Talk:Fonts - Revision history

Octan: /* Sofontes dead? */

Octan — Tue, 14 Jun 2022 01:48:12 GMT

Sofontes dead?

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:48, 14 June 2022
Line 407:		Line 407:
	::::The work put in to find these links is already preserved in the page history, so I don't think it needs to stay on the current page, as linking to unofficial font downloads (and in some cases supporting piracy) doesn't exactly reflect this wiki's usual [[underlings\|<s>tact and</s>]] professionalism. This article provides the font names, making it easy enough to find a link to a free download if one so chooses. On a tangentially related note, I definitely can relate to getting partway through a project before second-guessing myself and pausing to ask for advice, having started replacing the {{t\|stub}} templates on non-stub pages before suggesting that we should perhaps [[Category talk:Stubs\|reconsider what a stub even is]]. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 03:54, 17 February 2022 (UTC)		::::The work put in to find these links is already preserved in the page history, so I don't think it needs to stay on the current page, as linking to unofficial font downloads (and in some cases supporting piracy) doesn't exactly reflect this wiki's usual [[underlings\|<s>tact and</s>]] professionalism. This article provides the font names, making it easy enough to find a link to a free download if one so chooses. On a tangentially related note, I definitely can relate to getting partway through a project before second-guessing myself and pausing to ask for advice, having started replacing the {{t\|stub}} templates on non-stub pages before suggesting that we should perhaps [[Category talk:Stubs\|reconsider what a stub even is]]. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 03:54, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
	:::::FWIW, my feelings are not hurt. =] {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 01:32, 15 April 2022 (UTC)		:::::FWIW, my feelings are not hurt. =] {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 01:32, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
		+	:::If you're the one who removed all the links to DaFont and 1001 Fonts, you were right to have second thoughts. Pretty much everything on those sites is official. As a general rule, if either of those sites is the very first Google link for just the name of the font, it's actually freeware. [[User:Octan\|Octan]] 01:48, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

OptimisticFool: /* Sofontes dead? */ No hard feelings

OptimisticFool — Fri, 15 Apr 2022 01:32:57 GMT

Sofontes dead?: No hard feelings

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:32, 15 April 2022
Line 406:		Line 406:
	:::Your talk of how much time people spent on finding links to all these fonts reminds me of the STUFF process for a [[HRWiki:STUFF/Archive/Teen Girl Squad Issue 9#Math Geek\|fun fact for TGS Issue 9]], where one of the arguments for says that it should be accepted due to how much time someone took to try and decipher Tompkins' math homework, while another comment says that the time put into the fact doesn't factor into whether or not it should be used. I think that comment applies here as well; it doesn't matter how much time was put into finding a good number of these links, as they're links to illegally download fonts, and we shouldn't support piracy. I fully support keeping/adding links to ''official'' downloads and Wikipedia articles, however, as long as we can confirm if the former links are authentic. {{--}} [[User:Keegster2\|Keegster2]] 23:38, 15 February 2022 (UTC)		:::Your talk of how much time people spent on finding links to all these fonts reminds me of the STUFF process for a [[HRWiki:STUFF/Archive/Teen Girl Squad Issue 9#Math Geek\|fun fact for TGS Issue 9]], where one of the arguments for says that it should be accepted due to how much time someone took to try and decipher Tompkins' math homework, while another comment says that the time put into the fact doesn't factor into whether or not it should be used. I think that comment applies here as well; it doesn't matter how much time was put into finding a good number of these links, as they're links to illegally download fonts, and we shouldn't support piracy. I fully support keeping/adding links to ''official'' downloads and Wikipedia articles, however, as long as we can confirm if the former links are authentic. {{--}} [[User:Keegster2\|Keegster2]] 23:38, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
	::::The work put in to find these links is already preserved in the page history, so I don't think it needs to stay on the current page, as linking to unofficial font downloads (and in some cases supporting piracy) doesn't exactly reflect this wiki's usual [[underlings\|<s>tact and</s>]] professionalism. This article provides the font names, making it easy enough to find a link to a free download if one so chooses. On a tangentially related note, I definitely can relate to getting partway through a project before second-guessing myself and pausing to ask for advice, having started replacing the {{t\|stub}} templates on non-stub pages before suggesting that we should perhaps [[Category talk:Stubs\|reconsider what a stub even is]]. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 03:54, 17 February 2022 (UTC)		::::The work put in to find these links is already preserved in the page history, so I don't think it needs to stay on the current page, as linking to unofficial font downloads (and in some cases supporting piracy) doesn't exactly reflect this wiki's usual [[underlings\|<s>tact and</s>]] professionalism. This article provides the font names, making it easy enough to find a link to a free download if one so chooses. On a tangentially related note, I definitely can relate to getting partway through a project before second-guessing myself and pausing to ask for advice, having started replacing the {{t\|stub}} templates on non-stub pages before suggesting that we should perhaps [[Category talk:Stubs\|reconsider what a stub even is]]. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 03:54, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
		+	:::::FWIW, my feelings are not hurt. =] {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 01:32, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc: /* Sofontes dead? */ yeah, prolly get rid of unofficial links

