Talk:One Two, One Two - Revision history

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc: /* Reverting Reasoning */ makes sense

2019-05-26T02:00:26Z

Reverting Reasoning: makes sense

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:00, 26 May 2019
Line 410:		Line 410:
	[[HRWiki:Glossary#T\|The glossary definition of TTATOT says]] "the rule of thumb is that if it could apply to several things, it probably refers to [...] ''a genre in general''". That's what I was referring to by {{p\|l=http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=One_Two,_One_Two&diff=783877&oldid=783876 the genre exception}}. A genre isn't "this, that, and the other thing", it's just one thing. As for {{p\|l=http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=One_Two,_One_Two&diff=next&oldid=783877 explaining the joke}}, isn't that kind of the point of the wiki? We explain things for people who don't understand them. I haven't heard many of those songs, so I'd say that fun fact was fairly useful to me. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 00:12, 24 May 2019 (UTC)		[[HRWiki:Glossary#T\|The glossary definition of TTATOT says]] "the rule of thumb is that if it could apply to several things, it probably refers to [...] ''a genre in general''". That's what I was referring to by {{p\|l=http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=One_Two,_One_Two&diff=783877&oldid=783876 the genre exception}}. A genre isn't "this, that, and the other thing", it's just one thing. As for {{p\|l=http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=One_Two,_One_Two&diff=next&oldid=783877 explaining the joke}}, isn't that kind of the point of the wiki? We explain things for people who don't understand them. I haven't heard many of those songs, so I'd say that fun fact was fairly useful to me. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 00:12, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
	:1. That's not an exception, that doesn't say "you can list TTATOT if it refers to a genre" that says that TTATOT is usually an indication that a joke refers to a genre rather than something specific. There's no exception being made there, it's just putting an even finer point on the error. 2. No, it is not the point of the wiki. In fact, we have [[HRWiki:Standards#Explanations\|an explicit rule]] not to explain jokes. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 01:52, 24 May 2019 (UTC)		:1. That's not an exception, that doesn't say "you can list TTATOT if it refers to a genre" that says that TTATOT is usually an indication that a joke refers to a genre rather than something specific. There's no exception being made there, it's just putting an even finer point on the error. 2. No, it is not the point of the wiki. In fact, we have [[HRWiki:Standards#Explanations\|an explicit rule]] not to explain jokes. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 01:52, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
		+	::Okay, that makes sense. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 02:00, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Defender1031: /* Reverting Reasoning */ clarify

2019-05-24T02:02:04Z

Reverting Reasoning: clarify

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:02, 24 May 2019
Line 409:		Line 409:

	[[HRWiki:Glossary#T\|The glossary definition of TTATOT says]] "the rule of thumb is that if it could apply to several things, it probably refers to [...] ''a genre in general''". That's what I was referring to by {{p\|l=http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=One_Two,_One_Two&diff=783877&oldid=783876 the genre exception}}. A genre isn't "this, that, and the other thing", it's just one thing. As for {{p\|l=http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=One_Two,_One_Two&diff=next&oldid=783877 explaining the joke}}, isn't that kind of the point of the wiki? We explain things for people who don't understand them. I haven't heard many of those songs, so I'd say that fun fact was fairly useful to me. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 00:12, 24 May 2019 (UTC)		[[HRWiki:Glossary#T\|The glossary definition of TTATOT says]] "the rule of thumb is that if it could apply to several things, it probably refers to [...] ''a genre in general''". That's what I was referring to by {{p\|l=http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=One_Two,_One_Two&diff=783877&oldid=783876 the genre exception}}. A genre isn't "this, that, and the other thing", it's just one thing. As for {{p\|l=http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=One_Two,_One_Two&diff=next&oldid=783877 explaining the joke}}, isn't that kind of the point of the wiki? We explain things for people who don't understand them. I haven't heard many of those songs, so I'd say that fun fact was fairly useful to me. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 00:12, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
-	:1. That's not an exception, that doesn't say "you can list TTATOT if it refers to a genre" that says that TTATOT is usually an indication that a joke refers to a genre rather than something specific. 2. No, it is not the point of the wiki. In fact, we have [[HRWiki:Standards#Explanations\|an explicit rule]] not to explain jokes. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 01:52, 24 May 2019 (UTC)	+	:1. That's not an exception, that doesn't say "you can list TTATOT if it refers to a genre" that says that TTATOT is usually an indication that a joke refers to a genre rather than something specific. There's no exception being made there, it's just putting an even finer point on the error. 2. No, it is not the point of the wiki. In fact, we have [[HRWiki:Standards#Explanations\|an explicit rule]] not to explain jokes. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 01:52, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Defender1031: /* Reverting Reasoning */ Not an exception, not the point of the wiki.

