Talk:Onion Bubs - Revision history

Ngamer01: Onion Bubs got featured.

2011-10-17T18:25:02Z

Onion Bubs got featured.

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:25, 17 October 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	{{featuredarticle}}
		+
	It's dead obvious that this page should be '''merged with [[Other Character Variations]].''' [[User:Bad Bad Guy\|Bad Bad Guy]] 17:27, 3 September 2007 (UTC)		It's dead obvious that this page should be '''merged with [[Other Character Variations]].''' [[User:Bad Bad Guy\|Bad Bad Guy]] 17:27, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
	:That was what I was going to suggest. This variation is too minor for its own article. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 17:29, 3 September 2007 (UTC)		:That was what I was going to suggest. This variation is too minor for its own article. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 17:29, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

HRWiki Greg: /* Inspiration? */

2010-02-25T06:49:35Z

Inspiration?

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:49, 25 February 2010
Line 27:		Line 27:
	:::Perhaps a coincidence, but worthy of mention. Sure, it's not an onion, but that's what I think when I see a shape like that.--[[User:HRWiki Greg\|FIFTH GREG! HRWiki Greg]] 06:40, 25 February 2010 (UTC)		:::Perhaps a coincidence, but worthy of mention. Sure, it's not an onion, but that's what I think when I see a shape like that.--[[User:HRWiki Greg\|FIFTH GREG! HRWiki Greg]] 06:40, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
	::::Worthy of mention where? If you mean on the article, no, I don't agree. Here on the talk, page, sure. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 06:45, 25 February 2010 (UTC)		::::Worthy of mention where? If you mean on the article, no, I don't agree. Here on the talk, page, sure. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 06:45, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
		+	:::::Well, yeah. That's pretty much it. Umm...It's not really doin' much now.--[[User:HRWiki Greg\|FIFTH GREG! HRWiki Greg]] 06:49, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Heimstern Läufer: /* Inspiration? */ not for the article

2010-02-25T06:45:07Z

Inspiration?: not for the article

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:45, 25 February 2010
Line 26:		Line 26:
	::I think not. I think onion bubs is just bubs drawn on an onion, not a reference to this. This isn't even an onion! I think it's just coincidence that it looks similar. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 20:37, 24 February 2010 (UTC)		::I think not. I think onion bubs is just bubs drawn on an onion, not a reference to this. This isn't even an onion! I think it's just coincidence that it looks similar. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 20:37, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
	:::Perhaps a coincidence, but worthy of mention. Sure, it's not an onion, but that's what I think when I see a shape like that.--[[User:HRWiki Greg\|FIFTH GREG! HRWiki Greg]] 06:40, 25 February 2010 (UTC)		:::Perhaps a coincidence, but worthy of mention. Sure, it's not an onion, but that's what I think when I see a shape like that.--[[User:HRWiki Greg\|FIFTH GREG! HRWiki Greg]] 06:40, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
		+	::::Worthy of mention where? If you mean on the article, no, I don't agree. Here on the talk, page, sure. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 06:45, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

HRWiki Greg: /* Inspiration? */

2010-02-25T06:40:15Z

Inspiration?

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:40, 25 February 2010
Line 25:		Line 25:
	: Oh my. So it is. Uncanny, actually. I don't know where to put it, but that seems like a reference.--[[User:Jellote\|Jellote wuz here]] 20:23, 24 February 2010 (UTC)		: Oh my. So it is. Uncanny, actually. I don't know where to put it, but that seems like a reference.--[[User:Jellote\|Jellote wuz here]] 20:23, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
	::I think not. I think onion bubs is just bubs drawn on an onion, not a reference to this. This isn't even an onion! I think it's just coincidence that it looks similar. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 20:37, 24 February 2010 (UTC)		::I think not. I think onion bubs is just bubs drawn on an onion, not a reference to this. This isn't even an onion! I think it's just coincidence that it looks similar. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 20:37, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
		+	:::Perhaps a coincidence, but worthy of mention. Sure, it's not an onion, but that's what I think when I see a shape like that.--[[User:HRWiki Greg\|FIFTH GREG! HRWiki Greg]] 06:40, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Defender1031: /* Inspiration? */ ummno. just a hilarious coincidence.

2010-02-24T20:37:54Z

Inspiration?: ummno. just a hilarious coincidence.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:37, 24 February 2010
Line 24:		Line 24:
	It's known that the Chaps were [[The Legend of Zelda\|Zelda fans]], so could this have been subconscious inspiration?--[[User:HRWiki Greg\|FIFTH GREG! HRWiki Greg]] 20:01, 24 February 2010 (UTC)		It's known that the Chaps were [[The Legend of Zelda\|Zelda fans]], so could this have been subconscious inspiration?--[[User:HRWiki Greg\|FIFTH GREG! HRWiki Greg]] 20:01, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
	: Oh my. So it is. Uncanny, actually. I don't know where to put it, but that seems like a reference.--[[User:Jellote\|Jellote wuz here]] 20:23, 24 February 2010 (UTC)		: Oh my. So it is. Uncanny, actually. I don't know where to put it, but that seems like a reference.--[[User:Jellote\|Jellote wuz here]] 20:23, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
		+	::I think not. I think onion bubs is just bubs drawn on an onion, not a reference to this. This isn't even an onion! I think it's just coincidence that it looks similar. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 20:37, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Jellote: /* Inspiration? */ Uncanny depiction'd!

