Talk:Apothecary - Revision history

Heimstern Läufer: /* A Private Eye, A Crooked Cop... */ can't be a synonym if the point of the gag is the word itself.

2019-01-07T05:01:21Z

A Private Eye, A Crooked Cop...: can't be a synonym if the point of the gag is the word itself.

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:01, 7 January 2019
Line 16:		Line 16:

	...a secret agent, [[Dangeresque (song)\|and a celebrity pharmacist]], [[Dangeresque (character)\|Dangeresque]]? -- [[Special:Contributions/68.37.43.131\|68.37.43.131]] 23:15, 6 January 2019 (UTC)		...a secret agent, [[Dangeresque (song)\|and a celebrity pharmacist]], [[Dangeresque (character)\|Dangeresque]]? -- [[Special:Contributions/68.37.43.131\|68.37.43.131]] 23:15, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
		+	:This article is a word running gag, so it's necessary for the word "apothecary" to occur for it to fit the gag. A synonym doesn't work in this case. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 05:01, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

68.37.43.131: /**/A Private Eye, A Crooked Cop...

2019-01-06T23:15:41Z

: A Private Eye, A Crooked Cop...

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:15, 6 January 2019
Line 12:		Line 12:
	: It's actually the [[Toons Menu]] description for [[Mr. Shmallow (toon)\|Mr. Shmallow]]. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 21:38, 15 August 2006 (UTC)		: It's actually the [[Toons Menu]] description for [[Mr. Shmallow (toon)\|Mr. Shmallow]]. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 21:38, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
	::It's been fixed, thank you.		::It's been fixed, thank you.
		+
		+	== A Private Eye, A Crooked Cop... ==
		+
		+	...a secret agent, [[Dangeresque (song)\|and a celebrity pharmacist]], [[Dangeresque (character)\|Dangeresque]]? -- [[Special:Contributions/68.37.43.131\|68.37.43.131]] 23:15, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Qermaq: /* Deletion */ hey

2006-08-16T02:07:00Z

Deletion: hey

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:07, 16 August 2006
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::Hmmm, "archaic" might be a bit too much here. Anyway, according to Wikipedia, an [[Wikipedia:Apothecary\|Apothecary]]'s job description was a bit different from that of a pharmacist. So I guess it's a historic thing that would be out of place in the modern world, and therefore maybe notable. Not so in the old-timey toons, though. I'm still not quite convinced that this is notable.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 21:52, 15 August 2006 (UTC)		::Hmmm, "archaic" might be a bit too much here. Anyway, according to Wikipedia, an [[Wikipedia:Apothecary\|Apothecary]]'s job description was a bit different from that of a pharmacist. So I guess it's a historic thing that would be out of place in the modern world, and therefore maybe notable. Not so in the old-timey toons, though. I'm still not quite convinced that this is notable.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 21:52, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
	I think it's a borderline case. But TBC seem to use the word as a running gag of sorts, so I've taken the deletion notice off. Sorry for the trouble ;-){{User:Loafing/sig}} 22:37, 15 August 2006 (UTC)		I think it's a borderline case. But TBC seem to use the word as a running gag of sorts, so I've taken the deletion notice off. Sorry for the trouble ;-){{User:Loafing/sig}} 22:37, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
		+	:A reasoned, mature discussion is ''never'' trouble. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 02:07, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

