Talk:DNA Evidence - Revision history

The Cheatbot: autoreplace: The Secrets That I Keep → Strong Sad's Secret Styles

The Cheatbot — Wed, 02 Nov 2022 04:28:46 GMT

autoreplace: The Secrets That I Keep → Strong Sad's Secret Styles

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:28, 2 November 2022
Line 336:		Line 336:

	== Why'd he do it? ==		== Why'd he do it? ==
-	Why'd Strong Sad take the DNA evidence? There's gotta be ''some'' reason! Also, why didn't we see the DNA evidence before in [[The Secrets That I Keep]]? Anybody got info?	+	Why'd Strong Sad take the DNA evidence? There's gotta be ''some'' reason! Also, why didn't we see the DNA evidence before in [[Strong Sad's Secret Styles\|The Secrets That I Keep]]? Anybody got info?
	:That would be speculation, my siggieless comrade. Perhaps TBC will reveal this later, but for now we have to be content in not knowing. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 23:41, 24 May 2007 (UTC)		:That would be speculation, my siggieless comrade. Perhaps TBC will reveal this later, but for now we have to be content in not knowing. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 23:41, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Stux: featured

Stux — Sun, 12 Dec 2010 16:27:08 GMT

featured

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:27, 12 December 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	{{featuredarticle}}
	== Article name ==		== Article name ==

Shine Sprite: /* Color Flavored Foods */ Yes.

Shine Sprite — Mon, 29 Mar 2010 15:35:24 GMT

Color Flavored Foods: Yes.

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:35, 29 March 2010
Line 398:		Line 398:

	Aren't the snow cones another case of color-flavored foods?		Aren't the snow cones another case of color-flavored foods?
		+	:[[Color flavored\|They sure are]]. {{User:Shine Sprite/sig}} 15:35, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

68.44.194.81: another running gag, perhaps?

68.44.194.81 — Mon, 29 Mar 2010 04:48:13 GMT

another running gag, perhaps?

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:48, 29 March 2010
Line 394:		Line 394:

	Has anyone noticed that if you stop the frame as it's zooming in on Strong Bad's dirty boots you can clearly see that he still hass boots on? Is this significant?[[Special:Contributions/69.227.209.165\|69.227.209.165]] 23:04, 24 February 2009 (UTC)		Has anyone noticed that if you stop the frame as it's zooming in on Strong Bad's dirty boots you can clearly see that he still hass boots on? Is this significant?[[Special:Contributions/69.227.209.165\|69.227.209.165]] 23:04, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Color Flavored Foods ==
		+
		+	Aren't the snow cones another case of color-flavored foods?

Defender1031: STUFF doesn't exist anymore, and the rest of this is pure gibberish

Defender1031 — Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:02:01 GMT

STUFF doesn't exist anymore, and the rest of this is pure gibberish

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:02, 29 September 2009
Line 193:		Line 193:
	:Twice, actually, but it's just a coincidence. [[User:Hagurumon\|Hagurumon]] 14:42, 16 May 2007 (UTC)		:Twice, actually, but it's just a coincidence. [[User:Hagurumon\|Hagurumon]] 14:42, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
	::Let's not forget [[fingers]] and [[retirement]]. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 18:16, 16 May 2007 (UTC)		::Let's not forget [[fingers]] and [[retirement]]. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 18:16, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
-	~~STUFF'D--near going loco - and crushing those eggs [[Image:hrwikiegg.jpg\|hrwikiegg.jpg]] NOT ELVIS just sinderboard and plaster 18:12, 29 September 2009 (UTC)~~

	==Clue==		==Clue==

Sinderboard and plaster: /* Previously.... */

Sinderboard and plaster — Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:12:39 GMT

Previously....

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:12, 29 September 2009
Line 193:		Line 193:
	:Twice, actually, but it's just a coincidence. [[User:Hagurumon\|Hagurumon]] 14:42, 16 May 2007 (UTC)		:Twice, actually, but it's just a coincidence. [[User:Hagurumon\|Hagurumon]] 14:42, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
	::Let's not forget [[fingers]] and [[retirement]]. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 18:16, 16 May 2007 (UTC)		::Let's not forget [[fingers]] and [[retirement]]. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 18:16, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
		+	STUFF'D--near going loco - and crushing those eggs [[Image:hrwikiegg.jpg\|hrwikiegg.jpg]] NOT ELVIS just sinderboard and plaster 18:12, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

	==Clue==		==Clue==

69.227.209.165: .

