Talk:Diggity - Revision history

Heimstern Läufer: change to deletedtalk

Heimstern Läufer — Wed, 21 Jan 2009 02:26:46 GMT

change to deletedtalk

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:26, 21 January 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	{{~~tbd~~}}	+	{{deletedtalk}}
	==To be diggity-deleted==		==To be diggity-deleted==
	I can maybe accept the page itself - though that's debatable. But that "Blackstreet" ref has gotta go. It's too general a... word?... to pin down to them specifically. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:26, 16 October 2008 (UTC)		I can maybe accept the page itself - though that's debatable. But that "Blackstreet" ref has gotta go. It's too general a... word?... to pin down to them specifically. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:26, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Guard Duck: /* To be diggity-deleted */ delete

Guard Duck — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 06:38:15 GMT

To be diggity-deleted: delete

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:38, 10 January 2009
Line 9:		Line 9:
	::::::I'd have to say I'm on the '''keep''' side of the fence for this one. It also feels like there have been more instances of this than what we have currently listed, but maybe not spelled the same way.. I dunno. Anyway, I wouldn't be crushed to see it go, but I kinda like this article. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 02:36, 17 October 2008 (UTC)		::::::I'd have to say I'm on the '''keep''' side of the fence for this one. It also feels like there have been more instances of this than what we have currently listed, but maybe not spelled the same way.. I dunno. Anyway, I wouldn't be crushed to see it go, but I kinda like this article. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 02:36, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
	:::::::'''Get this weak mess outta here!''' [[User:Record307]]		:::::::'''Get this weak mess outta here!''' [[User:Record307]]
		+	::::::::If you count the word "digga," then I can think of at least one more example, the email [[Car]]. Still though, I don't think a word this common in the English language now really deserves a page. '''Delete.''' {{User:GuardDuck/sig}} 06:38, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Record307: /* To be diggity-deleted */

Record307 — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 03:25:18 GMT

To be diggity-deleted

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:25, 10 January 2009
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:::::It's gotta go. Not noteworthy, I'm with DeFender on this one. '''BALLETED!''' No, '''DELTETED!''' um... '''Del Taco??''' {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 02:14, 17 October 2008 (UTC)		:::::It's gotta go. Not noteworthy, I'm with DeFender on this one. '''BALLETED!''' No, '''DELTETED!''' um... '''Del Taco??''' {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 02:14, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
	::::::I'd have to say I'm on the '''keep''' side of the fence for this one. It also feels like there have been more instances of this than what we have currently listed, but maybe not spelled the same way.. I dunno. Anyway, I wouldn't be crushed to see it go, but I kinda like this article. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 02:36, 17 October 2008 (UTC)		::::::I'd have to say I'm on the '''keep''' side of the fence for this one. It also feels like there have been more instances of this than what we have currently listed, but maybe not spelled the same way.. I dunno. Anyway, I wouldn't be crushed to see it go, but I kinda like this article. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 02:36, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
		+	:::::::'''Get this weak mess outta here!''' [[User:Record307]]

OptimisticFool: That's some weird indenting.. anyway, I kinda like this article.

OptimisticFool — Fri, 17 Oct 2008 02:36:40 GMT

That's some weird indenting.. anyway, I kinda like this article.

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:36, 17 October 2008
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::I just noticed that the Wikipedia article for "Hot Diggity (Dog Ziggity Boom)" does claim that: "The song was the source of the phrase, "hot diggity dog!", an expression of great delight which was popular in the 1950s and 1960s." So maybe that should be in the article. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 19:33, 16 October 2008 (UTC)		::I just noticed that the Wikipedia article for "Hot Diggity (Dog Ziggity Boom)" does claim that: "The song was the source of the phrase, "hot diggity dog!", an expression of great delight which was popular in the 1950s and 1960s." So maybe that should be in the article. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 19:33, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
	:::I'm all for deleting this page. when i linked to instances of the word in my [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=50_emails&diff=597479&oldid=597474&rcid=555787 revert summary] it wasn't with the intention that this page be created. There's nothing remarkable about its use, nor anything tying the instances together. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 19:35, 16 October 2008 (UTC)		:::I'm all for deleting this page. when i linked to instances of the word in my [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=50_emails&diff=597479&oldid=597474&rcid=555787 revert summary] it wasn't with the intention that this page be created. There's nothing remarkable about its use, nor anything tying the instances together. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 19:35, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
-	::::::It's an unusual word, is all. [[User:StarFox\|StarFox]] 23:36, 16 October 2008 (UTC)	+	::::It's an unusual word, is all. [[User:StarFox\|StarFox]] 23:36, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
-	:::::::It's gotta go. Not noteworthy, I'm with DeFender on this one. '''BALLETED!''' No, '''DELTETED!''' um... '''Del Taco??''' {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 02:14, 17 October 2008 (UTC)	+	:::::It's gotta go. Not noteworthy, I'm with DeFender on this one. '''BALLETED!''' No, '''DELTETED!''' um... '''Del Taco??''' {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 02:14, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
		+	::::::I'd have to say I'm on the '''keep''' side of the fence for this one. It also feels like there have been more instances of this than what we have currently listed, but maybe not spelled the same way.. I dunno. Anyway, I wouldn't be crushed to see it go, but I kinda like this article. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 02:36, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