	==He's No Apothecary==		==He's No Apothecary==

Loafing: /* Deletion */ no indent

2006-08-15T22:38:30Z

Deletion: no indent

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:38, 15 August 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:Also, Wikipedia says it's "a historical term" for a pharmacist. [[User:Retromaniac\|Retromaniac]] 21:49, 15 August 2006 (UTC)		:Also, Wikipedia says it's "a historical term" for a pharmacist. [[User:Retromaniac\|Retromaniac]] 21:49, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
	::Hmmm, "archaic" might be a bit too much here. Anyway, according to Wikipedia, an [[Wikipedia:Apothecary\|Apothecary]]'s job description was a bit different from that of a pharmacist. So I guess it's a historic thing that would be out of place in the modern world, and therefore maybe notable. Not so in the old-timey toons, though. I'm still not quite convinced that this is notable.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 21:52, 15 August 2006 (UTC)		::Hmmm, "archaic" might be a bit too much here. Anyway, according to Wikipedia, an [[Wikipedia:Apothecary\|Apothecary]]'s job description was a bit different from that of a pharmacist. So I guess it's a historic thing that would be out of place in the modern world, and therefore maybe notable. Not so in the old-timey toons, though. I'm still not quite convinced that this is notable.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 21:52, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
-	~~:::~~I think it's a borderline case. But TBC seem to use the word as a running gag of sorts, so I've taken the deletion notice off. Sorry for the trouble ;-){{User:Loafing/sig}} 22:37, 15 August 2006 (UTC)	+	I think it's a borderline case. But TBC seem to use the word as a running gag of sorts, so I've taken the deletion notice off. Sorry for the trouble ;-){{User:Loafing/sig}} 22:37, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

	==He's No Apothecary==		==He's No Apothecary==

Loafing: -tobedeleted +comment

2006-08-15T22:37:52Z

-tobedeleted +comment

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:37, 15 August 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~{{talktobedeleted}}~~
	==Deletion==		==Deletion==
	That word is not that notable. It's not even outdated according to Webster ([http://m-w.com/dictionary/apothecary]).{{User:Loafing/sig}} 21:33, 15 August 2006 (UTC)		That word is not that notable. It's not even outdated according to Webster ([http://m-w.com/dictionary/apothecary]).{{User:Loafing/sig}} 21:33, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Line 5:		Line 4:
	:Also, Wikipedia says it's "a historical term" for a pharmacist. [[User:Retromaniac\|Retromaniac]] 21:49, 15 August 2006 (UTC)		:Also, Wikipedia says it's "a historical term" for a pharmacist. [[User:Retromaniac\|Retromaniac]] 21:49, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
	::Hmmm, "archaic" might be a bit too much here. Anyway, according to Wikipedia, an [[Wikipedia:Apothecary\|Apothecary]]'s job description was a bit different from that of a pharmacist. So I guess it's a historic thing that would be out of place in the modern world, and therefore maybe notable. Not so in the old-timey toons, though. I'm still not quite convinced that this is notable.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 21:52, 15 August 2006 (UTC)		::Hmmm, "archaic" might be a bit too much here. Anyway, according to Wikipedia, an [[Wikipedia:Apothecary\|Apothecary]]'s job description was a bit different from that of a pharmacist. So I guess it's a historic thing that would be out of place in the modern world, and therefore maybe notable. Not so in the old-timey toons, though. I'm still not quite convinced that this is notable.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 21:52, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
		+	:::I think it's a borderline case. But TBC seem to use the word as a running gag of sorts, so I've taken the deletion notice off. Sorry for the trouble ;-){{User:Loafing/sig}} 22:37, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

	==He's No Apothecary==		==He's No Apothecary==

Loafing: /* Deletion */ reply

2006-08-15T21:52:55Z

Deletion: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:52, 15 August 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:
	==Deletion==		==Deletion==
	That word is not that notable. It's not even outdated according to Webster ([http://m-w.com/dictionary/apothecary]).{{User:Loafing/sig}} 21:33, 15 August 2006 (UTC)		That word is not that notable. It's not even outdated according to Webster ([http://m-w.com/dictionary/apothecary]).{{User:Loafing/sig}} 21:33, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
-	::It's no longer in common use, meaning it's archaic. Therefore, it's notable.	+	:It's no longer in common use, meaning it's archaic. Therefore, it's notable.
-	::Also, Wikipedia says it's "a historical term" for a pharmacist. [[User:Retromaniac\|Retromaniac]] 21:49, 15 August 2006 (UTC)	+	:Also, Wikipedia says it's "a historical term" for a pharmacist. [[User:Retromaniac\|Retromaniac]] 21:49, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
		+	::Hmmm, "archaic" might be a bit too much here. Anyway, according to Wikipedia, an [[Wikipedia:Apothecary\|Apothecary]]'s job description was a bit different from that of a pharmacist. So I guess it's a historic thing that would be out of place in the modern world, and therefore maybe notable. Not so in the old-timey toons, though. I'm still not quite convinced that this is notable.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 21:52, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

