Talk:Crumpled Paper - Revision history

The Knights Who Say Ni: a comment, and thanks

The Knights Who Say Ni — Sat, 07 May 2011 05:30:38 GMT

a comment, and thanks

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:30, 7 May 2011
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:That's a good idea, anonny. We could compile this, the envelope paper and the paper from [[dreamail]] on it too. Sorta like a "Minor Characters" page. [[User:Garythesnail\|Garythesnail]] 23:26, 3 May 2011 (UTC)		:That's a good idea, anonny. We could compile this, the envelope paper and the paper from [[dreamail]] on it too. Sorta like a "Minor Characters" page. [[User:Garythesnail\|Garythesnail]] 23:26, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
	::If it was called "The Paper Variations", I could see it work. "Other The Papers" makes it sound like that these are completely unique papers. I agree with the established idea in [[The Paper]] that these other papers are just "twists". Really, there have only been four canon papers: The Paper, New Paper, Envelope Paper, and Compé-per. {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 01:00, 4 May 2011 (UTC)		::If it was called "The Paper Variations", I could see it work. "Other The Papers" makes it sound like that these are completely unique papers. I agree with the established idea in [[The Paper]] that these other papers are just "twists". Really, there have only been four canon papers: The Paper, New Paper, Envelope Paper, and Compé-per. {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 01:00, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
		+	:::Garythesnail - in case you weren't wondering, this page was about the paper from [[dreamail]]. The page was created by a 7-year-old kid (i think) who didn't know the meaning of the word "crumbled", and after it was moved to "crumpled", it was decidedly still a bad name. so that paper would be covered. i'm not sure if we have enough "other papers" for a new page. {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 05:30, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
	==The picture==		==The picture==
	There was a picture of the Constitution Paper on this page. Has it become an orphaned picture? If so, is there room for it on [[The Paper]], since according to previous talk posts, the topic is sufficiently covered there? {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 17:46, 2 May 2011 (UTC)		There was a picture of the Constitution Paper on this page. Has it become an orphaned picture? If so, is there room for it on [[The Paper]], since according to previous talk posts, the topic is sufficiently covered there? {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 17:46, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
	: Yes, [[:File:crumbled paper.png\|the picture]] is currently orphaned. You want to move it to [[The Paper]]? Be my guest. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 20:13, 2 May 2011 (UTC)		: Yes, [[:File:crumbled paper.png\|the picture]] is currently orphaned. You want to move it to [[The Paper]]? Be my guest. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 20:13, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
		+	::Jay - thanks for the link to the picture. I asked b/c i didn't know the file name. {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 05:30, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Soiled Bargains: Reply.

Soiled Bargains — Wed, 04 May 2011 01:00:15 GMT

Reply.

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:00, 4 May 2011
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::Yes, definitely '''delete'''. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 23:44, 21 August 2010 (UTC)		::Yes, definitely '''delete'''. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 23:44, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
	Maybe we could just put this page on an [[other the papers]] page? --[[Special:Contributions/206.116.143.157\|206.116.143.157]] 01:12, 2 May 2011 (UTC)		Maybe we could just put this page on an [[other the papers]] page? --[[Special:Contributions/206.116.143.157\|206.116.143.157]] 01:12, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
-	That's a good idea, anonny. We could compile this, the envelope paper and the paper from [[dreamail]] on it too. Sorta like a "Minor Characters" page. [[User:Garythesnail\|Garythesnail]] 23:26, 3 May 2011 (UTC)	+	:That's a good idea, anonny. We could compile this, the envelope paper and the paper from [[dreamail]] on it too. Sorta like a "Minor Characters" page. [[User:Garythesnail\|Garythesnail]] 23:26, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
		+	::If it was called "The Paper Variations", I could see it work. "Other The Papers" makes it sound like that these are completely unique papers. I agree with the established idea in [[The Paper]] that these other papers are just "twists". Really, there have only been four canon papers: The Paper, New Paper, Envelope Paper, and Compé-per. {{User:Soiled Bargains/sig}} 01:00, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
	==The picture==		==The picture==
	There was a picture of the Constitution Paper on this page. Has it become an orphaned picture? If so, is there room for it on [[The Paper]], since according to previous talk posts, the topic is sufficiently covered there? {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 17:46, 2 May 2011 (UTC)		There was a picture of the Constitution Paper on this page. Has it become an orphaned picture? If so, is there room for it on [[The Paper]], since according to previous talk posts, the topic is sufficiently covered there? {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 17:46, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
	: Yes, [[:File:crumbled paper.png\|the picture]] is currently orphaned. You want to move it to [[The Paper]]? Be my guest. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 20:13, 2 May 2011 (UTC)		: Yes, [[:File:crumbled paper.png\|the picture]] is currently orphaned. You want to move it to [[The Paper]]? Be my guest. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 20:13, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Garythesnail at 23:26, 3 May 2011