MichaelXX2: /* To be diggity-deleted */ reply to all uh dang yalls

MichaelXX2 — Fri, 17 Oct 2008 02:14:13 GMT

To be diggity-deleted: reply to all uh dang yalls

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:14, 17 October 2008
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:::I'm all for deleting this page. when i linked to instances of the word in my [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=50_emails&diff=597479&oldid=597474&rcid=555787 revert summary] it wasn't with the intention that this page be created. There's nothing remarkable about its use, nor anything tying the instances together. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 19:35, 16 October 2008 (UTC)		:::I'm all for deleting this page. when i linked to instances of the word in my [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=50_emails&diff=597479&oldid=597474&rcid=555787 revert summary] it wasn't with the intention that this page be created. There's nothing remarkable about its use, nor anything tying the instances together. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 19:35, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
	::::::It's an unusual word, is all. [[User:StarFox\|StarFox]] 23:36, 16 October 2008 (UTC)		::::::It's an unusual word, is all. [[User:StarFox\|StarFox]] 23:36, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
		+	:::::::It's gotta go. Not noteworthy, I'm with DeFender on this one. '''BALLETED!''' No, '''DELTETED!''' um... '''Del Taco??''' {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 02:14, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

StarFox: /* To be diggity-deleted */

StarFox — Thu, 16 Oct 2008 23:36:25 GMT

To be diggity-deleted

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:36, 16 October 2008
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::I just noticed that the Wikipedia article for "Hot Diggity (Dog Ziggity Boom)" does claim that: "The song was the source of the phrase, "hot diggity dog!", an expression of great delight which was popular in the 1950s and 1960s." So maybe that should be in the article. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 19:33, 16 October 2008 (UTC)		::I just noticed that the Wikipedia article for "Hot Diggity (Dog Ziggity Boom)" does claim that: "The song was the source of the phrase, "hot diggity dog!", an expression of great delight which was popular in the 1950s and 1960s." So maybe that should be in the article. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 19:33, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
	:::I'm all for deleting this page. when i linked to instances of the word in my [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=50_emails&diff=597479&oldid=597474&rcid=555787 revert summary] it wasn't with the intention that this page be created. There's nothing remarkable about its use, nor anything tying the instances together. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 19:35, 16 October 2008 (UTC)		:::I'm all for deleting this page. when i linked to instances of the word in my [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=50_emails&diff=597479&oldid=597474&rcid=555787 revert summary] it wasn't with the intention that this page be created. There's nothing remarkable about its use, nor anything tying the instances together. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 19:35, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
-	::::::It's an unusual ~~phrase~~, is all. [[User:StarFox\|StarFox]] 23:36, 16 October 2008 (UTC)	+	::::::It's an unusual word, is all. [[User:StarFox\|StarFox]] 23:36, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

StarFox: /* To be diggity-deleted */

StarFox — Thu, 16 Oct 2008 23:36:15 GMT

To be diggity-deleted

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:36, 16 October 2008
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::I just noticed that the Wikipedia article for "Hot Diggity (Dog Ziggity Boom)" does claim that: "The song was the source of the phrase, "hot diggity dog!", an expression of great delight which was popular in the 1950s and 1960s." So maybe that should be in the article. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 19:33, 16 October 2008 (UTC)		::I just noticed that the Wikipedia article for "Hot Diggity (Dog Ziggity Boom)" does claim that: "The song was the source of the phrase, "hot diggity dog!", an expression of great delight which was popular in the 1950s and 1960s." So maybe that should be in the article. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 19:33, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
	:::I'm all for deleting this page. when i linked to instances of the word in my [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=50_emails&diff=597479&oldid=597474&rcid=555787 revert summary] it wasn't with the intention that this page be created. There's nothing remarkable about its use, nor anything tying the instances together. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 19:35, 16 October 2008 (UTC)		:::I'm all for deleting this page. when i linked to instances of the word in my [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=50_emails&diff=597479&oldid=597474&rcid=555787 revert summary] it wasn't with the intention that this page be created. There's nothing remarkable about its use, nor anything tying the instances together. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 19:35, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
		+	::::::It's an unusual phrase, is all. [[User:StarFox\|StarFox]] 23:36, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Defender1031: fix