	==He's No Apothecary==		==He's No Apothecary==

Awexome at 21:50, 15 August 2006

2006-08-15T21:50:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:50, 15 August 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:
	==Deletion==		==Deletion==
	That word is not that notable. It's not even outdated according to Webster ([http://m-w.com/dictionary/apothecary]).{{User:Loafing/sig}} 21:33, 15 August 2006 (UTC)		That word is not that notable. It's not even outdated according to Webster ([http://m-w.com/dictionary/apothecary]).{{User:Loafing/sig}} 21:33, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
-	::It's no longer in common use, meaning it's archaic. Therefore, it's notable. ~~[[User:Retromaniac\|Retromaniac]] 21:36, 15 August 2006 (UTC)~~	+	::It's no longer in common use, meaning it's archaic. Therefore, it's notable.
	::Also, Wikipedia says it's "a historical term" for a pharmacist. [[User:Retromaniac\|Retromaniac]] 21:49, 15 August 2006 (UTC)		::Also, Wikipedia says it's "a historical term" for a pharmacist. [[User:Retromaniac\|Retromaniac]] 21:49, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Awexome at 21:49, 15 August 2006

2006-08-15T21:49:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:49, 15 August 2006
Line 3:		Line 3:
	That word is not that notable. It's not even outdated according to Webster ([http://m-w.com/dictionary/apothecary]).{{User:Loafing/sig}} 21:33, 15 August 2006 (UTC)		That word is not that notable. It's not even outdated according to Webster ([http://m-w.com/dictionary/apothecary]).{{User:Loafing/sig}} 21:33, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
	::It's no longer in common use, meaning it's archaic. Therefore, it's notable. [[User:Retromaniac\|Retromaniac]] 21:36, 15 August 2006 (UTC)		::It's no longer in common use, meaning it's archaic. Therefore, it's notable. [[User:Retromaniac\|Retromaniac]] 21:36, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
		+	::Also, Wikipedia says it's "a historical term" for a pharmacist. [[User:Retromaniac\|Retromaniac]] 21:49, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

	==He's No Apothecary==		==He's No Apothecary==

Heimstern Läufer: TTBD

2006-08-15T21:42:32Z

TTBD

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:42, 15 August 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	{{talktobedeleted}}
	==Deletion==		==Deletion==
	That word is not that notable. It's not even outdated according to Webster ([http://m-w.com/dictionary/apothecary]).{{User:Loafing/sig}} 21:33, 15 August 2006 (UTC)		That word is not that notable. It's not even outdated according to Webster ([http://m-w.com/dictionary/apothecary]).{{User:Loafing/sig}} 21:33, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Awexome at 21:39, 15 August 2006

2006-08-15T21:39:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:39, 15 August 2006
Line 7:		Line 7:
	I'd like to know the name of the toon with "He's no apothecary" as it's title. [[User:Retromaniac\|Retromaniac]] 21:36, 15 August 2006 (UTC)		I'd like to know the name of the toon with "He's no apothecary" as it's title. [[User:Retromaniac\|Retromaniac]] 21:36, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
	: It's actually the [[Toons Menu]] description for [[Mr. Shmallow (toon)\|Mr. Shmallow]]. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 21:38, 15 August 2006 (UTC)		: It's actually the [[Toons Menu]] description for [[Mr. Shmallow (toon)\|Mr. Shmallow]]. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 21:38, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
		+	::It's been fixed, thank you.