Talk:Damp Towel Man - Revision history

Trey56: content moved to Talk:Strong Badman Characters and replaced with a redirect to that page per discussion to merge this article with that one

2007-06-08T23:57:29Z

content moved to Talk:Strong Badman Characters and replaced with a redirect to that page per discussion to merge this article with that one

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:57, 8 June 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~{{talktobedeleted}}~~	+	#REDIRECT [[Talk:Strong Badman Characters]]
-		+
-	~~==What to do?==~~	+
-		+
-	~~'''Merge''' it, either with~~ [[~~Coach Z]] or [[Strong Badman]]. --{{User~~:~~Jay/sig}} 01:53, 19 May 2007 (UTC)~~	+
-	~~:'''Merge''' with [[Strong Badman]].{{User:Loafing/sig}} 01:59, 19 May 2007 (UTC)~~	+
-	~~'''Merge''' (I don't know which one to merge it with though). {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 02:06, 19 May 2007 (UTC)~~	+
-	::MERGE? Okay, I completely disagree. I think we should really just MENTION it. I mean, first off, this is written like fanstuff. Or something else very unencyclopedic. I think a simple "According to Coach Z, he is the "legendary" Damp Towel Man, who collects damp towels from across the universe. However, this is probably just a joke, and not canon." I vote '''mention''', and I don't even know or care if that's an option. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 04:17, 19 May 2007 (UTC)	+
-	~~:::I agree... this and Dry Ragamuffin probably deserve a sentence or two in [[Strong Badman]], and possibly a sentence in [[Coach Z]], but nothing more. {{User:Phlip/sig}} 04:23, 19 May 2007 (UTC)~~	+
-	~~::::'''Leave as is'''. All the other Strong Badman characters have their own pages, and have nearly the same amount of info. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 04:45, 19 May 2007 (UTC)~~	+
-	~~:::::Agree'd with DorianGray. This page needs a rewrite though. {{User:Homestar Coder/sig}} 05:16, 19 May 2007 (UTC)~~	+
-	~~::::::Serious rewrite... (When I wrote "leave as is", I hadn't actually looked at the page yet...) --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 05:18, 19 May 2007 (UTC)~~	+
-	:::::::I Don't Know Why The Guy Who Made This Article Chose To Capitalize Every Single Word In It. That's Really Silly. ahem Sorry. I think we should at least merge part of this article with the [[Coach Z]] one. Although, it's already mentioned in [[Alter Egos]]...hmm. [[User:Jimmy91\|Jimmy91]] 10:54, 19 May 2007 (UTC)	+
-	~~::::::::If this gets merged, so should [[Stiny]], [[Grossman]], [[Deutschman]] and [[The Deutsch Master]]. So '''No Merge'''. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 23:10, 19 May 2007 (UTC)~~	+
-	~~:::::::::'''no merge''' for the reasons already stated. [[User:DeFender1031\|DeFender1031]] 23:12, 19 May 2007 (UTC)~~	+
-	I feel the Strong Badman villains should get their own spotlight, and i don't mind separate pages, including this one ('''keep'''), but how about a page called [[Strong Badman Villains]] merging all of them there? Just throwing idea around. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 15:41, 20 May 2007 (UTC)	+
-	~~:But damp towelman isn't a villian, he's a good guy. Dry ragamuffin would belong there but not this. [[User:DeFender1031\|DeFender1031]] 15:46, 20 May 2007 (UTC)~~	+
-	~~::So how about [[~~Strong Badman Characters]] ~~so we can include Stainy. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 15:48, 20 May 2007 (UTC)~~	+
-	:::I agree with E.L. Cool, we should do a separate pago for StrongBadman's characters, but if that can't be done/made/be an option, then '''MERGE''' with Coach Z. --{{User:Darkangel/sig}} 17:56, 20 May 2007 (UTC)	+
-	::::I think the best plan is to '''MERGE''' Grossman, Deutschman, The Deutsch Master and Stiny (but not Stainy) '''INTO "Strong Badman Characters"'''. If that doesn't work out, then we take no action and '''LEAVE IT''' how it is. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 19:08, 20 May 2007 (UTC)	+
-	~~I agree with EL Cool, in saying that there should be a page for the Strong Badman villans, and the SBM "heroes", if they can even be called that. --{{User:Jangles5150/sig}} 19:15, 20 May 2007 (UTC)~~	+
-	~~:I guess a big ol' compilation page would do it. So yeah, '''Strong Badman Characters'''. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 20:26, 20 May 2007 (UTC)~~	+
-	::Hmm... I can go for that. Yeah, yeah, I see it now... Big ol' compliation page. Table, of course. Images down the left-most column... Without all those character pages, though, would we still need [[:Category:Strong Badman]]? --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 20:30, 20 May 2007 (UTC)	+
-	:::<s>es, if we do it this way: We place the "Main article found here: [[I LOVE LINKS!]]" think for Strong Badman (maybe Stiny), and we'd already have the two location articles in the category, with a healthy subcategory (NOTE: I don't know the current health of said subcategory; just wanted to use an adjective).</s> {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 22:49, 21 May 2007 (UTC)	+
-	~~::::Umm, was your head attached to your body when you wrote that? I seriously have no idea what you meant, and i read it through like 4 times. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 22:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC)~~	+
-	~~:::::Did you read DorianGray's question? "Without all those character pages, though, would we still need [[:Category:Strong Badman]]?" {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 22:56, 21 May 2007 (UTC)~~	+
-	~~::::::Yes I did. it didn't help. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 22:58, 21 May 2007 (UTC)~~	+
-	~~:::::::Allow me to reword it.~~	+
-		+
-	:::::::We'd still have the category [[:Category:Strong Badman]], if we do it this way: We include all characters on the compilation page, and in Strong Badman's (and maybe Stiny's) section we place "See main article: [[Strong Badman]]" or "See main article: [[Stiny]]" and a brief description. That way, we'd have the Strong Badman article, Stiny's article (maybe), the two location articles already in the category, and the subcategory, [[:Category:Strong Badman Filmography]]. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 23:03, 21 May 2007 (UTC)	+
-	::::::::I think [[Strong Badman Characters]] is a great idea. [[Strong Badman]] should stay a dedicated article, as Bluebry proposed, but I don't think that Stiny is relevant for enough for one.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 07:06, 8 June 2007 (UTC)	+
-	~~:::::::::I agree — merge all minor characters (including Stiny) into [[Strong Badman Characters]]. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 07:08, 8 June 2007 (UTC)~~	+
-	~~::::::::::Still totally see this happening. Table and all. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 07:11, 8 June 2007 (UTC)~~	+
-	~~::::::::::: Excellent. I'll get to work on this page, and if it looks good, then we can turn these other pages into redirects to the apprapriate sections. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 07:12, 8 June 2007 (UTC)~~	+
-		+
-	:Okay, I threw together a basic version of [[Strong Badman Characters]], but it needs a lot of trimming, formatting, etc. Once this is in a satisfactory form, we can turn these articles into redirects if we still agree that this is a good course of action. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 07:43, 8 June 2007 (UTC)	+
-	~~::Keep Stiny. I don't picture him without his page all about himself. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}}~~	+