2019-05-24T01:52:39Z

Reverting Reasoning: Not an exception, not the point of the wiki.

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:52, 24 May 2019
Line 409:		Line 409:

	[[HRWiki:Glossary#T\|The glossary definition of TTATOT says]] "the rule of thumb is that if it could apply to several things, it probably refers to [...] ''a genre in general''". That's what I was referring to by {{p\|l=http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=One_Two,_One_Two&diff=783877&oldid=783876 the genre exception}}. A genre isn't "this, that, and the other thing", it's just one thing. As for {{p\|l=http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=One_Two,_One_Two&diff=next&oldid=783877 explaining the joke}}, isn't that kind of the point of the wiki? We explain things for people who don't understand them. I haven't heard many of those songs, so I'd say that fun fact was fairly useful to me. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 00:12, 24 May 2019 (UTC)		[[HRWiki:Glossary#T\|The glossary definition of TTATOT says]] "the rule of thumb is that if it could apply to several things, it probably refers to [...] ''a genre in general''". That's what I was referring to by {{p\|l=http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=One_Two,_One_Two&diff=783877&oldid=783876 the genre exception}}. A genre isn't "this, that, and the other thing", it's just one thing. As for {{p\|l=http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=One_Two,_One_Two&diff=next&oldid=783877 explaining the joke}}, isn't that kind of the point of the wiki? We explain things for people who don't understand them. I haven't heard many of those songs, so I'd say that fun fact was fairly useful to me. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 00:12, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
		+	:1. That's not an exception, that doesn't say "you can list TTATOT if it refers to a genre" that says that TTATOT is usually an indication that a joke refers to a genre rather than something specific. 2. No, it is not the point of the wiki. In fact, we have [[HRWiki:Standards#Explanations\|an explicit rule]] not to explain jokes. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 01:52, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc: /**/Reverting Reasoning

2019-05-24T00:12:11Z

: Reverting Reasoning

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:12, 24 May 2019
Line 405:		Line 405:
	</pre>		</pre>
	Dagoth 14:11, 16 April 2014 (UTC)		Dagoth 14:11, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Reverting Reasoning ==
		+
		+	[[HRWiki:Glossary#T\|The glossary definition of TTATOT says]] "the rule of thumb is that if it could apply to several things, it probably refers to [...] ''a genre in general''". That's what I was referring to by {{p\|l=http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=One_Two,_One_Two&diff=783877&oldid=783876 the genre exception}}. A genre isn't "this, that, and the other thing", it's just one thing. As for {{p\|l=http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=One_Two,_One_Two&diff=next&oldid=783877 explaining the joke}}, isn't that kind of the point of the wiki? We explain things for people who don't understand them. I haven't heard many of those songs, so I'd say that fun fact was fairly useful to me. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 00:12, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Dagoth: /* Tab for Marzipan's song */

2014-04-16T14:12:43Z

Tab for Marzipan's song

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:12, 16 April 2014
Line 397:		Line 397:

	<pre>		<pre>
-	E------------------	+	E---------------------
-	B------------------	+	B---------------------
-	G------------------	+	G---------------------
-	D------------------	+	D---------------------
-	A------------0-~~2h3~~-	+	A---------------0-3=2-
-	E-0-0-2h3-0-0------	+	E-0-0-0-2h3-0-0-------
	</pre>		</pre>
	Dagoth 14:11, 16 April 2014 (UTC)		Dagoth 14:11, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Dagoth: /**/Tab for Marzipan's song

