Talk:Character Video Transcripts - Revision history

Bleu Ninja: /* Get outta here, pointless article! Nobody likes your style. */ I fully agree

Bleu Ninja — Sat, 05 Mar 2022 22:06:38 GMT

Get outta here, pointless article! Nobody likes your style.: I fully agree

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:06, 5 March 2022
Line 63:		Line 63:
	:I notice this page still exists, 5 years later --[[User:Jeffjman\|J∃ffJ]][[User_talk:Jeffjman\|Man]][[File:jeffjsigchrismas.png\|23px]] 15:14, 28 February 2022 (UTC)		:I notice this page still exists, 5 years later --[[User:Jeffjman\|J∃ffJ]][[User_talk:Jeffjman\|Man]][[File:jeffjsigchrismas.png\|23px]] 15:14, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
	::Wait, how has it been 5 years?! Anyway, my opinion hasn't changed in that time. This page still strikes me as redundant, unnecessary, and unorganized. It also strikes me as an odd page to have, considering to my knowledge, we don't have any other pages compiling transcripts from other pages (except in cases where the compilation itself is part of the body of work, such as [[Email Intros]] or [[WarioWare D.I.Y. Compilation]]), and I can't see a strong reason for this one to exist. It's extremely situational; this page is ''exclusively'' for situations in which someone, for some reason, wants to view pages for all of the character videos, but not enough to bother using any of the ''multiple'' simple navigation links on the individual articles. Plus, as mentioned previously, the fun facts go against Once And Only Once policy. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 08:27, 5 March 2022 (UTC)		::Wait, how has it been 5 years?! Anyway, my opinion hasn't changed in that time. This page still strikes me as redundant, unnecessary, and unorganized. It also strikes me as an odd page to have, considering to my knowledge, we don't have any other pages compiling transcripts from other pages (except in cases where the compilation itself is part of the body of work, such as [[Email Intros]] or [[WarioWare D.I.Y. Compilation]]), and I can't see a strong reason for this one to exist. It's extremely situational; this page is ''exclusively'' for situations in which someone, for some reason, wants to view pages for all of the character videos, but not enough to bother using any of the ''multiple'' simple navigation links on the individual articles. Plus, as mentioned previously, the fun facts go against Once And Only Once policy. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 08:27, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
		+	:::Third'd, agree with all reasons above. There is no built-in "play all" function and this goes against OAOO. --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 22:06, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc: /* Get outta here, pointless article! Nobody likes your style. */ I still still agree

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc — Sat, 05 Mar 2022 08:27:38 GMT

Get outta here, pointless article! Nobody likes your style.: I still still agree

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:27, 5 March 2022
Line 62:		Line 62:
	I still say '''delete'''. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 05:12, 23 November 2018 (UTC)		I still say '''delete'''. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 05:12, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
	:I notice this page still exists, 5 years later --[[User:Jeffjman\|J∃ffJ]][[User_talk:Jeffjman\|Man]][[File:jeffjsigchrismas.png\|23px]] 15:14, 28 February 2022 (UTC)		:I notice this page still exists, 5 years later --[[User:Jeffjman\|J∃ffJ]][[User_talk:Jeffjman\|Man]][[File:jeffjsigchrismas.png\|23px]] 15:14, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
		+	::Wait, how has it been 5 years?! Anyway, my opinion hasn't changed in that time. This page still strikes me as redundant, unnecessary, and unorganized. It also strikes me as an odd page to have, considering to my knowledge, we don't have any other pages compiling transcripts from other pages (except in cases where the compilation itself is part of the body of work, such as [[Email Intros]] or [[WarioWare D.I.Y. Compilation]]), and I can't see a strong reason for this one to exist. It's extremely situational; this page is ''exclusively'' for situations in which someone, for some reason, wants to view pages for all of the character videos, but not enough to bother using any of the ''multiple'' simple navigation links on the individual articles. Plus, as mentioned previously, the fun facts go against Once And Only Once policy. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 08:27, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Jeffjman: /* Get outta here, pointless article! Nobody likes your style. */ has it really been 5 years?

Jeffjman — Mon, 28 Feb 2022 15:14:06 GMT

Get outta here, pointless article! Nobody likes your style.: has it really been 5 years?