Sam the Man at 11:46, 8 June 2007

2007-06-08T11:46:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:46, 8 June 2007
Line 35:		Line 35:

	:Okay, I threw together a basic version of [[Strong Badman Characters]], but it needs a lot of trimming, formatting, etc. Once this is in a satisfactory form, we can turn these articles into redirects if we still agree that this is a good course of action. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 07:43, 8 June 2007 (UTC)		:Okay, I threw together a basic version of [[Strong Badman Characters]], but it needs a lot of trimming, formatting, etc. Once this is in a satisfactory form, we can turn these articles into redirects if we still agree that this is a good course of action. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 07:43, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
		+	::Keep Stiny. I don't picture him without his page all about himself. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}}

Trey56: update

2007-06-08T07:43:32Z

update

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:43, 8 June 2007
Line 33:		Line 33:
	::::::::::Still totally see this happening. Table and all. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 07:11, 8 June 2007 (UTC)		::::::::::Still totally see this happening. Table and all. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 07:11, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
	::::::::::: Excellent. I'll get to work on this page, and if it looks good, then we can turn these other pages into redirects to the apprapriate sections. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 07:12, 8 June 2007 (UTC)		::::::::::: Excellent. I'll get to work on this page, and if it looks good, then we can turn these other pages into redirects to the apprapriate sections. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 07:12, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	:Okay, I threw together a basic version of [[Strong Badman Characters]], but it needs a lot of trimming, formatting, etc. Once this is in a satisfactory form, we can turn these articles into redirects if we still agree that this is a good course of action. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 07:43, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Trey56: excellent, I'll get started on that page

