User talk:Dacheatbot - Revision history

SamFisher1022: /**/NAGLC Trivia Award

2007-10-18T19:53:49Z

: NAGLC Trivia Award

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:53, 18 October 2007
Line 42:		Line 42:
	Hey Dacheatbot do you mind that I used your sbemail talk page idea on my talk page becaause if you mind I can take it off.		Hey Dacheatbot do you mind that I used your sbemail talk page idea on my talk page becaause if you mind I can take it off.
	{{User:Flamer8965/sig}}		{{User:Flamer8965/sig}}
		+
		+	== NAGLC Trivia Award ==
		+
		+	Hey there, Dacheatbot. I thought I'd drop by to let you know that the [[HRWiki:Barnstars]] page is going to be cleaned, and your NAGLC Trivia award may be removed from the page. (The image will not be deleted.) If you want to keep the award there, please say so before the revision, or add it again afterward. Thanks, — {{User:SamFisher1022/sig}} 19:53, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Austio888888: /**/Used Your Sbemail Talk Page Idea

2006-11-17T05:19:05Z

: Used Your Sbemail Talk Page Idea

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:19, 17 November 2006
Line 37:		Line 37:

	GB, GBA, Gamecube, PS2, DS, Sonic the Hedgehog McDonald's game (saved up for that one), "PSP when the price goes down more" {{User:Cinnabon37/sig}} 05:36, 13 November 2006 (UTC)		GB, GBA, Gamecube, PS2, DS, Sonic the Hedgehog McDonald's game (saved up for that one), "PSP when the price goes down more" {{User:Cinnabon37/sig}} 05:36, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Used Your Sbemail Talk Page Idea ==
		+
		+	Hey Dacheatbot do you mind that I used your sbemail talk page idea on my talk page becaause if you mind I can take it off.
		+	{{User:Flamer8965/sig}}

Cinnabon37: reply

2006-11-13T05:36:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:36, 13 November 2006
Line 35:		Line 35:

	NES, Sega Genesis, Sega Saturn, "Wii'll see if it turns out to be good or not" {{User:Trey56/sig}} 11:33, 7 November 2006 (UTC)		NES, Sega Genesis, Sega Saturn, "Wii'll see if it turns out to be good or not" {{User:Trey56/sig}} 11:33, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	GB, GBA, Gamecube, PS2, DS, Sonic the Hedgehog McDonald's game (saved up for that one), "PSP when the price goes down more" {{User:Cinnabon37/sig}} 05:36, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Trey56: /* Poll */ twk

2006-11-07T11:33:57Z

Poll: twk

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:33, 7 November 2006
Line 34:		Line 34:
	SNES, N64, Gamecube, and the Dustball 680 (with Fiber!)--{{User:Homsarroks/sig}} 10:47, 7 November 2006 (UTC)		SNES, N64, Gamecube, and the Dustball 680 (with Fiber!)--{{User:Homsarroks/sig}} 10:47, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

-	NES, Sega Genesis, Sega Saturn, "Wii'll see if turns out to be good or not" {{User:Trey56/sig}} 11:33, 7 November 2006 (UTC)	+	NES, Sega Genesis, Sega Saturn, "Wii'll see if it turns out to be good or not" {{User:Trey56/sig}} 11:33, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Trey56: /* Poll */ my input

2006-11-07T11:33:37Z

Poll: my input

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:33, 7 November 2006
Line 33:		Line 33:

	SNES, N64, Gamecube, and the Dustball 680 (with Fiber!)--{{User:Homsarroks/sig}} 10:47, 7 November 2006 (UTC)		SNES, N64, Gamecube, and the Dustball 680 (with Fiber!)--{{User:Homsarroks/sig}} 10:47, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	NES, Sega Genesis, Sega Saturn, "Wii'll see if turns out to be good or not" {{User:Trey56/sig}} 11:33, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Homsarroks: /* Poll */

2006-11-07T10:47:42Z

Poll

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:47, 7 November 2006
Line 31:		Line 31:

	NES, SNES, N64, PS1, Gamecube, PS2, Xbox 360, "Wii" {{User:Dacheatbot/sig}} 21:44, 25 October 2006 (UTC)		NES, SNES, N64, PS1, Gamecube, PS2, Xbox 360, "Wii" {{User:Dacheatbot/sig}} 21:44, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	SNES, N64, Gamecube, and the Dustball 680 (with Fiber!)--{{User:Homsarroks/sig}} 10:47, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Dacheatbot: Poll

