User talk:BanditoDorito - Revision history

BanditoDorito: TYTY

2012-06-01T01:02:33Z

TYTY

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:02, 1 June 2012
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:::Listen, I really meant it when I said, "No mo' on the subjy." No one will benefit in any way if everyone sees it how I sees it. I never SAID you told me to give up; I said that I WOULD. But you have tempted me with the logic, so here goes: Tompkins is dead when his mopm comes back. She does not even come into contact with him. Or, it could just be an [[Inconsistencies\|inconsistency]]. But the matter does not matter. I have grown tired of this, and I would realy apprekiate it if there was no more. Please.		:::Listen, I really meant it when I said, "No mo' on the subjy." No one will benefit in any way if everyone sees it how I sees it. I never SAID you told me to give up; I said that I WOULD. But you have tempted me with the logic, so here goes: Tompkins is dead when his mopm comes back. She does not even come into contact with him. Or, it could just be an [[Inconsistencies\|inconsistency]]. But the matter does not matter. I have grown tired of this, and I would realy apprekiate it if there was no more. Please.
	::::OK, I will certainly leave you alone about this. {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 21:51, 30 May 2012 (UTC)		::::OK, I will certainly leave you alone about this. {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 21:51, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
		+	:::::Thanks, bro! BanditoDorito.

The Knights Who Say Ni: all right, never mind then

2012-05-30T21:51:57Z

all right, never mind then

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:51, 30 May 2012
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:You know WHAT!?!? I don't give a crap anymore! I don't know why you guys won't agree with me, but fine! There is really no freaking reward from winning this, and really, this would be an empty victory. It's useless info anyway. There might not even be a right answer, but who cares? So congrats; you all win, so no more on the subject.		:You know WHAT!?!? I don't give a crap anymore! I don't know why you guys won't agree with me, but fine! There is really no freaking reward from winning this, and really, this would be an empty victory. It's useless info anyway. There might not even be a right answer, but who cares? So congrats; you all win, so no more on the subject.
	:BTW: It is considered a logical fallacy to say that, because something has no proof, it is wrong. Lookit up!		:BTW: It is considered a logical fallacy to say that, because something has no proof, it is wrong. Lookit up!
-	::You're absolutely right about that last thing. I never expressed an opinion on the subject; I just said that this is how our wiki views speculation. We only document what we know to be true. There's no way to say for sure that Mrs. Tompkinsrobotmomerson gave Tompkins such an early bedtime if they didn't tell us directly. (and i didn't say "wrong", i said "assumed [to be] wrong". Assumptions can be incorrect.) Also, even if she did set Tompkins's bedtime to be well before 5 in the afternoon, don't you think by that same logic that she would be mad that he wasn't in bed yet when So and So got there? She isn't. So it's still not past his bedtime yet. And I don't think I ever told you to give up; I said twice that if you still thought the information should be there, to ask about it in the talk page. {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 21:17, 29 May 2012 (UTC)	+	::You're absolutely right about that last thing. I never expressed an opinion on the subject; I just said that this is how our wiki views speculation. We only document what we know to be true. There's no way to say for sure that Mrs. Tompkinsrobotmomerson gave Tompkins such an early bedtime if they didn't tell us directly. (and i didn't say "wrong", i said "assumed [to be] wrong". Assumptions can be incorrect.) Also, even if she did set Tompkins's bedtime to be well before 5 in the afternoon, don't you think by that same logic that she would be mad that he wasn't in bed yet when [[So and So]] got there? She isn't. So it's still not past his bedtime yet. And I don't think I ever told you to give up; I said twice that if you still thought the information should be there, to ask about it in the talk page. {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 21:17, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
	:::Listen, I really meant it when I said, "No mo' on the subjy." No one will benefit in any way if everyone sees it how I sees it. I never SAID you told me to give up; I said that I WOULD. But you have tempted me with the logic, so here goes: Tompkins is dead when his mopm comes back. She does not even come into contact with him. Or, it could just be an [[Inconsistencies\|inconsistency]]. But the matter does not matter. I have grown tired of this, and I would realy apprekiate it if there was no more. Please.		:::Listen, I really meant it when I said, "No mo' on the subjy." No one will benefit in any way if everyone sees it how I sees it. I never SAID you told me to give up; I said that I WOULD. But you have tempted me with the logic, so here goes: Tompkins is dead when his mopm comes back. She does not even come into contact with him. Or, it could just be an [[Inconsistencies\|inconsistency]]. But the matter does not matter. I have grown tired of this, and I would realy apprekiate it if there was no more. Please.
		+	::::OK, I will certainly leave you alone about this. {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 21:51, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

