HRWiki talk:Introduction - Revision history

185.220.101.48 at 11:30, 5 May 2023

185.220.101.48 — Fri, 05 May 2023 11:30:39 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:30, 5 May 2023
Line 50:		Line 50:
	I ''do'' want to know what to ''not'' do when editing. {{unsigned\|Gfdgsgxgzgdrc\|04:28, June 9, 2010}}		I ''do'' want to know what to ''not'' do when editing. {{unsigned\|Gfdgsgxgzgdrc\|04:28, June 9, 2010}}
	:See [[HRW:BOLD]]. Also, if you are not sure if you should make an edit, you can ask about it on the article's talk page. And lastly - '''Please''' sign your posts and always use the edit summary. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 05:05, 9 June 2010 (UTC)		:See [[HRW:BOLD]]. Also, if you are not sure if you should make an edit, you can ask about it on the article's talk page. And lastly - '''Please''' sign your posts and always use the edit summary. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 05:05, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+
		+	Hi, can you make the website https please? Thanks!

It's dot com: /* The method */ reply

It's dot com — Mon, 10 Apr 2017 23:52:47 GMT

The method: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:52, 10 April 2017
Line 30:		Line 30:
	How does this page work? By that, I mean how do we get all that at the top of the page without any coding whatsoever in relation to it when editing? {{User:Superfield Credit Union/sig}}		How does this page work? By that, I mean how do we get all that at the top of the page without any coding whatsoever in relation to it when editing? {{User:Superfield Credit Union/sig}}
	:I'd like to know this as well. This information would be useful for another [http://fanstuff2.referata.com/wiki/Main_Page wiki] I'm working on. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 05:45, 10 April 2017 (UTC)		:I'd like to know this as well. This information would be useful for another [http://fanstuff2.referata.com/wiki/Main_Page wiki] I'm working on. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 05:45, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
		+	::The text is from [[MediaWiki:Header-introduction]]. It's included via a custom function. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 23:52, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

	== Redesign ==		== Redesign ==

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc: /* The method */ Yes, I'm aware this discussion is like a decade old.

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc — Mon, 10 Apr 2017 05:45:52 GMT

The method: Yes, I'm aware this discussion is like a decade old.

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:45, 10 April 2017
Line 29:		Line 29:

	How does this page work? By that, I mean how do we get all that at the top of the page without any coding whatsoever in relation to it when editing? {{User:Superfield Credit Union/sig}}		How does this page work? By that, I mean how do we get all that at the top of the page without any coding whatsoever in relation to it when editing? {{User:Superfield Credit Union/sig}}
		+	:I'd like to know this as well. This information would be useful for another [http://fanstuff2.referata.com/wiki/Main_Page wiki] I'm working on. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 05:45, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

	== Redesign ==		== Redesign ==

DorianGray: Reverted edits by 70.39.93.16 (Talk) to last revision by Elcool

DorianGray — Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:37:55 GMT

Reverted edits by 70.39.93.16 (Talk) to last revision by Elcool

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:37, 29 November 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::Yes, this page is bound for trolling unless protected. →''<small><tt>[[User:FireBird\|<font color=green>FireBird</font>]]</tt></small>''		::Yes, this page is bound for trolling unless protected. →''<small><tt>[[User:FireBird\|<font color=green>FireBird</font>]]</tt></small>''

-	:::We're simply following the [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Introduction\|example]] of Wikipedia, but if a lot of people want to get rid of the "experimental edits" section, I have no problems with dumping it. However, I think it's a good way for newcomers to get that "I can edit ''any'' page" experience. It might be a little discouraging ~~[http://www.resumewritingservice.biz/services/ resume writing service]~~ if there's a page that says "You can edit any page" and they can't edit ''that'' page. Does that make sense? — {{User:JoeyDay/sig}} 17:20, 18 May 2005 (UTC)	+	:::We're simply following the [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Introduction\|example]] of Wikipedia, but if a lot of people want to get rid of the "experimental edits" section, I have no problems with dumping it. However, I think it's a good way for newcomers to get that "I can edit ''any'' page" experience. It might be a little discouraging if there's a page that says "You can edit any page" and they can't edit ''that'' page. Does that make sense? — {{User:JoeyDay/sig}} 17:20, 18 May 2005 (UTC)

