Talk:H*R.com updates 2016 - Revision history

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc: no objections from me

2017-12-14T00:06:08Z

no objections from me

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:06, 14 December 2017
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:::::Maybe some linkage would be nice. What I think we should do is remove them from this page— I still hold that they have nothing to do with H*R.com updates, and they clutter up the page— then we make a nice template for new Tweets and put that in the empty space on the [[Main Page]] currently occupied by "Browse the knowledge base". If not that, we should '''at least''' link to @StrongBadActual from the Main Page. Anyone else have an opinion? {{User:SRMX12/sig}} 21:14, 20 November 2016 (UTC)		:::::Maybe some linkage would be nice. What I think we should do is remove them from this page— I still hold that they have nothing to do with H*R.com updates, and they clutter up the page— then we make a nice template for new Tweets and put that in the empty space on the [[Main Page]] currently occupied by "Browse the knowledge base". If not that, we should '''at least''' link to @StrongBadActual from the Main Page. Anyone else have an opinion? {{User:SRMX12/sig}} 21:14, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
	::::::Since it's [[H*R.com updates 2017\|clear]] that we're not continuing to keep up with tweets on our update pages, nor should we, I'm going to go ahead and remove them from this page if there are no objections. {{User:SRMX12/sig}} 21:54, 13 December 2017 (UTC)		::::::Since it's [[H*R.com updates 2017\|clear]] that we're not continuing to keep up with tweets on our update pages, nor should we, I'm going to go ahead and remove them from this page if there are no objections. {{User:SRMX12/sig}} 21:54, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
		+	:::::::Yeah. I say remove 'em, and put @StrongBadActual in the See Also section. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 00:06, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Lira: If we're not going to keep doing 'em, let's scrap 'em.

2017-12-13T21:54:35Z

If we're not going to keep doing 'em, let's scrap 'em.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:54, 13 December 2017
Line 9:		Line 9:
	::::Ya know, now that I think about it... maybe not. Maybe. I'm not sure. If we don't include thems, I think we should at least include a "<code><nowiki>==See Also== *[[@StrongBadActual]]</nowiki></code>" at the bottom. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 20:57, 20 November 2016 (UTC)		::::Ya know, now that I think about it... maybe not. Maybe. I'm not sure. If we don't include thems, I think we should at least include a "<code><nowiki>==See Also== *[[@StrongBadActual]]</nowiki></code>" at the bottom. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 20:57, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
	:::::Maybe some linkage would be nice. What I think we should do is remove them from this page— I still hold that they have nothing to do with H*R.com updates, and they clutter up the page— then we make a nice template for new Tweets and put that in the empty space on the [[Main Page]] currently occupied by "Browse the knowledge base". If not that, we should '''at least''' link to @StrongBadActual from the Main Page. Anyone else have an opinion? {{User:SRMX12/sig}} 21:14, 20 November 2016 (UTC)		:::::Maybe some linkage would be nice. What I think we should do is remove them from this page— I still hold that they have nothing to do with H*R.com updates, and they clutter up the page— then we make a nice template for new Tweets and put that in the empty space on the [[Main Page]] currently occupied by "Browse the knowledge base". If not that, we should '''at least''' link to @StrongBadActual from the Main Page. Anyone else have an opinion? {{User:SRMX12/sig}} 21:14, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
		+	::::::Since it's [[H*R.com updates 2017\|clear]] that we're not continuing to keep up with tweets on our update pages, nor should we, I'm going to go ahead and remove them from this page if there are no objections. {{User:SRMX12/sig}} 21:54, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Lira: /* In response to this */ A modest proposal

2016-11-20T21:14:16Z

In response to this: A modest proposal

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:14, 20 November 2016
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:::I'd say that Strong Bad tweets so much that it's better to exclude them from the page to reduce clutter. - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 14:57, 10 October 2016 (UTC)		:::I'd say that Strong Bad tweets so much that it's better to exclude them from the page to reduce clutter. - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 14:57, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
	::::Ya know, now that I think about it... maybe not. Maybe. I'm not sure. If we don't include thems, I think we should at least include a "<code><nowiki>==See Also== *[[@StrongBadActual]]</nowiki></code>" at the bottom. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 20:57, 20 November 2016 (UTC)		::::Ya know, now that I think about it... maybe not. Maybe. I'm not sure. If we don't include thems, I think we should at least include a "<code><nowiki>==See Also== *[[@StrongBadActual]]</nowiki></code>" at the bottom. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 20:57, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
		+	:::::Maybe some linkage would be nice. What I think we should do is remove them from this page— I still hold that they have nothing to do with H*R.com updates, and they clutter up the page— then we make a nice template for new Tweets and put that in the empty space on the [[Main Page]] currently occupied by "Browse the knowledge base". If not that, we should '''at least''' link to @StrongBadActual from the Main Page. Anyone else have an opinion? {{User:SRMX12/sig}} 21:14, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc at 20:57, 20 November 2016

