Talk:Balloons - Revision history

Heimstern Läufer: change to deletedtalk

2014-07-13T23:48:18Z

change to deletedtalk

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:48, 13 July 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	{{~~tbd~~}}	+	{{deletedtalk}}
	== Too ordinary ==		== Too ordinary ==
	It seems to me that these occurrences are all pretty much your run-of-the-mill use of a run-of-the-discount-party-shop item. '''Not worthy of page-have''' in my opinion. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 16:10, 7 January 2010 (UTC)		It seems to me that these occurrences are all pretty much your run-of-the-mill use of a run-of-the-discount-party-shop item. '''Not worthy of page-have''' in my opinion. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 16:10, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

RickTommy at 03:27, 23 November 2011

2011-11-23T03:27:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:27, 23 November 2011
Line 9:		Line 9:
	::::::Yeah, man! This is just as good as any other article; It's just more of an expected background element than anything that's overly important. I'm sure if you make a page about something else, it'll no doubt be kept!--[[User:HRWiki Greg\|FIFTH GREG! HRWiki Greg]] 16:30, 8 January 2010 (UTC)		::::::Yeah, man! This is just as good as any other article; It's just more of an expected background element than anything that's overly important. I'm sure if you make a page about something else, it'll no doubt be kept!--[[User:HRWiki Greg\|FIFTH GREG! HRWiki Greg]] 16:30, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
	:::::::Awwww,thanks you guys!You make me feel so much better!Now continue with your discussion. {{User:Wasd98/sig}} 01:20, 29 April 2010 (UTC)		:::::::Awwww,thanks you guys!You make me feel so much better!Now continue with your discussion. {{User:Wasd98/sig}} 01:20, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
		+	::::::::'''Keep.''' {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 03:27, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Rondleman: /* Too ordinary */

2010-04-29T01:20:53Z

Too ordinary

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:20, 29 April 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:::::Hey, don't get disappointed, dude! I got to say that this article (in contrast to many other new pages) is very well written, thoughtfully researched, and formatted with a category, links and image with only two edits on your part. I see this is not your first page, so don't worry :). {{User:Elcool/sig}} 05:33, 8 January 2010 (UTC)		:::::Hey, don't get disappointed, dude! I got to say that this article (in contrast to many other new pages) is very well written, thoughtfully researched, and formatted with a category, links and image with only two edits on your part. I see this is not your first page, so don't worry :). {{User:Elcool/sig}} 05:33, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
	::::::Yeah, man! This is just as good as any other article; It's just more of an expected background element than anything that's overly important. I'm sure if you make a page about something else, it'll no doubt be kept!--[[User:HRWiki Greg\|FIFTH GREG! HRWiki Greg]] 16:30, 8 January 2010 (UTC)		::::::Yeah, man! This is just as good as any other article; It's just more of an expected background element than anything that's overly important. I'm sure if you make a page about something else, it'll no doubt be kept!--[[User:HRWiki Greg\|FIFTH GREG! HRWiki Greg]] 16:30, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
		+	:::::::Awwww,thanks you guys!You make me feel so much better!Now continue with your discussion. {{User:Wasd98/sig}} 01:20, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

