Talk:Crud - Revision history

Hatkirby: /* Crud Commonness */

Hatkirby — Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:43:50 GMT

Crud Commonness

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:43, 19 February 2010
Line 14:		Line 14:
	== Crud Commonness ==		== Crud Commonness ==

-	The article states that it is more common for the sender of a sbemail to say the word "crud" than Strong Bad himself, however, 2 of the 5 examples are of Strong Bad saying "crud" and 2 are of the sender of a sbemail saying "crud"~~. That seems pretty equal to me~~. Either that or the list of examples isn't complete. --[[User:Hatkirby\|Hatkirby]] 14:39, 19 February 2010 (UTC)	+	The article states that it is more common for the sender of a sbemail to say the word "crud" than Strong Bad himself, however, 3 of the 5 examples are of Strong Bad saying "crud" and 2 are of the sender of a sbemail saying "crud". Either that or the list of examples isn't complete. --[[User:Hatkirby\|Hatkirby]] 14:39, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Hatkirby: /**/Crud Commonness

Hatkirby — Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:39:01 GMT

: Crud Commonness

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:39, 19 February 2010
Line 11:		Line 11:

	Since crud is something you say instead of "crap" when you're don't want to be vulgar, saying it on a site where "crap" is such a common term is something notable. So much that it makes me wonder what "crudcrap" is even supposed to mean. Since other people seem to also think so, I removed the TBD tag. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 19:56, 5 August 2009 (UTC)		Since crud is something you say instead of "crap" when you're don't want to be vulgar, saying it on a site where "crap" is such a common term is something notable. So much that it makes me wonder what "crudcrap" is even supposed to mean. Since other people seem to also think so, I removed the TBD tag. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 19:56, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Crud Commonness ==
		+
		+	The article states that it is more common for the sender of a sbemail to say the word "crud" than Strong Bad himself, however, 2 of the 5 examples are of Strong Bad saying "crud" and 2 are of the sender of a sbemail saying "crud". That seems pretty equal to me. Either that or the list of examples isn't complete. --[[User:Hatkirby\|Hatkirby]] 14:39, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Elcool: comment

Elcool — Wed, 05 Aug 2009 19:56:49 GMT

comment

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:56, 5 August 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
-
	==deletion discussion==		==deletion discussion==
	don't think this page is necessary. It's a common word, and it's not used in HR very often besides. It doesn't have a particular connection to a character like crap does to strong bad. -[[Special:Contributions/128.103.10.135\|128.103.10.135]] 14:12, 29 July 2009 (UTC)		don't think this page is necessary. It's a common word, and it's not used in HR very often besides. It doesn't have a particular connection to a character like crap does to strong bad. -[[Special:Contributions/128.103.10.135\|128.103.10.135]] 14:12, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Line 10:		Line 9:

	::::: I really like where this page is going. The appearences of "crud" are getting funnier and more delibirate. Why, just last month Strong Bad made several jokes about "crudfully", and several times in a mocking fashion. '''Oh crud, for real keep'''--[[User:Jellote\|Jellote wuz here]] 20:34, 2 August 2009 (UTC)		::::: I really like where this page is going. The appearences of "crud" are getting funnier and more delibirate. Why, just last month Strong Bad made several jokes about "crudfully", and several times in a mocking fashion. '''Oh crud, for real keep'''--[[User:Jellote\|Jellote wuz here]] 20:34, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	Since crud is something you say instead of "crap" when you're don't want to be vulgar, saying it on a site where "crap" is such a common term is something notable. So much that it makes me wonder what "crudcrap" is even supposed to mean. Since other people seem to also think so, I removed the TBD tag. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 19:56, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Free: Consensus seems to be keep.

Free — Wed, 05 Aug 2009 19:56:18 GMT

Consensus seems to be keep.

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:56, 5 August 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~{{ttbd}}~~	+
	==deletion discussion==		==deletion discussion==
	don't think this page is necessary. It's a common word, and it's not used in HR very often besides. It doesn't have a particular connection to a character like crap does to strong bad. -[[Special:Contributions/128.103.10.135\|128.103.10.135]] 14:12, 29 July 2009 (UTC)		don't think this page is necessary. It's a common word, and it's not used in HR very often besides. It doesn't have a particular connection to a character like crap does to strong bad. -[[Special:Contributions/128.103.10.135\|128.103.10.135]] 14:12, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Jellote: Keep this crud. Pun intended.

