Talk:Dangeresque (character) - Revision history

Catjaz63: /* Danger-Like */ blurp

Catjaz63 — Tue, 19 Apr 2016 20:40:22 GMT

Danger-Like: blurp

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:40, 19 April 2016
Line 15:		Line 15:
	I'm just the king of bringing up minor issues on years-abandoned talk pages, aren't I? So I looked at the history of this page, and it looks like a while ago, [[User:StarFox\|StarFox]] added the fun fact that "Dangeresque" literally means "danger-like". [[User:DeFender1031\|DeFender1031]] removed it on the grounds that "HRWiki is not a dictionary". While I agree with this, and I don't think every word should be defined on our illustrious wiki, I would argue that this is actually a valid fun fact, if maybe worded a little different. I doubt that everyone knows that "-esque" means "-like", and I personally think it's a little bit funny that Dangeresque has this cool-sounding name that actually makes no sense. How's about you's? {{User:SRMX12/sig}} 20:47, 18 April 2016 (UTC)		I'm just the king of bringing up minor issues on years-abandoned talk pages, aren't I? So I looked at the history of this page, and it looks like a while ago, [[User:StarFox\|StarFox]] added the fun fact that "Dangeresque" literally means "danger-like". [[User:DeFender1031\|DeFender1031]] removed it on the grounds that "HRWiki is not a dictionary". While I agree with this, and I don't think every word should be defined on our illustrious wiki, I would argue that this is actually a valid fun fact, if maybe worded a little different. I doubt that everyone knows that "-esque" means "-like", and I personally think it's a little bit funny that Dangeresque has this cool-sounding name that actually makes no sense. How's about you's? {{User:SRMX12/sig}} 20:47, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
	:I agree with this one. It's totally a fun-fact and should be included. {{User:The thing/sig}} 20:49, 18 April 2016 (UTC)		:I agree with this one. It's totally a fun-fact and should be included. {{User:The thing/sig}} 20:49, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
		+	::I feel that this may be on the verge of explaining the joke because Dangeresque always says "sounds... dangeresque", which could be a joke that Strong Bad is trying to sound cool but instead sounds redundant by saying that things aren't dangerous, just danger-like. Plus, isn't it a bit obvious already? - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 20:40, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

The thing: /* Danger-Like */

The thing — Mon, 18 Apr 2016 20:49:42 GMT

Danger-Like

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:49, 18 April 2016
Line 14:		Line 14:

	I'm just the king of bringing up minor issues on years-abandoned talk pages, aren't I? So I looked at the history of this page, and it looks like a while ago, [[User:StarFox\|StarFox]] added the fun fact that "Dangeresque" literally means "danger-like". [[User:DeFender1031\|DeFender1031]] removed it on the grounds that "HRWiki is not a dictionary". While I agree with this, and I don't think every word should be defined on our illustrious wiki, I would argue that this is actually a valid fun fact, if maybe worded a little different. I doubt that everyone knows that "-esque" means "-like", and I personally think it's a little bit funny that Dangeresque has this cool-sounding name that actually makes no sense. How's about you's? {{User:SRMX12/sig}} 20:47, 18 April 2016 (UTC)		I'm just the king of bringing up minor issues on years-abandoned talk pages, aren't I? So I looked at the history of this page, and it looks like a while ago, [[User:StarFox\|StarFox]] added the fun fact that "Dangeresque" literally means "danger-like". [[User:DeFender1031\|DeFender1031]] removed it on the grounds that "HRWiki is not a dictionary". While I agree with this, and I don't think every word should be defined on our illustrious wiki, I would argue that this is actually a valid fun fact, if maybe worded a little different. I doubt that everyone knows that "-esque" means "-like", and I personally think it's a little bit funny that Dangeresque has this cool-sounding name that actually makes no sense. How's about you's? {{User:SRMX12/sig}} 20:47, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
		+	:I agree with this one. It's totally a fun-fact and should be included. {{User:The thing/sig}} 20:49, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Lira: /**/Danger-Like

