H*R.com updates 2002 - Revision history

DorianGray: Reverted edits by 177.203.193.210 (Talk) to last revision by Stux

DorianGray — Fri, 02 Jan 2026 22:55:20 GMT

Reverted edits by 177.203.193.210 (Talk) to last revision by Stux

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:55, 2 January 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{updates-box}}		{{updates-box}}
	{{hrupdates\|02\|circa=1}}		{{hrupdates\|02\|circa=1}}
-
-	~~It looks like you’re aiming to make a comparison, but the sentence has a double negative (“always never”), which makes it unclear. Here are a few clear, corrected versions depending~~
-
-	~~It looks like you’re aiming to make a comparison, but the sentence has a double negative (“always never”), which makes it unclear. Here are a few clear, corrected versions depending~~
-
-	~~Got it — I’ll continue and complete that thought clearly.~~
-
-	~~Here are a few corrected versions of the original sentence, depending on the intended meaning:~~
-
-	### 1. If you mean Rick and Morty is more grounded or consistent than SpongeBob
-
-	> *Unlike SpongeBob, Rick and Morty* rarely features wild takes.**
-
-	### 2. If you mean Rick and Morty avoids absurdity altogether
-
-	> *Unlike SpongeBob, Rick and Morty* never features wild takes.**
-
-	~~### 3. If you mean the opposite (that Rick and Morty actually does have wild takes)~~
-
-	> *Unlike SpongeBob, Rick and Morty* often features wild takes.**
-
-	~~### 4. If you want a more natural, conversational tone~~
-
-	> *Unlike SpongeBob, Rick and Morty* tends to be less absurd in its humor.**
-
-	~~If you want, tell me what point you’re trying to make about the shows (humor, philosophy, tone, absurdism, satire), and I can refine it further or make it sound more academic or more casual.~~
-
-	~~although i pretty completely know, Rick and Morty is not extremely exaggerated and extremely physical and extremely golden age classic cartoons-influenced as Spongebob always at all always.~~
-
-	~~Here’s a clear, natural rewrite of your sentence, keeping your meaning but fixing grammar and flow. I’ll give a few tone options.~~
-
-	~~### Clear and neutral~~
-
-	> *Although I understand this well, Rick and Morty* is not as exaggerated, physical, or heavily influenced by Golden Age classic cartoons as SpongeBob consistently is.**
-
-	~~### Slightly more casual~~
-
-	> *Even though I’m well aware of it, Rick and Morty* isn’t nearly as exaggerated or physically expressive, nor as influenced by Golden Age cartoons, as SpongeBob always is.**
-
-	~~### More academic / analytical~~
-
-	> *While I am fully aware of this distinction, Rick and Morty* lacks the extreme exaggeration, physical comedy, and strong Golden Age cartoon influence that consistently define SpongeBob SquarePants.**
-
-	~~### Very conversational~~
-
-	> *I know this pretty well, but Rick and Morty* just isn’t as over-the-top, physical, or classic-cartoon-inspired as SpongeBob.**
-
-	~~If you want, I can also:~~
-
-	~~* make it shorter~~
-	~~* make it more critical or more neutral~~
-	~~* adjust it to sound like a review, essay, or forum post~~
-
-	~~Just tell me 👍~~
-

