User talk:B - Revision history

B: -fin

2005-11-05T05:55:42Z

-fin

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:55, 5 November 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	''{comment copied from my talk page}'' In the interest of fairness to all points of view, I have amended the page with a link to ''both'' toons, and I will be including it in the main archive under both names and on both talk pages. I hope this compromise is satisfactory. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 05:47, 1 November 2005 (UTC)		''{comment copied from my talk page}'' In the interest of fairness to all points of view, I have amended the page with a link to ''both'' toons, and I will be including it in the main archive under both names and on both talk pages. I hope this compromise is satisfactory. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 05:47, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
		+
		+	:The issue is that I have decided that I have better things to do than to remain attached to the seedy underbelly that is the wiki disussion. I will continue to visit, as the site is ''really cool''. I won't make contributions unless no one else can provide what I have to offer, or if there is a blatant error on a page. I may continue to play on the sound effects page. Other than that, I have nothing else to add.
		+
		+	:The amendment is acceptable. The beef was not with what was the better referene. My beef was that it kept getting moved and altered. And without comment. The whole event was a display in discourteousness (on both parts, mine especially). I don't do much of this, and I worked hard trying to get that right. I appreciate the re-consideration.
		+
		+	:end of line. [[User:B\|B]] 05:55, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

It's dot com: comment copied from my talk page

2005-11-01T05:49:24Z

comment copied from my talk page

← Older revision	Revision as of 05:49, 1 November 2005
Line 1:	Line 1:
-	+	''{comment copied from my talk page}'' In the interest of fairness to all points of view, I have amended the page with a link to ''both'' toons, and I will be including it in the main archive under both names and on both talk pages. I hope this compromise is satisfactory. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 05:47, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

B at 04:44, 1 November 2005

2005-11-01T04:44:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:44, 1 November 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~==The Fabrosi Factor==~~
-	Hey, B (note that I feel 'gangsta' now). I just reverted your edit of [[lady...ing]], and before you throw up your hands in despair and say, "why! whhhy!?!", I'ma let you know. If memory serves me, the wiki fought a minor battle over the nature of Fabrosi and Van Mundegard (sp) after this sbemail came out. Usually, for about two weeks after a toon or e-mail comes out, everyone and their mother tries to expound on all the minutiae of the content, and people here take these things seriously. So seriously, in fact, that we even have a formal voting process called STUFF for remarks, fun facts, and the like.

-	Now, I think your point is essentially correct, but others might disagree. Just letting you know your input is appreciated, but those remarks and fun facts are like a cage match, man. I'm 99% sure the battle was fought before - you can even check in the STUFF archives or the "history" of the page.
-
-	~~If it wasn't, put it back.~~
-
-	~~Cheers,~~
-
-	~~{{User:Thesmokingmonkey/sig}} 17:30, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)~~
-
-	''-That's cool, and I appreciate the feedback, not just a deletion. For my reference, and so I don't add a ton of those, is there some general way to check up on that sort of thing '''before''' an addition? I'm thinking more specific than just checking the history, because that is tedious at the best of times. If not, that's fine too. At this point, I'm also thinking of those things that don't hit the STUFF pages. Any suggestions?'' [[User:B\|B]] 19:59, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)
-
-	:Before adding a fact it is always good practice to check the talk page of that article to see if it has already been dicussed and rejected. Closed STUFF can usually be found there as well. STUFF [[HRWiki:STUFF/Archive/Verdicts\|verdicts]] are also archived, so you can check there too. If it doesn't apper in either place and you think it may be an issue, you can post it on the article's talk page and see what the general consensus is. If you don't think it will be an issue, just post it on the article, and hopefully it will stay.<br>Hope that helps. {{User:Some HSR themed username/sig}} 20:06, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)
-
-	~~:''- That's exactly what I'm looking for, thanks. I'll be sure to follow that in the future.'' [[User:B\|B]] 20:11, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)~~

