Talk:Jibblies 2 - Revision history

Trott: /* Killer Instinct music? */

2024-05-24T21:20:19Z

Killer Instinct music?

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:20, 24 May 2024
Line 447:		Line 447:
	Either way, could whoever added that fact be a bit more specific? -{{User:YK/sig}} 08:54, 12 November 2007 (UTC)		Either way, could whoever added that fact be a bit more specific? -{{User:YK/sig}} 08:54, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
	:See [[Image:HR vs KI.ogg]] for a comparison. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 11:36, 12 November 2007 (UTC)		:See [[Image:HR vs KI.ogg]] for a comparison. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 11:36, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	::I know I'm here 16+ years later, but if that .ogg file is the sole evidence, then yeah, that's interesting but the article vastly overstates the case. The two slivers of music are somewhat similar, but they are different tempos, different notes, etc. The rhythms are similar, in particular the note repetition, and the general melodic shape--which is just two notes--are similar. I guess the orchestration and the lack of harmony is similar too. But it's not like either one is all that distinctive that no one could have possibly come up with it independently. I think this should be cited as an interesting coincidence rather than stating that the music throughout is based on _Killer Instinct_. [[User:Trott\|Trott]] 21:20, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

	== Is That Come On In Here A Come On In Here? ==		== Is That Come On In Here A Come On In Here? ==

209.128.223.72 at 07:39, 2 December 2023

2023-12-02T07:39:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:39, 2 December 2023
Line 562:		Line 562:

	: It is mentioned somewhere—that he is too "oblivious" to contract the jibblies (and that Homsar can apparently deflect it). {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 20:02, 12 April 2013 (UTC)		: It is mentioned somewhere—that he is too "oblivious" to contract the jibblies (and that Homsar can apparently deflect it). {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 20:02, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Out Of Character? ==
		+
		+	This is probably not important to say, but I feel it's a little out of character for Strong Sad to desperately attempt to get a girlfriend. Like, that's Strong Bad's thing. [[Special:Contributions/209.128.223.72\|209.128.223.72]] 07:39, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Defender1031: rv, comment has nothing to do with page content, would be better for the forum.

2016-03-13T19:42:12Z

rv, comment has nothing to do with page content, would be better for the forum.

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:42, 13 March 2016
Line 562:		Line 562:

	: It is mentioned somewhere—that he is too "oblivious" to contract the jibblies (and that Homsar can apparently deflect it). {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 20:02, 12 April 2013 (UTC)		: It is mentioned somewhere—that he is too "oblivious" to contract the jibblies (and that Homsar can apparently deflect it). {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 20:02, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
-
-	~~== Beetlejuice ==~~
-
-	Why there is Strong Bad smiling the whole time in the first place? Is it because of his Beetlejuice costume? Or is it a miracle from Strong Bad himself? We don't know. But, You guys have to be there to find out! --[[Special:Contributions/76.177.9.12\|76.177.9.12]] 19:39, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

76.177.9.12: /**/Beetlejuice

2016-03-13T19:39:40Z

: Beetlejuice

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:39, 13 March 2016
Line 562:		Line 562:

	: It is mentioned somewhere—that he is too "oblivious" to contract the jibblies (and that Homsar can apparently deflect it). {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 20:02, 12 April 2013 (UTC)		: It is mentioned somewhere—that he is too "oblivious" to contract the jibblies (and that Homsar can apparently deflect it). {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 20:02, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Beetlejuice ==
		+
		+	Why there is Strong Bad smiling the whole time in the first place? Is it because of his Beetlejuice costume? Or is it a miracle from Strong Bad himself? We don't know. But, You guys have to be there to find out! --[[Special:Contributions/76.177.9.12\|76.177.9.12]] 19:39, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Broncotroll: Reply

2013-04-12T20:02:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:02, 12 April 2013
Line 560:		Line 560:

	I'm a little surprised that this didn't already come up. It appears for some, unexplained reason, that Homestar is immune to the Jibblies, considering he didn't get them when the Horrible Painting said "Come on in here..." to him. Of course, this may also have to do with the fact he turned his head the exact moment it spoke, but it may not be based off of "hypnosis". Perhaps this would be mentioned in the "Remarks" section?		I'm a little surprised that this didn't already come up. It appears for some, unexplained reason, that Homestar is immune to the Jibblies, considering he didn't get them when the Horrible Painting said "Come on in here..." to him. Of course, this may also have to do with the fact he turned his head the exact moment it spoke, but it may not be based off of "hypnosis". Perhaps this would be mentioned in the "Remarks" section?
		+
		+	: It is mentioned somewhere—that he is too "oblivious" to contract the jibblies (and that Homsar can apparently deflect it). {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 20:02, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

98.232.170.161: /**/Unexplained immunity to the Jibblies?

2013-04-12T04:29:56Z

: Unexplained immunity to the Jibblies?

