Talk:Email Processing Room - Revision history

Trey56: /**/Dumpy USA & Adam's Blog

Trey56 — Fri, 16 May 2008 15:42:39 GMT

: Dumpy USA & Adam's Blog

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:42, 16 May 2008
Line 54:		Line 54:
	:I agree, it stands out too well to be an accident. But the part with Strong Bad floating off the stool is very odd, and I thought it was notable. But now that you mention it, it could have been intended. — {{User:SamFisher1022/sig}} 23:19, 9 February 2008 (UTC)		:I agree, it stands out too well to be an accident. But the part with Strong Bad floating off the stool is very odd, and I thought it was notable. But now that you mention it, it could have been intended. — {{User:SamFisher1022/sig}} 23:19, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
	::I agree. It's just a stylized silhouette, not a goof.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 23:30, 9 February 2008 (UTC)		::I agree. It's just a stylized silhouette, not a goof.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 23:30, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Dumpy USA & Adam's Blog ==
		+
		+	In {{p\|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Email_Processing_Room&diff=prev&oldid=563807 this edit}}, some links were removed and the paragraph was reworded; this edit was later {{p\|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Email_Processing_Room&diff=next&oldid=563807 reverted}}. However, those links are now broken; I guess those sites have been taken down.
		+
		+	I don't feel like doing the work to sort through how this section should be fixed, so I'll let somebody else do it. I just wanted to bring it to people's attention. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 15:42, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Loafing: /* Floating "goof" */ not a goof

Loafing — Sat, 09 Feb 2008 23:30:52 GMT

Floating "goof": not a goof

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:30, 9 February 2008
Line 53:		Line 53:
	I'd propose the "goof" about Strong Bad and his computer floating is not a goof at all, but intentional. As he and his table are in sillhouette, the white space allows the shapes to be more easily recognized. As this has been there a while, I presume, I'll await others' opinions before removing it. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 23:10, 9 February 2008 (UTC)		I'd propose the "goof" about Strong Bad and his computer floating is not a goof at all, but intentional. As he and his table are in sillhouette, the white space allows the shapes to be more easily recognized. As this has been there a while, I presume, I'll await others' opinions before removing it. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 23:10, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
	:I agree, it stands out too well to be an accident. But the part with Strong Bad floating off the stool is very odd, and I thought it was notable. But now that you mention it, it could have been intended. — {{User:SamFisher1022/sig}} 23:19, 9 February 2008 (UTC)		:I agree, it stands out too well to be an accident. But the part with Strong Bad floating off the stool is very odd, and I thought it was notable. But now that you mention it, it could have been intended. — {{User:SamFisher1022/sig}} 23:19, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
		+	::I agree. It's just a stylized silhouette, not a goof.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 23:30, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

SamFisher1022: /* Floating "goof" */ probably intended

SamFisher1022 — Sat, 09 Feb 2008 23:19:00 GMT

Floating "goof": probably intended

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:19, 9 February 2008
Line 52:		Line 52:

	I'd propose the "goof" about Strong Bad and his computer floating is not a goof at all, but intentional. As he and his table are in sillhouette, the white space allows the shapes to be more easily recognized. As this has been there a while, I presume, I'll await others' opinions before removing it. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 23:10, 9 February 2008 (UTC)		I'd propose the "goof" about Strong Bad and his computer floating is not a goof at all, but intentional. As he and his table are in sillhouette, the white space allows the shapes to be more easily recognized. As this has been there a while, I presume, I'll await others' opinions before removing it. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 23:10, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
		+	:I agree, it stands out too well to be an accident. But the part with Strong Bad floating off the stool is very odd, and I thought it was notable. But now that you mention it, it could have been intended. — {{User:SamFisher1022/sig}} 23:19, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Qermaq: /**/Floating "goof"

Qermaq — Sat, 09 Feb 2008 23:10:22 GMT

: Floating "goof"

