Talk:Aztecs - Revision history

99.224.229.97 at 21:29, 11 February 2008

99.224.229.97 — Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:29:18 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:29, 11 February 2008
Line 37:		Line 37:

	Does [[Eh, Steve]] look like an Aztec glyph of some sort to any of you? That was my first thought when [[crazy cartoon]] came out, and has been in my head ever since. {{User:Bassbone/sig}} 02:25, 6 May 2006 (UTC)		Does [[Eh, Steve]] look like an Aztec glyph of some sort to any of you? That was my first thought when [[crazy cartoon]] came out, and has been in my head ever since. {{User:Bassbone/sig}} 02:25, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	You Know What?He Does....Wonder If He Is An Aztec Too?

86.135.125.118 at 11:58, 19 June 2006

86.135.125.118 — Mon, 19 Jun 2006 11:58:57 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:58, 19 June 2006
Line 6:		Line 6:

	::Mexican heritage and Aztec heritage are completely different. Also. just because Strong Bad wears a mexican wrestler costume does not man he is mexican. We don't have enough evidence to support either idea. — {{User: Seriously/sig}} 23:54, 4 March 2006 (UTC)		::Mexican heritage and Aztec heritage are completely different. Also. just because Strong Bad wears a mexican wrestler costume does not man he is mexican. We don't have enough evidence to support either idea. — {{User: Seriously/sig}} 23:54, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
		+	:::like 90% of the population of Mexico is mixed native (Aztec or Mayan) and Spanish. And the other 10% are pure native. The word Mexico itself is from the Aztec word for their own people and land: Mexicatl. Mexico = Aztec. --[[User:86.135.125.118\|86.135.125.118]] 11:58, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
	:::He also used to have a pseudo-Mexican accent... --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]]		:::He also used to have a pseudo-Mexican accent... --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]]
	::::Well yes, but can we get off the mexican thing? We have ''no proof'' that he is actually mexican. That's besides the point, however, as mexico is not related in any way to the Aztecs. — {{User: Seriously/sig}} 00:16, 5 March 2006 (UTC)		::::Well yes, but can we get off the mexican thing? We have ''no proof'' that he is actually mexican. That's besides the point, however, as mexico is not related in any way to the Aztecs. — {{User: Seriously/sig}} 00:16, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Bassbone: Eh, Steve!

Bassbone — Sat, 06 May 2006 02:25:27 GMT

Eh, Steve!

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:25, 6 May 2006
Line 32:		Line 32:
	::::'''Neutral'''. Wikipedia vs. Google fight. I just dunno. Google Fight seems less ligitimate, but Wikipedia can be wrong, with millions of editors. {{User:Bluebry muffin/sig}} 03:49, 17 April 2006 (UTC)		::::'''Neutral'''. Wikipedia vs. Google fight. I just dunno. Google Fight seems less ligitimate, but Wikipedia can be wrong, with millions of editors. {{User:Bluebry muffin/sig}} 03:49, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
	:::::One more note: I asked my wife, who is a history major, and she agrees that it should be "The Aztecs". The singular word refers to a single member of the race, or when used as an adjective (the Aztec Civilization, the Aztec ruins, the Aztec language, etc.) And that's how I'd remembered it in school as well. {{User:KieferSkunk/sig}} 14:46, 17 April 2006 (UTC)		:::::One more note: I asked my wife, who is a history major, and she agrees that it should be "The Aztecs". The singular word refers to a single member of the race, or when used as an adjective (the Aztec Civilization, the Aztec ruins, the Aztec language, etc.) And that's how I'd remembered it in school as well. {{User:KieferSkunk/sig}} 14:46, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Eh, Steve! ==
		+
		+	Does [[Eh, Steve]] look like an Aztec glyph of some sort to any of you? That was my first thought when [[crazy cartoon]] came out, and has been in my head ever since. {{User:Bassbone/sig}} 02:25, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Bassbone: Talk:Aztecs ON WHEELS!!!!!! moved to Talk:Aztecs

Bassbone — Mon, 01 May 2006 08:03:45 GMT

Talk:Aztecs ON WHEELS!!!!!! moved to Talk:Aztecs

← Older revision

Revision as of 08:03, 1 May 2006

THE CHEAT ON WHEELS!!!!!: Talk:Aztecs moved to Talk:Aztecs ON WHEELS!!!!!!

