Talk:Scroll Button Songs (video) - Revision history

Octan: /**/Reflections...

2007-12-11T19:10:35Z

: Reflections...

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:10, 11 December 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::Should we note each time Strong Bad types? Did you get to read my thing about how this format gives it even closer treatment to that of a normal toon? [[User:Bad Bad Guy\|Bad Bad Guy]] 03:14, 28 March 2007 (UTC)		::Should we note each time Strong Bad types? Did you get to read my thing about how this format gives it even closer treatment to that of a normal toon? [[User:Bad Bad Guy\|Bad Bad Guy]] 03:14, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
	I feel that if someone wanted to know how long a particular song was used for, they'd search "Scroll button songs" or "scroll button raps" as opposed to placing "(video)" at the end. [[User:Bad Bad Guy\|Bad Bad Guy]] 00:54, 30 March 2007 (UTC)		I feel that if someone wanted to know how long a particular song was used for, they'd search "Scroll button songs" or "scroll button raps" as opposed to placing "(video)" at the end. [[User:Bad Bad Guy\|Bad Bad Guy]] 00:54, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Reflections... ==
		+
		+	''"For all of the scroll button songs, Strong Bad's eyes have their usual reflection, however, on the site, they do not, his eyes in fact gain their current reflection after the Lappy takes over."''
		+
		+	I'll ignore the fact that it's a huge run-on sentence and just ask: ORLY? The [[Scroll Button Songs\|Scroll Button Song mirrors]] show that the reflections were added after [[caper]]. [[User:Octan\|Octan]] 19:10, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Bad Bad Guy: /* Revert */

2007-03-30T00:54:48Z

Revert

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:54, 30 March 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:Okay, so I gave it a little bit of a chance. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 02:47, 28 March 2007 (UTC)		:Okay, so I gave it a little bit of a chance. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 02:47, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
	::Should we note each time Strong Bad types? Did you get to read my thing about how this format gives it even closer treatment to that of a normal toon? [[User:Bad Bad Guy\|Bad Bad Guy]] 03:14, 28 March 2007 (UTC)		::Should we note each time Strong Bad types? Did you get to read my thing about how this format gives it even closer treatment to that of a normal toon? [[User:Bad Bad Guy\|Bad Bad Guy]] 03:14, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
		+	I feel that if someone wanted to know how long a particular song was used for, they'd search "Scroll button songs" or "scroll button raps" as opposed to placing "(video)" at the end. [[User:Bad Bad Guy\|Bad Bad Guy]] 00:54, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Bad Bad Guy: /* Revert */

2007-03-28T03:14:25Z

Revert

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:14, 28 March 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Oh, originally my {{pl\|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Scroll_Button_Songs_%28video%29&diff=435880&oldid=435752 revert}} was for the {{pl\|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Scroll_Button_Songs_%28video%29&diff=433921&oldid=429972 merge}} template but I see you took that out. Although having a traditional transcript section makes more sense, it's not as visually appealing or as information heavy. Then again, the disambig link helps but I don't think casual readers would look to it to gather more information. So, I don't know. If you were going to make more changes then feel free to revert and show the finished product. If not, then just know that I personally liked the old style better and if I'm the only one that thinks this and I'm dead wrong, then let it be reverted without impunity. Er. Yeah. Sorry again, I thought you were still trying to merge these two articles. Later! --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 02:40, 28 March 2007 (UTC)		Oh, originally my {{pl\|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Scroll_Button_Songs_%28video%29&diff=435880&oldid=435752 revert}} was for the {{pl\|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Scroll_Button_Songs_%28video%29&diff=433921&oldid=429972 merge}} template but I see you took that out. Although having a traditional transcript section makes more sense, it's not as visually appealing or as information heavy. Then again, the disambig link helps but I don't think casual readers would look to it to gather more information. So, I don't know. If you were going to make more changes then feel free to revert and show the finished product. If not, then just know that I personally liked the old style better and if I'm the only one that thinks this and I'm dead wrong, then let it be reverted without impunity. Er. Yeah. Sorry again, I thought you were still trying to merge these two articles. Later! --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 02:40, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
	:Okay, so I gave it a little bit of a chance. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 02:47, 28 March 2007 (UTC)		:Okay, so I gave it a little bit of a chance. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 02:47, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
		+	::Should we note each time Strong Bad types? Did you get to read my thing about how this format gives it even closer treatment to that of a normal toon? [[User:Bad Bad Guy\|Bad Bad Guy]] 03:14, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Stux: /* Revert */ addendum

2007-03-28T02:47:44Z

Revert: addendum

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:47, 28 March 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Revert ==		== Revert ==
	Oh, originally my {{pl\|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Scroll_Button_Songs_%28video%29&diff=435880&oldid=435752 revert}} was for the {{pl\|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Scroll_Button_Songs_%28video%29&diff=433921&oldid=429972 merge}} template but I see you took that out. Although having a traditional transcript section makes more sense, it's not as visually appealing or as information heavy. Then again, the disambig link helps but I don't think casual readers would look to it to gather more information. So, I don't know. If you were going to make more changes then feel free to revert and show the finished product. If not, then just know that I personally liked the old style better and if I'm the only one that thinks this and I'm dead wrong, then let it be reverted without impunity. Er. Yeah. Sorry again, I thought you were still trying to merge these two articles. Later! --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 02:40, 28 March 2007 (UTC)		Oh, originally my {{pl\|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Scroll_Button_Songs_%28video%29&diff=435880&oldid=435752 revert}} was for the {{pl\|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Scroll_Button_Songs_%28video%29&diff=433921&oldid=429972 merge}} template but I see you took that out. Although having a traditional transcript section makes more sense, it's not as visually appealing or as information heavy. Then again, the disambig link helps but I don't think casual readers would look to it to gather more information. So, I don't know. If you were going to make more changes then feel free to revert and show the finished product. If not, then just know that I personally liked the old style better and if I'm the only one that thinks this and I'm dead wrong, then let it be reverted without impunity. Er. Yeah. Sorry again, I thought you were still trying to merge these two articles. Later! --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 02:40, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
		+	:Okay, so I gave it a little bit of a chance. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 02:47, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Stux: /* Revert */ +link