BanditoDorito: /* No edit warring */

2012-05-30T20:55:09Z

No edit warring

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:55, 30 May 2012
Line 4:		Line 4:

	:You know WHAT!?!? I don't give a crap anymore! I don't know why you guys won't agree with me, but fine! There is really no freaking reward from winning this, and really, this would be an empty victory. It's useless info anyway. There might not even be a right answer, but who cares? So congrats; you all win, so no more on the subject.		:You know WHAT!?!? I don't give a crap anymore! I don't know why you guys won't agree with me, but fine! There is really no freaking reward from winning this, and really, this would be an empty victory. It's useless info anyway. There might not even be a right answer, but who cares? So congrats; you all win, so no more on the subject.
-
	:BTW: It is considered a logical fallacy to say that, because something has no proof, it is wrong. Lookit up!		:BTW: It is considered a logical fallacy to say that, because something has no proof, it is wrong. Lookit up!
	::You're absolutely right about that last thing. I never expressed an opinion on the subject; I just said that this is how our wiki views speculation. We only document what we know to be true. There's no way to say for sure that Mrs. Tompkinsrobotmomerson gave Tompkins such an early bedtime if they didn't tell us directly. (and i didn't say "wrong", i said "assumed [to be] wrong". Assumptions can be incorrect.) Also, even if she did set Tompkins's bedtime to be well before 5 in the afternoon, don't you think by that same logic that she would be mad that he wasn't in bed yet when So and So got there? She isn't. So it's still not past his bedtime yet. And I don't think I ever told you to give up; I said twice that if you still thought the information should be there, to ask about it in the talk page. {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 21:17, 29 May 2012 (UTC)		::You're absolutely right about that last thing. I never expressed an opinion on the subject; I just said that this is how our wiki views speculation. We only document what we know to be true. There's no way to say for sure that Mrs. Tompkinsrobotmomerson gave Tompkins such an early bedtime if they didn't tell us directly. (and i didn't say "wrong", i said "assumed [to be] wrong". Assumptions can be incorrect.) Also, even if she did set Tompkins's bedtime to be well before 5 in the afternoon, don't you think by that same logic that she would be mad that he wasn't in bed yet when So and So got there? She isn't. So it's still not past his bedtime yet. And I don't think I ever told you to give up; I said twice that if you still thought the information should be there, to ask about it in the talk page. {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 21:17, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
	:::Listen, I really meant it when I said, "No mo' on the subjy." No one will benefit in any way if everyone sees it how I sees it. I never SAID you told me to give up; I said that I WOULD. But you have tempted me with the logic, so here goes: Tompkins is dead when his mopm comes back. She does not even come into contact with him. Or, it could just be an [[Inconsistencies\|inconsistency]]. But the matter does not matter. I have grown tired of this, and I would realy apprekiate it if there was no more. Please.		:::Listen, I really meant it when I said, "No mo' on the subjy." No one will benefit in any way if everyone sees it how I sees it. I never SAID you told me to give up; I said that I WOULD. But you have tempted me with the logic, so here goes: Tompkins is dead when his mopm comes back. She does not even come into contact with him. Or, it could just be an [[Inconsistencies\|inconsistency]]. But the matter does not matter. I have grown tired of this, and I would realy apprekiate it if there was no more. Please.