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:10, 9 February 2008
Line 48:		Line 48:
	Lots of "you can" phrasing here. Other rewording seems important as well ("Strong Mad's right arm is ''messed up''"??). I ain't no good at rewording; marking page for cleanup. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 01:30, 24 December 2007 (UTC)		Lots of "you can" phrasing here. Other rewording seems important as well ("Strong Mad's right arm is ''messed up''"??). I ain't no good at rewording; marking page for cleanup. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 01:30, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
	:We also need to find out ''how'' to find this on the sbemail dvd since that dvd's article says nothing about the toon. [[User:Bad Bad Guy\|Bad Bad Guy]] 15:47, 24 December 2007 (UTC)		:We also need to find out ''how'' to find this on the sbemail dvd since that dvd's article says nothing about the toon. [[User:Bad Bad Guy\|Bad Bad Guy]] 15:47, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Floating "goof" ==
		+
		+	I'd propose the "goof" about Strong Bad and his computer floating is not a goof at all, but intentional. As he and his table are in sillhouette, the white space allows the shapes to be more easily recognized. As this has been there a while, I presume, I'll await others' opinions before removing it. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 23:10, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Bad Bad Guy: /* Cleanup */

Bad Bad Guy — Mon, 24 Dec 2007 15:47:52 GMT

Cleanup

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:47, 24 December 2007
Line 47:		Line 47:

	Lots of "you can" phrasing here. Other rewording seems important as well ("Strong Mad's right arm is ''messed up''"??). I ain't no good at rewording; marking page for cleanup. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 01:30, 24 December 2007 (UTC)		Lots of "you can" phrasing here. Other rewording seems important as well ("Strong Mad's right arm is ''messed up''"??). I ain't no good at rewording; marking page for cleanup. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 01:30, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
		+	:We also need to find out ''how'' to find this on the sbemail dvd since that dvd's article says nothing about the toon. [[User:Bad Bad Guy\|Bad Bad Guy]] 15:47, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

OptimisticFool: /**/Cleanup

OptimisticFool — Mon, 24 Dec 2007 01:30:33 GMT

: Cleanup

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:30, 24 December 2007
Line 43:		Line 43:
	--[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]]		--[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]]
	:try thinking about what notstrongorbad said before you add more things, we don't know that this is the E-mail answeing room anyway and we don't even know if this room realy exists.-[[User:Anonomys\|Anonomys]] 00:56, 21 October 2005 (UTC)		:try thinking about what notstrongorbad said before you add more things, we don't know that this is the E-mail answeing room anyway and we don't even know if this room realy exists.-[[User:Anonomys\|Anonomys]] 00:56, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Cleanup ==
		+
		+	Lots of "you can" phrasing here. Other rewording seems important as well ("Strong Mad's right arm is ''messed up''"??). I ain't no good at rewording; marking page for cleanup. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 01:30, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Anonomys: /* Errors/Inconsistencies */

Anonomys — Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:56:58 GMT

Errors/Inconsistencies

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:56, 21 October 2005
Line 42:		Line 42:
	4. The computer appears to be resting on a CPU, but no CPU was ever actually seen in normal emails. <br>		4. The computer appears to be resting on a CPU, but no CPU was ever actually seen in normal emails. <br>
	--[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]]		--[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]]
		+	:try thinking about what notstrongorbad said before you add more things, we don't know that this is the E-mail answeing room anyway and we don't even know if this room realy exists.-[[User:Anonomys\|Anonomys]] 00:56, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

Anonomys: /* Transcript */

Anonomys — Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:54:00 GMT

Transcript

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:54, 21 October 2005
Line 29:		Line 29:

	::Quite True. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 18:28, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)		::Quite True. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 18:28, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)
		+	:unless of course you count strong mad yelling and strong bad laughing.-[[User:Anonomys\|Anonomys]] 00:54, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