2007-03-28T02:40:51Z

Revert: +link

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:40, 28 March 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Revert ==		== Revert ==
-	Oh, originally my revert was for the {{pl\|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Scroll_Button_Songs_%28video%29&diff=433921&oldid=429972 merge}} template but I see you took that out. Although having a traditional transcript section makes more sense, it's not as visually appealing or as information heavy. Then again, the disambig link helps but I don't think casual readers would look to it to gather more information. So, I don't know. If you were going to make more changes then feel free to revert and show the finished product. If not, then just know that I personally liked the old style better and if I'm the only one that thinks this and I'm dead wrong, then let it be reverted without impunity. Er. Yeah. Sorry again, I thought you were still trying to merge these two articles. Later! --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 02:40, 28 March 2007 (UTC)	+	Oh, originally my {{pl\|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Scroll_Button_Songs_%28video%29&diff=435880&oldid=435752 revert}} was for the {{pl\|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Scroll_Button_Songs_%28video%29&diff=433921&oldid=429972 merge}} template but I see you took that out. Although having a traditional transcript section makes more sense, it's not as visually appealing or as information heavy. Then again, the disambig link helps but I don't think casual readers would look to it to gather more information. So, I don't know. If you were going to make more changes then feel free to revert and show the finished product. If not, then just know that I personally liked the old style better and if I'm the only one that thinks this and I'm dead wrong, then let it be reverted without impunity. Er. Yeah. Sorry again, I thought you were still trying to merge these two articles. Later! --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 02:40, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Stux: explanation

2007-03-28T02:40:20Z

explanation

New page

== Revert ==
Oh, originally my revert was for the {{pl|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Scroll_Button_Songs_%28video%29&diff=433921&oldid=429972 merge}} template but I see you took that out. Although having a traditional transcript section makes more sense, it's not as visually appealing or as information heavy. Then again, the disambig link helps but I don't think casual readers would look to it to gather more information. So, I don't know. If you were going to make more changes then feel free to revert and show the finished product. If not, then just know that I personally liked the old style better and if I'm the only one that thinks this and I'm dead wrong, then let it be reverted without impunity. Er. Yeah. Sorry again, I thought you were still trying to merge these two articles. Later! --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 02:40, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:54, 30 March 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:Okay, so I gave it a little bit of a chance. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 02:47, 28 March 2007 (UTC)		:Okay, so I gave it a little bit of a chance. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 02:47, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
	::Should we note each time Strong Bad types? Did you get to read my thing about how this format gives it even closer treatment to that of a normal toon? [[User:Bad Bad Guy\|Bad Bad Guy]] 03:14, 28 March 2007 (UTC)		::Should we note each time Strong Bad types? Did you get to read my thing about how this format gives it even closer treatment to that of a normal toon? [[User:Bad Bad Guy\|Bad Bad Guy]] 03:14, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
		+	I feel that if someone wanted to know how long a particular song was used for, they'd search "Scroll button songs" or "scroll button raps" as opposed to placing "(video)" at the end. [[User:Bad Bad Guy\|Bad Bad Guy]] 00:54, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:14, 28 March 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Oh, originally my {{pl\|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Scroll_Button_Songs_%28video%29&diff=435880&oldid=435752 revert}} was for the {{pl\|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Scroll_Button_Songs_%28video%29&diff=433921&oldid=429972 merge}} template but I see you took that out. Although having a traditional transcript section makes more sense, it's not as visually appealing or as information heavy. Then again, the disambig link helps but I don't think casual readers would look to it to gather more information. So, I don't know. If you were going to make more changes then feel free to revert and show the finished product. If not, then just know that I personally liked the old style better and if I'm the only one that thinks this and I'm dead wrong, then let it be reverted without impunity. Er. Yeah. Sorry again, I thought you were still trying to merge these two articles. Later! --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 02:40, 28 March 2007 (UTC)		Oh, originally my {{pl\|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Scroll_Button_Songs_%28video%29&diff=435880&oldid=435752 revert}} was for the {{pl\|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Scroll_Button_Songs_%28video%29&diff=433921&oldid=429972 merge}} template but I see you took that out. Although having a traditional transcript section makes more sense, it's not as visually appealing or as information heavy. Then again, the disambig link helps but I don't think casual readers would look to it to gather more information. So, I don't know. If you were going to make more changes then feel free to revert and show the finished product. If not, then just know that I personally liked the old style better and if I'm the only one that thinks this and I'm dead wrong, then let it be reverted without impunity. Er. Yeah. Sorry again, I thought you were still trying to merge these two articles. Later! --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 02:40, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
	:Okay, so I gave it a little bit of a chance. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 02:47, 28 March 2007 (UTC)		:Okay, so I gave it a little bit of a chance. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 02:47, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
		+	::Should we note each time Strong Bad types? Did you get to read my thing about how this format gives it even closer treatment to that of a normal toon? [[User:Bad Bad Guy\|Bad Bad Guy]] 03:14, 28 March 2007 (UTC)