Talk:Cold Cuts - Revision history

Elcool: consensus to keep. removing template

2009-06-22T19:44:52Z

consensus to keep. removing template

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:44, 22 June 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~{{ttbd}}~~
	== Discussion ==		== Discussion ==
	This page needs to make explicit why cold cuts are important to HR... or else be tbd'ed. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.151.81\|132.183.151.81]] 01:07, 13 March 2009 (UTC)		This page needs to make explicit why cold cuts are important to HR... or else be tbd'ed. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.151.81\|132.183.151.81]] 01:07, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Sbmaniac: Talk:Cold cuts moved to Talk:Cold Cuts: Proper Title Capitalization

2009-06-12T01:08:48Z

Talk:Cold cuts moved to Talk:Cold Cuts: Proper Title Capitalization

← Older revision

Revision as of 01:08, 12 June 2009

OptimisticFool: /* Discussion */ Keep

2009-06-08T00:52:33Z

Discussion: Keep

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:52, 8 June 2009
Line 15:		Line 15:
	:::::::::::::I disagree. A "spoon" is a "terribly common and mundane" item. With only four mentions, I wouldn't call cold cuts common. It's not like they've turned up every few weeks since the website began. Furthermore, according to that very article you mention, ''"Articles should be written about particularly interesting or unique items, or items which are utilized often in a novel way."'' As E.L. Cool pointed out, what's unusual about cold cuts is that we never see them. That's probably why I'm not against keeping this article. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 20:07, 7 June 2009 (UTC)		:::::::::::::I disagree. A "spoon" is a "terribly common and mundane" item. With only four mentions, I wouldn't call cold cuts common. It's not like they've turned up every few weeks since the website began. Furthermore, according to that very article you mention, ''"Articles should be written about particularly interesting or unique items, or items which are utilized often in a novel way."'' As E.L. Cool pointed out, what's unusual about cold cuts is that we never see them. That's probably why I'm not against keeping this article. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 20:07, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
	::::::::::::::Besides, it's not like you hear "cold cuts" every day. At least I don't, here in WV. I hear spoons every day, though. {{User:Theycallmefree/sig}} 20:14, 7 June 2009 (UTC)		::::::::::::::Besides, it's not like you hear "cold cuts" every day. At least I don't, here in WV. I hear spoons every day, though. {{User:Theycallmefree/sig}} 20:14, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
		+	'''Keep''' and move to title case ([[Cold Cuts]] rather than [[Cold cuts]]). And I don't argue that it's worthy of a page "especially because we never see them" or whatever... because if TBC decide to show some cold cuts in an upcoming toon, I don't wan't people saying, "Oh, wait.. now we have seen them.. gotta delete now!" All other reasons for "keep" are enough for a keep, IMHO. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 00:52, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Free: /* Discussion */

2009-06-07T20:14:11Z

Discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:14, 7 June 2009
Line 14:		Line 14:
	::::::::::::'''Delete'''. It's a [[HRWiki:Spoons\|spoon]] thing, I think. {{User:Thy Not Dennis/sig}} 21:42, 10 May 2009 (UTC)		::::::::::::'''Delete'''. It's a [[HRWiki:Spoons\|spoon]] thing, I think. {{User:Thy Not Dennis/sig}} 21:42, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
	:::::::::::::I disagree. A "spoon" is a "terribly common and mundane" item. With only four mentions, I wouldn't call cold cuts common. It's not like they've turned up every few weeks since the website began. Furthermore, according to that very article you mention, ''"Articles should be written about particularly interesting or unique items, or items which are utilized often in a novel way."'' As E.L. Cool pointed out, what's unusual about cold cuts is that we never see them. That's probably why I'm not against keeping this article. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 20:07, 7 June 2009 (UTC)		:::::::::::::I disagree. A "spoon" is a "terribly common and mundane" item. With only four mentions, I wouldn't call cold cuts common. It's not like they've turned up every few weeks since the website began. Furthermore, according to that very article you mention, ''"Articles should be written about particularly interesting or unique items, or items which are utilized often in a novel way."'' As E.L. Cool pointed out, what's unusual about cold cuts is that we never see them. That's probably why I'm not against keeping this article. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 20:07, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
		+	::::::::::::::Besides, it's not like you hear "cold cuts" every day. At least I don't, here in WV. I hear spoons every day, though. {{User:Theycallmefree/sig}} 20:14, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

The Chort: /* Discussion */ If you must bring up that spoons article, please take the time to understand it, rather than throwing The S Word about willy-nilly.