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:14, 28 February 2022
Line 61:		Line 61:
	:::::::::::::::Each toon gets its own page. Character Videos are toons; therefore, they get their own pages. They are for introducing each of the characters and their personalities; therefore, it belongs on the character's page too. That's perfectly fine. But this? Why? The reason seems to be "for convenience", but it doesn't seem that inconvenient to click some links to see each video's page. This is extremely unorganized and breaks wiki policy. (I understand that it doesn't break OAOO because of how it's structured internally... but what about the Fun Facts? Those don't use templates, so doesn't that mean the Fun Facts break OAOO?) And if grouping together transcripts into one disorganized page is more convenient, why don't we make a page for <nowiki>[[Shorts Transcripts]] or [[Puppet Stuff Transcripts]]</nowiki>? Remember what happened to [[Skills of an Artist]]? Originally, they were all on the same page. Not for convenience, but because they didn't have their own pages yet at the time. Once they were split into seperate pages, the list of transcripts was gone as well. That was the consensus. And since this page is already on several other pages, it doesn't need to be here. '''Delete'''. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 21:29, 11 November 2017 (UTC)		:::::::::::::::Each toon gets its own page. Character Videos are toons; therefore, they get their own pages. They are for introducing each of the characters and their personalities; therefore, it belongs on the character's page too. That's perfectly fine. But this? Why? The reason seems to be "for convenience", but it doesn't seem that inconvenient to click some links to see each video's page. This is extremely unorganized and breaks wiki policy. (I understand that it doesn't break OAOO because of how it's structured internally... but what about the Fun Facts? Those don't use templates, so doesn't that mean the Fun Facts break OAOO?) And if grouping together transcripts into one disorganized page is more convenient, why don't we make a page for <nowiki>[[Shorts Transcripts]] or [[Puppet Stuff Transcripts]]</nowiki>? Remember what happened to [[Skills of an Artist]]? Originally, they were all on the same page. Not for convenience, but because they didn't have their own pages yet at the time. Once they were split into seperate pages, the list of transcripts was gone as well. That was the consensus. And since this page is already on several other pages, it doesn't need to be here. '''Delete'''. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 21:29, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
	I still say '''delete'''. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 05:12, 23 November 2018 (UTC)		I still say '''delete'''. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 05:12, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
		+	:I notice this page still exists, 5 years later --[[User:Jeffjman\|J∃ffJ]][[User_talk:Jeffjman\|Man]][[File:jeffjsigchrismas.png\|23px]] 15:14, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc: reviving discussion from over a year ago

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc — Fri, 23 Nov 2018 05:12:14 GMT

reviving discussion from over a year ago

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:12, 23 November 2018
Line 60:		Line 60:
	::::::::::::::I think we should <s>do '''[http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=HRWiki:Sandbox&oldid=758001 something like this]'''. Or maybe</s> delete. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 23:22, 29 May 2016 (UTC)		::::::::::::::I think we should <s>do '''[http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=HRWiki:Sandbox&oldid=758001 something like this]'''. Or maybe</s> delete. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 23:22, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
	:::::::::::::::Each toon gets its own page. Character Videos are toons; therefore, they get their own pages. They are for introducing each of the characters and their personalities; therefore, it belongs on the character's page too. That's perfectly fine. But this? Why? The reason seems to be "for convenience", but it doesn't seem that inconvenient to click some links to see each video's page. This is extremely unorganized and breaks wiki policy. (I understand that it doesn't break OAOO because of how it's structured internally... but what about the Fun Facts? Those don't use templates, so doesn't that mean the Fun Facts break OAOO?) And if grouping together transcripts into one disorganized page is more convenient, why don't we make a page for <nowiki>[[Shorts Transcripts]] or [[Puppet Stuff Transcripts]]</nowiki>? Remember what happened to [[Skills of an Artist]]? Originally, they were all on the same page. Not for convenience, but because they didn't have their own pages yet at the time. Once they were split into seperate pages, the list of transcripts was gone as well. That was the consensus. And since this page is already on several other pages, it doesn't need to be here. '''Delete'''. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 21:29, 11 November 2017 (UTC)		:::::::::::::::Each toon gets its own page. Character Videos are toons; therefore, they get their own pages. They are for introducing each of the characters and their personalities; therefore, it belongs on the character's page too. That's perfectly fine. But this? Why? The reason seems to be "for convenience", but it doesn't seem that inconvenient to click some links to see each video's page. This is extremely unorganized and breaks wiki policy. (I understand that it doesn't break OAOO because of how it's structured internally... but what about the Fun Facts? Those don't use templates, so doesn't that mean the Fun Facts break OAOO?) And if grouping together transcripts into one disorganized page is more convenient, why don't we make a page for <nowiki>[[Shorts Transcripts]] or [[Puppet Stuff Transcripts]]</nowiki>? Remember what happened to [[Skills of an Artist]]? Originally, they were all on the same page. Not for convenience, but because they didn't have their own pages yet at the time. Once they were split into seperate pages, the list of transcripts was gone as well. That was the consensus. And since this page is already on several other pages, it doesn't need to be here. '''Delete'''. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 21:29, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
		+	I still say '''delete'''. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 05:12, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc: /* Get outta here, pointless article! Nobody likes your style. */ I still agree

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc — Sat, 11 Nov 2017 21:29:17 GMT