Garythesnail — Tue, 03 May 2011 23:26:45 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:26, 3 May 2011
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::Yes, definitely '''delete'''. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 23:44, 21 August 2010 (UTC)		::Yes, definitely '''delete'''. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 23:44, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
	Maybe we could just put this page on an [[other the papers]] page? --[[Special:Contributions/206.116.143.157\|206.116.143.157]] 01:12, 2 May 2011 (UTC)		Maybe we could just put this page on an [[other the papers]] page? --[[Special:Contributions/206.116.143.157\|206.116.143.157]] 01:12, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
		+	That's a good idea, anonny. We could compile this, the envelope paper and the paper from [[dreamail]] on it too. Sorta like a "Minor Characters" page. [[User:Garythesnail\|Garythesnail]] 23:26, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
	==The picture==		==The picture==
	There was a picture of the Constitution Paper on this page. Has it become an orphaned picture? If so, is there room for it on [[The Paper]], since according to previous talk posts, the topic is sufficiently covered there? {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 17:46, 2 May 2011 (UTC)		There was a picture of the Constitution Paper on this page. Has it become an orphaned picture? If so, is there room for it on [[The Paper]], since according to previous talk posts, the topic is sufficiently covered there? {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 17:46, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
	: Yes, [[:File:crumbled paper.png\|the picture]] is currently orphaned. You want to move it to [[The Paper]]? Be my guest. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 20:13, 2 May 2011 (UTC)		: Yes, [[:File:crumbled paper.png\|the picture]] is currently orphaned. You want to move it to [[The Paper]]? Be my guest. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 20:13, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Jay: /* The picture */

Jay — Mon, 02 May 2011 20:13:47 GMT

The picture

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:13, 2 May 2011
Line 7:		Line 7:
	==The picture==		==The picture==
	There was a picture of the Constitution Paper on this page. Has it become an orphaned picture? If so, is there room for it on [[The Paper]], since according to previous talk posts, the topic is sufficiently covered there? {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 17:46, 2 May 2011 (UTC)		There was a picture of the Constitution Paper on this page. Has it become an orphaned picture? If so, is there room for it on [[The Paper]], since according to previous talk posts, the topic is sufficiently covered there? {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 17:46, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
		+	: Yes, [[:File:crumbled paper.png\|the picture]] is currently orphaned. You want to move it to [[The Paper]]? Be my guest. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 20:13, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

The Knights Who Say Ni: has the picture become orphaned?

The Knights Who Say Ni — Mon, 02 May 2011 17:46:12 GMT

has the picture become orphaned?

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:46, 2 May 2011
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::Yes, definitely '''delete'''. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 23:44, 21 August 2010 (UTC)		::Yes, definitely '''delete'''. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 23:44, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
	Maybe we could just put this page on an [[other the papers]] page? --[[Special:Contributions/206.116.143.157\|206.116.143.157]] 01:12, 2 May 2011 (UTC)		Maybe we could just put this page on an [[other the papers]] page? --[[Special:Contributions/206.116.143.157\|206.116.143.157]] 01:12, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
		+	==The picture==
		+	There was a picture of the Constitution Paper on this page. Has it become an orphaned picture? If so, is there room for it on [[The Paper]], since according to previous talk posts, the topic is sufficiently covered there? {{User:The Knights Who Say Ni/sig}} 17:46, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Jay: It was a poor name for it anyway

Jay — Mon, 02 May 2011 09:31:00 GMT

It was a poor name for it anyway

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:31, 2 May 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	{{~~ttbd~~}}	+	{{deletedtalk}}

