Talk:è - Revision history

Ecot3: /**/Oops

2023-05-15T19:57:03Z

: Oops

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:57, 15 May 2023
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::At first I thought it was a good idea, but now I agree with you guys. {{User:Tenerence Love/sig}} 02:16, 17 August 2012 (UTC)		::At first I thought it was a good idea, but now I agree with you guys. {{User:Tenerence Love/sig}} 02:16, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
	::: I think that '''if''' [[é]] was a valid redirect, it would be to something like [[Compé]]. But yeah, I can do without this redirect. We're not likely to get many people searching for it. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 08:17, 17 August 2012 (UTC)		::: I think that '''if''' [[é]] was a valid redirect, it would be to something like [[Compé]]. But yeah, I can do without this redirect. We're not likely to get many people searching for it. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 08:17, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Oops ==
		+
		+	I did not know that this was already deleted, Ill go delete this--{{User:Ecot3/sig}} 19:57, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

It's dot com: deletedtalk

2013-04-04T22:15:32Z

deletedtalk

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:15, 4 April 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	{{~~ttbd~~}}	+	{{deletedtalk}}

	== Doesn't look like a useful redirect... ==		== Doesn't look like a useful redirect... ==

Jay: /* Doesn't look like a useful redirect... */

2012-08-17T08:17:48Z

Doesn't look like a useful redirect...

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:17, 17 August 2012
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:I agree. I thought the same thing when i saw this redirect. I would add, however, that if it WERE useful, so would [[é]] which was accidentally created and marked with delete. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 21:11, 16 August 2012 (UTC)		:I agree. I thought the same thing when i saw this redirect. I would add, however, that if it WERE useful, so would [[é]] which was accidentally created and marked with delete. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 21:11, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
	::At first I thought it was a good idea, but now I agree with you guys. {{User:Tenerence Love/sig}} 02:16, 17 August 2012 (UTC)		::At first I thought it was a good idea, but now I agree with you guys. {{User:Tenerence Love/sig}} 02:16, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
		+	::: I think that '''if''' [[é]] was a valid redirect, it would be to something like [[Compé]]. But yeah, I can do without this redirect. We're not likely to get many people searching for it. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 08:17, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Tenerence Love at 02:16, 17 August 2012

2012-08-17T02:16:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:16, 17 August 2012
Line 5:		Line 5:
	è is way too broad to be a useful redirect when èd (already a redirect), -ed (already a redirect), and ed (already a redirect) make better redirects. This should be '''deleted'''. — [[User:Ngamer01\|Ngamer01]] 18:31, 16 August 2012 (UTC)		è is way too broad to be a useful redirect when èd (already a redirect), -ed (already a redirect), and ed (already a redirect) make better redirects. This should be '''deleted'''. — [[User:Ngamer01\|Ngamer01]] 18:31, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
	:I agree. I thought the same thing when i saw this redirect. I would add, however, that if it WERE useful, so would [[é]] which was accidentally created and marked with delete. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 21:11, 16 August 2012 (UTC)		:I agree. I thought the same thing when i saw this redirect. I would add, however, that if it WERE useful, so would [[é]] which was accidentally created and marked with delete. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 21:11, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
		+	::At first I thought it was a good idea, but now I agree with you guys. {{User:Tenerence Love/sig}} 02:16, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Defender1031: /* Doesn't look like a useful redirect... */ i agree.

2012-08-16T21:11:03Z

Doesn't look like a useful redirect...: i agree.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:11, 16 August 2012
Line 4:		Line 4:

	è is way too broad to be a useful redirect when èd (already a redirect), -ed (already a redirect), and ed (already a redirect) make better redirects. This should be '''deleted'''. — [[User:Ngamer01\|Ngamer01]] 18:31, 16 August 2012 (UTC)		è is way too broad to be a useful redirect when èd (already a redirect), -ed (already a redirect), and ed (already a redirect) make better redirects. This should be '''deleted'''. — [[User:Ngamer01\|Ngamer01]] 18:31, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
		+	:I agree. I thought the same thing when i saw this redirect. I would add, however, that if it WERE useful, so would [[é]] which was accidentally created and marked with delete. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 21:11, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Ngamer01: Starting a discussion on what to do with this redirect that I feel is not useful.

2012-08-16T18:31:42Z

Starting a discussion on what to do with this redirect that I feel is not useful.

New page

{{ttbd}}

== Doesn't look like a useful redirect... ==

è is way too broad to be a useful redirect when èd (already a redirect), -ed (already a redirect), and ed (already a redirect) make better redirects. This should be '''deleted'''. — [[User:Ngamer01|Ngamer01]] 18:31, 16 August 2012 (UTC)