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:29, 12 April 2013
Line 556:		Line 556:
	::I knew Marzipan's eyes were spinning, but if you still shot a frame of her with the spinning eyes, and look at a photo of a pokemon unable to battle, the design is the same... or rather, very close to the same... [[User:Jibblejibblejibble\|Jibblejibblejibble]]		::I knew Marzipan's eyes were spinning, but if you still shot a frame of her with the spinning eyes, and look at a photo of a pokemon unable to battle, the design is the same... or rather, very close to the same... [[User:Jibblejibblejibble\|Jibblejibblejibble]]
	::: The "swirling eyes to denote unconsciousness or mind-control" thing far, far, FAR predates Pokemon. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 18:15, 29 June 2011 (UTC)		::: The "swirling eyes to denote unconsciousness or mind-control" thing far, far, FAR predates Pokemon. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 18:15, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Unexplained immunity to the Jibblies? ==
		+
		+	I'm a little surprised that this didn't already come up. It appears for some, unexplained reason, that Homestar is immune to the Jibblies, considering he didn't get them when the Horrible Painting said "Come on in here..." to him. Of course, this may also have to do with the fact he turned his head the exact moment it spoke, but it may not be based off of "hypnosis". Perhaps this would be mentioned in the "Remarks" section?

Ngamer01: Jibblies 2 is featured.

2011-11-01T17:54:00Z

Jibblies 2 is featured.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:54, 1 November 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	{{featuredarticle}}
		+
	== 2 things ==		== 2 things ==
	1. this is the first/ maybe 2nd time strong bad closes is eyes		1. this is the first/ maybe 2nd time strong bad closes is eyes

Jay: /* Marzipan is Unable to Battle? */

2011-06-29T18:15:42Z

Marzipan is Unable to Battle?

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:15, 29 June 2011
Line 553:		Line 553:
	:Marzipan's eyes are spinning. From what I remember, Pokémon eyes remain perfectly still when they are swirled and unable to battle. Just adding a thought; not suggesting yes or no right now. {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 03:01, 27 June 2011 (UTC)		:Marzipan's eyes are spinning. From what I remember, Pokémon eyes remain perfectly still when they are swirled and unable to battle. Just adding a thought; not suggesting yes or no right now. {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 03:01, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
	::I knew Marzipan's eyes were spinning, but if you still shot a frame of her with the spinning eyes, and look at a photo of a pokemon unable to battle, the design is the same... or rather, very close to the same... [[User:Jibblejibblejibble\|Jibblejibblejibble]]		::I knew Marzipan's eyes were spinning, but if you still shot a frame of her with the spinning eyes, and look at a photo of a pokemon unable to battle, the design is the same... or rather, very close to the same... [[User:Jibblejibblejibble\|Jibblejibblejibble]]
		+	::: The "swirling eyes to denote unconsciousness or mind-control" thing far, far, FAR predates Pokemon. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 18:15, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Jibblejibblejibble: /* Marzipan is Unable to Battle? */

2011-06-29T15:44:25Z

Marzipan is Unable to Battle?

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:44, 29 June 2011
Line 552:		Line 552:
	Ok, when Marzipan is having the Jibblies, and her eyes are swirled like that, should I put it in refrences that that type of eye use is from the Pokemon series? When a pokemon is unable to battle, their eyes become swirls, that are exactly identical to Marzipans! Thoughts? [[User:Jibblejibblejibble\|Jibblejibblejibble]]		Ok, when Marzipan is having the Jibblies, and her eyes are swirled like that, should I put it in refrences that that type of eye use is from the Pokemon series? When a pokemon is unable to battle, their eyes become swirls, that are exactly identical to Marzipans! Thoughts? [[User:Jibblejibblejibble\|Jibblejibblejibble]]
	:Marzipan's eyes are spinning. From what I remember, Pokémon eyes remain perfectly still when they are swirled and unable to battle. Just adding a thought; not suggesting yes or no right now. {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 03:01, 27 June 2011 (UTC)		:Marzipan's eyes are spinning. From what I remember, Pokémon eyes remain perfectly still when they are swirled and unable to battle. Just adding a thought; not suggesting yes or no right now. {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 03:01, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
		+	::I knew Marzipan's eyes were spinning, but if you still shot a frame of her with the spinning eyes, and look at a photo of a pokemon unable to battle, the design is the same... or rather, very close to the same... [[User:Jibblejibblejibble\|Jibblejibblejibble]]

The Knights Who Say Ni: /* Marzipan is Unable to Battle? */ i don't think pokémon eyes spin like that

2011-06-27T03:01:04Z

Marzipan is Unable to Battle?: i don't think pokémon eyes spin like that

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:01, 27 June 2011
Line 551:		Line 551:

	Ok, when Marzipan is having the Jibblies, and her eyes are swirled like that, should I put it in refrences that that type of eye use is from the Pokemon series? When a pokemon is unable to battle, their eyes become swirls, that are exactly identical to Marzipans! Thoughts? [[User:Jibblejibblejibble\|Jibblejibblejibble]]		Ok, when Marzipan is having the Jibblies, and her eyes are swirled like that, should I put it in refrences that that type of eye use is from the Pokemon series? When a pokemon is unable to battle, their eyes become swirls, that are exactly identical to Marzipans! Thoughts? [[User:Jibblejibblejibble\|Jibblejibblejibble]]
		+	:Marzipan's eyes are spinning. From what I remember, Pokémon eyes remain perfectly still when they are swirled and unable to battle. Just adding a thought; not suggesting yes or no right now. {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 03:01, 27 June 2011 (UTC)