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc — Thu, 17 Feb 2022 03:54:55 GMT

Sofontes dead?: yeah, prolly get rid of unofficial links

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:54, 17 February 2022
Line 405:		Line 405:
	::Got a start on the A (and a few other) sections, but am pausing for now as I'm second-guessing myself. Previous users like OptimisticFool did put in a lot of work to find the exact fonts used; but just because you CAN find a free font doesn't mean it's truly free - for example, [https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/font-list/baskerville-old-face Baskerville Old Face] is ''supposed to be'' [https://www.fonts.com/content/microsoft-typography licensed from Microsoft], even if you can [https://www.sofontes.com.br/en/Baskerville-Old-Face/download/2958 find a free link] with ease. I do feel that only linking to Wikipedia is the "right" way to do things, kind of like how [[The Big Lebowski]] page links to Wikipedia and not a pirated stream of the full movie. I do suspect that TBC ''probably'' sifted through a bunch of 'free font' websites (heck, I've done the same) but I don't feel this approach is correct for a wiki. Besides, you can just go in the history of the page and find the links if you so desire. I know with the low activity the site gets that 'consensus' can be hard to come by these days, but I think another editor should weigh in before I continue. --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 22:25, 15 February 2022 (UTC)		::Got a start on the A (and a few other) sections, but am pausing for now as I'm second-guessing myself. Previous users like OptimisticFool did put in a lot of work to find the exact fonts used; but just because you CAN find a free font doesn't mean it's truly free - for example, [https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/font-list/baskerville-old-face Baskerville Old Face] is ''supposed to be'' [https://www.fonts.com/content/microsoft-typography licensed from Microsoft], even if you can [https://www.sofontes.com.br/en/Baskerville-Old-Face/download/2958 find a free link] with ease. I do feel that only linking to Wikipedia is the "right" way to do things, kind of like how [[The Big Lebowski]] page links to Wikipedia and not a pirated stream of the full movie. I do suspect that TBC ''probably'' sifted through a bunch of 'free font' websites (heck, I've done the same) but I don't feel this approach is correct for a wiki. Besides, you can just go in the history of the page and find the links if you so desire. I know with the low activity the site gets that 'consensus' can be hard to come by these days, but I think another editor should weigh in before I continue. --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 22:25, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
	:::Your talk of how much time people spent on finding links to all these fonts reminds me of the STUFF process for a [[HRWiki:STUFF/Archive/Teen Girl Squad Issue 9#Math Geek\|fun fact for TGS Issue 9]], where one of the arguments for says that it should be accepted due to how much time someone took to try and decipher Tompkins' math homework, while another comment says that the time put into the fact doesn't factor into whether or not it should be used. I think that comment applies here as well; it doesn't matter how much time was put into finding a good number of these links, as they're links to illegally download fonts, and we shouldn't support piracy. I fully support keeping/adding links to ''official'' downloads and Wikipedia articles, however, as long as we can confirm if the former links are authentic. {{--}} [[User:Keegster2\|Keegster2]] 23:38, 15 February 2022 (UTC)		:::Your talk of how much time people spent on finding links to all these fonts reminds me of the STUFF process for a [[HRWiki:STUFF/Archive/Teen Girl Squad Issue 9#Math Geek\|fun fact for TGS Issue 9]], where one of the arguments for says that it should be accepted due to how much time someone took to try and decipher Tompkins' math homework, while another comment says that the time put into the fact doesn't factor into whether or not it should be used. I think that comment applies here as well; it doesn't matter how much time was put into finding a good number of these links, as they're links to illegally download fonts, and we shouldn't support piracy. I fully support keeping/adding links to ''official'' downloads and Wikipedia articles, however, as long as we can confirm if the former links are authentic. {{--}} [[User:Keegster2\|Keegster2]] 23:38, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
		+	::::The work put in to find these links is already preserved in the page history, so I don't think it needs to stay on the current page, as linking to unofficial font downloads (and in some cases supporting piracy) doesn't exactly reflect this wiki's usual [[underlings\|<s>tact and</s>]] professionalism. This article provides the font names, making it easy enough to find a link to a free download if one so chooses. On a tangentially related note, I definitely can relate to getting partway through a project before second-guessing myself and pausing to ask for advice, having started replacing the {{t\|stub}} templates on non-stub pages before suggesting that we should perhaps [[Category talk:Stubs\|reconsider what a stub even is]]. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 03:54, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Keegster2: /* Sofontes dead? */ My two cents. In a nutshell, no to unofficial download links, yes to official ones.

