Talk:Strong Bad Email Records - Revision history

Loafing: disambig

2006-10-11T10:33:21Z

disambig

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:33, 11 October 2006
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::I also think that the information on this page is slightly different from By Length, and should be preserved somehow. Perhaps we could adjust the formatting of the table and add a note that reads "Emails in bold were the longest email at the time of their release" or something. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 22:30, 10 October 2006 (UTC)		::I also think that the information on this page is slightly different from By Length, and should be preserved somehow. Perhaps we could adjust the formatting of the table and add a note that reads "Emails in bold were the longest email at the time of their release" or something. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 22:30, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
	:::This page could be a great section in Statistics, but it's not enough for it's own page. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 09:28, 11 October 2006 (UTC)		:::This page could be a great section in Statistics, but it's not enough for it's own page. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 09:28, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	The information on this page has been merged into [[Strong Bad Emails By Length]] yesterday. I'm turning this into a disambig page, as Dot Com suggested.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 10:33, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Elcool: merge with Statistics

2006-10-11T09:28:23Z

merge with Statistics

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:28, 11 October 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:I think a disambig might work nicely. It depends on how you take the word "records". If you mean "unsurpassed measurements", then By Length is the place to go. If you mean "information or facts", then Statistics is what you want. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 22:28, 10 October 2006 (UTC)		:I think a disambig might work nicely. It depends on how you take the word "records". If you mean "unsurpassed measurements", then By Length is the place to go. If you mean "information or facts", then Statistics is what you want. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 22:28, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
	::I also think that the information on this page is slightly different from By Length, and should be preserved somehow. Perhaps we could adjust the formatting of the table and add a note that reads "Emails in bold were the longest email at the time of their release" or something. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 22:30, 10 October 2006 (UTC)		::I also think that the information on this page is slightly different from By Length, and should be preserved somehow. Perhaps we could adjust the formatting of the table and add a note that reads "Emails in bold were the longest email at the time of their release" or something. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 22:30, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
		+	:::This page could be a great section in Statistics, but it's not enough for it's own page. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 09:28, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

It's dot com: fix number

2006-10-10T22:32:17Z

fix number

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:32, 10 October 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Yep... I was a bit over hasty on this. I think that [[Strong Bad Emails By Length]] and [[Strong Bad Email Statistics]] would cover this... but which one should we redirect to? Or should we disimbig? {{User:Rogue Leader/sig}} 22:23, 10 October 2006 (UTC)		Yep... I was a bit over hasty on this. I think that [[Strong Bad Emails By Length]] and [[Strong Bad Email Statistics]] would cover this... but which one should we redirect to? Or should we disimbig? {{User:Rogue Leader/sig}} 22:23, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
-	:I think a disambig might work nicely. It depends on how you take the word "records". If you mean "an unsurpassed ~~measurement~~", then By Length is the place to go. If you mean "information or facts", then Statistics is what you want. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 22:28, 10 October 2006 (UTC)	+	:I think a disambig might work nicely. It depends on how you take the word "records". If you mean "unsurpassed measurements", then By Length is the place to go. If you mean "information or facts", then Statistics is what you want. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 22:28, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
	::I also think that the information on this page is slightly different from By Length, and should be preserved somehow. Perhaps we could adjust the formatting of the table and add a note that reads "Emails in bold were the longest email at the time of their release" or something. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 22:30, 10 October 2006 (UTC)		::I also think that the information on this page is slightly different from By Length, and should be preserved somehow. Perhaps we could adjust the formatting of the table and add a note that reads "Emails in bold were the longest email at the time of their release" or something. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 22:30, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

It's dot com: fix link

2006-10-10T22:31:23Z

fix link

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:31, 10 October 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	Yep... I was a bit over hasty on this. I think that [[Strong Bad Emails by Length]] and [[Strong Bad Email Statistics]] would cover this... but which one should we redirect to? Or should we disimbig? {{User:Rogue Leader/sig}} 22:23, 10 October 2006 (UTC)	+	Yep... I was a bit over hasty on this. I think that [[Strong Bad Emails By Length]] and [[Strong Bad Email Statistics]] would cover this... but which one should we redirect to? Or should we disimbig? {{User:Rogue Leader/sig}} 22:23, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
	:I think a disambig might work nicely. It depends on how you take the word "records". If you mean "an unsurpassed measurement", then By Length is the place to go. If you mean "information or facts", then Statistics is what you want. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 22:28, 10 October 2006 (UTC)		:I think a disambig might work nicely. It depends on how you take the word "records". If you mean "an unsurpassed measurement", then By Length is the place to go. If you mean "information or facts", then Statistics is what you want. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 22:28, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
	::I also think that the information on this page is slightly different from By Length, and should be preserved somehow. Perhaps we could adjust the formatting of the table and add a note that reads "Emails in bold were the longest email at the time of their release" or something. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 22:30, 10 October 2006 (UTC)		::I also think that the information on this page is slightly different from By Length, and should be preserved somehow. Perhaps we could adjust the formatting of the table and add a note that reads "Emails in bold were the longest email at the time of their release" or something. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 22:30, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

It's dot com: about the content

2006-10-10T22:30:34Z

about the content

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:30, 10 October 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Yep... I was a bit over hasty on this. I think that [[Strong Bad Emails by Length]] and [[Strong Bad Email Statistics]] would cover this... but which one should we redirect to? Or should we disimbig? {{User:Rogue Leader/sig}} 22:23, 10 October 2006 (UTC)		Yep... I was a bit over hasty on this. I think that [[Strong Bad Emails by Length]] and [[Strong Bad Email Statistics]] would cover this... but which one should we redirect to? Or should we disimbig? {{User:Rogue Leader/sig}} 22:23, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
	:I think a disambig might work nicely. It depends on how you take the word "records". If you mean "an unsurpassed measurement", then By Length is the place to go. If you mean "information or facts", then Statistics is what you want. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 22:28, 10 October 2006 (UTC)		:I think a disambig might work nicely. It depends on how you take the word "records". If you mean "an unsurpassed measurement", then By Length is the place to go. If you mean "information or facts", then Statistics is what you want. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 22:28, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
		+	::I also think that the information on this page is slightly different from By Length, and should be preserved somehow. Perhaps we could adjust the formatting of the table and add a note that reads "Emails in bold were the longest email at the time of their release" or something. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 22:30, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

It's dot com: reply

2006-10-10T22:28:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:28, 10 October 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Yep... I was a bit over hasty on this. I think that [[Strong Bad Emails by Length]] and [[Strong Bad Email Statistics]] would cover this... but which one should we redirect to? Or should we disimbig? {{User:Rogue Leader/sig}} 22:23, 10 October 2006 (UTC)		Yep... I was a bit over hasty on this. I think that [[Strong Bad Emails by Length]] and [[Strong Bad Email Statistics]] would cover this... but which one should we redirect to? Or should we disimbig? {{User:Rogue Leader/sig}} 22:23, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
		+	:I think a disambig might work nicely. It depends on how you take the word "records". If you mean "an unsurpassed measurement", then By Length is the place to go. If you mean "information or facts", then Statistics is what you want. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 22:28, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Rogue Leader: Hastiness... not a good thing

2006-10-10T22:23:45Z

Hastiness... not a good thing

New page

Yep... I was a bit over hasty on this. I think that [[Strong Bad Emails by Length]] and [[Strong Bad Email Statistics]] would cover this... but which one should we redirect to? Or should we disimbig? {{User:Rogue Leader/sig}} 22:23, 10 October 2006 (UTC)