Talk:Cow Clips - Revision history

Wbwolf: legacy pointer

Wbwolf — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:48:57 GMT

legacy pointer

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:48, 19 June 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	{{deletedtalk}}	+	{{deletedtalk\|redirect=Items}}
	== Important enough? ==		== Important enough? ==
	To me, they played a minor role in one episode, their purpose was for a one-off joke which i didn't even particularly find that funny. I don't think it deserves its own page, but is there some sort of list page where this would fit? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 21:46, 3 February 2009 (UTC)		To me, they played a minor role in one episode, their purpose was for a one-off joke which i didn't even particularly find that funny. I don't think it deserves its own page, but is there some sort of list page where this would fit? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 21:46, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

It's dot com: deletedtalk

It's dot com — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:40:30 GMT

deletedtalk

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:40, 26 February 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	{{~~ttbd~~}}	+	{{deletedtalk}}
	== Important enough? ==		== Important enough? ==
	To me, they played a minor role in one episode, their purpose was for a one-off joke which i didn't even particularly find that funny. I don't think it deserves its own page, but is there some sort of list page where this would fit? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 21:46, 3 February 2009 (UTC)		To me, they played a minor role in one episode, their purpose was for a one-off joke which i didn't even particularly find that funny. I don't think it deserves its own page, but is there some sort of list page where this would fit? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 21:46, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

The Chort: /* Important enough? */ Agreed. Also, if I see you misuse the phrase "spoon" again, I will come to your house and throw a brick through your dad's windshield.

The Chort — Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:39:55 GMT

Important enough?: Agreed. Also, if I see you misuse the phrase "spoon" again, I will come to your house and throw a brick through your dad's windshield.

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:39, 22 February 2009
Line 18:		Line 18:
	:::::::True. it's become this buzzword that people just throw around when they don't like something and don't know what it really means. Like "copyedit" over at wikipedia. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 18:44, 19 February 2009 (UTC)		:::::::True. it's become this buzzword that people just throw around when they don't like something and don't know what it really means. Like "copyedit" over at wikipedia. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 18:44, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
	::::::::With the new [[Cows]] page i made, all of the information that is here is now there. Since i don't see this as a helpful redirect, i think that it's time to delete this page. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 12:18, 22 February 2009 (UTC)		::::::::With the new [[Cows]] page i made, all of the information that is here is now there. Since i don't see this as a helpful redirect, i think that it's time to delete this page. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 12:18, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
		+	:::::::::Agreed. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 12:39, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Defender1031: /* Important enough? */ i found a place for them.

Defender1031 — Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:18:31 GMT

Important enough?: i found a place for them.

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:18, 22 February 2009
Line 17:		Line 17:
	::::::Ahh, "Spoons". The new "TTATOT", if you will. Nice to see someone finally speak out against this irritating new trend. Anyhow, not much I can say without repeating half the posts here, so... '''Delete'''. -{{User:YK/sig}} 18:30, 19 February 2009 (UTC)		::::::Ahh, "Spoons". The new "TTATOT", if you will. Nice to see someone finally speak out against this irritating new trend. Anyhow, not much I can say without repeating half the posts here, so... '''Delete'''. -{{User:YK/sig}} 18:30, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
	:::::::True. it's become this buzzword that people just throw around when they don't like something and don't know what it really means. Like "copyedit" over at wikipedia. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 18:44, 19 February 2009 (UTC)		:::::::True. it's become this buzzword that people just throw around when they don't like something and don't know what it really means. Like "copyedit" over at wikipedia. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 18:44, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
		+	::::::::With the new [[Cows]] page i made, all of the information that is here is now there. Since i don't see this as a helpful redirect, i think that it's time to delete this page. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 12:18, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Defender1031: /* Important enough? */ reply

Defender1031 — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:44:01 GMT

Important enough?: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:44, 19 February 2009
Line 16:		Line 16:
	:::::First of all, i hate when people say "this page is a spoon", but secondly, the spoons page is referring to things that appear all the time and are not worthy of mention. By the fact that this only appeared once, it makes it not fall under that category. (not saying i like this page and think it should stay, cause i don't. I'm just correcting the misuse of the policy article.) {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 18:08, 19 February 2009 (UTC)		:::::First of all, i hate when people say "this page is a spoon", but secondly, the spoons page is referring to things that appear all the time and are not worthy of mention. By the fact that this only appeared once, it makes it not fall under that category. (not saying i like this page and think it should stay, cause i don't. I'm just correcting the misuse of the policy article.) {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 18:08, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
	::::::Ahh, "Spoons". The new "TTATOT", if you will. Nice to see someone finally speak out against this irritating new trend. Anyhow, not much I can say without repeating half the posts here, so... '''Delete'''. -{{User:YK/sig}} 18:30, 19 February 2009 (UTC)		::::::Ahh, "Spoons". The new "TTATOT", if you will. Nice to see someone finally speak out against this irritating new trend. Anyhow, not much I can say without repeating half the posts here, so... '''Delete'''. -{{User:YK/sig}} 18:30, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
		+	:::::::True. it's become this buzzword that people just throw around when they don't like something and don't know what it really means. Like "copyedit" over at wikipedia. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 18:44, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

YK: /* Important enough? */ Haha! (And delete)