2006-10-25T21:44:44Z

Poll

Show changes

Homsarroks: /* Idea */

2006-10-25T21:22:44Z

Idea

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:22, 25 October 2006
Line 173:		Line 173:
	::::So don't read what I wrote as "I dislike users with flashy user pages and who talk on user talks" - rather, I question the relevance to this wiki of the actions of users who do nothing but that. I think you know the type of user I'm describing. Well, any chance I get to suggest a user get into more main namespace editing (and "all opinions are welcome" was an open door!) I'm going to use it. Like I said, that's exactly the kind of user I think we need more of. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 00:26, 23 October 2006 (UTC)		::::So don't read what I wrote as "I dislike users with flashy user pages and who talk on user talks" - rather, I question the relevance to this wiki of the actions of users who do nothing but that. I think you know the type of user I'm describing. Well, any chance I get to suggest a user get into more main namespace editing (and "all opinions are welcome" was an open door!) I'm going to use it. Like I said, that's exactly the kind of user I think we need more of. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 00:26, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
	:::::Very Good timing on TBC's part ;) {{User:Dacheatbot/sig}} 03:55, 23 October 2006 (UTC)		:::::Very Good timing on TBC's part ;) {{User:Dacheatbot/sig}} 03:55, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	I think you should make your userpage in the format of a hall of fame commemorating men with partially tucked in shirts!--{{User:Homsarroks/sig}} 21:22, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Dacheatbot: /* Idea */ ;)

2006-10-23T03:55:17Z

Idea: ;)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:55, 23 October 2006
Line 172:		Line 172:
	::::Oh, and I'd like to clarify something that my previous post doesn't say well enough. I don't think there's anything wrong with a cool-looking user page (look at mine, for example) and with a small amount of chatter on user talk pages. But it's when a user is doing nothing or little but that, that's when I question why that user is here. You, though, do a lot of main namespace editing and that's why I don't count you among those users.		::::Oh, and I'd like to clarify something that my previous post doesn't say well enough. I don't think there's anything wrong with a cool-looking user page (look at mine, for example) and with a small amount of chatter on user talk pages. But it's when a user is doing nothing or little but that, that's when I question why that user is here. You, though, do a lot of main namespace editing and that's why I don't count you among those users.
	::::So don't read what I wrote as "I dislike users with flashy user pages and who talk on user talks" - rather, I question the relevance to this wiki of the actions of users who do nothing but that. I think you know the type of user I'm describing. Well, any chance I get to suggest a user get into more main namespace editing (and "all opinions are welcome" was an open door!) I'm going to use it. Like I said, that's exactly the kind of user I think we need more of. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 00:26, 23 October 2006 (UTC)		::::So don't read what I wrote as "I dislike users with flashy user pages and who talk on user talks" - rather, I question the relevance to this wiki of the actions of users who do nothing but that. I think you know the type of user I'm describing. Well, any chance I get to suggest a user get into more main namespace editing (and "all opinions are welcome" was an open door!) I'm going to use it. Like I said, that's exactly the kind of user I think we need more of. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 00:26, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
		+	:::::Very Good timing on TBC's part ;) {{User:Dacheatbot/sig}} 03:55, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Qermaq: /* Idea */ reply

2006-10-23T00:26:27Z

Idea: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:26, 23 October 2006
Line 169:		Line 169:
	::No no no. My intention was never to shame you. Just pointing out that, while there are a lot of users who NEVER make main namespace edits, you're not one of those. Frankly, I think we need more users who can do good main namespace editing and (yep, I'll say it) less of the HRWiki-is-MySpace type users. You're capable of being in either camp, based on what I've seen from you. I'd like you in the "good main namespace editor" camp, personally. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 19:48, 22 October 2006 (UTC)		::No no no. My intention was never to shame you. Just pointing out that, while there are a lot of users who NEVER make main namespace edits, you're not one of those. Frankly, I think we need more users who can do good main namespace editing and (yep, I'll say it) less of the HRWiki-is-MySpace type users. You're capable of being in either camp, based on what I've seen from you. I'd like you in the "good main namespace editor" camp, personally. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 19:48, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
	:::I know i say this a lot, but I can't find anything to do {{User:Dacheatbot/sig}} 19:52, 22 October 2006 (UTC)		:::I know i say this a lot, but I can't find anything to do {{User:Dacheatbot/sig}} 19:52, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
		+	::::I hear ya. Most of my edits lately have been reverts and helpful talk posts on article talks and occassional user talks. It's slow. Hopefully tomorrow there'll be a new email and there'll be plenty to do. When I was new here, I'd just watch Recent Changes when a new toon came out to see the variety of activities that took place as a result. You might peek at the contributions list of some users you respect and see what they've been up to lately. It might give you some ideas.
		+	::::Oh, and I'd like to clarify something that my previous post doesn't say well enough. I don't think there's anything wrong with a cool-looking user page (look at mine, for example) and with a small amount of chatter on user talk pages. But it's when a user is doing nothing or little but that, that's when I question why that user is here. You, though, do a lot of main namespace editing and that's why I don't count you among those users.
		+	::::So don't read what I wrote as "I dislike users with flashy user pages and who talk on user talks" - rather, I question the relevance to this wiki of the actions of users who do nothing but that. I think you know the type of user I'm describing. Well, any chance I get to suggest a user get into more main namespace editing (and "all opinions are welcome" was an open door!) I'm going to use it. Like I said, that's exactly the kind of user I think we need more of. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 00:26, 23 October 2006 (UTC)