Talk:Jumbled Words - Revision history

The Knights Who Say Ni: /* See you nice time! */ as in, later next time

2019-06-12T01:53:13Z

See you nice time!: as in, later next time

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:53, 12 June 2019
Line 33:		Line 33:
	== See you nice time! ==		== See you nice time! ==

-	So guys, I can't decide if "So, okay folks, I gotta go to my next show. See you later nice time!" from [[mile]] is an example of jumbled words or a [[Malapropisms\|malapropism]]. Do you know where should it belong?	+	So guys, I can't decide if "So, okay folks, I gotta go to my next show. See you later nice time!" from [[mile]] is an example of jumbled words or a [[Malapropisms\|malapropism]]. Do you know where should it belong? {{unsigned\|Strongest of the Sads\|01:24, 12 June 2019 (UTC)}}
		+	:If you can't switch the order of the words to make sense, then it's not an example of jumbled words. A malapropism is when one word is swapped out for another that makes less sense. I'd say it's just an example of incoherence somewhat typical of Powered By The Cheat-style videos, but if I have to say, I'd call it a malapropism combined with a [[pleonasm]]. {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 01:53, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Strongest of the Sads at 01:25, 12 June 2019

2019-06-12T01:25:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:25, 12 June 2019
Line 30:		Line 30:
	::Yes. the joke is ESPECIALLY when it inverted from what you'd normally expect but means what its intent was. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 00:59, 13 March 2009 (UTC)		::Yes. the joke is ESPECIALLY when it inverted from what you'd normally expect but means what its intent was. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 00:59, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
	:::I don't understand. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.151.81\|132.183.151.81]] 01:02, 13 March 2009 (UTC)		:::I don't understand. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.151.81\|132.183.151.81]] 01:02, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	== See you nice time! ==

	So guys, I can't decide if "So, okay folks, I gotta go to my next show. See you later nice time!" from [[mile]] is an example of jumbled words or a [[Malapropisms\|malapropism]]. Do you know where should it belong?		So guys, I can't decide if "So, okay folks, I gotta go to my next show. See you later nice time!" from [[mile]] is an example of jumbled words or a [[Malapropisms\|malapropism]]. Do you know where should it belong?

Strongest of the Sads at 01:24, 12 June 2019

2019-06-12T01:24:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:24, 12 June 2019
Line 30:		Line 30:
	::Yes. the joke is ESPECIALLY when it inverted from what you'd normally expect but means what its intent was. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 00:59, 13 March 2009 (UTC)		::Yes. the joke is ESPECIALLY when it inverted from what you'd normally expect but means what its intent was. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 00:59, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
	:::I don't understand. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.151.81\|132.183.151.81]] 01:02, 13 March 2009 (UTC)		:::I don't understand. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.151.81\|132.183.151.81]] 01:02, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	So guys, I can't decide if "So, okay folks, I gotta go to my next show. See you later nice time!" from [[mile]] is an example of jumbled words or a [[Malapropisms\|malapropism]]. Do you know where should it belong?

132.183.151.81: /* Music-free commercials */ Are you trying to make some sense?

2009-03-13T01:02:54Z

Music-free commercials: Are you trying to make some sense?

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:02, 13 March 2009
Line 29:		Line 29:
	:I wondered the exact same thing myself. But I don't know the answer. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.151.81\|132.183.151.81]] 22:42, 12 March 2009 (UTC)		:I wondered the exact same thing myself. But I don't know the answer. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.151.81\|132.183.151.81]] 22:42, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
	::Yes. the joke is ESPECIALLY when it inverted from what you'd normally expect but means what its intent was. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 00:59, 13 March 2009 (UTC)		::Yes. the joke is ESPECIALLY when it inverted from what you'd normally expect but means what its intent was. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 00:59, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
		+	:::I don't understand. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.151.81\|132.183.151.81]] 01:02, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Defender1031: /* Music-free commercials */ all the more so

2009-03-13T00:59:04Z

Music-free commercials: all the more so

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:59, 13 March 2009
Line 28:		Line 28:
	In this case, I think that the joke is that the Deathly Pallor actually ''means'' that he plans on playing music-free commercials. This is still an inversion of the normal phrase, of course, but does intent matter? --{{User:Jay/sig}} 21:04, 12 March 2009 (UTC)		In this case, I think that the joke is that the Deathly Pallor actually ''means'' that he plans on playing music-free commercials. This is still an inversion of the normal phrase, of course, but does intent matter? --{{User:Jay/sig}} 21:04, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
	:I wondered the exact same thing myself. But I don't know the answer. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.151.81\|132.183.151.81]] 22:42, 12 March 2009 (UTC)		:I wondered the exact same thing myself. But I don't know the answer. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.151.81\|132.183.151.81]] 22:42, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
		+	::Yes. the joke is ESPECIALLY when it inverted from what you'd normally expect but means what its intent was. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 00:59, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

132.183.151.81: /* Music-free commercials */ a non-reply?