HRWiki Greg: /* Too ordinary */

2010-01-08T16:30:29Z

Too ordinary

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:30, 8 January 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::::Yeah you guys are right.It isn't used in an unusual way and are to ordinary.I am the creator of this page.I think I made this becuase I was bored.I guess you guys can delete it if you want to sniff {{User:Wasd98/sig}} 07 January, 2009 15:46 (UTC)		::::Yeah you guys are right.It isn't used in an unusual way and are to ordinary.I am the creator of this page.I think I made this becuase I was bored.I guess you guys can delete it if you want to sniff {{User:Wasd98/sig}} 07 January, 2009 15:46 (UTC)
	:::::Hey, don't get disappointed, dude! I got to say that this article (in contrast to many other new pages) is very well written, thoughtfully researched, and formatted with a category, links and image with only two edits on your part. I see this is not your first page, so don't worry :). {{User:Elcool/sig}} 05:33, 8 January 2010 (UTC)		:::::Hey, don't get disappointed, dude! I got to say that this article (in contrast to many other new pages) is very well written, thoughtfully researched, and formatted with a category, links and image with only two edits on your part. I see this is not your first page, so don't worry :). {{User:Elcool/sig}} 05:33, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
		+	::::::Yeah, man! This is just as good as any other article; It's just more of an expected background element than anything that's overly important. I'm sure if you make a page about something else, it'll no doubt be kept!--[[User:HRWiki Greg\|FIFTH GREG! HRWiki Greg]] 16:30, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Elcool: /* Too ordinary */ reply

2010-01-08T05:33:22Z

Too ordinary: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:33, 8 January 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:::Yeah, this may be more pointless than my Nevermind page... the Balloon uses aren't very obscure, or in any way out of the ordinary, most of them are in exactly where you'd expect them. I'm hafta say '''Del Taco''' on this -- [[User:The McArby\|The McArby!]] 21:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)		:::Yeah, this may be more pointless than my Nevermind page... the Balloon uses aren't very obscure, or in any way out of the ordinary, most of them are in exactly where you'd expect them. I'm hafta say '''Del Taco''' on this -- [[User:The McArby\|The McArby!]] 21:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
	::::Yeah you guys are right.It isn't used in an unusual way and are to ordinary.I am the creator of this page.I think I made this becuase I was bored.I guess you guys can delete it if you want to sniff {{User:Wasd98/sig}} 07 January, 2009 15:46 (UTC)		::::Yeah you guys are right.It isn't used in an unusual way and are to ordinary.I am the creator of this page.I think I made this becuase I was bored.I guess you guys can delete it if you want to sniff {{User:Wasd98/sig}} 07 January, 2009 15:46 (UTC)
		+	:::::Hey, don't get disappointed, dude! I got to say that this article (in contrast to many other new pages) is very well written, thoughtfully researched, and formatted with a category, links and image with only two edits on your part. I see this is not your first page, so don't worry :). {{User:Elcool/sig}} 05:33, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Rondleman: /* Too ordinary */

2010-01-07T22:47:12Z

Too ordinary

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:47, 7 January 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::I found only one reference in which balloons are used in an unusual way: Tied to the Heavy Lourde in Homestar Ruiner. And that's also a stretch. Not enough to warrant a page, unless someone dis are 4-5 better things. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 20:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)		::I found only one reference in which balloons are used in an unusual way: Tied to the Heavy Lourde in Homestar Ruiner. And that's also a stretch. Not enough to warrant a page, unless someone dis are 4-5 better things. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 20:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
	:::Yeah, this may be more pointless than my Nevermind page... the Balloon uses aren't very obscure, or in any way out of the ordinary, most of them are in exactly where you'd expect them. I'm hafta say '''Del Taco''' on this -- [[User:The McArby\|The McArby!]] 21:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)		:::Yeah, this may be more pointless than my Nevermind page... the Balloon uses aren't very obscure, or in any way out of the ordinary, most of them are in exactly where you'd expect them. I'm hafta say '''Del Taco''' on this -- [[User:The McArby\|The McArby!]] 21:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
		+	::::Yeah you guys are right.It isn't used in an unusual way and are to ordinary.I am the creator of this page.I think I made this becuase I was bored.I guess you guys can delete it if you want to sniff {{User:Wasd98/sig}} 07 January, 2009 15:46 (UTC)