Lira — Mon, 18 Apr 2016 20:47:17 GMT

: Danger-Like

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:47, 18 April 2016
Line 10:		Line 10:
	Although I can understand the style of this article, Someone looking here to find out about Dangeresque for the first time would undoubtedly be perplexed. I'm thinking rewrite. {{User:The President/sig}} 15:38, 1 June 2007 (UTC)		Although I can understand the style of this article, Someone looking here to find out about Dangeresque for the first time would undoubtedly be perplexed. I'm thinking rewrite. {{User:The President/sig}} 15:38, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
	:You can add to it if you want to clarify (perhaps in a separate paragraph), but please don't remove any of the inside jokes already present in the article. They give it an interesting flair. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 02:03, 4 June 2007 (UTC)		:You can add to it if you want to clarify (perhaps in a separate paragraph), but please don't remove any of the inside jokes already present in the article. They give it an interesting flair. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 02:03, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Danger-Like ==
		+
		+	I'm just the king of bringing up minor issues on years-abandoned talk pages, aren't I? So I looked at the history of this page, and it looks like a while ago, [[User:StarFox\|StarFox]] added the fun fact that "Dangeresque" literally means "danger-like". [[User:DeFender1031\|DeFender1031]] removed it on the grounds that "HRWiki is not a dictionary". While I agree with this, and I don't think every word should be defined on our illustrious wiki, I would argue that this is actually a valid fun fact, if maybe worded a little different. I doubt that everyone knows that "-esque" means "-like", and I personally think it's a little bit funny that Dangeresque has this cool-sounding name that actually makes no sense. How's about you's? {{User:SRMX12/sig}} 20:47, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

That'sBupkis: This is now a featured article

That'sBupkis — Mon, 03 May 2010 00:05:11 GMT

This is now a featured article

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:05, 3 May 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	{{featuredarticle}}
	Was Dangeresque 1 ever a toon?		Was Dangeresque 1 ever a toon?
	: Dangeresque 1 appears in (oddly enough) [[dangeresque 3]]. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 03:22, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)		: Dangeresque 1 appears in (oddly enough) [[dangeresque 3]]. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 03:22, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

It's dot com: /* VERY Informal. */ reply

It's dot com — Mon, 04 Jun 2007 02:03:15 GMT

VERY Informal.: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:03, 4 June 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:
	== VERY Informal. ==		== VERY Informal. ==
	Although I can understand the style of this article, Someone looking here to find out about Dangeresque for the first time would undoubtedly be perplexed. I'm thinking rewrite. {{User:The President/sig}} 15:38, 1 June 2007 (UTC)		Although I can understand the style of this article, Someone looking here to find out about Dangeresque for the first time would undoubtedly be perplexed. I'm thinking rewrite. {{User:The President/sig}} 15:38, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
		+	:You can add to it if you want to clarify (perhaps in a separate paragraph), but please don't remove any of the inside jokes already present in the article. They give it an interesting flair. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 02:03, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

The President: rewrite this article?

The President — Fri, 01 Jun 2007 15:38:32 GMT

rewrite this article?

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:38, 1 June 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:

	Those glasses look like aviator's glasses. Am I right?-[[User:LordQuackingstick\|LordQuackingstick]] 16:35, 6 January 2007 (UTC)		Those glasses look like aviator's glasses. Am I right?-[[User:LordQuackingstick\|LordQuackingstick]] 16:35, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	== VERY Informal. ==
		+	Although I can understand the style of this article, Someone looking here to find out about Dangeresque for the first time would undoubtedly be perplexed. I'm thinking rewrite. {{User:The President/sig}} 15:38, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

LordQuackingstick: /**/Aviator's Shades?

LordQuackingstick — Sat, 06 Jan 2007 16:35:04 GMT

: Aviator's Shades?

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:35, 6 January 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Was Dangeresque 1 ever a toon?		Was Dangeresque 1 ever a toon?
	: Dangeresque 1 appears in (oddly enough) [[dangeresque 3]]. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 03:22, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)		: Dangeresque 1 appears in (oddly enough) [[dangeresque 3]]. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 03:22, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Aviator's Shades? ==
		+
		+	Those glasses look like aviator's glasses. Am I right?-[[User:LordQuackingstick\|LordQuackingstick]] 16:35, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Jay at 03:22, 20 June 2005

Jay — Mon, 20 Jun 2005 03:22:46 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:22, 20 June 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Was Dangeresque 1 ever a toon?		Was Dangeresque 1 ever a toon?
		+	: Dangeresque 1 appears in (oddly enough) [[dangeresque 3]]. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 03:22, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

68.1.140.209 at 03:20, 20 June 2005

68.1.140.209 — Mon, 20 Jun 2005 03:20:46 GMT

New page

Was Dangeresque 1 ever a toon?