2009-06-07T20:07:53Z

Discussion: If you must bring up that spoons article, please take the time to understand it, rather than throwing The S Word about willy-nilly.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:07, 7 June 2009
Line 13:		Line 13:
	::::::::::: '''Keep'''. I think Cold Cuts are used in many odd places. Also, a sandwich made form moist towelettes? Ewww... --[[User:Jellote\|Jellote]] 21:14, 10 May 2009 (UTC)		::::::::::: '''Keep'''. I think Cold Cuts are used in many odd places. Also, a sandwich made form moist towelettes? Ewww... --[[User:Jellote\|Jellote]] 21:14, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
	::::::::::::'''Delete'''. It's a [[HRWiki:Spoons\|spoon]] thing, I think. {{User:Thy Not Dennis/sig}} 21:42, 10 May 2009 (UTC)		::::::::::::'''Delete'''. It's a [[HRWiki:Spoons\|spoon]] thing, I think. {{User:Thy Not Dennis/sig}} 21:42, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
		+	:::::::::::::I disagree. A "spoon" is a "terribly common and mundane" item. With only four mentions, I wouldn't call cold cuts common. It's not like they've turned up every few weeks since the website began. Furthermore, according to that very article you mention, ''"Articles should be written about particularly interesting or unique items, or items which are utilized often in a novel way."'' As E.L. Cool pointed out, what's unusual about cold cuts is that we never see them. That's probably why I'm not against keeping this article. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 20:07, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Thy Not Dennis: /* Discussion */ delete

2009-05-10T21:42:14Z

Discussion: delete

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:42, 10 May 2009
Line 12:		Line 12:
	::::::::::I agree with Elcool. It is their lack of appearance despite mention that makes them special and unique. I have modified the introduction accordingly to reflect this. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 15:47, 14 April 2009 (UTC)		::::::::::I agree with Elcool. It is their lack of appearance despite mention that makes them special and unique. I have modified the introduction accordingly to reflect this. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 15:47, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
	::::::::::: '''Keep'''. I think Cold Cuts are used in many odd places. Also, a sandwich made form moist towelettes? Ewww... --[[User:Jellote\|Jellote]] 21:14, 10 May 2009 (UTC)		::::::::::: '''Keep'''. I think Cold Cuts are used in many odd places. Also, a sandwich made form moist towelettes? Ewww... --[[User:Jellote\|Jellote]] 21:14, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
		+	::::::::::::'''Delete'''. It's a [[HRWiki:Spoons\|spoon]] thing, I think. {{User:Thy Not Dennis/sig}} 21:42, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Jellote: keep.

2009-05-10T21:14:02Z

keep.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:14, 10 May 2009
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:::::::::Just for the record - When I mentioned that we never once saw them, I meant it as a positive thing for why this article should be kept. For example, when Blue Laser Commander thought that pizza is the ultimate weapon against the CC, they dressed as giant pizza. When mildew was it, we see a minion scrubbing mildew. Cold cuts are never seen and that's what makes them spacial. How can Coach Z confuse them with moist towelettes? That what's fascinating. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 05:51, 14 April 2009 (UTC)		:::::::::Just for the record - When I mentioned that we never once saw them, I meant it as a positive thing for why this article should be kept. For example, when Blue Laser Commander thought that pizza is the ultimate weapon against the CC, they dressed as giant pizza. When mildew was it, we see a minion scrubbing mildew. Cold cuts are never seen and that's what makes them spacial. How can Coach Z confuse them with moist towelettes? That what's fascinating. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 05:51, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
	::::::::::I agree with Elcool. It is their lack of appearance despite mention that makes them special and unique. I have modified the introduction accordingly to reflect this. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 15:47, 14 April 2009 (UTC)		::::::::::I agree with Elcool. It is their lack of appearance despite mention that makes them special and unique. I have modified the introduction accordingly to reflect this. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 15:47, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
		+	::::::::::: '''Keep'''. I think Cold Cuts are used in many odd places. Also, a sandwich made form moist towelettes? Ewww... --[[User:Jellote\|Jellote]] 21:14, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Stux: /* Discussion */ agreed.