Keegster2 — Tue, 15 Feb 2022 23:39:00 GMT

Sofontes dead?: My two cents. In a nutshell, no to unofficial download links, yes to official ones.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:39, 15 February 2022
Line 404:		Line 404:
	:{{w\|List of typefaces}} is a good reference for what fonts have Wikipedia links. --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 21:51, 15 February 2022 (UTC)		:{{w\|List of typefaces}} is a good reference for what fonts have Wikipedia links. --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 21:51, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
	::Got a start on the A (and a few other) sections, but am pausing for now as I'm second-guessing myself. Previous users like OptimisticFool did put in a lot of work to find the exact fonts used; but just because you CAN find a free font doesn't mean it's truly free - for example, [https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/font-list/baskerville-old-face Baskerville Old Face] is ''supposed to be'' [https://www.fonts.com/content/microsoft-typography licensed from Microsoft], even if you can [https://www.sofontes.com.br/en/Baskerville-Old-Face/download/2958 find a free link] with ease. I do feel that only linking to Wikipedia is the "right" way to do things, kind of like how [[The Big Lebowski]] page links to Wikipedia and not a pirated stream of the full movie. I do suspect that TBC ''probably'' sifted through a bunch of 'free font' websites (heck, I've done the same) but I don't feel this approach is correct for a wiki. Besides, you can just go in the history of the page and find the links if you so desire. I know with the low activity the site gets that 'consensus' can be hard to come by these days, but I think another editor should weigh in before I continue. --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 22:25, 15 February 2022 (UTC)		::Got a start on the A (and a few other) sections, but am pausing for now as I'm second-guessing myself. Previous users like OptimisticFool did put in a lot of work to find the exact fonts used; but just because you CAN find a free font doesn't mean it's truly free - for example, [https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/font-list/baskerville-old-face Baskerville Old Face] is ''supposed to be'' [https://www.fonts.com/content/microsoft-typography licensed from Microsoft], even if you can [https://www.sofontes.com.br/en/Baskerville-Old-Face/download/2958 find a free link] with ease. I do feel that only linking to Wikipedia is the "right" way to do things, kind of like how [[The Big Lebowski]] page links to Wikipedia and not a pirated stream of the full movie. I do suspect that TBC ''probably'' sifted through a bunch of 'free font' websites (heck, I've done the same) but I don't feel this approach is correct for a wiki. Besides, you can just go in the history of the page and find the links if you so desire. I know with the low activity the site gets that 'consensus' can be hard to come by these days, but I think another editor should weigh in before I continue. --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 22:25, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
		+	:::Your talk of how much time people spent on finding links to all these fonts reminds me of the STUFF process for a [[HRWiki:STUFF/Archive/Teen Girl Squad Issue 9#Math Geek\|fun fact for TGS Issue 9]], where one of the arguments for says that it should be accepted due to how much time someone took to try and decipher Tompkins' math homework, while another comment says that the time put into the fact doesn't factor into whether or not it should be used. I think that comment applies here as well; it doesn't matter how much time was put into finding a good number of these links, as they're links to illegally download fonts, and we shouldn't support piracy. I fully support keeping/adding links to ''official'' downloads and Wikipedia articles, however, as long as we can confirm if the former links are authentic. {{--}} [[User:Keegster2\|Keegster2]] 23:38, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Bleu Ninja: /* Sofontes dead? */ second-guessing myself, expanding on rationale. looking for consensus

