Talk:Giblets - Revision history

Jellote: Finally, it is concreted.

2009-06-14T14:12:37Z

Finally, it is concreted.

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:12, 14 June 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:::Since it has three appearances, all centering around the King of town in some way, I think it is safe to say that it is notable. '''Keep.''' {{User:Sbmaniac/sig}} 01:35, 21 April 2009 (UTC)		:::Since it has three appearances, all centering around the King of town in some way, I think it is safe to say that it is notable. '''Keep.''' {{User:Sbmaniac/sig}} 01:35, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
	::::Giblets are sufficiently uncommon that I think we can apply the three-appearances rule, so I'm cool with a keep. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 01:49, 21 April 2009 (UTC)		::::Giblets are sufficiently uncommon that I think we can apply the three-appearances rule, so I'm cool with a keep. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 01:49, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
		+	::::: Either way, there are now '''five''' appearences, pretty much stomping out the "coincidence" factor in any future debates.--[[User:Jellote\|Jellote wuz here]] 14:12, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

2009-05-15T22:50:28Z

remove ttbd

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:50, 15 May 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~{{ttbd}}~~
	== More than two problems? ==		== More than two problems? ==
	I made the giblets page, but do we need it? Any takers? --[[User:Jellote\|Jellote]] 10:57, 20 April 2009 (UTC)		I made the giblets page, but do we need it? Any takers? --[[User:Jellote\|Jellote]] 10:57, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

2009-04-21T01:49:41Z

2009-04-21T01:35:28Z

2009-04-20T20:28:41Z

2009-04-20T16:21:09Z

More than two problems?: i see two problems...

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:21, 20 April 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{ttbd}}		{{ttbd}}
-	===More than two problems?===	+	== More than two problems? ==
	I made the giblets page, but do we need it? Any takers? --[[User:Jellote\|Jellote]] 10:57, 20 April 2009 (UTC)		I made the giblets page, but do we need it? Any takers? --[[User:Jellote\|Jellote]] 10:57, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
	:The appearances are tenuous at best, it has serious formatting issues, and I think some just don't plain fit. '''Weak delete''' {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 14:11, 20 April 2009 (UTC)		:The appearances are tenuous at best, it has serious formatting issues, and I think some just don't plain fit. '''Weak delete''' {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 14:11, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

2009-04-20T14:11:48Z

I object

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:11, 20 April 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	{{ttbd}}
		+	===More than two problems?===
	I made the giblets page, but do we need it? Any takers? --[[User:Jellote\|Jellote]] 10:57, 20 April 2009 (UTC)		I made the giblets page, but do we need it? Any takers? --[[User:Jellote\|Jellote]] 10:57, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
		+	:The appearances are tenuous at best, it has serious formatting issues, and I think some just don't plain fit. '''Weak delete''' {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 14:11, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

2009-04-20T10:57:37Z

Giblets?

New page

I made the giblets page, but do we need it? Any takers? --[[User:Jellote|Jellote]] 10:57, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:35, 21 April 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:The appearances are tenuous at best, it has serious formatting issues, and I think some just don't plain fit. '''Weak delete''' {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 14:11, 20 April 2009 (UTC)		:The appearances are tenuous at best, it has serious formatting issues, and I think some just don't plain fit. '''Weak delete''' {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 14:11, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
	:: Formatting issues can be fixed, of course they all fit, and I don't know what you mean by "tenuous". The real concern is whether it's ''notable'' or not... and I think it's potentially okay. '''Neutral, but leaning keep.''' --{{User:Jay/sig}} 20:28, 20 April 2009 (UTC)		:: Formatting issues can be fixed, of course they all fit, and I don't know what you mean by "tenuous". The real concern is whether it's ''notable'' or not... and I think it's potentially okay. '''Neutral, but leaning keep.''' --{{User:Jay/sig}} 20:28, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
		+	:::Since it has three appearances, all centering around the King of town in some way, I think it is safe to say that it is notable. '''Keep.''' {{User:Sbmaniac/sig}} 01:35, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:49, 21 April 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:: Formatting issues can be fixed, of course they all fit, and I don't know what you mean by "tenuous". The real concern is whether it's ''notable'' or not... and I think it's potentially okay. '''Neutral, but leaning keep.''' --{{User:Jay/sig}} 20:28, 20 April 2009 (UTC)		:: Formatting issues can be fixed, of course they all fit, and I don't know what you mean by "tenuous". The real concern is whether it's ''notable'' or not... and I think it's potentially okay. '''Neutral, but leaning keep.''' --{{User:Jay/sig}} 20:28, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
	:::Since it has three appearances, all centering around the King of town in some way, I think it is safe to say that it is notable. '''Keep.''' {{User:Sbmaniac/sig}} 01:35, 21 April 2009 (UTC)		:::Since it has three appearances, all centering around the King of town in some way, I think it is safe to say that it is notable. '''Keep.''' {{User:Sbmaniac/sig}} 01:35, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
		+	::::Giblets are sufficiently uncommon that I think we can apply the three-appearances rule, so I'm cool with a keep. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 01:49, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:28, 20 April 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	I made the giblets page, but do we need it? Any takers? --[[User:Jellote\|Jellote]] 10:57, 20 April 2009 (UTC)		I made the giblets page, but do we need it? Any takers? --[[User:Jellote\|Jellote]] 10:57, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
	:The appearances are tenuous at best, it has serious formatting issues, and I think some just don't plain fit. '''Weak delete''' {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 14:11, 20 April 2009 (UTC)		:The appearances are tenuous at best, it has serious formatting issues, and I think some just don't plain fit. '''Weak delete''' {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 14:11, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
		+	:: Formatting issues can be fixed, of course they all fit, and I don't know what you mean by "tenuous". The real concern is whether it's ''notable'' or not... and I think it's potentially okay. '''Neutral, but leaning keep.''' --{{User:Jay/sig}} 20:28, 20 April 2009 (UTC)