2009-04-14T15:47:09Z

Discussion: agreed.

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:47, 14 April 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:::::::According to the [[HRWiki:Inclusion guidelines\|Inclusion guidelines]], a very generic item "''needs at least five to ten appearances and must be of at least moderate importance to the toon (i.e. not just in the background and never mentioned) in half of its appearances.''" On one hand, we only have four appearances (which isn't too much of a problem as we are allowed to bend the guidelines a little) and, as E.L. Cool says, cold cuts aren't actually shown in any of the cartoons. On the other, the fact that [[Crack Stuntman's Girlfriend]] is obsessed with them, Coach Z mistook napkins for them, and that they apparently ''might'' crush the Cheat Commandos means that they do have some significance to the Homestar Runner universe. I'm leaning towards a '''keep''' here, but only just, mind you. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 19:23, 8 April 2009 (UTC)		:::::::According to the [[HRWiki:Inclusion guidelines\|Inclusion guidelines]], a very generic item "''needs at least five to ten appearances and must be of at least moderate importance to the toon (i.e. not just in the background and never mentioned) in half of its appearances.''" On one hand, we only have four appearances (which isn't too much of a problem as we are allowed to bend the guidelines a little) and, as E.L. Cool says, cold cuts aren't actually shown in any of the cartoons. On the other, the fact that [[Crack Stuntman's Girlfriend]] is obsessed with them, Coach Z mistook napkins for them, and that they apparently ''might'' crush the Cheat Commandos means that they do have some significance to the Homestar Runner universe. I'm leaning towards a '''keep''' here, but only just, mind you. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 19:23, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
	:::::::::Just for the record - When I mentioned that we never once saw them, I meant it as a positive thing for why this article should be kept. For example, when Blue Laser Commander thought that pizza is the ultimate weapon against the CC, they dressed as giant pizza. When mildew was it, we see a minion scrubbing mildew. Cold cuts are never seen and that's what makes them spacial. How can Coach Z confuse them with moist towelettes? That what's fascinating. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 05:51, 14 April 2009 (UTC)		:::::::::Just for the record - When I mentioned that we never once saw them, I meant it as a positive thing for why this article should be kept. For example, when Blue Laser Commander thought that pizza is the ultimate weapon against the CC, they dressed as giant pizza. When mildew was it, we see a minion scrubbing mildew. Cold cuts are never seen and that's what makes them spacial. How can Coach Z confuse them with moist towelettes? That what's fascinating. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 05:51, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
		+	::::::::::I agree with Elcool. It is their lack of appearance despite mention that makes them special and unique. I have modified the introduction accordingly to reflect this. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 15:47, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Elcool: /* Discussion */ clearify.

2009-04-14T05:51:32Z

Discussion: clearify.

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:51, 14 April 2009
Line 9:		Line 9:
	::::::There is at least one peculiar thing about cold cuts - We never seen them. We don't know how their cold cuts look (And why would anyone confuse them with moist towelettes). With four appearances, I think it should be '''kept'''. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 20:36, 17 March 2009 (UTC)		::::::There is at least one peculiar thing about cold cuts - We never seen them. We don't know how their cold cuts look (And why would anyone confuse them with moist towelettes). With four appearances, I think it should be '''kept'''. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 20:36, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
	:::::::According to the [[HRWiki:Inclusion guidelines\|Inclusion guidelines]], a very generic item "''needs at least five to ten appearances and must be of at least moderate importance to the toon (i.e. not just in the background and never mentioned) in half of its appearances.''" On one hand, we only have four appearances (which isn't too much of a problem as we are allowed to bend the guidelines a little) and, as E.L. Cool says, cold cuts aren't actually shown in any of the cartoons. On the other, the fact that [[Crack Stuntman's Girlfriend]] is obsessed with them, Coach Z mistook napkins for them, and that they apparently ''might'' crush the Cheat Commandos means that they do have some significance to the Homestar Runner universe. I'm leaning towards a '''keep''' here, but only just, mind you. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 19:23, 8 April 2009 (UTC)		:::::::According to the [[HRWiki:Inclusion guidelines\|Inclusion guidelines]], a very generic item "''needs at least five to ten appearances and must be of at least moderate importance to the toon (i.e. not just in the background and never mentioned) in half of its appearances.''" On one hand, we only have four appearances (which isn't too much of a problem as we are allowed to bend the guidelines a little) and, as E.L. Cool says, cold cuts aren't actually shown in any of the cartoons. On the other, the fact that [[Crack Stuntman's Girlfriend]] is obsessed with them, Coach Z mistook napkins for them, and that they apparently ''might'' crush the Cheat Commandos means that they do have some significance to the Homestar Runner universe. I'm leaning towards a '''keep''' here, but only just, mind you. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 19:23, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
		+	:::::::::Just for the record - When I mentioned that we never once saw them, I meant it as a positive thing for why this article should be kept. For example, when Blue Laser Commander thought that pizza is the ultimate weapon against the CC, they dressed as giant pizza. When mildew was it, we see a minion scrubbing mildew. Cold cuts are never seen and that's what makes them spacial. How can Coach Z confuse them with moist towelettes? That what's fascinating. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 05:51, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