Get outta here, pointless article! Nobody likes your style.: I still agree

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:29, 11 November 2017
Line 58:		Line 58:
	::::::::::::Again, because of how it's structured internally, it ''does not'' go against OAOO. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 23:13, 8 March 2016 (UTC)		::::::::::::Again, because of how it's structured internally, it ''does not'' go against OAOO. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 23:13, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
	:::::::::::::I see then. Well, I still think we should keep this. Wouldn't it be less convenient to keep things scattered instead of in a pile such as one as nice as this? - '''XY''' [[Special:Contributions/71.122.225.64\|71.122.225.64]] 9:05 PM, March 8th, 2016 (EST)		:::::::::::::I see then. Well, I still think we should keep this. Wouldn't it be less convenient to keep things scattered instead of in a pile such as one as nice as this? - '''XY''' [[Special:Contributions/71.122.225.64\|71.122.225.64]] 9:05 PM, March 8th, 2016 (EST)
-	::::::::::I think we should <s>do '''[http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=HRWiki:Sandbox&oldid=758001 something like this]'''. Or maybe</s> delete. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 23:22, 29 May 2016 (UTC)	+	::::::::::::::I think we should <s>do '''[http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=HRWiki:Sandbox&oldid=758001 something like this]'''. Or maybe</s> delete. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 23:22, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
		+	:::::::::::::::Each toon gets its own page. Character Videos are toons; therefore, they get their own pages. They are for introducing each of the characters and their personalities; therefore, it belongs on the character's page too. That's perfectly fine. But this? Why? The reason seems to be "for convenience", but it doesn't seem that inconvenient to click some links to see each video's page. This is extremely unorganized and breaks wiki policy. (I understand that it doesn't break OAOO because of how it's structured internally... but what about the Fun Facts? Those don't use templates, so doesn't that mean the Fun Facts break OAOO?) And if grouping together transcripts into one disorganized page is more convenient, why don't we make a page for <nowiki>[[Shorts Transcripts]] or [[Puppet Stuff Transcripts]]</nowiki>? Remember what happened to [[Skills of an Artist]]? Originally, they were all on the same page. Not for convenience, but because they didn't have their own pages yet at the time. Once they were split into seperate pages, the list of transcripts was gone as well. That was the consensus. And since this page is already on several other pages, it doesn't need to be here. '''Delete'''. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 21:29, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc: /* Get outta here, pointless article! Nobody likes your style. */ Editing my comment. There's already a list here.

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc — Wed, 23 Aug 2017 23:33:44 GMT

Get outta here, pointless article! Nobody likes your style.: Editing my comment. There's already a list here.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:33, 23 August 2017
Line 58:		Line 58:
	::::::::::::Again, because of how it's structured internally, it ''does not'' go against OAOO. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 23:13, 8 March 2016 (UTC)		::::::::::::Again, because of how it's structured internally, it ''does not'' go against OAOO. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 23:13, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
	:::::::::::::I see then. Well, I still think we should keep this. Wouldn't it be less convenient to keep things scattered instead of in a pile such as one as nice as this? - '''XY''' [[Special:Contributions/71.122.225.64\|71.122.225.64]] 9:05 PM, March 8th, 2016 (EST)		:::::::::::::I see then. Well, I still think we should keep this. Wouldn't it be less convenient to keep things scattered instead of in a pile such as one as nice as this? - '''XY''' [[Special:Contributions/71.122.225.64\|71.122.225.64]] 9:05 PM, March 8th, 2016 (EST)
-	::::::::::I think we should do '''[http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=HRWiki:Sandbox&oldid=758001 something like this]'''. Or maybe delete. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 23:22, 29 May 2016 (UTC)	+	::::::::::I think we should <s>do '''[http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=HRWiki:Sandbox&oldid=758001 something like this]'''. Or maybe</s> delete. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 23:22, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc: /* Get outta here, pointless article! Nobody likes your style. */

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc — Sun, 29 May 2016 23:25:19 GMT

Get outta here, pointless article! Nobody likes your style.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:25, 29 May 2016
Line 58:		Line 58:
	::::::::::::Again, because of how it's structured internally, it ''does not'' go against OAOO. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 23:13, 8 March 2016 (UTC)		::::::::::::Again, because of how it's structured internally, it ''does not'' go against OAOO. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 23:13, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
	:::::::::::::I see then. Well, I still think we should keep this. Wouldn't it be less convenient to keep things scattered instead of in a pile such as one as nice as this? - '''XY''' [[Special:Contributions/71.122.225.64\|71.122.225.64]] 9:05 PM, March 8th, 2016 (EST)		:::::::::::::I see then. Well, I still think we should keep this. Wouldn't it be less convenient to keep things scattered instead of in a pile such as one as nice as this? - '''XY''' [[Special:Contributions/71.122.225.64\|71.122.225.64]] 9:05 PM, March 8th, 2016 (EST)
-	::I think we should do '''[http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=HRWiki:Sandbox&oldid=758001 something like this]'''. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 23:22, 29 May 2016 (UTC)	+	::::::::::I think we should do '''[http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=HRWiki:Sandbox&oldid=758001 something like this]'''. Or maybe delete. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 23:22, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc: /* Get outta here, pointless article! Nobody likes your style. */