YK — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:30:38 GMT

Important enough?: Haha! (And delete)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:30, 19 February 2009
Line 15:		Line 15:
	:::: I'm really sorry to say this, but this page is not needed. The Thank You sign has appeared much more often and does not have a page, so why should theese? This page, sadly, is a spoon. While I hate deleting articles that people have worked hard on, it is my duty to say '''merge'''. --[[User:Jellote\|Jellote]] 17:52, 19 February 2009 (UTC)		:::: I'm really sorry to say this, but this page is not needed. The Thank You sign has appeared much more often and does not have a page, so why should theese? This page, sadly, is a spoon. While I hate deleting articles that people have worked hard on, it is my duty to say '''merge'''. --[[User:Jellote\|Jellote]] 17:52, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
	:::::First of all, i hate when people say "this page is a spoon", but secondly, the spoons page is referring to things that appear all the time and are not worthy of mention. By the fact that this only appeared once, it makes it not fall under that category. (not saying i like this page and think it should stay, cause i don't. I'm just correcting the misuse of the policy article.) {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 18:08, 19 February 2009 (UTC)		:::::First of all, i hate when people say "this page is a spoon", but secondly, the spoons page is referring to things that appear all the time and are not worthy of mention. By the fact that this only appeared once, it makes it not fall under that category. (not saying i like this page and think it should stay, cause i don't. I'm just correcting the misuse of the policy article.) {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 18:08, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
		+	::::::Ahh, "Spoons". The new "TTATOT", if you will. Nice to see someone finally speak out against this irritating new trend. Anyhow, not much I can say without repeating half the posts here, so... '''Delete'''. -{{User:YK/sig}} 18:30, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Defender1031: /* Important enough? */ not a spoon. still not page worthy, but not a spoon.

Defender1031 — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:08:54 GMT

Important enough?: not a spoon. still not page worthy, but not a spoon.

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:08, 19 February 2009
Line 14:		Line 14:
	:::On the other hand, some items, like Strong Bad's towel, seem more unique than the cow clips and don't <small>any longer</small> have their own page. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.138.34\|132.183.138.34]] 00:04, 14 February 2009 (UTC)		:::On the other hand, some items, like Strong Bad's towel, seem more unique than the cow clips and don't <small>any longer</small> have their own page. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.138.34\|132.183.138.34]] 00:04, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
	:::: I'm really sorry to say this, but this page is not needed. The Thank You sign has appeared much more often and does not have a page, so why should theese? This page, sadly, is a spoon. While I hate deleting articles that people have worked hard on, it is my duty to say '''merge'''. --[[User:Jellote\|Jellote]] 17:52, 19 February 2009 (UTC)		:::: I'm really sorry to say this, but this page is not needed. The Thank You sign has appeared much more often and does not have a page, so why should theese? This page, sadly, is a spoon. While I hate deleting articles that people have worked hard on, it is my duty to say '''merge'''. --[[User:Jellote\|Jellote]] 17:52, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
		+	:::::First of all, i hate when people say "this page is a spoon", but secondly, the spoons page is referring to things that appear all the time and are not worthy of mention. By the fact that this only appeared once, it makes it not fall under that category. (not saying i like this page and think it should stay, cause i don't. I'm just correcting the misuse of the policy article.) {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 18:08, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Jellote: spoon

Jellote — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:52:30 GMT

spoon

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:52, 19 February 2009
Line 13:		Line 13:
	::Well, [[Styleron Ecochair]] has its own article. In fact, a lot if items on [[Items]] appear for less time than the cow clip does. I say we need to keep it. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 00:00, 14 February 2009 (UTC)		::Well, [[Styleron Ecochair]] has its own article. In fact, a lot if items on [[Items]] appear for less time than the cow clip does. I say we need to keep it. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 00:00, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
	:::On the other hand, some items, like Strong Bad's towel, seem more unique than the cow clips and don't <small>any longer</small> have their own page. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.138.34\|132.183.138.34]] 00:04, 14 February 2009 (UTC)		:::On the other hand, some items, like Strong Bad's towel, seem more unique than the cow clips and don't <small>any longer</small> have their own page. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.138.34\|132.183.138.34]] 00:04, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
		+	:::: I'm really sorry to say this, but this page is not needed. The Thank You sign has appeared much more often and does not have a page, so why should theese? This page, sadly, is a spoon. While I hate deleting articles that people have worked hard on, it is my duty to say '''merge'''. --[[User:Jellote\|Jellote]] 17:52, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

132.183.138.34: /* Important enough? */

132.183.138.34 — Sat, 14 Feb 2009 00:04:32 GMT

Important enough?

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:04, 14 February 2009
Line 12:		Line 12:
	:Merge it with items or something. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.138.34\|132.183.138.34]] 23:58, 13 February 2009 (UTC)		:Merge it with items or something. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.138.34\|132.183.138.34]] 23:58, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
	::Well, [[Styleron Ecochair]] has its own article. In fact, a lot if items on [[Items]] appear for less time than the cow clip does. I say we need to keep it. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 00:00, 14 February 2009 (UTC)		::Well, [[Styleron Ecochair]] has its own article. In fact, a lot if items on [[Items]] appear for less time than the cow clip does. I say we need to keep it. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 00:00, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
		+	:::On the other hand, some items, like Strong Bad's towel, seem more unique than the cow clips and don't <small>any longer</small> have their own page. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.138.34\|132.183.138.34]] 00:04, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

MichaelXX2: reply

MichaelXX2 — Sat, 14 Feb 2009 00:00:47 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:00, 14 February 2009
Line 11:		Line 11:
	I agree with the thing.But instead of merging I vote '''Deletanate.'''--[[User:Mariofan1000\|Mariofan1000]] 20:15, 10 February 2009 (UTC)		I agree with the thing.But instead of merging I vote '''Deletanate.'''--[[User:Mariofan1000\|Mariofan1000]] 20:15, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
	:Merge it with items or something. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.138.34\|132.183.138.34]] 23:58, 13 February 2009 (UTC)		:Merge it with items or something. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.138.34\|132.183.138.34]] 23:58, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
		+	::Well, [[Styleron Ecochair]] has its own article. In fact, a lot if items on [[Items]] appear for less time than the cow clip does. I say we need to keep it. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 00:00, 14 February 2009 (UTC)