B at 02:08, 6 October 2005

2005-10-06T02:08:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:08, 6 October 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	Welcome to the Homestar Runner Wiki! We're glad to have you as a member. If you need any help, feel free to ask me, a '''[[HRWiki:Administrators\|sysop]]''', or anyone on the welcoming committee. You can also post questions on the [[HRWiki talk:FAQ\|FAQ talk page]].
-
-	~~Here are some tips to get you started:<br>~~
-
-	*If you need general information, editing tips, or answers to frequently asked questions, check out the [[Help:Contents\|help page]].
-	*Before you do any significant editing, be sure to familiarize yourself with our [[HRWiki:Standards\|wiki standards]].
-	*Read up on the rules and guidelines for your [[HRWiki:User page\|user page]].
-	*If you're not sure what you can do to help out, head over to [[HRWiki:The Stick\|The Stick]].
-	*If you're looking for more community interaction, you can also register over at our [http://forum.hrwiki.org forum].
-	*Above all, be sure to '''be bold''' and have fun!
-
-	Feel free to delete this message when you're done reading it. After all, your user page belongs to you. I hope this information is helpful, and that you'll have a good experience contributing to our knowledge-base and our community.
-
-	~~Sincerely,<br>~~
-	~~{{User:bkmlb/sig}} 19:01, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC), and [[HRWiki:Welcoming committee\|The Homestar Runner Wiki Welcoming Committee]]~~
-
-	~~:Allow me to extend my most sincere welcome as well. —[[User:BazookaJoe\|BazookaJoe]] 19:04, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)~~
-
-	~~-''Thanks for the welcome, Guys. I'm happy to be here.'' [[User:B\|B]] 19:22, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)~~
-
-	~~To post your username along with a timestamp all you have to do is this:<nowiki> ~~~~</nowiki>. See you around!--{{User:bkmlb/sig}} 19:19, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)~~
-
-	~~-''That's easier than I expected. Thanks again.'' [[User:B\|B]] 19:22, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)~~
-
	==The Fabrosi Factor==		==The Fabrosi Factor==
	Hey, B (note that I feel 'gangsta' now). I just reverted your edit of [[lady...ing]], and before you throw up your hands in despair and say, "why! whhhy!?!", I'ma let you know. If memory serves me, the wiki fought a minor battle over the nature of Fabrosi and Van Mundegard (sp) after this sbemail came out. Usually, for about two weeks after a toon or e-mail comes out, everyone and their mother tries to expound on all the minutiae of the content, and people here take these things seriously. So seriously, in fact, that we even have a formal voting process called STUFF for remarks, fun facts, and the like.		Hey, B (note that I feel 'gangsta' now). I just reverted your edit of [[lady...ing]], and before you throw up your hands in despair and say, "why! whhhy!?!", I'ma let you know. If memory serves me, the wiki fought a minor battle over the nature of Fabrosi and Van Mundegard (sp) after this sbemail came out. Usually, for about two weeks after a toon or e-mail comes out, everyone and their mother tries to expound on all the minutiae of the content, and people here take these things seriously. So seriously, in fact, that we even have a formal voting process called STUFF for remarks, fun facts, and the like.

B: /* The Fabrosi Factor */

2005-10-02T20:11:59Z

The Fabrosi Factor

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:11, 2 October 2005
Line 36:		Line 36:
	''-That's cool, and I appreciate the feedback, not just a deletion. For my reference, and so I don't add a ton of those, is there some general way to check up on that sort of thing '''before''' an addition? I'm thinking more specific than just checking the history, because that is tedious at the best of times. If not, that's fine too. At this point, I'm also thinking of those things that don't hit the STUFF pages. Any suggestions?'' [[User:B\|B]] 19:59, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)		''-That's cool, and I appreciate the feedback, not just a deletion. For my reference, and so I don't add a ton of those, is there some general way to check up on that sort of thing '''before''' an addition? I'm thinking more specific than just checking the history, because that is tedious at the best of times. If not, that's fine too. At this point, I'm also thinking of those things that don't hit the STUFF pages. Any suggestions?'' [[User:B\|B]] 19:59, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)