	== Errors/Inconsistencies ==		== Errors/Inconsistencies ==

DorianGray: /* Errors/Inconsistencies */ Adding one more, just because

DorianGray — Thu, 06 Oct 2005 02:49:44 GMT

Errors/Inconsistencies: Adding one more, just because

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:49, 6 October 2005
Line 38:		Line 38:
	::Yeah, I guess "fussy" is fair. But I think it's only appropriate we are; the editors of a print encyclopedia are too. (And a heck of a lot less open to input!) And I know sometimes it's hard to know whether to make changes directly to an article just to see them reverted or to suggest them in Talk as you've done, just to see them ignored. But if you go with the first scenario and its reverted, there's no real harm done, so don't feel you can't do so.<br>		::Yeah, I guess "fussy" is fair. But I think it's only appropriate we are; the editors of a print encyclopedia are too. (And a heck of a lot less open to input!) And I know sometimes it's hard to know whether to make changes directly to an article just to see them reverted or to suggest them in Talk as you've done, just to see them ignored. But if you go with the first scenario and its reverted, there's no real harm done, so don't feel you can't do so.<br>
	::     Anyway, thanks for pointing those out (I certainly hadn't noticed the rungs!). The only reason I wouldn't list them as errors is that this <i>whole</i> scene has little or no bearing on the Brothers Strong's real house. As far as we know, this room doesn't really exist, and we certainly know Strong Bad doesn't have a pneumatic tube delivering emails next to his computer. The whole thing could really be considered an Easter Egg, and they tend to carry less weight in terms of what's "real." --[[User:notstrongorbad\|notstrongorbad]] 02:43, 6 Oct 2005 (UTC)		::     Anyway, thanks for pointing those out (I certainly hadn't noticed the rungs!). The only reason I wouldn't list them as errors is that this <i>whole</i> scene has little or no bearing on the Brothers Strong's real house. As far as we know, this room doesn't really exist, and we certainly know Strong Bad doesn't have a pneumatic tube delivering emails next to his computer. The whole thing could really be considered an Easter Egg, and they tend to carry less weight in terms of what's "real." --[[User:notstrongorbad\|notstrongorbad]] 02:43, 6 Oct 2005 (UTC)
		+
		+	4. The computer appears to be resting on a CPU, but no CPU was ever actually seen in normal emails. <br>
		+	--[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]]

notstrongorbad: /* Errors/Inconsistencies */

notstrongorbad — Thu, 06 Oct 2005 02:44:07 GMT

Errors/Inconsistencies

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:44, 6 October 2005
Line 36:		Line 36:
	# Strong Bad's computer desk is in the middle of the room, not against the wall as in actual emails.		# Strong Bad's computer desk is in the middle of the room, not against the wall as in actual emails.
	# There are no cables protruding from the back of Strong Bad's computer.		# There are no cables protruding from the back of Strong Bad's computer.
-	:Yeah, I guess "fussy" is fair. But I think it's only appropriate we are; the editors of a print encyclopedia are too. (And a heck of a lot less open to input!) And I know sometimes it's hard to know whether to make changes directly to an article just to see them reverted or to suggest them in Talk as you've done, just to see them ignored. But if you go with the first scenario and its reverted, there's no real harm done, so don't feel you can't do so.<br>	+	::Yeah, I guess "fussy" is fair. But I think it's only appropriate we are; the editors of a print encyclopedia are too. (And a heck of a lot less open to input!) And I know sometimes it's hard to know whether to make changes directly to an article just to see them reverted or to suggest them in Talk as you've done, just to see them ignored. But if you go with the first scenario and its reverted, there's no real harm done, so don't feel you can't do so.<br>
-	:     Anyway, thanks for pointing those out (I certainly hadn't noticed the rungs!). The only reason I wouldn't list them as errors is that this <i>whole</i> scene has little or no bearing on the Brothers Strong's real house. As far as we know, this room doesn't really exist, and we certainly know Strong Bad doesn't have a pneumatic tube delivering emails next to his computer. The whole thing could really be considered an Easter Egg, and they tend to carry less weight in terms of what's "real." --[[User:notstrongorbad\|notstrongorbad]] 02:43, 6 Oct 2005 (UTC)	+	::     Anyway, thanks for pointing those out (I certainly hadn't noticed the rungs!). The only reason I wouldn't list them as errors is that this <i>whole</i> scene has little or no bearing on the Brothers Strong's real house. As far as we know, this room doesn't really exist, and we certainly know Strong Bad doesn't have a pneumatic tube delivering emails next to his computer. The whole thing could really be considered an Easter Egg, and they tend to carry less weight in terms of what's "real." --[[User:notstrongorbad\|notstrongorbad]] 02:43, 6 Oct 2005 (UTC)