Talk:Main Page 18 - Revision history

Wolf O'Donnel: /* Back to normal */

2021-01-18T21:50:25Z

Back to normal

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:50, 18 January 2021
Line 31:		Line 31:
	:::I would agree too, but it looks like I'm too late ;-){{User:Loafing/sig}} 19:20, 9 June 2010 (UTC)		:::I would agree too, but it looks like I'm too late ;-){{User:Loafing/sig}} 19:20, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
	::::Awesomeness. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 19:28, 9 June 2010 (UTC)		::::Awesomeness. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 19:28, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
-
-	~~==Back to normal==~~
-
-	~~Everything is back to normal again. [[User:Wolf O'Donnel\|Wolf O'Donnel]] 21:50, 18 January 2021 (UTC)~~

2021-01-18T21:50:01Z

Showing the source code

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:50, 18 January 2021
Line 31:		Line 31:
	:::I would agree too, but it looks like I'm too late ;-){{User:Loafing/sig}} 19:20, 9 June 2010 (UTC)		:::I would agree too, but it looks like I'm too late ;-){{User:Loafing/sig}} 19:20, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
	::::Awesomeness. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 19:28, 9 June 2010 (UTC)		::::Awesomeness. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 19:28, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	==Back to normal==
		+
		+	Everything is back to normal again. [[User:Wolf O'Donnel\|Wolf O'Donnel]] 21:50, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

2010-06-09T19:28:53Z

Showing the source code: everything is fine, nothing is ruined

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:28, 9 June 2010
Line 30:		Line 30:
	::Yep... There's that DeFender guy again, summarily reverting things... so... yeah... I agree too. — [[Blatant Lies\|Someone who is totally not]] [[User:DeFender1031\|DeFender1031]]		::Yep... There's that DeFender guy again, summarily reverting things... so... yeah... I agree too. — [[Blatant Lies\|Someone who is totally not]] [[User:DeFender1031\|DeFender1031]]
	:::I would agree too, but it looks like I'm too late ;-){{User:Loafing/sig}} 19:20, 9 June 2010 (UTC)		:::I would agree too, but it looks like I'm too late ;-){{User:Loafing/sig}} 19:20, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
		+	::::Awesomeness. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 19:28, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

2010-06-09T19:20:51Z

Showing the source code: agree

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:20, 9 June 2010
Line 29:		Line 29:
	:Agreed. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 19:11, 9 June 2010 (UTC)		:Agreed. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 19:11, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
	::Yep... There's that DeFender guy again, summarily reverting things... so... yeah... I agree too. — [[Blatant Lies\|Someone who is totally not]] [[User:DeFender1031\|DeFender1031]]		::Yep... There's that DeFender guy again, summarily reverting things... so... yeah... I agree too. — [[Blatant Lies\|Someone who is totally not]] [[User:DeFender1031\|DeFender1031]]
		+	:::I would agree too, but it looks like I'm too late ;-){{User:Loafing/sig}} 19:20, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

2010-06-09T19:19:41Z

Showing the source code: well then... umm... yeah...

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:19, 9 June 2010
Line 28:		Line 28:
	Since it's been reverted twice already - I think that the full text of the source code visible when mousing over Store should be included in the article. I looked at the ''actual'' source code of the page itself and it's different. Nevertheless, even if it was exactly the same, we usually have a plain-text version of everything that is written in the toons, so I don't see why not here. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 19:05, 9 June 2010 (UTC)		Since it's been reverted twice already - I think that the full text of the source code visible when mousing over Store should be included in the article. I looked at the ''actual'' source code of the page itself and it's different. Nevertheless, even if it was exactly the same, we usually have a plain-text version of everything that is written in the toons, so I don't see why not here. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 19:05, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
	:Agreed. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 19:11, 9 June 2010 (UTC)		:Agreed. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 19:11, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
		+	::Yep... There's that DeFender guy again, summarily reverting things... so... yeah... I agree too. — [[Blatant Lies\|Someone who is totally not]] [[User:DeFender1031\|DeFender1031]]

2010-06-09T19:11:52Z

Showing the source code: agreed

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:11, 9 June 2010
Line 27:		Line 27:

	Since it's been reverted twice already - I think that the full text of the source code visible when mousing over Store should be included in the article. I looked at the ''actual'' source code of the page itself and it's different. Nevertheless, even if it was exactly the same, we usually have a plain-text version of everything that is written in the toons, so I don't see why not here. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 19:05, 9 June 2010 (UTC)		Since it's been reverted twice already - I think that the full text of the source code visible when mousing over Store should be included in the article. I looked at the ''actual'' source code of the page itself and it's different. Nevertheless, even if it was exactly the same, we usually have a plain-text version of everything that is written in the toons, so I don't see why not here. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 19:05, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
		+	:Agreed. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 19:11, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

2010-06-09T19:05:36Z

: Showing the source code

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:05, 9 June 2010
Line 23:		Line 23:

	:I now realize that this page does not show Html stuff. Oops [[User:McArbys\|The McArby!]] 22:37, 6 November 2009 (UTC)		:I now realize that this page does not show Html stuff. Oops [[User:McArbys\|The McArby!]] 22:37, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Showing the source code ==
		+
		+	Since it's been reverted twice already - I think that the full text of the source code visible when mousing over Store should be included in the article. I looked at the ''actual'' source code of the page itself and it's different. Nevertheless, even if it was exactly the same, we usually have a plain-text version of everything that is written in the toons, so I don't see why not here. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 19:05, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

2009-11-06T22:37:52Z

HTML stuff

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:37, 6 November 2009
Line 20:		Line 20:


-	~~----~~	+	<s>Is it safe to say that no html coding says or should say HTML stuff in the first tag? or did they really do that at first</s>
-	Is it safe to say that no html coding says or should say HTML stuff in the first tag? or did they really do that at first	+

-	:I now realize that this page does not show Html stuff. ~~Opps~~[[User:McArbys\|The McArby!]] 22:37, 6 November 2009 (UTC)	+	:I now realize that this page does not show Html stuff. Oops [[User:McArbys\|The McArby!]] 22:37, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

2009-11-06T22:37:04Z

HTML stuff

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:37, 6 November 2009
Line 19:		Line 19:
	== HTML stuff ==		== HTML stuff ==

		+
		+	----
	Is it safe to say that no html coding says or should say HTML stuff in the first tag? or did they really do that at first		Is it safe to say that no html coding says or should say HTML stuff in the first tag? or did they really do that at first
		+
		+	:I now realize that this page does not show Html stuff. Opps[[User:McArbys\|The McArby!]] 22:37, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

2009-11-05T03:28:33Z

: HTML stuff

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:28, 5 November 2009
Line 16:		Line 16:

	... or is the audio/toon sync back to normal when mousing over "E-mail" again?--[[Special:Contributions/68.111.251.45\|68.111.251.45]] 09:59, 7 April 2009 (UTC)		... or is the audio/toon sync back to normal when mousing over "E-mail" again?--[[Special:Contributions/68.111.251.45\|68.111.251.45]] 09:59, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	== HTML stuff ==
		+
		+	Is it safe to say that no html coding says or should say HTML stuff in the first tag? or did they really do that at first