THE CHEAT ON WHEELS!!!!! — Mon, 01 May 2006 08:00:53 GMT

Talk:Aztecs moved to Talk:Aztecs ON WHEELS!!!!!!

← Older revision

Revision as of 08:00, 1 May 2006

KieferSkunk: Talk:The Aztecs moved to Talk:Aztecs

KieferSkunk — Mon, 17 Apr 2006 14:51:40 GMT

Talk:The Aztecs moved to Talk:Aztecs

← Older revision

Revision as of 14:51, 17 April 2006

KieferSkunk: Talk:The Aztec moved to Talk:The Aztecs

KieferSkunk — Mon, 17 Apr 2006 14:46:55 GMT

Talk:The Aztec moved to Talk:The Aztecs

← Older revision

Revision as of 14:46, 17 April 2006

KieferSkunk: /* Shouldn't this be "The Aztecs"? */ And my wife says...

KieferSkunk — Mon, 17 Apr 2006 14:46:01 GMT

Shouldn't this be "The Aztecs"?: And my wife says...

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:46, 17 April 2006
Line 31:		Line 31:
	:::We would not name an article "The American", so why "The Aztec"? Sugg '''move''' to "The Aztecs". {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 03:46, 17 April 2006 (UTC)		:::We would not name an article "The American", so why "The Aztec"? Sugg '''move''' to "The Aztecs". {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 03:46, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
	::::'''Neutral'''. Wikipedia vs. Google fight. I just dunno. Google Fight seems less ligitimate, but Wikipedia can be wrong, with millions of editors. {{User:Bluebry muffin/sig}} 03:49, 17 April 2006 (UTC)		::::'''Neutral'''. Wikipedia vs. Google fight. I just dunno. Google Fight seems less ligitimate, but Wikipedia can be wrong, with millions of editors. {{User:Bluebry muffin/sig}} 03:49, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
		+	:::::One more note: I asked my wife, who is a history major, and she agrees that it should be "The Aztecs". The singular word refers to a single member of the race, or when used as an adjective (the Aztec Civilization, the Aztec ruins, the Aztec language, etc.) And that's how I'd remembered it in school as well. {{User:KieferSkunk/sig}} 14:46, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Bluebry: /* Shouldn't this be "The Aztecs"? */ my new take

Bluebry — Mon, 17 Apr 2006 03:49:18 GMT

Shouldn't this be "The Aztecs"?: my new take

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:49, 17 April 2006
Line 30:		Line 30:
	:::Okay. You are probably right. However, [http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=The+Aztec&word2=The+Aztecs a Google fight] says otherwise. {{User:Bluebry muffin/sig}} 03:45, 17 April 2006 (UTC)		:::Okay. You are probably right. However, [http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=The+Aztec&word2=The+Aztecs a Google fight] says otherwise. {{User:Bluebry muffin/sig}} 03:45, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
	:::We would not name an article "The American", so why "The Aztec"? Sugg '''move''' to "The Aztecs". {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 03:46, 17 April 2006 (UTC)		:::We would not name an article "The American", so why "The Aztec"? Sugg '''move''' to "The Aztecs". {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 03:46, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
		+	::::'''Neutral'''. Wikipedia vs. Google fight. I just dunno. Google Fight seems less ligitimate, but Wikipedia can be wrong, with millions of editors. {{User:Bluebry muffin/sig}} 03:49, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Qermaq: /* Shouldn't this be "The Aztecs"? */

Qermaq — Mon, 17 Apr 2006 03:46:17 GMT

Shouldn't this be "The Aztecs"?

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:46, 17 April 2006
Line 29:		Line 29:

	:::Okay. You are probably right. However, [http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=The+Aztec&word2=The+Aztecs a Google fight] says otherwise. {{User:Bluebry muffin/sig}} 03:45, 17 April 2006 (UTC)		:::Okay. You are probably right. However, [http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=The+Aztec&word2=The+Aztecs a Google fight] says otherwise. {{User:Bluebry muffin/sig}} 03:45, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
		+	:::We would not name an article "The American", so why "The Aztec"? Sugg '''move''' to "The Aztecs". {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 03:46, 17 April 2006 (UTC)