2007-06-08T07:12:10Z

excellent, I'll get started on that page

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:12, 8 June 2007
Line 32:		Line 32:
	:::::::::I agree — merge all minor characters (including Stiny) into [[Strong Badman Characters]]. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 07:08, 8 June 2007 (UTC)		:::::::::I agree — merge all minor characters (including Stiny) into [[Strong Badman Characters]]. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 07:08, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
	::::::::::Still totally see this happening. Table and all. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 07:11, 8 June 2007 (UTC)		::::::::::Still totally see this happening. Table and all. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 07:11, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
		+	::::::::::: Excellent. I'll get to work on this page, and if it looks good, then we can turn these other pages into redirects to the apprapriate sections. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 07:12, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

DorianGray: /* What to do? */ Replyu

2007-06-08T07:11:06Z

What to do?: Replyu

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:11, 8 June 2007
Line 31:		Line 31:
	::::::::I think [[Strong Badman Characters]] is a great idea. [[Strong Badman]] should stay a dedicated article, as Bluebry proposed, but I don't think that Stiny is relevant for enough for one.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 07:06, 8 June 2007 (UTC)		::::::::I think [[Strong Badman Characters]] is a great idea. [[Strong Badman]] should stay a dedicated article, as Bluebry proposed, but I don't think that Stiny is relevant for enough for one.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 07:06, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
	:::::::::I agree — merge all minor characters (including Stiny) into [[Strong Badman Characters]]. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 07:08, 8 June 2007 (UTC)		:::::::::I agree — merge all minor characters (including Stiny) into [[Strong Badman Characters]]. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 07:08, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
		+	::::::::::Still totally see this happening. Table and all. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 07:11, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Trey56: agree

2007-06-08T07:08:57Z

agree

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:08, 8 June 2007
Line 30:		Line 30:
	:::::::We'd still have the category [[:Category:Strong Badman]], if we do it this way: We include all characters on the compilation page, and in Strong Badman's (and maybe Stiny's) section we place "See main article: [[Strong Badman]]" or "See main article: [[Stiny]]" and a brief description. That way, we'd have the Strong Badman article, Stiny's article (maybe), the two location articles already in the category, and the subcategory, [[:Category:Strong Badman Filmography]]. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 23:03, 21 May 2007 (UTC)		:::::::We'd still have the category [[:Category:Strong Badman]], if we do it this way: We include all characters on the compilation page, and in Strong Badman's (and maybe Stiny's) section we place "See main article: [[Strong Badman]]" or "See main article: [[Stiny]]" and a brief description. That way, we'd have the Strong Badman article, Stiny's article (maybe), the two location articles already in the category, and the subcategory, [[:Category:Strong Badman Filmography]]. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 23:03, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
	::::::::I think [[Strong Badman Characters]] is a great idea. [[Strong Badman]] should stay a dedicated article, as Bluebry proposed, but I don't think that Stiny is relevant for enough for one.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 07:06, 8 June 2007 (UTC)		::::::::I think [[Strong Badman Characters]] is a great idea. [[Strong Badman]] should stay a dedicated article, as Bluebry proposed, but I don't think that Stiny is relevant for enough for one.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 07:06, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
		+	:::::::::I agree — merge all minor characters (including Stiny) into [[Strong Badman Characters]]. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 07:08, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Loafing: /* What to do? */ reply

2007-06-08T07:06:38Z

What to do?: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:06, 8 June 2007
Line 29:		Line 29:

	:::::::We'd still have the category [[:Category:Strong Badman]], if we do it this way: We include all characters on the compilation page, and in Strong Badman's (and maybe Stiny's) section we place "See main article: [[Strong Badman]]" or "See main article: [[Stiny]]" and a brief description. That way, we'd have the Strong Badman article, Stiny's article (maybe), the two location articles already in the category, and the subcategory, [[:Category:Strong Badman Filmography]]. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 23:03, 21 May 2007 (UTC)		:::::::We'd still have the category [[:Category:Strong Badman]], if we do it this way: We include all characters on the compilation page, and in Strong Badman's (and maybe Stiny's) section we place "See main article: [[Strong Badman]]" or "See main article: [[Stiny]]" and a brief description. That way, we'd have the Strong Badman article, Stiny's article (maybe), the two location articles already in the category, and the subcategory, [[:Category:Strong Badman Filmography]]. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 23:03, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
		+	::::::::I think [[Strong Badman Characters]] is a great idea. [[Strong Badman]] should stay a dedicated article, as Bluebry proposed, but I don't think that Stiny is relevant for enough for one.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 07:06, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Bluebry: /* What to do? */ elaboration

2007-05-21T23:04:22Z

What to do?: elaboration

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:04, 21 May 2007
Line 28:		Line 28:
	:::::::Allow me to reword it.		:::::::Allow me to reword it.