69.227.209.165 — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 23:04:42 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:04, 24 February 2009
Line 390:		Line 390:
	The email "underlings" came ''before'' DNA Evidence, but ''after'' rough copy. The email "underlings" didn't mention DNA evidence. Why would they skip an email? --Homestar tiger (HRFWiki)		The email "underlings" came ''before'' DNA Evidence, but ''after'' rough copy. The email "underlings" didn't mention DNA evidence. Why would they skip an email? --Homestar tiger (HRFWiki)
	:I think any ideas presented would be pure speculation. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 21:20, 12 October 2008 (UTC)		:I think any ideas presented would be pure speculation. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 21:20, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Strong Bad's boots ==
		+
		+	Has anyone noticed that if you stop the frame as it's zooming in on Strong Bad's dirty boots you can clearly see that he still hass boots on? Is this significant?[[Special:Contributions/69.227.209.165\|69.227.209.165]] 23:04, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Defender1031: /* underlings doesn't have DNA */ reply

Defender1031 — Sun, 12 Oct 2008 21:20:18 GMT

underlings doesn't have DNA: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:20, 12 October 2008
Line 389:		Line 389:

	The email "underlings" came ''before'' DNA Evidence, but ''after'' rough copy. The email "underlings" didn't mention DNA evidence. Why would they skip an email? --Homestar tiger (HRFWiki)		The email "underlings" came ''before'' DNA Evidence, but ''after'' rough copy. The email "underlings" didn't mention DNA evidence. Why would they skip an email? --Homestar tiger (HRFWiki)
		+	:I think any ideas presented would be pure speculation. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 21:20, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

65.184.150.101: /**/underlings doesn't have DNA

65.184.150.101 — Sun, 12 Oct 2008 21:17:59 GMT

: underlings doesn't have DNA

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:17, 12 October 2008
Line 385:		Line 385:
	I swear I hear Homestar say Dwai Dwah (Dry Dwah). It would make sense that Homestar would spit out the normally sweet Mountain Dew if it has no sugar taste to it. Though I do get the joke of Dwah Dwah. I do still hear it as Dry Dwah though (obviously with his lack of Rs). - walker		I swear I hear Homestar say Dwai Dwah (Dry Dwah). It would make sense that Homestar would spit out the normally sweet Mountain Dew if it has no sugar taste to it. Though I do get the joke of Dwah Dwah. I do still hear it as Dry Dwah though (obviously with his lack of Rs). - walker
	:Nope, definitely a [[whatsit\|doo]] [[crap\|doo]] joke... {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 03:22, 17 June 2008 (UTC)		:Nope, definitely a [[whatsit\|doo]] [[crap\|doo]] joke... {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 03:22, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	== underlings doesn't have DNA ==
		+
		+	The email "underlings" came ''before'' DNA Evidence, but ''after'' rough copy. The email "underlings" didn't mention DNA evidence. Why would they skip an email? --Homestar tiger (HRFWiki)

Defender1031: /* Dwah-Dwah or Dry-Dwah? / that'll teach me puts a {{showpreview}} on his own page*

Defender1031 — Tue, 17 Jun 2008 03:22:52 GMT

Dwah-Dwah or Dry-Dwah?: that'll teach me *puts a {{showpreview}} on his own page*

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:22, 17 June 2008
Line 384:		Line 384:

	I swear I hear Homestar say Dwai Dwah (Dry Dwah). It would make sense that Homestar would spit out the normally sweet Mountain Dew if it has no sugar taste to it. Though I do get the joke of Dwah Dwah. I do still hear it as Dry Dwah though (obviously with his lack of Rs). - walker		I swear I hear Homestar say Dwai Dwah (Dry Dwah). It would make sense that Homestar would spit out the normally sweet Mountain Dew if it has no sugar taste to it. Though I do get the joke of Dwah Dwah. I do still hear it as Dry Dwah though (obviously with his lack of Rs). - walker
-	:Nope, definitely a [[~~whastit~~\|doo]] [[crap\|doo]] joke... {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 03:22, 17 June 2008 (UTC)	+	:Nope, definitely a [[whatsit\|doo]] [[crap\|doo]] joke... {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 03:22, 17 June 2008 (UTC)