Bleu Ninja — Tue, 15 Feb 2022 22:25:33 GMT

Sofontes dead?: second-guessing myself, expanding on rationale. looking for consensus

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:25, 15 February 2022
Line 403:		Line 403:
	:You make a good point. A lot of "download free font" and/or "user-uploaded fonts" sites use pirated font files, and have a tendency to go under or have spammy/misleading "DOWNLOAD NOW!" ads on them. Besides, it's easy enough for someone to Google ''download AhnbergHand font'' or whatever without a link from us. I think a better approach would be to link to Wikipedia articles (like {{w\|Arial}}) or official, paid websites (like [https://www.myfonts.com/fonts/urw/baskerville-old-face/ MyFonts]) instead. --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 04:36, 4 February 2022 (UTC)		:You make a good point. A lot of "download free font" and/or "user-uploaded fonts" sites use pirated font files, and have a tendency to go under or have spammy/misleading "DOWNLOAD NOW!" ads on them. Besides, it's easy enough for someone to Google ''download AhnbergHand font'' or whatever without a link from us. I think a better approach would be to link to Wikipedia articles (like {{w\|Arial}}) or official, paid websites (like [https://www.myfonts.com/fonts/urw/baskerville-old-face/ MyFonts]) instead. --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 04:36, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
	:{{w\|List of typefaces}} is a good reference for what fonts have Wikipedia links. --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 21:51, 15 February 2022 (UTC)		:{{w\|List of typefaces}} is a good reference for what fonts have Wikipedia links. --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 21:51, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
		+	::Got a start on the A (and a few other) sections, but am pausing for now as I'm second-guessing myself. Previous users like OptimisticFool did put in a lot of work to find the exact fonts used; but just because you CAN find a free font doesn't mean it's truly free - for example, [https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/font-list/baskerville-old-face Baskerville Old Face] is ''supposed to be'' [https://www.fonts.com/content/microsoft-typography licensed from Microsoft], even if you can [https://www.sofontes.com.br/en/Baskerville-Old-Face/download/2958 find a free link] with ease. I do feel that only linking to Wikipedia is the "right" way to do things, kind of like how [[The Big Lebowski]] page links to Wikipedia and not a pirated stream of the full movie. I do suspect that TBC ''probably'' sifted through a bunch of 'free font' websites (heck, I've done the same) but I don't feel this approach is correct for a wiki. Besides, you can just go in the history of the page and find the links if you so desire. I know with the low activity the site gets that 'consensus' can be hard to come by these days, but I think another editor should weigh in before I continue. --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 22:25, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Bleu Ninja: /* Sofontes dead? */ wp guide for reference