BanditoDorito: /* No edit warring */

2012-05-30T20:53:09Z

No edit warring

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:53, 30 May 2012
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:BTW: It is considered a logical fallacy to say that, because something has no proof, it is wrong. Lookit up!		:BTW: It is considered a logical fallacy to say that, because something has no proof, it is wrong. Lookit up!
	::You're absolutely right about that last thing. I never expressed an opinion on the subject; I just said that this is how our wiki views speculation. We only document what we know to be true. There's no way to say for sure that Mrs. Tompkinsrobotmomerson gave Tompkins such an early bedtime if they didn't tell us directly. (and i didn't say "wrong", i said "assumed [to be] wrong". Assumptions can be incorrect.) Also, even if she did set Tompkins's bedtime to be well before 5 in the afternoon, don't you think by that same logic that she would be mad that he wasn't in bed yet when So and So got there? She isn't. So it's still not past his bedtime yet. And I don't think I ever told you to give up; I said twice that if you still thought the information should be there, to ask about it in the talk page. {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 21:17, 29 May 2012 (UTC)		::You're absolutely right about that last thing. I never expressed an opinion on the subject; I just said that this is how our wiki views speculation. We only document what we know to be true. There's no way to say for sure that Mrs. Tompkinsrobotmomerson gave Tompkins such an early bedtime if they didn't tell us directly. (and i didn't say "wrong", i said "assumed [to be] wrong". Assumptions can be incorrect.) Also, even if she did set Tompkins's bedtime to be well before 5 in the afternoon, don't you think by that same logic that she would be mad that he wasn't in bed yet when So and So got there? She isn't. So it's still not past his bedtime yet. And I don't think I ever told you to give up; I said twice that if you still thought the information should be there, to ask about it in the talk page. {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 21:17, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
-	:::Listen, I really meant it when I said, "No mo' on the subjy." No one will benefit in any way if everyone sees it how I sees it. I never SAID you told me to give up; I said that I WOULD.	+	:::Listen, I really meant it when I said, "No mo' on the subjy." No one will benefit in any way if everyone sees it how I sees it. I never SAID you told me to give up; I said that I WOULD. But you have tempted me with the logic, so here goes: Tompkins is dead when his mopm comes back. She does not even come into contact with him. Or, it could just be an [[Inconsistencies\|inconsistency]]. But the matter does not matter. I have grown tired of this, and I would realy apprekiate it if there was no more. Please.
-	But you have tempted me with the logic, so here goes: Tompkins is dead when his mopm comes back. She does not even come into contact with him. Or, it could just be an [[Inconsistencies\|inconsistency]]. But the matter does not matter. I have grown tired of this, and I would realy apprekiate it if there was no more. Please.	+

BanditoDorito: Cmon!

2012-05-30T20:50:30Z

Cmon!

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:50, 30 May 2012
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:BTW: It is considered a logical fallacy to say that, because something has no proof, it is wrong. Lookit up!		:BTW: It is considered a logical fallacy to say that, because something has no proof, it is wrong. Lookit up!
	::You're absolutely right about that last thing. I never expressed an opinion on the subject; I just said that this is how our wiki views speculation. We only document what we know to be true. There's no way to say for sure that Mrs. Tompkinsrobotmomerson gave Tompkins such an early bedtime if they didn't tell us directly. (and i didn't say "wrong", i said "assumed [to be] wrong". Assumptions can be incorrect.) Also, even if she did set Tompkins's bedtime to be well before 5 in the afternoon, don't you think by that same logic that she would be mad that he wasn't in bed yet when So and So got there? She isn't. So it's still not past his bedtime yet. And I don't think I ever told you to give up; I said twice that if you still thought the information should be there, to ask about it in the talk page. {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 21:17, 29 May 2012 (UTC)		::You're absolutely right about that last thing. I never expressed an opinion on the subject; I just said that this is how our wiki views speculation. We only document what we know to be true. There's no way to say for sure that Mrs. Tompkinsrobotmomerson gave Tompkins such an early bedtime if they didn't tell us directly. (and i didn't say "wrong", i said "assumed [to be] wrong". Assumptions can be incorrect.) Also, even if she did set Tompkins's bedtime to be well before 5 in the afternoon, don't you think by that same logic that she would be mad that he wasn't in bed yet when So and So got there? She isn't. So it's still not past his bedtime yet. And I don't think I ever told you to give up; I said twice that if you still thought the information should be there, to ask about it in the talk page. {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 21:17, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
		+	:::Listen, I really meant it when I said, "No mo' on the subjy." No one will benefit in any way if everyone sees it how I sees it. I never SAID you told me to give up; I said that I WOULD.
		+	But you have tempted me with the logic, so here goes: Tompkins is dead when his mopm comes back. She does not even come into contact with him. Or, it could just be an [[Inconsistencies\|inconsistency]]. But the matter does not matter. I have grown tired of this, and I would realy apprekiate it if there was no more. Please.

