a large number of threads on your user talk page. The usual way to do this is:~~	+
-		+
-	~~#Create a subpage in your userspace called "Talk Archive" or similar.~~	+
-	~~#Copy the oldest threads from your talk page to this archive page.~~	+
-	~~#*Do not move any threads which are currently active to an archive.~~	+
-	~~#*Leave all threads entirely intact in the archive. Do not omit any material.~~	+
-	~~#Include a link to the archive on your talk page so these threads are still accessible.~~	+
-		+
-	<span id="deleteposts"></span>'''Completely deleting posts from your talk page is usually frowned upon,''' especially when these are posts which are legitimately critical of your actions. Your removing these posts may be seen as an effort to hide your mistakes. A better solution is to reply to these criticisms with an appropriate response and let them stand, whether on your talk page or in an archive.	+
-		+
-	~~There are times when talk page posts can and should be unceremoniously removed, such as when they are clearly not on topic, or when they are vandalism, spam or plain insults. Also, feel~~ free ~~to remove any posts which you have moved to a location where they should have been posted to in the first place.~~	+
-		+
-	~~== How to format talk posts ==~~	+
-		+
-	When you are '''beginning a new thread''' of discussion on a talk page, you should use the "+" tab on the top of the page to start a new thread. Enter the thread title in the small box and your post in the large box. Sign your talk post by typing a space, then <~~nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> at the end of your post. The wiki will turn this into~~ a ~~signature and a timestamp.~~	+
-		+
-	When you are '''replying to a post,''' do not start a new thread. Use the edit link to the right of the thread title (or, if it is not under a thread title, use the edit tab at the top of the page). Under the post, type a colon (:) and your reply. The colon indents the post - this makes it easier to follow the conversation. Again, conclude your post by typing a space, then <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>.	+
-		+
-	~~Example:~~	+
-	~~<pre>~~=~~= Delete? ==~~	+
-	~~I think the page should be deleted. User 03:00, 1 January 2007 (UTC)~~	+
-	~~:I agree. User2 03:05, 1 January 2007 (UTC)</pre>~~	+
-		+
-	~~('''Note:''' The above is correct formatting, but for purposes of brevity it is not the ideal way to argue for deletion. See [[#Posting on Talk for Articles for Discussion\|below]].)~~	+
-		+
-	If you are replying under a comment with one colon, use ''two'' colons for yours. Add a colon for each subsequent comment. (If the thread is extremely long, a user may opt to not indent the post (use no colons), essentially resetting the indenting.)	+
-		+
-	There are times when this format might not be strictly followed; feel free to go against this method of sequential indentation in cases where it will lead to clearer comprehension of the thread by other users. However, following sequential indentation is usually preferred.	+
-		+
-	~~==Posting on Talk for Articles for Discussion==~~	+
-		+
-	~~When proposing, supporting, or arguing against an article marked for discussion, be sure to remember a few important points.~~	+
-		+
-	*Give a '''rationale''' for your suggestion. Merely stating "~~delete" or "merge" is a weak suggestion. If the argument you would have raised has already been presented, refer to it in your post unless it is obvious.~~	+
-	*Do your best to '''ground your arguments''' in the [[:Category:HRWiki Policy\|policies]] and [[:Category:HRWiki Guidelines\|guidelines]] of the wiki. Remember that these are not votes, but discussions. If more users support one action with a weak argument supporting it, but the other users support another action which is argued more effectively, the latter action could still win consensus.	+
-	*Many users choose to '''boldface''' their recommendation, such as '''delete''', '''merge''', '''redirect''', or '''keep'''. This helps others in determining consensus.	+
-		+
-	~~== Talk post content ==~~	+
-		+
-	It is important to remember that your post is going to be read by many people. Each of these people will interpret what you are saying in their own way unless you are careful to be clear. Here are some basic guidelines which will decrease your chances of being misunderstood, as well as improve your relations with other editors.	+
-		+