-	:Before adding a fact it is always good practice to check the talk page of that article to see if it has already been dicussed and rejected. Closed STUFF can usually be found there as well. STUFF [[HRWiki:STUFF/Archive/Verdicts\|verdicts]] are also archived, so you can check there too. If it doesn't apper in either place and you think it may be an issue, you can post it on the article's talk page and see what the general consensus is. If ~~youi~~ don't think it will be an issue, just post it on the article, and hopefully it will stay.<br>Hope that helps. {{User:Some HSR themed username/sig}} 20:06, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)	+	:Before adding a fact it is always good practice to check the talk page of that article to see if it has already been dicussed and rejected. Closed STUFF can usually be found there as well. STUFF [[HRWiki:STUFF/Archive/Verdicts\|verdicts]] are also archived, so you can check there too. If it doesn't apper in either place and you think it may be an issue, you can post it on the article's talk page and see what the general consensus is. If you don't think it will be an issue, just post it on the article, and hopefully it will stay.<br>Hope that helps. {{User:Some HSR themed username/sig}} 20:06, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)
		+
		+	:''- That's exactly what I'm looking for, thanks. I'll be sure to follow that in the future.'' [[User:B\|B]] 20:11, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Some HSR themed username: /* The Fabrosi Factor */reply for B

2005-10-02T20:06:29Z

The Fabrosi Factor: reply for B

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:06, 2 October 2005
Line 35:		Line 35:

	''-That's cool, and I appreciate the feedback, not just a deletion. For my reference, and so I don't add a ton of those, is there some general way to check up on that sort of thing '''before''' an addition? I'm thinking more specific than just checking the history, because that is tedious at the best of times. If not, that's fine too. At this point, I'm also thinking of those things that don't hit the STUFF pages. Any suggestions?'' [[User:B\|B]] 19:59, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)		''-That's cool, and I appreciate the feedback, not just a deletion. For my reference, and so I don't add a ton of those, is there some general way to check up on that sort of thing '''before''' an addition? I'm thinking more specific than just checking the history, because that is tedious at the best of times. If not, that's fine too. At this point, I'm also thinking of those things that don't hit the STUFF pages. Any suggestions?'' [[User:B\|B]] 19:59, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)
		+
		+	:Before adding a fact it is always good practice to check the talk page of that article to see if it has already been dicussed and rejected. Closed STUFF can usually be found there as well. STUFF [[HRWiki:STUFF/Archive/Verdicts\|verdicts]] are also archived, so you can check there too. If it doesn't apper in either place and you think it may be an issue, you can post it on the article's talk page and see what the general consensus is. If youi don't think it will be an issue, just post it on the article, and hopefully it will stay.<br>Hope that helps. {{User:Some HSR themed username/sig}} 20:06, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)

B at 19:59, 2 October 2005

2005-10-02T19:59:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:59, 2 October 2005
Line 33:		Line 33:

	{{User:Thesmokingmonkey/sig}} 17:30, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)		{{User:Thesmokingmonkey/sig}} 17:30, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)
		+
		+	''-That's cool, and I appreciate the feedback, not just a deletion. For my reference, and so I don't add a ton of those, is there some general way to check up on that sort of thing '''before''' an addition? I'm thinking more specific than just checking the history, because that is tedious at the best of times. If not, that's fine too. At this point, I'm also thinking of those things that don't hit the STUFF pages. Any suggestions?'' [[User:B\|B]] 19:59, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Thesmokingmonkey: reasoning for reverting

2005-10-02T17:30:29Z

reasoning for reverting

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:30, 2 October 2005
Line 22:		Line 22:

	-''That's easier than I expected. Thanks again.'' [[User:B\|B]] 19:22, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)		-''That's easier than I expected. Thanks again.'' [[User:B\|B]] 19:22, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)
		+
		+	==The Fabrosi Factor==
		+	Hey, B (note that I feel 'gangsta' now). I just reverted your edit of [[lady...ing]], and before you throw up your hands in despair and say, "why! whhhy!?!", I'ma let you know. If memory serves me, the wiki fought a minor battle over the nature of Fabrosi and Van Mundegard (sp) after this sbemail came out. Usually, for about two weeks after a toon or e-mail comes out, everyone and their mother tries to expound on all the minutiae of the content, and people here take these things seriously. So seriously, in fact, that we even have a formal voting process called STUFF for remarks, fun facts, and the like.
		+
		+	Now, I think your point is essentially correct, but others might disagree. Just letting you know your input is appreciated, but those remarks and fun facts are like a cage match, man. I'm 99% sure the battle was fought before - you can even check in the STUFF archives or the "history" of the page.
		+
		+	If it wasn't, put it back.
		+
		+	Cheers,
		+
		+	{{User:Thesmokingmonkey/sig}} 17:30, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)