2010-02-24T20:23:40Z

Inspiration?: Uncanny depiction'd!

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:23, 24 February 2010
Line 23:		Line 23:

	It's known that the Chaps were [[The Legend of Zelda\|Zelda fans]], so could this have been subconscious inspiration?--[[User:HRWiki Greg\|FIFTH GREG! HRWiki Greg]] 20:01, 24 February 2010 (UTC)		It's known that the Chaps were [[The Legend of Zelda\|Zelda fans]], so could this have been subconscious inspiration?--[[User:HRWiki Greg\|FIFTH GREG! HRWiki Greg]] 20:01, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
		+	: Oh my. So it is. Uncanny, actually. I don't know where to put it, but that seems like a reference.--[[User:Jellote\|Jellote wuz here]] 20:23, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

HRWiki Greg: /**/Inspiration?

2010-02-24T20:01:13Z

: Inspiration?

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:01, 24 February 2010
Line 13:		Line 13:
	:::::It's appeared enough to warrant a keep. {{User:Espemon333/sig}} 22:30, 4 September 2009 (UTC)		:::::It's appeared enough to warrant a keep. {{User:Espemon333/sig}} 22:30, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
	:::::: The conversation was closed over half a year ago. We agreed to bring it back if it reutrned. It did. Case closed.--[[User:Jellote\|Jellote wuz here]] 22:49, 4 September 2009 (UTC)		:::::: The conversation was closed over half a year ago. We agreed to bring it back if it reutrned. It did. Case closed.--[[User:Jellote\|Jellote wuz here]] 22:49, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Inspiration? ==
		+
		+	Well, I was looking through some Majora's Mask artwork. And guess what? Something popped out.
		+
		+	[[File:Curiosity.jpg]]
		+
		+	Encircled in white, and pardon my sloppiness.
		+
		+	It's known that the Chaps were [[The Legend of Zelda\|Zelda fans]], so could this have been subconscious inspiration?--[[User:HRWiki Greg\|FIFTH GREG! HRWiki Greg]] 20:01, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Jellote: Beating the un-named horse?

2009-09-04T22:49:57Z

Beating the un-named horse?

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:49, 4 September 2009
Line 12:		Line 12:
	::::<b>Merge, Merge, MERGE!!!</b>{{User:Platinum789hi/sig}}		::::<b>Merge, Merge, MERGE!!!</b>{{User:Platinum789hi/sig}}
	:::::It's appeared enough to warrant a keep. {{User:Espemon333/sig}} 22:30, 4 September 2009 (UTC)		:::::It's appeared enough to warrant a keep. {{User:Espemon333/sig}} 22:30, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
-	:::::: The conversation was closed over half a year ago. We agreed to bring it back if it reutrned. It did. Case closed.	+	:::::: The conversation was closed over half a year ago. We agreed to bring it back if it reutrned. It did. Case closed.--[[User:Jellote\|Jellote wuz here]] 22:49, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Jellote: Beating the un-dead horse?

2009-09-04T22:49:24Z

Beating the un-dead horse?

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:49, 4 September 2009
Line 12:		Line 12:
	::::<b>Merge, Merge, MERGE!!!</b>{{User:Platinum789hi/sig}}		::::<b>Merge, Merge, MERGE!!!</b>{{User:Platinum789hi/sig}}
	:::::It's appeared enough to warrant a keep. {{User:Espemon333/sig}} 22:30, 4 September 2009 (UTC)		:::::It's appeared enough to warrant a keep. {{User:Espemon333/sig}} 22:30, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
		+	:::::: The conversation was closed over half a year ago. We agreed to bring it back if it reutrned. It did. Case closed.

Espemon333 at 22:30, 4 September 2009

2009-09-04T22:30:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:30, 4 September 2009
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:::And guess what? It did! {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 10:10, 19 March 2009 (UTC)		:::And guess what? It did! {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 10:10, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
	::::<b>Merge, Merge, MERGE!!!</b>{{User:Platinum789hi/sig}}		::::<b>Merge, Merge, MERGE!!!</b>{{User:Platinum789hi/sig}}
		+	:::::It's appeared enough to warrant a keep. {{User:Espemon333/sig}} 22:30, 4 September 2009 (UTC)