2009-03-12T22:42:04Z

Music-free commercials: a non-reply?

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:42, 12 March 2009
Line 27:		Line 27:

	In this case, I think that the joke is that the Deathly Pallor actually ''means'' that he plans on playing music-free commercials. This is still an inversion of the normal phrase, of course, but does intent matter? --{{User:Jay/sig}} 21:04, 12 March 2009 (UTC)		In this case, I think that the joke is that the Deathly Pallor actually ''means'' that he plans on playing music-free commercials. This is still an inversion of the normal phrase, of course, but does intent matter? --{{User:Jay/sig}} 21:04, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
		+	:I wondered the exact same thing myself. But I don't know the answer. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.151.81\|132.183.151.81]] 22:42, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Jay: /**/Music-free commercials

2009-03-12T21:04:40Z

: Music-free commercials

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:04, 12 March 2009
Line 23:		Line 23:
	Would Becheive to Alieve be classified as Jumbled words, or portmanteaus? I'm kinda confused. {{User:Stark Traurig/sig}} 22:38, 28 January 2009 (UTC)		Would Becheive to Alieve be classified as Jumbled words, or portmanteaus? I'm kinda confused. {{User:Stark Traurig/sig}} 22:38, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
	:Actually, they're [[spoonerisms]]. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 22:40, 28 January 2009 (UTC)		:Actually, they're [[spoonerisms]]. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 22:40, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Music-free commercials ==
		+
		+	In this case, I think that the joke is that the Deathly Pallor actually ''means'' that he plans on playing music-free commercials. This is still an inversion of the normal phrase, of course, but does intent matter? --{{User:Jay/sig}} 21:04, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

DorianGray: /* Confusion */ Reply

2009-01-28T22:40:07Z

Confusion: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:40, 28 January 2009
Line 22:		Line 22:

	Would Becheive to Alieve be classified as Jumbled words, or portmanteaus? I'm kinda confused. {{User:Stark Traurig/sig}} 22:38, 28 January 2009 (UTC)		Would Becheive to Alieve be classified as Jumbled words, or portmanteaus? I'm kinda confused. {{User:Stark Traurig/sig}} 22:38, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
		+	:Actually, they're [[spoonerisms]]. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 22:40, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Stark Traurig: /**/Confusion

2009-01-28T22:38:36Z

: Confusion

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:38, 28 January 2009
Line 18:		Line 18:
	::I do not really know but i think it could be layout better or some better formating. Something just seems messed up with it. [[User:The-homsarrunner\|The-homsarrunner]] 00:30 25, Dec 2007 (UTC)		::I do not really know but i think it could be layout better or some better formating. Something just seems messed up with it. [[User:The-homsarrunner\|The-homsarrunner]] 00:30 25, Dec 2007 (UTC)
	:::If you can't be more specific, there's nothing that can be done... it WOULD look better with a picture, i'm about to upload one. Maybe THAT'S what's bothering you? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 00:32, 25 December 2007 (UTC)		:::If you can't be more specific, there's nothing that can be done... it WOULD look better with a picture, i'm about to upload one. Maybe THAT'S what's bothering you? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 00:32, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Confusion ==
		+
		+	Would Becheive to Alieve be classified as Jumbled words, or portmanteaus? I'm kinda confused. {{User:Stark Traurig/sig}} 22:38, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Defender1031: /* Clean Up */ reply

2007-12-25T00:32:14Z

Clean Up: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:32, 25 December 2007
Line 17:		Line 17:
	:What exactly is wrong with it? it looks perfectly well-organized to me... {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 00:17, 25 December 2007 (UTC)		:What exactly is wrong with it? it looks perfectly well-organized to me... {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 00:17, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
	::I do not really know but i think it could be layout better or some better formating. Something just seems messed up with it. [[User:The-homsarrunner\|The-homsarrunner]] 00:30 25, Dec 2007 (UTC)		::I do not really know but i think it could be layout better or some better formating. Something just seems messed up with it. [[User:The-homsarrunner\|The-homsarrunner]] 00:30 25, Dec 2007 (UTC)
		+	:::If you can't be more specific, there's nothing that can be done... it WOULD look better with a picture, i'm about to upload one. Maybe THAT'S what's bothering you? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 00:32, 25 December 2007 (UTC)