Defender1031 — Thu, 16 Oct 2008 19:39:03 GMT

fix

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:39, 16 October 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	{{{tbd}}	+	{{tbd}}
	==To be diggity-deleted==		==To be diggity-deleted==
	I can maybe accept the page itself - though that's debatable. But that "Blackstreet" ref has gotta go. It's too general a... word?... to pin down to them specifically. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:26, 16 October 2008 (UTC)		I can maybe accept the page itself - though that's debatable. But that "Blackstreet" ref has gotta go. It's too general a... word?... to pin down to them specifically. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:26, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Defender1031: tbd and opinion

Defender1031 — Thu, 16 Oct 2008 19:35:54 GMT

tbd and opinion

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:35, 16 October 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	{{{tbd}}
	==To be diggity-deleted==		==To be diggity-deleted==
	I can maybe accept the page itself - though that's debatable. But that "Blackstreet" ref has gotta go. It's too general a... word?... to pin down to them specifically. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:26, 16 October 2008 (UTC)		I can maybe accept the page itself - though that's debatable. But that "Blackstreet" ref has gotta go. It's too general a... word?... to pin down to them specifically. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:26, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
	:A quick search reveals that a song called [[Wikipedia:Hot Diggity (Dog Ziggity Boom)\|Hot Diggity (Dog Ziggity Boom)]] was published in 1956. <s>I doubt that's the earliest "diggity" but the point is that</s> It's laughable to think the word originated with a 1996 song. I'm killing the supposed reference to "No Diggity". {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 19:30, 16 October 2008 (UTC)		:A quick search reveals that a song called [[Wikipedia:Hot Diggity (Dog Ziggity Boom)\|Hot Diggity (Dog Ziggity Boom)]] was published in 1956. <s>I doubt that's the earliest "diggity" but the point is that</s> It's laughable to think the word originated with a 1996 song. I'm killing the supposed reference to "No Diggity". {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 19:30, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
	::I just noticed that the Wikipedia article for "Hot Diggity (Dog Ziggity Boom)" does claim that: "The song was the source of the phrase, "hot diggity dog!", an expression of great delight which was popular in the 1950s and 1960s." So maybe that should be in the article. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 19:33, 16 October 2008 (UTC)		::I just noticed that the Wikipedia article for "Hot Diggity (Dog Ziggity Boom)" does claim that: "The song was the source of the phrase, "hot diggity dog!", an expression of great delight which was popular in the 1950s and 1960s." So maybe that should be in the article. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 19:33, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
		+	:::I'm all for deleting this page. when i linked to instances of the word in my [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=50_emails&diff=597479&oldid=597474&rcid=555787 revert summary] it wasn't with the intention that this page be created. There's nothing remarkable about its use, nor anything tying the instances together. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 19:35, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

OptimisticFool: Oh...

OptimisticFool — Thu, 16 Oct 2008 19:33:37 GMT

Oh...

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:33, 16 October 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==To be diggity-deleted==		==To be diggity-deleted==
	I can maybe accept the page itself - though that's debatable. But that "Blackstreet" ref has gotta go. It's too general a... word?... to pin down to them specifically. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:26, 16 October 2008 (UTC)		I can maybe accept the page itself - though that's debatable. But that "Blackstreet" ref has gotta go. It's too general a... word?... to pin down to them specifically. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 19:26, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
-	:A quick search reveals that a song called [[Wikipedia:Hot Diggity (Dog Ziggity Boom)\|Hot Diggity (Dog Ziggity Boom)]] was published in 1956. I doubt that's the earliest "diggity" but the point is that it's laughable to think the word originated with a 1996 song. I'm killing the supposed reference to "No Diggity". {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 19:30, 16 October 2008 (UTC)	+	:A quick search reveals that a song called [[Wikipedia:Hot Diggity (Dog Ziggity Boom)\|Hot Diggity (Dog Ziggity Boom)]] was published in 1956. <s>I doubt that's the earliest "diggity" but the point is that</s> It's laughable to think the word originated with a 1996 song. I'm killing the supposed reference to "No Diggity". {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 19:30, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
		+	::I just noticed that the Wikipedia article for "Hot Diggity (Dog Ziggity Boom)" does claim that: "The song was the source of the phrase, "hot diggity dog!", an expression of great delight which was popular in the 1950s and 1960s." So maybe that should be in the article. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 19:33, 16 October 2008 (UTC)