The Knights Who Say Ni: and don't edit anyone's talk posts except your own.

2012-05-29T21:17:43Z

and don't edit anyone's talk posts except your own.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:17, 29 May 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==No edit warring==		==No edit warring==

-	Just so you know, we tend to discourage adding the same content repeatedly if it continues to be removed. This is known as edit warring, and it is not productive. If you believe that the content should be there, and everyone else keeps removing it, you can take it to the talk page and try to argue your point there. In the case of [[Teen Girl Squad Issue 13]], you have been reverted six times already by three different users, all for good reasons. What So and So said is a [[blatant lie]]~~. I enjoy eating steak~~. And regarding the "stopping him" issue: y'all were both right because if you read carefully, "stopping him" is not the same as "trying to stop him". If you still think the information should be there, please add a section to [[Talk:Teen Girl Squad Issue 13\|the talk page]] and try to argue your points there. Please don't re-add the information to the page itself, as consensus is currently against having it there. {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 17:30, 26 May 2012 (UTC)	+	Just so you know, we tend to discourage adding the same content repeatedly if it continues to be removed. This is known as edit warring, and it is not productive. If you believe that the content should be there, and everyone else keeps removing it, you can take it to the talk page and try to argue your point there. In the case of [[Teen Girl Squad Issue 13]], you have been reverted six times already by three different users, all for good reasons. What So and So said is a [[blatant lie]]. And regarding the "stopping him" issue: y'all were both right because if you read carefully, "stopping him" is not the same as "trying to stop him". If you still think the information should be there, please add a section to [[Talk:Teen Girl Squad Issue 13\|the talk page]] and try to argue your points there. Please don't re-add the information to the page itself, as consensus is currently against having it there. {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 17:30, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

-	You know WHAT!?!? I don't give a crap anymore! I don't know why you guys won't agree with me, but fine! There is really no freaking reward from winning this, and really, this would be an empty victory. It's useless info anyway. There might not even be a right answer, but who cares? So congrats; you all win, so no more on the subject.	+	:You know WHAT!?!? I don't give a crap anymore! I don't know why you guys won't agree with me, but fine! There is really no freaking reward from winning this, and really, this would be an empty victory. It's useless info anyway. There might not even be a right answer, but who cares? So congrats; you all win, so no more on the subject.

-	BTW: It is considered a logical fallacy to say that, because something has no proof, it is wrong. Lookit up!	+	:BTW: It is considered a logical fallacy to say that, because something has no proof, it is wrong. Lookit up!
		+	::You're absolutely right about that last thing. I never expressed an opinion on the subject; I just said that this is how our wiki views speculation. We only document what we know to be true. There's no way to say for sure that Mrs. Tompkinsrobotmomerson gave Tompkins such an early bedtime if they didn't tell us directly. (and i didn't say "wrong", i said "assumed [to be] wrong". Assumptions can be incorrect.) Also, even if she did set Tompkins's bedtime to be well before 5 in the afternoon, don't you think by that same logic that she would be mad that he wasn't in bed yet when So and So got there? She isn't. So it's still not past his bedtime yet. And I don't think I ever told you to give up; I said twice that if you still thought the information should be there, to ask about it in the talk page. {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 21:17, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

BanditoDorito: You win!

2012-05-29T20:27:46Z

You win!

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:27, 29 May 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==No edit warring==		==No edit warring==