The McArby: /* Too ordinary */

2010-01-07T21:37:43Z

Too ordinary

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:37, 7 January 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:Sorry, man. I agree.--[[User:HRWiki Greg\|FIFTH GREG! HRWiki Greg]] 16:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)		:Sorry, man. I agree.--[[User:HRWiki Greg\|FIFTH GREG! HRWiki Greg]] 16:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
	::I found only one reference in which balloons are used in an unusual way: Tied to the Heavy Lourde in Homestar Ruiner. And that's also a stretch. Not enough to warrant a page, unless someone dis are 4-5 better things. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 20:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)		::I found only one reference in which balloons are used in an unusual way: Tied to the Heavy Lourde in Homestar Ruiner. And that's also a stretch. Not enough to warrant a page, unless someone dis are 4-5 better things. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 20:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
-	:::Yeah, this may be more pointless than my Nevermind page... the Balloon uses aren't very obscure, or in any way out of the ordinary, most of them are in exactly where you'd expect them. I'm hafta say ''Del Taco'' on this -- [[User:The McArby\|The McArby!]] 21:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)	+	:::Yeah, this may be more pointless than my Nevermind page... the Balloon uses aren't very obscure, or in any way out of the ordinary, most of them are in exactly where you'd expect them. I'm hafta say '''Del Taco''' on this -- [[User:The McArby\|The McArby!]] 21:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

The McArby at 21:37, 7 January 2010

2010-01-07T21:37:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:37, 7 January 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:Sorry, man. I agree.--[[User:HRWiki Greg\|FIFTH GREG! HRWiki Greg]] 16:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)		:Sorry, man. I agree.--[[User:HRWiki Greg\|FIFTH GREG! HRWiki Greg]] 16:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
	::I found only one reference in which balloons are used in an unusual way: Tied to the Heavy Lourde in Homestar Ruiner. And that's also a stretch. Not enough to warrant a page, unless someone dis are 4-5 better things. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 20:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)		::I found only one reference in which balloons are used in an unusual way: Tied to the Heavy Lourde in Homestar Ruiner. And that's also a stretch. Not enough to warrant a page, unless someone dis are 4-5 better things. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 20:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
		+	:::Yeah, this may be more pointless than my Nevermind page... the Balloon uses aren't very obscure, or in any way out of the ordinary, most of them are in exactly where you'd expect them. I'm hafta say ''Del Taco'' on this -- [[User:The McArby\|The McArby!]] 21:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Elcool: /* Too ordinary */ delete

2010-01-07T20:46:08Z

Too ordinary: delete

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:46, 7 January 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	It seems to me that these occurrences are all pretty much your run-of-the-mill use of a run-of-the-discount-party-shop item. '''Not worthy of page-have''' in my opinion. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 16:10, 7 January 2010 (UTC)		It seems to me that these occurrences are all pretty much your run-of-the-mill use of a run-of-the-discount-party-shop item. '''Not worthy of page-have''' in my opinion. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 16:10, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
	:Sorry, man. I agree.--[[User:HRWiki Greg\|FIFTH GREG! HRWiki Greg]] 16:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)		:Sorry, man. I agree.--[[User:HRWiki Greg\|FIFTH GREG! HRWiki Greg]] 16:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
		+	::I found only one reference in which balloons are used in an unusual way: Tied to the Heavy Lourde in Homestar Ruiner. And that's also a stretch. Not enough to warrant a page, unless someone dis are 4-5 better things. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 20:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

HRWiki Greg: /* Too ordinary */

2010-01-07T16:21:15Z

Too ordinary

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:21, 7 January 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:
	== Too ordinary ==		== Too ordinary ==
	It seems to me that these occurrences are all pretty much your run-of-the-mill use of a run-of-the-discount-party-shop item. '''Not worthy of page-have''' in my opinion. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 16:10, 7 January 2010 (UTC)		It seems to me that these occurrences are all pretty much your run-of-the-mill use of a run-of-the-discount-party-shop item. '''Not worthy of page-have''' in my opinion. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 16:10, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
		+	:Sorry, man. I agree.--[[User:HRWiki Greg\|FIFTH GREG! HRWiki Greg]] 16:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)