	I think this is already fairly well covered on [[The Paper]]. If we decide we do need this, it needs a better name. This paper isn't crumpled, it's just old because it's parchment. (When I first saw this page, I thought it was going to be the Paper from [[more armies]].) {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 15:28, 9 July 2010 (UTC)		I think this is already fairly well covered on [[The Paper]]. If we decide we do need this, it needs a better name. This paper isn't crumpled, it's just old because it's parchment. (When I first saw this page, I thought it was going to be the Paper from [[more armies]].) {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 15:28, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

206.116.143.157 at 01:12, 2 May 2011

206.116.143.157 — Mon, 02 May 2011 01:12:25 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:12, 2 May 2011
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:I agree that this should not have its own page. It is well enough covered on [[The Paper]], and there is nothing more to say about it. Maybe the picture could be included in the article.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 23:36, 9 July 2010 (UTC)		:I agree that this should not have its own page. It is well enough covered on [[The Paper]], and there is nothing more to say about it. Maybe the picture could be included in the article.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 23:36, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
	::Yes, definitely '''delete'''. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 23:44, 21 August 2010 (UTC)		::Yes, definitely '''delete'''. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 23:44, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
		+	Maybe we could just put this page on an [[other the papers]] page? --[[Special:Contributions/206.116.143.157\|206.116.143.157]] 01:12, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

RickTommy at 23:44, 21 August 2010

RickTommy — Sat, 21 Aug 2010 23:44:14 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:44, 21 August 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	I think this is already fairly well covered on [[The Paper]]. If we decide we do need this, it needs a better name. This paper isn't crumpled, it's just old because it's parchment. (When I first saw this page, I thought it was going to be the Paper from [[more armies]].) {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 15:28, 9 July 2010 (UTC)		I think this is already fairly well covered on [[The Paper]]. If we decide we do need this, it needs a better name. This paper isn't crumpled, it's just old because it's parchment. (When I first saw this page, I thought it was going to be the Paper from [[more armies]].) {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 15:28, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
	:I agree that this should not have its own page. It is well enough covered on [[The Paper]], and there is nothing more to say about it. Maybe the picture could be included in the article.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 23:36, 9 July 2010 (UTC)		:I agree that this should not have its own page. It is well enough covered on [[The Paper]], and there is nothing more to say about it. Maybe the picture could be included in the article.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 23:36, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
-	::Yes, definitely '''delete'''.	+	::Yes, definitely '''delete'''. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 23:44, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

RickTommy at 23:44, 21 August 2010

RickTommy — Sat, 21 Aug 2010 23:44:08 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:44, 21 August 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	I think this is already fairly well covered on [[The Paper]]. If we decide we do need this, it needs a better name. This paper isn't crumpled, it's just old because it's parchment. (When I first saw this page, I thought it was going to be the Paper from [[more armies]].) {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 15:28, 9 July 2010 (UTC)		I think this is already fairly well covered on [[The Paper]]. If we decide we do need this, it needs a better name. This paper isn't crumpled, it's just old because it's parchment. (When I first saw this page, I thought it was going to be the Paper from [[more armies]].) {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 15:28, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
	:I agree that this should not have its own page. It is well enough covered on [[The Paper]], and there is nothing more to say about it. Maybe the picture could be included in the article.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 23:36, 9 July 2010 (UTC)		:I agree that this should not have its own page. It is well enough covered on [[The Paper]], and there is nothing more to say about it. Maybe the picture could be included in the article.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 23:36, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
		+	::Yes, definitely '''delete'''.

Loafing: delteat

Loafing — Fri, 09 Jul 2010 23:36:03 GMT

delteat

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:36, 9 July 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I think this is already fairly well covered on [[The Paper]]. If we decide we do need this, it needs a better name. This paper isn't crumpled, it's just old because it's parchment. (When I first saw this page, I thought it was going to be the Paper from [[more armies]].) {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 15:28, 9 July 2010 (UTC)		I think this is already fairly well covered on [[The Paper]]. If we decide we do need this, it needs a better name. This paper isn't crumpled, it's just old because it's parchment. (When I first saw this page, I thought it was going to be the Paper from [[more armies]].) {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 15:28, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
		+	:I agree that this should not have its own page. It is well enough covered on [[The Paper]], and there is nothing more to say about it. Maybe the picture could be included in the article.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 23:36, 9 July 2010 (UTC)