2016-11-20T20:57:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:57, 20 November 2016
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::Alright, so... to open this conversaysh back up, ''should'' we include [[@StrongBadActual]] posts on the H*R.com updates page? It's hard to say, but my vote is also no. Unless we're going to rename the page— and I don't think we should— Strong Bad's tweets have nothing to do with the page topic, which is [[homestarrunner.com]] updates. I think we should remove tweets from this page, and instead include a link to [[@StrongBadActual]] on the [[Main Page]]. What do you think? {{User:SRMX12/sig}} 14:31, 10 October 2016 (UTC)		::Alright, so... to open this conversaysh back up, ''should'' we include [[@StrongBadActual]] posts on the H*R.com updates page? It's hard to say, but my vote is also no. Unless we're going to rename the page— and I don't think we should— Strong Bad's tweets have nothing to do with the page topic, which is [[homestarrunner.com]] updates. I think we should remove tweets from this page, and instead include a link to [[@StrongBadActual]] on the [[Main Page]]. What do you think? {{User:SRMX12/sig}} 14:31, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
	:::I'd say that Strong Bad tweets so much that it's better to exclude them from the page to reduce clutter. - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 14:57, 10 October 2016 (UTC)		:::I'd say that Strong Bad tweets so much that it's better to exclude them from the page to reduce clutter. - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 14:57, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
		+	::::Ya know, now that I think about it... maybe not. Maybe. I'm not sure. If we don't include thems, I think we should at least include a "<code><nowiki>==See Also== *[[@StrongBadActual]]</nowiki></code>" at the bottom. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 20:57, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Catjaz63: yep

2016-10-10T14:57:59Z

yep

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:57, 10 October 2016
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:Me too. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 16:33, 17 September 2016 (UTC)		:Me too. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 16:33, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
	::Alright, so... to open this conversaysh back up, ''should'' we include [[@StrongBadActual]] posts on the H*R.com updates page? It's hard to say, but my vote is also no. Unless we're going to rename the page— and I don't think we should— Strong Bad's tweets have nothing to do with the page topic, which is [[homestarrunner.com]] updates. I think we should remove tweets from this page, and instead include a link to [[@StrongBadActual]] on the [[Main Page]]. What do you think? {{User:SRMX12/sig}} 14:31, 10 October 2016 (UTC)		::Alright, so... to open this conversaysh back up, ''should'' we include [[@StrongBadActual]] posts on the H*R.com updates page? It's hard to say, but my vote is also no. Unless we're going to rename the page— and I don't think we should— Strong Bad's tweets have nothing to do with the page topic, which is [[homestarrunner.com]] updates. I think we should remove tweets from this page, and instead include a link to [[@StrongBadActual]] on the [[Main Page]]. What do you think? {{User:SRMX12/sig}} 14:31, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
		+	:::I'd say that Strong Bad tweets so much that it's better to exclude them from the page to reduce clutter. - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 14:57, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Lira at 14:31, 10 October 2016

2016-10-10T14:31:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:31, 10 October 2016
Line 5:		Line 5:
	I agree. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 13:47, 17 September 2016 (UTC)		I agree. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 13:47, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
	:Me too. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 16:33, 17 September 2016 (UTC)		:Me too. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 16:33, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
		+	::Alright, so... to open this conversaysh back up, ''should'' we include [[@StrongBadActual]] posts on the H*R.com updates page? It's hard to say, but my vote is also no. Unless we're going to rename the page— and I don't think we should— Strong Bad's tweets have nothing to do with the page topic, which is [[homestarrunner.com]] updates. I think we should remove tweets from this page, and instead include a link to [[@StrongBadActual]] on the [[Main Page]]. What do you think? {{User:SRMX12/sig}} 14:31, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc at 16:33, 17 September 2016

2016-09-17T16:33:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:33, 17 September 2016
Line 4:		Line 4:

	I agree. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 13:47, 17 September 2016 (UTC)		I agree. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 13:47, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
		+	:Me too. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 16:33, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

RickTommy: /**/In response to [http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=H*R.com_updates_2016&diff=760657&oldid=760148 this]

2016-09-17T13:47:05Z

: In response to [http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=H*R.com_updates_2016&diff=760657&oldid=760148 this]

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:47, 17 September 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{updates-talk-box}}		{{updates-talk-box}}
		+
		+	== In response to [http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=H*R.com_updates_2016&diff=760657&oldid=760148 this] ==
		+
		+	I agree. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 13:47, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

It's dot com: updates talk navigation

2016-01-01T09:07:23Z

updates talk navigation

New page