-	Just so you know, we tend to discourage adding the same content repeatedly if it continues to be removed. This is known as edit warring, and it is not productive. If you believe that the content should be there, and everyone else keeps removing it, you can take it to the talk page and try to argue your point there. In the case of [[Teen Girl Squad Issue 13]], you have been reverted six times already by three different users, all for good reasons. What So and So said is a [[blatant lie]]. And regarding the "stopping him" issue: y'all were both right because if you read carefully, "stopping him" is not the same as "trying to stop him". If you still think the information should be there, please add a section to [[Talk:Teen Girl Squad Issue 13\|the talk page]] and try to argue your points there. Please don't re-add the information to the page itself, as consensus is currently against having it there. {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 17:30, 26 May 2012 (UTC)	+	Just so you know, we tend to discourage adding the same content repeatedly if it continues to be removed. This is known as edit warring, and it is not productive. If you believe that the content should be there, and everyone else keeps removing it, you can take it to the talk page and try to argue your point there. In the case of [[Teen Girl Squad Issue 13]], you have been reverted six times already by three different users, all for good reasons. What So and So said is a [[blatant lie]]. I enjoy eating steak. And regarding the "stopping him" issue: y'all were both right because if you read carefully, "stopping him" is not the same as "trying to stop him". If you still think the information should be there, please add a section to [[Talk:Teen Girl Squad Issue 13\|the talk page]] and try to argue your points there. Please don't re-add the information to the page itself, as consensus is currently against having it there. {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 17:30, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
		+
		+	You know WHAT!?!? I don't give a crap anymore! I don't know why you guys won't agree with me, but fine! There is really no freaking reward from winning this, and really, this would be an empty victory. It's useless info anyway. There might not even be a right answer, but who cares? So congrats; you all win, so no more on the subject.
		+
		+	BTW: It is considered a logical fallacy to say that, because something has no proof, it is wrong. Lookit up!

BanditoDorito: /* Some links to help get you started */

2012-05-26T17:59:04Z

Some links to help get you started

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:59, 26 May 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~== Some links to help get you started ==~~
-	~~'''Here are some resources to help familiarize yourself with the [[HRWiki:About\|Homestar Runner Wiki]]:'''~~
-	*Before you do any significant editing, be sure to read our [[HRWiki:Standards\|wiki standards]] and our other [[:Category:HRWiki Policy\|policies]].
-	*If you need general information, editing tips, or answers to [[HRWiki:FAQ\|frequently asked questions]], check out the various [[Help:Contents\|help]] pages.
-	*To practice editing, head over to the [[HRWiki:Sandbox\|sandbox]].
-	*If you have a question that isn't addressed on a help page, you can ask it on the [[HRWiki talk:FAQ\|FAQ talk page]].
-	~~----~~
-	~~'''To get plugged in to the community:'''~~
-	*Let us know a little bit about yourself on your [[User:BanditoDorito\|user page]]. (Please see the rules and guidelines for your [[HRWiki:User space\|user space]] first.)
-	*If you're not sure what you can do to help out, head over to [[HRWiki:The Stick\|The Stick]].
-	*If you're looking for more community interaction, you can also register over at our <span class="plainlinks">[http://forum.hrwiki.org forum]</span>.
-	If you see an update on [[HR:\|homestarrunner.com]] that isn't listed on the [[Main Page]], put it up [[HR.com updates\|here]].
-	*To sign and timestamp a post on a [[HRWiki:Talk page etiquette\|talk page]], type four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>).
-	*Above all, be sure to '''[[HRWiki:Standards#Be bold, but know when not to be\|be bold]]''' and have fun!
-	<div style="border-top:1px solid #aaa;background:#f4f4f4;border-bottom:1px solid #aaa;font-size:80%;line-height:110%;padding: 0.5em;margin-top:1.5em;margin-bottom:2em">The information above is provided as a service upon registration. Once you have checked out all the links, please feel free to delete it.</div>
-
	==No edit warring==		==No edit warring==

	Just so you know, we tend to discourage adding the same content repeatedly if it continues to be removed. This is known as edit warring, and it is not productive. If you believe that the content should be there, and everyone else keeps removing it, you can take it to the talk page and try to argue your point there. In the case of [[Teen Girl Squad Issue 13]], you have been reverted six times already by three different users, all for good reasons. What So and So said is a [[blatant lie]]. And regarding the "stopping him" issue: y'all were both right because if you read carefully, "stopping him" is not the same as "trying to stop him". If you still think the information should be there, please add a section to [[Talk:Teen Girl Squad Issue 13\|the talk page]] and try to argue your points there. Please don't re-add the information to the page itself, as consensus is currently against having it there. {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 17:30, 26 May 2012 (UTC)		Just so you know, we tend to discourage adding the same content repeatedly if it continues to be removed. This is known as edit warring, and it is not productive. If you believe that the content should be there, and everyone else keeps removing it, you can take it to the talk page and try to argue your point there. In the case of [[Teen Girl Squad Issue 13]], you have been reverted six times already by three different users, all for good reasons. What So and So said is a [[blatant lie]]. And regarding the "stopping him" issue: y'all were both right because if you read carefully, "stopping him" is not the same as "trying to stop him". If you still think the information should be there, please add a section to [[Talk:Teen Girl Squad Issue 13\|the talk page]] and try to argue your points there. Please don't re-add the information to the page itself, as consensus is currently against having it there. {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 17:30, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