	==Monday, December 30, 2002==		==Monday, December 30, 2002==

177.203.193.210 at 22:24, 2 January 2026

177.203.193.210 — Fri, 02 Jan 2026 22:24:04 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:24, 2 January 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{updates-box}}		{{updates-box}}
	{{hrupdates\|02\|circa=1}}		{{hrupdates\|02\|circa=1}}
		+
		+	It looks like you’re aiming to make a comparison, but the sentence has a double negative (“always never”), which makes it unclear. Here are a few clear, corrected versions depending
		+
		+	It looks like you’re aiming to make a comparison, but the sentence has a double negative (“always never”), which makes it unclear. Here are a few clear, corrected versions depending
		+
		+	Got it — I’ll continue and complete that thought clearly.
		+
		+	Here are a few corrected versions of the original sentence, depending on the intended meaning:
		+
		+	### 1. If you mean Rick and Morty is more grounded or consistent than SpongeBob
		+
		+	> *Unlike SpongeBob, Rick and Morty* rarely features wild takes.**
		+
		+	### 2. If you mean Rick and Morty avoids absurdity altogether
		+
		+	> *Unlike SpongeBob, Rick and Morty* never features wild takes.**
		+
		+	### 3. If you mean the opposite (that Rick and Morty actually does have wild takes)
		+
		+	> *Unlike SpongeBob, Rick and Morty* often features wild takes.**
		+
		+	### 4. If you want a more natural, conversational tone
		+
		+	> *Unlike SpongeBob, Rick and Morty* tends to be less absurd in its humor.**
		+
		+	If you want, tell me what point you’re trying to make about the shows (humor, philosophy, tone, absurdism, satire), and I can refine it further or make it sound more academic or more casual.
		+
		+	although i pretty completely know, Rick and Morty is not extremely exaggerated and extremely physical and extremely golden age classic cartoons-influenced as Spongebob always at all always.
		+
		+	Here’s a clear, natural rewrite of your sentence, keeping your meaning but fixing grammar and flow. I’ll give a few tone options.
		+
		+	### Clear and neutral
		+
		+	> *Although I understand this well, Rick and Morty* is not as exaggerated, physical, or heavily influenced by Golden Age classic cartoons as SpongeBob consistently is.**
		+
		+	### Slightly more casual
		+
		+	> *Even though I’m well aware of it, Rick and Morty* isn’t nearly as exaggerated or physically expressive, nor as influenced by Golden Age cartoons, as SpongeBob always is.**
		+
		+	### More academic / analytical
		+
		+	> *While I am fully aware of this distinction, Rick and Morty* lacks the extreme exaggeration, physical comedy, and strong Golden Age cartoon influence that consistently define SpongeBob SquarePants.**
		+
		+	### Very conversational
		+
		+	> *I know this pretty well, but Rick and Morty* just isn’t as over-the-top, physical, or classic-cartoon-inspired as SpongeBob.**
		+
		+	If you want, I can also:
		+
		+	* make it shorter
		+	* make it more critical or more neutral
		+	* adjust it to sound like a review, essay, or forum post
		+
		+	Just tell me 👍
		+

	==Monday, December 30, 2002==		==Monday, December 30, 2002==

Stux: use new circa parameter

Stux — Thu, 18 Sep 2025 01:40:41 GMT

use new circa parameter

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:40, 18 September 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{updates-box}}		{{updates-box}}
-	{{hrupdates\|02}}	+	{{hrupdates\|02\|circa=1}}
-		+
-	~~Some exact dates are unknown, with approximations indicated by "c." ({{p~~\|l=~~https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/circa circa~~}}).	+

	==Monday, December 30, 2002==		==Monday, December 30, 2002==

Bleu Ninja: templatize lede + other minor tweaks

Bleu Ninja — Wed, 17 Sep 2025 22:04:13 GMT

templatize lede + other minor tweaks

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:04, 17 September 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{updates-box}}		{{updates-box}}
-	~~This is a nearly complete log of all of the '''updates''' to '''[[Homestar Runner~~ (~~body of work)~~\|~~H*R~~.~~com]]''' during '''2002'''~~.	+	{{hrupdates\|02}}
		+
		+	Some exact dates are unknown, with approximations indicated by "c." ({{p\|l=https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/circa circa}}).
		+
	==Monday, December 30, 2002==		==Monday, December 30, 2002==
	*[[Strong Bad Email]] #56: [[current status]]		*[[Strong Bad Email]] #56: [[current status]]
Line 98:		Line 101:
	*[[vacation]]: [[vacation#Postcard 5\|Postcard 5]] added		*[[vacation]]: [[vacation#Postcard 5\|Postcard 5]] added

-	==Thursday, August 22?, 2002==	+	==c. Thursday, August 22, 2002==
-	*[[vacation]]: [[vacation#Postcard 4\|Postcard 4]] added (~~Approx. Date~~)	+	*[[vacation]]: [[vacation#Postcard 4\|Postcard 4]] added ''(approximate date)''

	==Monday, August 19, 2002==		==Monday, August 19, 2002==
Line 150:		Line 153:
	*[[Strong Bad Email]] #31: [[sugarbob]]		*[[Strong Bad Email]] #31: [[sugarbob]]

-	==~~Circa~~ June 4, 2002==	+	==c. June 4, 2002==
	*[[Short]]: [[The Interview]]		*[[Short]]: [[The Interview]]

Line 228:		Line 231:
	==Monday, January 14, 2002==		==Monday, January 14, 2002==
	*[[Strong Bad Email]] #9: [[i love you]]		*[[Strong Bad Email]] #9: [[i love you]]
-	*[[Strong Bad Email\|Strong Bad Emails]] announced to be updated every ~~monday~~	+	**[[Strong Bad Email\|Strong Bad Emails]] announced to be updated every Monday

	==Thursday, January 10, 2002==		==Thursday, January 10, 2002==

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc: remove sbemail quotes for consistency with later entries

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc — Wed, 21 Apr 2021 23:13:52 GMT

remove sbemail quotes for consistency with later entries

Show changes

The Cheatbot: update page name

The Cheatbot — Wed, 03 Feb 2021 21:06:25 GMT

update page name

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:06, 3 February 2021
Line 166:		Line 166:

	==Monday, May 13, 2002==		==Monday, May 13, 2002==
-	*[[Strong Bad Email]] #27: "[[3 ~~Wishes~~]]"	+	*[[Strong Bad Email]] #27: "[[3 wishes]]"

	==Monday, May 6, 2002==		==Monday, May 6, 2002==

Broncotroll: Moved template

Broncotroll — Sun, 07 Apr 2013 01:13:55 GMT

Moved template

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:13, 7 April 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{updates-box}}		{{updates-box}}
-	~~{{missinginfo\|[[The Interview]] release date, [[vacation#postcard 4\|Postcard 4]] release date}}~~
	This is a nearly complete log of all of the '''updates''' to '''[[Homestar Runner (body of work)\|H*R.com]]''' during '''2002'''.		This is a nearly complete log of all of the '''updates''' to '''[[Homestar Runner (body of work)\|H*R.com]]''' during '''2002'''.
	==Monday, December 30, 2002==		==Monday, December 30, 2002==
Line 235:		Line 234:
	*[[Quote of the Week]] started, under the name 'Quote of the Day'		*[[Quote of the Week]] started, under the name 'Quote of the Day'
	*[[Strong Bad's Message Bored]] added		*[[Strong Bad's Message Bored]] added
		+	{{missinginfo\|[[The Interview]] release date, [[vacation#postcard 4\|Postcard 4]] release date}}
	__NOTOC__		__NOTOC__
	[[Category:Past Updates]]		[[Category:Past Updates]]

Broncotroll: Added reason

Broncotroll — Sun, 07 Apr 2013 00:18:17 GMT

Added reason

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:18, 7 April 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{updates-box}}		{{updates-box}}
-	{{~~unknown~~}}	+	{{missinginfo\|[[The Interview]] release date, [[vacation#postcard 4\|Postcard 4]] release date}}
	This is a nearly complete log of all of the '''updates''' to '''[[Homestar Runner (body of work)\|H*R.com]]''' during '''2002'''.		This is a nearly complete log of all of the '''updates''' to '''[[Homestar Runner (body of work)\|H*R.com]]''' during '''2002'''.
	==Monday, December 30, 2002==		==Monday, December 30, 2002==

Broncotroll: Move again

Broncotroll — Wed, 03 Apr 2013 23:18:59 GMT

Move again

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:18, 3 April 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{updates-box}}		{{updates-box}}
-	~~This is a nearly complete log of all of the '''updates''' to '''[[Homestar Runner (body of work)\|H*R.com]]''' during '''2002'''.~~
	{{unknown}}		{{unknown}}
		+	This is a nearly complete log of all of the '''updates''' to '''[[Homestar Runner (body of work)\|H*R.com]]''' during '''2002'''.
	==Monday, December 30, 2002==		==Monday, December 30, 2002==
	*[[Strong Bad Email]] #56: "[[current status]]"		*[[Strong Bad Email]] #56: "[[current status]]"

Broncotroll: Test drive!

Broncotroll — Wed, 03 Apr 2013 23:13:27 GMT

Test drive!

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:13, 3 April 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{updates-box}}		{{updates-box}}
	This is a nearly complete log of all of the '''updates''' to '''[[Homestar Runner (body of work)\|H*R.com]]''' during '''2002'''.		This is a nearly complete log of all of the '''updates''' to '''[[Homestar Runner (body of work)\|H*R.com]]''' during '''2002'''.
-		+	{{unknown}}
	==Monday, December 30, 2002==		==Monday, December 30, 2002==
	*[[Strong Bad Email]] #56: "[[current status]]"		*[[Strong Bad Email]] #56: "[[current status]]"