-	:::::::We'd still have the category [[:Category:Strong Badman]], if we do it this way: We include all characters, and in Strong Badman's (and maybe Stiny's) section we place "See main article: [[Strong Badman]]" or "See main article: [[Stiny]]" and a brief description. That way, we'd have the Strong Badman article, Stiny's article (maybe), the two location articles already in the category, and the subcategory, [[:Category:Strong Badman Filmography]]. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 23:03, 21 May 2007 (UTC)	+	:::::::We'd still have the category [[:Category:Strong Badman]], if we do it this way: We include all characters on the compilation page, and in Strong Badman's (and maybe Stiny's) section we place "See main article: [[Strong Badman]]" or "See main article: [[Stiny]]" and a brief description. That way, we'd have the Strong Badman article, Stiny's article (maybe), the two location articles already in the category, and the subcategory, [[:Category:Strong Badman Filmography]]. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 23:03, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Bluebry: /* What to do? */ reword

2007-05-21T23:03:53Z

What to do?: reword

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:03, 21 May 2007
Line 22:		Line 22:
	:I guess a big ol' compilation page would do it. So yeah, '''Strong Badman Characters'''. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 20:26, 20 May 2007 (UTC)		:I guess a big ol' compilation page would do it. So yeah, '''Strong Badman Characters'''. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 20:26, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
	::Hmm... I can go for that. Yeah, yeah, I see it now... Big ol' compliation page. Table, of course. Images down the left-most column... Without all those character pages, though, would we still need [[:Category:Strong Badman]]? --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 20:30, 20 May 2007 (UTC)		::Hmm... I can go for that. Yeah, yeah, I see it now... Big ol' compliation page. Table, of course. Images down the left-most column... Without all those character pages, though, would we still need [[:Category:Strong Badman]]? --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 20:30, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
-	:::~~Yes~~, if we do it this way: We place the "Main article found here: [[I LOVE LINKS!]]" think for Strong Badman (maybe Stiny), and we'd already have the two location articles in the category, with a healthy subcategory (NOTE: I don't know the current health of said subcategory; just wanted to use an adjective). {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 22:49, 21 May 2007 (UTC)	+	:::<s>es, if we do it this way: We place the "Main article found here: [[I LOVE LINKS!]]" think for Strong Badman (maybe Stiny), and we'd already have the two location articles in the category, with a healthy subcategory (NOTE: I don't know the current health of said subcategory; just wanted to use an adjective).</s> {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 22:49, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
	::::Umm, was your head attached to your body when you wrote that? I seriously have no idea what you meant, and i read it through like 4 times. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 22:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC)		::::Umm, was your head attached to your body when you wrote that? I seriously have no idea what you meant, and i read it through like 4 times. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 22:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
	:::::Did you read DorianGray's question? "Without all those character pages, though, would we still need [[:Category:Strong Badman]]?" {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 22:56, 21 May 2007 (UTC)		:::::Did you read DorianGray's question? "Without all those character pages, though, would we still need [[:Category:Strong Badman]]?" {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 22:56, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
	::::::Yes I did. it didn't help. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 22:58, 21 May 2007 (UTC)		::::::Yes I did. it didn't help. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 22:58, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
		+	:::::::Allow me to reword it.
		+
		+	:::::::We'd still have the category [[:Category:Strong Badman]], if we do it this way: We include all characters, and in Strong Badman's (and maybe Stiny's) section we place "See main article: [[Strong Badman]]" or "See main article: [[Stiny]]" and a brief description. That way, we'd have the Strong Badman article, Stiny's article (maybe), the two location articles already in the category, and the subcategory, [[:Category:Strong Badman Filmography]]. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 23:03, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Defender1031: /* What to do? */ replor

2007-05-21T22:58:09Z

What to do?: replor

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:58, 21 May 2007
Line 25:		Line 25:
	::::Umm, was your head attached to your body when you wrote that? I seriously have no idea what you meant, and i read it through like 4 times. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 22:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC)		::::Umm, was your head attached to your body when you wrote that? I seriously have no idea what you meant, and i read it through like 4 times. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 22:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
	:::::Did you read DorianGray's question? "Without all those character pages, though, would we still need [[:Category:Strong Badman]]?" {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 22:56, 21 May 2007 (UTC)		:::::Did you read DorianGray's question? "Without all those character pages, though, would we still need [[:Category:Strong Badman]]?" {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 22:56, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
		+	::::::Yes I did. it didn't help. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 22:58, 21 May 2007 (UTC)