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc — Sun, 29 May 2016 23:22:54 GMT

Get outta here, pointless article! Nobody likes your style.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:22, 29 May 2016
Line 58:		Line 58:
	::::::::::::Again, because of how it's structured internally, it ''does not'' go against OAOO. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 23:13, 8 March 2016 (UTC)		::::::::::::Again, because of how it's structured internally, it ''does not'' go against OAOO. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 23:13, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
	:::::::::::::I see then. Well, I still think we should keep this. Wouldn't it be less convenient to keep things scattered instead of in a pile such as one as nice as this? - '''XY''' [[Special:Contributions/71.122.225.64\|71.122.225.64]] 9:05 PM, March 8th, 2016 (EST)		:::::::::::::I see then. Well, I still think we should keep this. Wouldn't it be less convenient to keep things scattered instead of in a pile such as one as nice as this? - '''XY''' [[Special:Contributions/71.122.225.64\|71.122.225.64]] 9:05 PM, March 8th, 2016 (EST)
		+	::I think we should do '''[http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=HRWiki:Sandbox&oldid=758001 something like this]'''. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 23:22, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

71.122.225.64: /* Get outta here, pointless article! Nobody likes your style. */ Argument is kind of coming to a close!

71.122.225.64 — Wed, 09 Mar 2016 02:07:29 GMT

Get outta here, pointless article! Nobody likes your style.: Argument is kind of coming to a close!

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:07, 9 March 2016
Line 57:		Line 57:
	:::::::::::I'm looking at this, and since they're all small-enough transcripts, it seems kind of nice they're put in a pile here. I'm not really bothered by the fact the Once And Only Once policy goes against this. Maybe we shouldn't always follow it! I think it's better off we keep this in an organized article. - '''XY''' [[Special:Contributions/71.122.225.64\|71.122.225.64]] 5:24 PM, March 8th, 2016 (EST)		:::::::::::I'm looking at this, and since they're all small-enough transcripts, it seems kind of nice they're put in a pile here. I'm not really bothered by the fact the Once And Only Once policy goes against this. Maybe we shouldn't always follow it! I think it's better off we keep this in an organized article. - '''XY''' [[Special:Contributions/71.122.225.64\|71.122.225.64]] 5:24 PM, March 8th, 2016 (EST)
	::::::::::::Again, because of how it's structured internally, it ''does not'' go against OAOO. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 23:13, 8 March 2016 (UTC)		::::::::::::Again, because of how it's structured internally, it ''does not'' go against OAOO. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 23:13, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
		+	:::::::::::::I see then. Well, I still think we should keep this. Wouldn't it be less convenient to keep things scattered instead of in a pile such as one as nice as this? - '''XY''' [[Special:Contributions/71.122.225.64\|71.122.225.64]] 9:05 PM, March 8th, 2016 (EST)

Defender1031: /* Get outta here, pointless article! Nobody likes your style. */ again, it does not go against OAOO

Defender1031 — Tue, 08 Mar 2016 23:13:45 GMT

Get outta here, pointless article! Nobody likes your style.: again, it does not go against OAOO

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:13, 8 March 2016
Line 56:		Line 56:
	::::::::::I was going to say what defender said. IF you look at the source, templates are used to accurately copy the information over. This is information that is useful in all 3 locations and is treated nicely via the use of templates. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 14:56, 8 March 2016 (UTC)		::::::::::I was going to say what defender said. IF you look at the source, templates are used to accurately copy the information over. This is information that is useful in all 3 locations and is treated nicely via the use of templates. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 14:56, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
	:::::::::::I'm looking at this, and since they're all small-enough transcripts, it seems kind of nice they're put in a pile here. I'm not really bothered by the fact the Once And Only Once policy goes against this. Maybe we shouldn't always follow it! I think it's better off we keep this in an organized article. - '''XY''' [[Special:Contributions/71.122.225.64\|71.122.225.64]] 5:24 PM, March 8th, 2016 (EST)		:::::::::::I'm looking at this, and since they're all small-enough transcripts, it seems kind of nice they're put in a pile here. I'm not really bothered by the fact the Once And Only Once policy goes against this. Maybe we shouldn't always follow it! I think it's better off we keep this in an organized article. - '''XY''' [[Special:Contributions/71.122.225.64\|71.122.225.64]] 5:24 PM, March 8th, 2016 (EST)
		+	::::::::::::Again, because of how it's structured internally, it ''does not'' go against OAOO. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 23:13, 8 March 2016 (UTC)