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:55, 2 January 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{updates-box}}		{{updates-box}}
	{{hrupdates\|02\|circa=1}}		{{hrupdates\|02\|circa=1}}
-
-	~~It looks like you’re aiming to make a comparison, but the sentence has a double negative (“always never”), which makes it unclear. Here are a few clear, corrected versions depending~~
-
-	~~It looks like you’re aiming to make a comparison, but the sentence has a double negative (“always never”), which makes it unclear. Here are a few clear, corrected versions depending~~
-
-	~~Got it — I’ll continue and complete that thought clearly.~~
-
-	~~Here are a few corrected versions of the original sentence, depending on the intended meaning:~~
-
-	### 1. If you mean Rick and Morty is more grounded or consistent than SpongeBob
-
-	> *Unlike SpongeBob, Rick and Morty* rarely features wild takes.**
-
-	### 2. If you mean Rick and Morty avoids absurdity altogether
-
-	> *Unlike SpongeBob, Rick and Morty* never features wild takes.**
-
-	~~### 3. If you mean the opposite (that Rick and Morty actually does have wild takes)~~
-
-	> *Unlike SpongeBob, Rick and Morty* often features wild takes.**
-
-	~~### 4. If you want a more natural, conversational tone~~
-
-	> *Unlike SpongeBob, Rick and Morty* tends to be less absurd in its humor.**
-
-	~~If you want, tell me what point you’re trying to make about the shows (humor, philosophy, tone, absurdism, satire), and I can refine it further or make it sound more academic or more casual.~~
-
-	~~although i pretty completely know, Rick and Morty is not extremely exaggerated and extremely physical and extremely golden age classic cartoons-influenced as Spongebob always at all always.~~
-
-	~~Here’s a clear, natural rewrite of your sentence, keeping your meaning but fixing grammar and flow. I’ll give a few tone options.~~
-
-	~~### Clear and neutral~~
-
-	> *Although I understand this well, Rick and Morty* is not as exaggerated, physical, or heavily influenced by Golden Age classic cartoons as SpongeBob consistently is.**
-
-	~~### Slightly more casual~~
-
-	> *Even though I’m well aware of it, Rick and Morty* isn’t nearly as exaggerated or physically expressive, nor as influenced by Golden Age cartoons, as SpongeBob always is.**
-
-	~~### More academic / analytical~~
-
-	> *While I am fully aware of this distinction, Rick and Morty* lacks the extreme exaggeration, physical comedy, and strong Golden Age cartoon influence that consistently define SpongeBob SquarePants.**
-
-	~~### Very conversational~~
-
-	> *I know this pretty well, but Rick and Morty* just isn’t as over-the-top, physical, or classic-cartoon-inspired as SpongeBob.**
-
-	~~If you want, I can also:~~
-
-	~~* make it shorter~~
-	~~* make it more critical or more neutral~~
-	~~* adjust it to sound like a review, essay, or forum post~~
-
-	~~Just tell me 👍~~
-

	==Monday, December 30, 2002==		==Monday, December 30, 2002==

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:24, 2 January 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{updates-box}}		{{updates-box}}
	{{hrupdates\|02\|circa=1}}		{{hrupdates\|02\|circa=1}}
		+
		+	It looks like you’re aiming to make a comparison, but the sentence has a double negative (“always never”), which makes it unclear. Here are a few clear, corrected versions depending
		+
		+	It looks like you’re aiming to make a comparison, but the sentence has a double negative (“always never”), which makes it unclear. Here are a few clear, corrected versions depending
		+
		+	Got it — I’ll continue and complete that thought clearly.
		+
		+	Here are a few corrected versions of the original sentence, depending on the intended meaning:
		+
		+	### 1. If you mean Rick and Morty is more grounded or consistent than SpongeBob
		+
		+	> *Unlike SpongeBob, Rick and Morty* rarely features wild takes.**
		+
		+	### 2. If you mean Rick and Morty avoids absurdity altogether
		+
		+	> *Unlike SpongeBob, Rick and Morty* never features wild takes.**
		+
		+	### 3. If you mean the opposite (that Rick and Morty actually does have wild takes)
		+
		+	> *Unlike SpongeBob, Rick and Morty* often features wild takes.**
		+
		+	### 4. If you want a more natural, conversational tone
		+
		+	> *Unlike SpongeBob, Rick and Morty* tends to be less absurd in its humor.**
		+
		+	If you want, tell me what point you’re trying to make about the shows (humor, philosophy, tone, absurdism, satire), and I can refine it further or make it sound more academic or more casual.
		+
		+	although i pretty completely know, Rick and Morty is not extremely exaggerated and extremely physical and extremely golden age classic cartoons-influenced as Spongebob always at all always.
		+
		+	Here’s a clear, natural rewrite of your sentence, keeping your meaning but fixing grammar and flow. I’ll give a few tone options.
		+
		+	### Clear and neutral
		+
		+	> *Although I understand this well, Rick and Morty* is not as exaggerated, physical, or heavily influenced by Golden Age classic cartoons as SpongeBob consistently is.**
		+
		+	### Slightly more casual
		+
		+	> *Even though I’m well aware of it, Rick and Morty* isn’t nearly as exaggerated or physically expressive, nor as influenced by Golden Age cartoons, as SpongeBob always is.**
		+
		+	### More academic / analytical
		+
		+	> *While I am fully aware of this distinction, Rick and Morty* lacks the extreme exaggeration, physical comedy, and strong Golden Age cartoon influence that consistently define SpongeBob SquarePants.**
		+
		+	### Very conversational
		+
		+	> *I know this pretty well, but Rick and Morty* just isn’t as over-the-top, physical, or classic-cartoon-inspired as SpongeBob.**
		+
		+	If you want, I can also:
		+
		+	* make it shorter
		+	* make it more critical or more neutral
		+	* adjust it to sound like a review, essay, or forum post
		+
		+	Just tell me 👍
		+

	==Monday, December 30, 2002==		==Monday, December 30, 2002==