-	*<span id="same_page"></span>'''Always reply to a post on the same page the post is on.''' In some online communities like Wikipedia or MySpace, users reply by posting to other users' pages. This is not necessary here. In cases where you wish to move the conversation elsewhere, leave a post to indicate where you are moving discussion.	+
-	*<span id="not_malice"></~~span>'''Never attribute to malice what can be attributed to stupidity or ignorance~~.~~''' This simply means that when someone says something which gets you upset in any way, assume they did not mean it intentionally and respond as if they were not aware they could have upset you~~. ~~In most cases, that's the truth.~~	+
-	*<span id="no_obscenity"></span>'''No obscenity of any kind is permitted on talk pages,''' as we have many, many users under the age of 18. (There are exceptions to this rule; for example, when a talk page discusses profanity used by The Brothers Chaps themselves. These exceptions are rare, and discussion in these cases is to be handled in a dignified and mature manner.)	+
-	*<span id="no_personal_attacks"></~~span>'''Personal attacks of any kind or severity are forbidden.''' Each user shall be treated with dignity and respect at all times, with no exceptions. Even if~~ a ~~user has vandalized the wiki with the most vile content, that person shall be dealt with based on the facts of their actions and never with personal opinions or insults.~~	+
-	*<span id="on_topic"></span>~~'''All talk page posts should be~~ on ~~topic.''' If you think the post (or part of a post) might be better suited for the Forum or a chat room~~, ~~you're probably right. Also~~, if you think it might not need to be said, don't say it. However, do not feel as if you should not post something which might be of importance to the article. Every user's contributions are equally welcome in talk pages.	+
-	*<span id="edit-conflict"></span>'''It's usually not necessary to indicate that you were edit-conflicted''' in your post. Remember: nearly all users get edit conflicts from time to time. It's certainly frustrating, and you might be wishing to vent, but noting a conflict is almost always unnecessary information, and it's arguable whether users benefit from its inclusion, especially on a long-term basis. Instead of noting a conflict, you can often just add an extra colon and post it below. You might even want to indicate your reaction to the intervening post. Or, you might simply note that your post is in reply to a particular user's post. If the post that caused the edit conflict made your post obsolete, don't send your post again.	+
-	*<span id="be_bold"></span>'''Be bold''' and change the article (including an appropriate edit summary), rather than posting on an article's talk page regarding an error or omission in the article. If it is reverted, then at that point you should post on the talk page about it. (Note also [[HRWiki:~~Standards#Be bold, but know when not to be\|when '''not''' to be bold]].)~~	+
-	*<span id="dead_conversations"></~~span>'''Replying to dead conversations is generally futile~~.~~''' Many talk pages are quite old, and you will find conversations from years past~~. If you feel a very old topic should be revisited, normally you should start a new thread and begin it there, saying something along the lines of "Bringing up an old discussion...". There are times, however, when there may be a legitimate reason to post within an old thread (where a consensus was sought on a topic but never reached, for example); use your discretion.	+
-	*<span id="archived_page"></span>'''You should never reply to items on an archived page.''' However, if a revisiting of the topic is warranted, create a new thread on the active talk page, quote the relevant text in a [[Help:Format#Logical and Physical Tags\|blockquote]], and reply following.	+
-	*<span id="descriptive_title"></~~span>'''Choose~~ a descriptive title when beginning a new thread.''' Try to be as specific as possible. Avoid generic titles like "Question", "Huh?", or "My thoughts", and avoid making the title be a whole sentence (or a sentence that begins in the subject and concludes in the first post).	+
-	*<span id="removing_posts"></span>'''Do not remove posts from a talk page''' unless it is your user talk page (but see [[#deleteposts\|above]]) or there is a clear, compelling reason the post must be removed. Changing or deleting the words of others is opposite to the purpose of talk pages, not to mention that it's rude.	+
-		+
-	~~[[Category:Help\|{{PAGENAME}}]]~~	+
-	~~[[Category:HRWiki Guidelines\|{{PAGENAME}}]]~~	+