The Chort: Probably keep.

2009-04-08T19:23:26Z

Probably keep.

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:23, 8 April 2009
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:::::After doing a lot of editing on this page, I think it is ready to stand on its own. In all of the references listed, only once was cold cuts used as a throwaway joke, in impression. In all the other references, the characters talk about it like an actual item in the HR universe. Thus, I say '''Keep'''. {{User:Sbmaniac/sig}} 17:06, 17 March 2009 (UTC)		:::::After doing a lot of editing on this page, I think it is ready to stand on its own. In all of the references listed, only once was cold cuts used as a throwaway joke, in impression. In all the other references, the characters talk about it like an actual item in the HR universe. Thus, I say '''Keep'''. {{User:Sbmaniac/sig}} 17:06, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
	::::::There is at least one peculiar thing about cold cuts - We never seen them. We don't know how their cold cuts look (And why would anyone confuse them with moist towelettes). With four appearances, I think it should be '''kept'''. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 20:36, 17 March 2009 (UTC)		::::::There is at least one peculiar thing about cold cuts - We never seen them. We don't know how their cold cuts look (And why would anyone confuse them with moist towelettes). With four appearances, I think it should be '''kept'''. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 20:36, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
		+	:::::::According to the [[HRWiki:Inclusion guidelines\|Inclusion guidelines]], a very generic item "''needs at least five to ten appearances and must be of at least moderate importance to the toon (i.e. not just in the background and never mentioned) in half of its appearances.''" On one hand, we only have four appearances (which isn't too much of a problem as we are allowed to bend the guidelines a little) and, as E.L. Cool says, cold cuts aren't actually shown in any of the cartoons. On the other, the fact that [[Crack Stuntman's Girlfriend]] is obsessed with them, Coach Z mistook napkins for them, and that they apparently ''might'' crush the Cheat Commandos means that they do have some significance to the Homestar Runner universe. I'm leaning towards a '''keep''' here, but only just, mind you. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 19:23, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:42, 10 May 2009
Line 12:		Line 12:
	::::::::::I agree with Elcool. It is their lack of appearance despite mention that makes them special and unique. I have modified the introduction accordingly to reflect this. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 15:47, 14 April 2009 (UTC)		::::::::::I agree with Elcool. It is their lack of appearance despite mention that makes them special and unique. I have modified the introduction accordingly to reflect this. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 15:47, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
	::::::::::: '''Keep'''. I think Cold Cuts are used in many odd places. Also, a sandwich made form moist towelettes? Ewww... --[[User:Jellote\|Jellote]] 21:14, 10 May 2009 (UTC)		::::::::::: '''Keep'''. I think Cold Cuts are used in many odd places. Also, a sandwich made form moist towelettes? Ewww... --[[User:Jellote\|Jellote]] 21:14, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
		+	::::::::::::'''Delete'''. It's a [[HRWiki:Spoons\|spoon]] thing, I think. {{User:Thy Not Dennis/sig}} 21:42, 10 May 2009 (UTC)