	::::I think a simple "You can edit [[HRWiki:Sandbox\|this page]] as much as you want (in fact, you can edit ''any'' article!)" would be fine. Plus, it doesn't look very nice to have this nice introduction box and then all this jibberish at the bottom. →<small>[[User:FireBird\|FireBird]]</small>\|<sub>([[User Talk:FireBird\|Talk]])</sub>		::::I think a simple "You can edit [[HRWiki:Sandbox\|this page]] as much as you want (in fact, you can edit ''any'' article!)" would be fine. Plus, it doesn't look very nice to have this nice introduction box and then all this jibberish at the bottom. →<small>[[User:FireBird\|FireBird]]</small>\|<sub>([[User Talk:FireBird\|Talk]])</sub>

70.39.93.16 at 13:37, 29 November 2010

70.39.93.16 — Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:37:15 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:37, 29 November 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::Yes, this page is bound for trolling unless protected. →''<small><tt>[[User:FireBird\|<font color=green>FireBird</font>]]</tt></small>''		::Yes, this page is bound for trolling unless protected. →''<small><tt>[[User:FireBird\|<font color=green>FireBird</font>]]</tt></small>''

-	:::We're simply following the [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Introduction\|example]] of Wikipedia, but if a lot of people want to get rid of the "experimental edits" section, I have no problems with dumping it. However, I think it's a good way for newcomers to get that "I can edit ''any'' page" experience. It might be a little discouraging if there's a page that says "You can edit any page" and they can't edit ''that'' page. Does that make sense? — {{User:JoeyDay/sig}} 17:20, 18 May 2005 (UTC)	+	:::We're simply following the [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Introduction\|example]] of Wikipedia, but if a lot of people want to get rid of the "experimental edits" section, I have no problems with dumping it. However, I think it's a good way for newcomers to get that "I can edit ''any'' page" experience. It might be a little discouraging [http://www.resumewritingservice.biz/services/ resume writing service] if there's a page that says "You can edit any page" and they can't edit ''that'' page. Does that make sense? — {{User:JoeyDay/sig}} 17:20, 18 May 2005 (UTC)

	::::I think a simple "You can edit [[HRWiki:Sandbox\|this page]] as much as you want (in fact, you can edit ''any'' article!)" would be fine. Plus, it doesn't look very nice to have this nice introduction box and then all this jibberish at the bottom. →<small>[[User:FireBird\|FireBird]]</small>\|<sub>([[User Talk:FireBird\|Talk]])</sub>		::::I think a simple "You can edit [[HRWiki:Sandbox\|this page]] as much as you want (in fact, you can edit ''any'' article!)" would be fine. Plus, it doesn't look very nice to have this nice introduction box and then all this jibberish at the bottom. →<small>[[User:FireBird\|FireBird]]</small>\|<sub>([[User Talk:FireBird\|Talk]])</sub>

Elcool: /* well... */ replu

Elcool — Wed, 09 Jun 2010 05:05:09 GMT

well...: replu

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:05, 9 June 2010
Line 46:		Line 46:
	== well... ==		== well... ==

-	I ''do'' want to know what to ''not'' do when editing.	+	I ''do'' want to know what to ''not'' do when editing. {{unsigned\|Gfdgsgxgzgdrc\|04:28, June 9, 2010}}
		+	:See [[HRW:BOLD]]. Also, if you are not sure if you should make an edit, you can ask about it on the article's talk page. And lastly - '''Please''' sign your posts and always use the edit summary. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 05:05, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc: /**/well...

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc — Wed, 09 Jun 2010 01:28:12 GMT

: well...