2014-04-16T14:11:29Z

: Tab for Marzipan's song

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:11, 16 April 2014
Line 393:		Line 393:
	Is there a name for this kind of song? When everything is made up of common noises? {{User:The thing/sig}} 00:21, 3 June 2009 (UTC)		Is there a name for this kind of song? When everything is made up of common noises? {{User:The thing/sig}} 00:21, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
	:I've heard it referred to as a "musical montage" recently (when something similar was done in an episode of Flight of the Conchords). Wikipedia redirects that phrase to [[wikipedia:Sound collage\|Sound collage]]. I'm not sure if there's any different name used when it's done specifically with everyday sounds like this. {{User:GreenHelmet/sig}} 00:55, 3 June 2009 (UTC)		:I've heard it referred to as a "musical montage" recently (when something similar was done in an episode of Flight of the Conchords). Wikipedia redirects that phrase to [[wikipedia:Sound collage\|Sound collage]]. I'm not sure if there's any different name used when it's done specifically with everyday sounds like this. {{User:GreenHelmet/sig}} 00:55, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Tab for Marzipan's song ==
		+
		+	<pre>
		+	E------------------
		+	B------------------
		+	G------------------
		+	D------------------
		+	A------------0-2h3-
		+	E-0-0-2h3-0-0------
		+	</pre>
		+	Dagoth 14:11, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

GreenHelmet: /* Name */ hmm, good question

2009-06-03T00:55:08Z

Name: hmm, good question

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:55, 3 June 2009
Line 392:		Line 392:
	== Name ==		== Name ==
	Is there a name for this kind of song? When everything is made up of common noises? {{User:The thing/sig}} 00:21, 3 June 2009 (UTC)		Is there a name for this kind of song? When everything is made up of common noises? {{User:The thing/sig}} 00:21, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
		+	:I've heard it referred to as a "musical montage" recently (when something similar was done in an episode of Flight of the Conchords). Wikipedia redirects that phrase to [[wikipedia:Sound collage\|Sound collage]]. I'm not sure if there's any different name used when it's done specifically with everyday sounds like this. {{User:GreenHelmet/sig}} 00:55, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

The thing: /* Name */

2009-06-03T00:21:20Z

Name

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:21, 3 June 2009
Line 391:		Line 391:

	== Name ==		== Name ==
-		+	Is there a name for this kind of song? When everything is made up of common noises? {{User:The thing/sig}} 00:21, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
-	Is ~~the~~ a name for ~~what~~ this ~~is? A bunch~~ of ~~of things making a~~ song? 00:19, 3 June 2009 (UTC)	+

The thing: /**/Name

2009-06-03T00:19:12Z

: Name

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:19, 3 June 2009
Line 389:		Line 389:
	:: could the animations sharing the similar concepts be listed in "Real world references"?		:: could the animations sharing the similar concepts be listed in "Real world references"?
	:::No, because if it's a referewnce to many things, it's not a reference to anything in particular. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 01:24, 5 July 2007 (UTC)		:::No, because if it's a referewnce to many things, it's not a reference to anything in particular. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 01:24, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Name ==
		+
		+	Is the a name for what this is? A bunch of of things making a song? 00:19, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Loafing: haha, that's funny, but this talk page is only for discussing the contents of this article. you should post this on the forum, i'm sure they'd be happy

2007-07-06T05:32:51Z

haha, that's funny, but this talk page is only for discussing the contents of this article. you should post this on the forum, i'm sure they'd be happy

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:32, 6 July 2007
Line 389:		Line 389:
	:: could the animations sharing the similar concepts be listed in "Real world references"?		:: could the animations sharing the similar concepts be listed in "Real world references"?
	:::No, because if it's a referewnce to many things, it's not a reference to anything in particular. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 01:24, 5 July 2007 (UTC)		:::No, because if it's a referewnce to many things, it's not a reference to anything in particular. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 01:24, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
-
-	~~== Strongbad's singing ==~~
-
-	~~Syncs up pretty nicely with Rick Astley's Never "Gonna Give You Up" [http://strongbadd.ytmnd.com/]~~