Jellote — Sun, 02 Aug 2009 20:34:59 GMT

Keep this crud. Pun intended.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:34, 2 August 2009
Line 8:		Line 8:

	::::I'd say there's enough references. It has been used seldom enough to warrant a page. '''''Keep.''''' {{User:That'sBupkis/sig}} 15:23, 1 August 2009 (UTC)		::::I'd say there's enough references. It has been used seldom enough to warrant a page. '''''Keep.''''' {{User:That'sBupkis/sig}} 15:23, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	::::: I really like where this page is going. The appearences of "crud" are getting funnier and more delibirate. Why, just last month Strong Bad made several jokes about "crudfully", and several times in a mocking fashion. '''Oh crud, for real keep'''--[[User:Jellote\|Jellote wuz here]] 20:34, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

That'sBupkis at 15:23, 1 August 2009

That'sBupkis — Sat, 01 Aug 2009 15:23:06 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:23, 1 August 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:

	:::It seems like a fine page to me. We have enough examples. '''''Keep.''''' -Espemon333		:::It seems like a fine page to me. We have enough examples. '''''Keep.''''' -Espemon333
		+
		+	::::I'd say there's enough references. It has been used seldom enough to warrant a page. '''''Keep.''''' {{User:That'sBupkis/sig}} 15:23, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Espemon333: /* deletion discussion */

Espemon333 — Sat, 01 Aug 2009 15:17:47 GMT

deletion discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:17, 1 August 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::But it's not clear that that was specifically the reason for its use, except in the last case, which wasn't even by TBC. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.140.154\|132.183.140.154]] 17:49, 29 July 2009 (UTC)		::But it's not clear that that was specifically the reason for its use, except in the last case, which wasn't even by TBC. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.140.154\|132.183.140.154]] 17:49, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

-	It seems like a fine page to me. We have enough examples. '''''Keep.''''' -Espemon333	+	:::It seems like a fine page to me. We have enough examples. '''''Keep.''''' -Espemon333

Espemon333: /* deletion discussion */

Espemon333 — Sat, 01 Aug 2009 15:17:27 GMT

deletion discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:17, 1 August 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::But it's not clear that that was specifically the reason for its use, except in the last case, which wasn't even by TBC. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.140.154\|132.183.140.154]] 17:49, 29 July 2009 (UTC)		::But it's not clear that that was specifically the reason for its use, except in the last case, which wasn't even by TBC. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.140.154\|132.183.140.154]] 17:49, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

-	It seems like a fine page to me. We have enough examples. '''''Keep.'''''	+	It seems like a fine page to me. We have enough examples. '''''Keep.''''' -Espemon333

Espemon333: /* deletion discussion */

Espemon333 — Sat, 01 Aug 2009 15:14:37 GMT

deletion discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:14, 1 August 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:However, I think that the reason for it's use (to prevent overuse of [[crap]]), is useful, and it has appeared enough to warrant noting. '''Keep''' {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 17:12, 29 July 2009 (UTC)		:However, I think that the reason for it's use (to prevent overuse of [[crap]]), is useful, and it has appeared enough to warrant noting. '''Keep''' {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 17:12, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
	::But it's not clear that that was specifically the reason for its use, except in the last case, which wasn't even by TBC. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.140.154\|132.183.140.154]] 17:49, 29 July 2009 (UTC)		::But it's not clear that that was specifically the reason for its use, except in the last case, which wasn't even by TBC. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.140.154\|132.183.140.154]] 17:49, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	It seems like a fine page to me. We have enough examples. '''''Keep.'''''

132.183.140.154 at 17:49, 29 July 2009

132.183.140.154 — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:49:37 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:49, 29 July 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	don't think this page is necessary. It's a common word, and it's not used in HR very often besides. It doesn't have a particular connection to a character like crap does to strong bad. -[[Special:Contributions/128.103.10.135\|128.103.10.135]] 14:12, 29 July 2009 (UTC)		don't think this page is necessary. It's a common word, and it's not used in HR very often besides. It doesn't have a particular connection to a character like crap does to strong bad. -[[Special:Contributions/128.103.10.135\|128.103.10.135]] 14:12, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
	:However, I think that the reason for it's use (to prevent overuse of [[crap]]), is useful, and it has appeared enough to warrant noting. '''Keep''' {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 17:12, 29 July 2009 (UTC)		:However, I think that the reason for it's use (to prevent overuse of [[crap]]), is useful, and it has appeared enough to warrant noting. '''Keep''' {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 17:12, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
		+	::But it's not clear that that was specifically the reason for its use, except in the last case, which wasn't even by TBC. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.140.154\|132.183.140.154]] 17:49, 29 July 2009 (UTC)