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:28, 9 June 2010
Line 43:		Line 43:
	:I think that's a great idea. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 14:45, 19 April 2009 (UTC)		:I think that's a great idea. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 14:45, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
	::Over a year, and people still use this for testing? —[[User:ColdReactive\|ColdReactive]] 16:40, 13 May 2010 (UTC)		::Over a year, and people still use this for testing? —[[User:ColdReactive\|ColdReactive]] 16:40, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	== well... ==
		+
		+	I ''do'' want to know what to ''not'' do when editing.

ColdReactive: /* Sandbox */ re

ColdReactive — Thu, 13 May 2010 16:40:52 GMT

Sandbox: re

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:40, 13 May 2010
Line 42:		Line 42:
	I will again bring this up. Why do we need a test edits section when you could just link to the [[HRWiki:Sandbox\|Sandbox]]? It's not only less confusing to newbies, but it's also easier to keep track of. And if you bring up Wikipedia, they made a decision to link to their sandbox over a year ago. {{User:HRjcm/sig}} 17:00, 24 January 2009 (UTC)		I will again bring this up. Why do we need a test edits section when you could just link to the [[HRWiki:Sandbox\|Sandbox]]? It's not only less confusing to newbies, but it's also easier to keep track of. And if you bring up Wikipedia, they made a decision to link to their sandbox over a year ago. {{User:HRjcm/sig}} 17:00, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
	:I think that's a great idea. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 14:45, 19 April 2009 (UTC)		:I think that's a great idea. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 14:45, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
		+	::Over a year, and people still use this for testing? —[[User:ColdReactive\|ColdReactive]] 16:40, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

MichaelXX2: /* Sandbox */ I think that's a great idea.

MichaelXX2 — Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:45:33 GMT

Sandbox: I think that's a great idea.

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:45, 19 April 2009
Line 41:		Line 41:

	I will again bring this up. Why do we need a test edits section when you could just link to the [[HRWiki:Sandbox\|Sandbox]]? It's not only less confusing to newbies, but it's also easier to keep track of. And if you bring up Wikipedia, they made a decision to link to their sandbox over a year ago. {{User:HRjcm/sig}} 17:00, 24 January 2009 (UTC)		I will again bring this up. Why do we need a test edits section when you could just link to the [[HRWiki:Sandbox\|Sandbox]]? It's not only less confusing to newbies, but it's also easier to keep track of. And if you bring up Wikipedia, they made a decision to link to their sandbox over a year ago. {{User:HRjcm/sig}} 17:00, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
		+	:I think that's a great idea. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 14:45, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

JCM: /**/Sandbox

JCM — Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:00:00 GMT

: Sandbox

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:00, 24 January 2009
Line 37:		Line 37:
	:But the idea of this wiki is that anyone can edit it. It's what makes it awesome. Maybe you should just tell your brother off ;-){{User:Loafing/sig}} 00:51, 2 December 2008 (UTC)		:But the idea of this wiki is that anyone can edit it. It's what makes it awesome. Maybe you should just tell your brother off ;-){{User:Loafing/sig}} 00:51, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
	:: Yeah, when someone breaks the rules too badly, they get a temporary (or permanent if they're TOO bad) block. This is likely to hurt you more than the Wiki (if you and your brother use the same computer, or different computers on the same line) so it's up to you to keep said brother under control. With a sufficient number of competent users to review edits, Wikis work best if anonnies are let in, not kept out — and allowing anonnies to edit encourages them to join as full members. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 01:05, 2 December 2008 (UTC)		:: Yeah, when someone breaks the rules too badly, they get a temporary (or permanent if they're TOO bad) block. This is likely to hurt you more than the Wiki (if you and your brother use the same computer, or different computers on the same line) so it's up to you to keep said brother under control. With a sufficient number of competent users to review edits, Wikis work best if anonnies are let in, not kept out — and allowing anonnies to edit encourages them to join as full members. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 01:05, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Sandbox ==
		+
		+	I will again bring this up. Why do we need a test edits section when you could just link to the [[HRWiki:Sandbox\|Sandbox]]? It's not only less confusing to newbies, but it's also easier to keep track of. And if you bring up Wikipedia, they made a decision to link to their sandbox over a year ago. {{User:HRjcm/sig}} 17:00, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:37, 29 November 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::Yes, this page is bound for trolling unless protected. →''<small><tt>[[User:FireBird\|<font color=green>FireBird</font>]]</tt></small>''		::Yes, this page is bound for trolling unless protected. →''<small><tt>[[User:FireBird\|<font color=green>FireBird</font>]]</tt></small>''