The Knights Who Say Ni: /* No edit warring */

2012-05-26T17:30:45Z

No edit warring

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:30, 26 May 2012
Line 14:		Line 14:
	*Above all, be sure to '''[[HRWiki:Standards#Be bold, but know when not to be\|be bold]]''' and have fun!		*Above all, be sure to '''[[HRWiki:Standards#Be bold, but know when not to be\|be bold]]''' and have fun!
	<div style="border-top:1px solid #aaa;background:#f4f4f4;border-bottom:1px solid #aaa;font-size:80%;line-height:110%;padding: 0.5em;margin-top:1.5em;margin-bottom:2em">The information above is provided as a service upon registration. Once you have checked out all the links, please feel free to delete it.</div>		<div style="border-top:1px solid #aaa;background:#f4f4f4;border-bottom:1px solid #aaa;font-size:80%;line-height:110%;padding: 0.5em;margin-top:1.5em;margin-bottom:2em">The information above is provided as a service upon registration. Once you have checked out all the links, please feel free to delete it.</div>
		+
		+	==No edit warring==
		+
		+	Just so you know, we tend to discourage adding the same content repeatedly if it continues to be removed. This is known as edit warring, and it is not productive. If you believe that the content should be there, and everyone else keeps removing it, you can take it to the talk page and try to argue your point there. In the case of [[Teen Girl Squad Issue 13]], you have been reverted six times already by three different users, all for good reasons. What So and So said is a [[blatant lie]]. And regarding the "stopping him" issue: y'all were both right because if you read carefully, "stopping him" is not the same as "trying to stop him". If you still think the information should be there, please add a section to [[Talk:Teen Girl Squad Issue 13\|the talk page]] and try to argue your points there. Please don't re-add the information to the page itself, as consensus is currently against having it there. {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 17:30, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

First Time Here?: /**/Some links to help get you started

2011-11-20T01:12:23Z

: Some links to help get you started

New page

== Some links to help get you started ==
'''Here are some resources to help familiarize yourself with the [[HRWiki:About|Homestar Runner Wiki]]:'''
*Before you do any significant editing, be sure to read our [[HRWiki:Standards|wiki standards]] and our other [[:Category:HRWiki Policy|policies]].
*If you need general information, editing tips, or answers to [[HRWiki:FAQ|frequently asked questions]], check out the various [[Help:Contents|help]] pages.
*To practice editing, head over to the [[HRWiki:Sandbox|sandbox]].
*If you have a question that isn't addressed on a help page, you can ask it on the [[HRWiki talk:FAQ|FAQ talk page]].
----
'''To get plugged in to the community:'''
*Let us know a little bit about yourself on your [[User:BanditoDorito|user page]]. (Please see the rules and guidelines for your [[HRWiki:User space|user space]] first.)
*If you're not sure what you can do to help out, head over to [[HRWiki:The Stick|The Stick]].
*If you're looking for more community interaction, you can also register over at our <span class="plainlinks">[http://forum.hrwiki.org forum]</span>.
*If you see an update on [[HR:|homestarrunner.com]] that isn't listed on the [[Main Page]], put it up [[H*R.com updates|here]].
*To sign and timestamp a post on a [[HRWiki:Talk page etiquette|talk page]], type four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>).
*Above all, be sure to '''[[HRWiki:Standards#Be bold, but know when not to be|be bold]]''' and have fun!
<div style="border-top:1px solid #aaa;background:#f4f4f4;border-bottom:1px solid #aaa;font-size:80%;line-height:110%;padding: 0.5em;margin-top:1.5em;margin-bottom:2em">The information above is provided as a service upon registration. Once you have checked out all the links, please feel free to delete it.</div>