B at 19:22, 25 September 2005

2005-09-25T19:22:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:22, 25 September 2005
Line 17:		Line 17:
	:Allow me to extend my most sincere welcome as well. —[[User:BazookaJoe\|BazookaJoe]] 19:04, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)		:Allow me to extend my most sincere welcome as well. —[[User:BazookaJoe\|BazookaJoe]] 19:04, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

-	-''Thanks for the welcome, Guys. I'm happy to be here.''	+	-''Thanks for the welcome, Guys. I'm happy to be here.'' [[User:B\|B]] 19:22, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

	To post your username along with a timestamp all you have to do is this:<nowiki> ~~~~</nowiki>. See you around!--{{User:bkmlb/sig}} 19:19, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)		To post your username along with a timestamp all you have to do is this:<nowiki> ~~~~</nowiki>. See you around!--{{User:bkmlb/sig}} 19:19, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

	-''That's easier than I expected. Thanks again.'' [[User:B\|B]] 19:22, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)		-''That's easier than I expected. Thanks again.'' [[User:B\|B]] 19:22, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

B at 19:22, 25 September 2005

2005-09-25T19:22:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:22, 25 September 2005
Line 20:		Line 20:

	To post your username along with a timestamp all you have to do is this:<nowiki> ~~~~</nowiki>. See you around!--{{User:bkmlb/sig}} 19:19, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)		To post your username along with a timestamp all you have to do is this:<nowiki> ~~~~</nowiki>. See you around!--{{User:bkmlb/sig}} 19:19, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)
		+
		+	-''That's easier than I expected. Thanks again.'' [[User:B\|B]] 19:22, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:11, 2 October 2005
Line 36:		Line 36:
	''-That's cool, and I appreciate the feedback, not just a deletion. For my reference, and so I don't add a ton of those, is there some general way to check up on that sort of thing '''before''' an addition? I'm thinking more specific than just checking the history, because that is tedious at the best of times. If not, that's fine too. At this point, I'm also thinking of those things that don't hit the STUFF pages. Any suggestions?'' [[User:B\|B]] 19:59, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)		''-That's cool, and I appreciate the feedback, not just a deletion. For my reference, and so I don't add a ton of those, is there some general way to check up on that sort of thing '''before''' an addition? I'm thinking more specific than just checking the history, because that is tedious at the best of times. If not, that's fine too. At this point, I'm also thinking of those things that don't hit the STUFF pages. Any suggestions?'' [[User:B\|B]] 19:59, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)

-	:Before adding a fact it is always good practice to check the talk page of that article to see if it has already been dicussed and rejected. Closed STUFF can usually be found there as well. STUFF [[HRWiki:STUFF/Archive/Verdicts\|verdicts]] are also archived, so you can check there too. If it doesn't apper in either place and you think it may be an issue, you can post it on the article's talk page and see what the general consensus is. If ~~youi~~ don't think it will be an issue, just post it on the article, and hopefully it will stay.<br>Hope that helps. {{User:Some HSR themed username/sig}} 20:06, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)	+	:Before adding a fact it is always good practice to check the talk page of that article to see if it has already been dicussed and rejected. Closed STUFF can usually be found there as well. STUFF [[HRWiki:STUFF/Archive/Verdicts\|verdicts]] are also archived, so you can check there too. If it doesn't apper in either place and you think it may be an issue, you can post it on the article's talk page and see what the general consensus is. If you don't think it will be an issue, just post it on the article, and hopefully it will stay.<br>Hope that helps. {{User:Some HSR themed username/sig}} 20:06, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)
		+
		+	:''- That's exactly what I'm looking for, thanks. I'll be sure to follow that in the future.'' [[User:B\|B]] 20:11, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)