-	:::We're simply following the [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Introduction\|example]] of Wikipedia, but if a lot of people want to get rid of the "experimental edits" section, I have no problems with dumping it. However, I think it's a good way for newcomers to get that "I can edit ''any'' page" experience. It might be a little discouraging ~~[http://www.resumewritingservice.biz/services/ resume writing service]~~ if there's a page that says "You can edit any page" and they can't edit ''that'' page. Does that make sense? — {{User:JoeyDay/sig}} 17:20, 18 May 2005 (UTC)	+	:::We're simply following the [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Introduction\|example]] of Wikipedia, but if a lot of people want to get rid of the "experimental edits" section, I have no problems with dumping it. However, I think it's a good way for newcomers to get that "I can edit ''any'' page" experience. It might be a little discouraging if there's a page that says "You can edit any page" and they can't edit ''that'' page. Does that make sense? — {{User:JoeyDay/sig}} 17:20, 18 May 2005 (UTC)

	::::I think a simple "You can edit [[HRWiki:Sandbox\|this page]] as much as you want (in fact, you can edit ''any'' article!)" would be fine. Plus, it doesn't look very nice to have this nice introduction box and then all this jibberish at the bottom. →<small>[[User:FireBird\|FireBird]]</small>\|<sub>([[User Talk:FireBird\|Talk]])</sub>		::::I think a simple "You can edit [[HRWiki:Sandbox\|this page]] as much as you want (in fact, you can edit ''any'' article!)" would be fine. Plus, it doesn't look very nice to have this nice introduction box and then all this jibberish at the bottom. →<small>[[User:FireBird\|FireBird]]</small>\|<sub>([[User Talk:FireBird\|Talk]])</sub>

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:37, 29 November 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::Yes, this page is bound for trolling unless protected. →''<small><tt>[[User:FireBird\|<font color=green>FireBird</font>]]</tt></small>''		::Yes, this page is bound for trolling unless protected. →''<small><tt>[[User:FireBird\|<font color=green>FireBird</font>]]</tt></small>''

-	:::We're simply following the [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Introduction\|example]] of Wikipedia, but if a lot of people want to get rid of the "experimental edits" section, I have no problems with dumping it. However, I think it's a good way for newcomers to get that "I can edit ''any'' page" experience. It might be a little discouraging if there's a page that says "You can edit any page" and they can't edit ''that'' page. Does that make sense? — {{User:JoeyDay/sig}} 17:20, 18 May 2005 (UTC)	+	:::We're simply following the [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Introduction\|example]] of Wikipedia, but if a lot of people want to get rid of the "experimental edits" section, I have no problems with dumping it. However, I think it's a good way for newcomers to get that "I can edit ''any'' page" experience. It might be a little discouraging [http://www.resumewritingservice.biz/services/ resume writing service] if there's a page that says "You can edit any page" and they can't edit ''that'' page. Does that make sense? — {{User:JoeyDay/sig}} 17:20, 18 May 2005 (UTC)

	::::I think a simple "You can edit [[HRWiki:Sandbox\|this page]] as much as you want (in fact, you can edit ''any'' article!)" would be fine. Plus, it doesn't look very nice to have this nice introduction box and then all this jibberish at the bottom. →<small>[[User:FireBird\|FireBird]]</small>\|<sub>([[User Talk:FireBird\|Talk]])</sub>		::::I think a simple "You can edit [[HRWiki:Sandbox\|this page]] as much as you want (in fact, you can edit ''any'' article!)" would be fine. Plus, it doesn't look very nice to have this nice introduction box and then all this jibberish at the bottom. →<small>[[User:FireBird\|FireBird]]</small>\|<sub>([[User Talk:FireBird\|Talk]])</sub>