Bleu Ninja — Tue, 15 Feb 2022 21:51:25 GMT

Sofontes dead?: wp guide for reference

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:51, 15 February 2022
Line 402:		Line 402:
	All the Sofontes links seem to no longer lead to actual downloadable fonts, due to the offsite-hosted captcha being absent. Should we start finding other places to link to? I think most of them were pirated anyway and maybe shouldn't have been linked to in the first place. [[User:Octan\|Octan]] 01:10, 4 February 2022 (UTC)		All the Sofontes links seem to no longer lead to actual downloadable fonts, due to the offsite-hosted captcha being absent. Should we start finding other places to link to? I think most of them were pirated anyway and maybe shouldn't have been linked to in the first place. [[User:Octan\|Octan]] 01:10, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
	:You make a good point. A lot of "download free font" and/or "user-uploaded fonts" sites use pirated font files, and have a tendency to go under or have spammy/misleading "DOWNLOAD NOW!" ads on them. Besides, it's easy enough for someone to Google ''download AhnbergHand font'' or whatever without a link from us. I think a better approach would be to link to Wikipedia articles (like {{w\|Arial}}) or official, paid websites (like [https://www.myfonts.com/fonts/urw/baskerville-old-face/ MyFonts]) instead. --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 04:36, 4 February 2022 (UTC)		:You make a good point. A lot of "download free font" and/or "user-uploaded fonts" sites use pirated font files, and have a tendency to go under or have spammy/misleading "DOWNLOAD NOW!" ads on them. Besides, it's easy enough for someone to Google ''download AhnbergHand font'' or whatever without a link from us. I think a better approach would be to link to Wikipedia articles (like {{w\|Arial}}) or official, paid websites (like [https://www.myfonts.com/fonts/urw/baskerville-old-face/ MyFonts]) instead. --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 04:36, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
		+	:{{w\|List of typefaces}} is a good reference for what fonts have Wikipedia links. --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 21:51, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Bleu Ninja: /* Sofontes dead? */ better practice for a wiki

Bleu Ninja — Fri, 04 Feb 2022 04:36:38 GMT

Sofontes dead?: better practice for a wiki

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:36, 4 February 2022
Line 401:		Line 401:

	All the Sofontes links seem to no longer lead to actual downloadable fonts, due to the offsite-hosted captcha being absent. Should we start finding other places to link to? I think most of them were pirated anyway and maybe shouldn't have been linked to in the first place. [[User:Octan\|Octan]] 01:10, 4 February 2022 (UTC)		All the Sofontes links seem to no longer lead to actual downloadable fonts, due to the offsite-hosted captcha being absent. Should we start finding other places to link to? I think most of them were pirated anyway and maybe shouldn't have been linked to in the first place. [[User:Octan\|Octan]] 01:10, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
		+	:You make a good point. A lot of "download free font" and/or "user-uploaded fonts" sites use pirated font files, and have a tendency to go under or have spammy/misleading "DOWNLOAD NOW!" ads on them. Besides, it's easy enough for someone to Google ''download AhnbergHand font'' or whatever without a link from us. I think a better approach would be to link to Wikipedia articles (like {{w\|Arial}}) or official, paid websites (like [https://www.myfonts.com/fonts/urw/baskerville-old-face/ MyFonts]) instead. --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 04:36, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Octan: /**/Sofontes dead?

Octan — Fri, 04 Feb 2022 01:10:59 GMT

: Sofontes dead?

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:10, 4 February 2022
Line 397:		Line 397:
	Could anybody identify the font on Homestar's computer logo? {{unsigned\|71.11.243.124\|21:46, 2 May 2016}}		Could anybody identify the font on Homestar's computer logo? {{unsigned\|71.11.243.124\|21:46, 2 May 2016}}
	:From this page and the list for [[email thunder]] on [[Fonts By Toon]], it looks like FederationBold. {{User:Mee/sig}} 01:12, 3 May 2016 (UTC)		:From this page and the list for [[email thunder]] on [[Fonts By Toon]], it looks like FederationBold. {{User:Mee/sig}} 01:12, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Sofontes dead? ==
		+
		+	All the Sofontes links seem to no longer lead to actual downloadable fonts, due to the offsite-hosted captcha being absent. Should we start finding other places to link to? I think most of them were pirated anyway and maybe shouldn't have been linked to in the first place. [[User:Octan\|Octan]] 01:10, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

It's dot com: rv unsigned comment that doesn't add anything and the commenter even acknowledges the conversation is over a decade old

It's dot com — Sat, 20 Jun 2020 15:18:42 GMT

rv unsigned comment that doesn't add anything and the commenter even acknowledges the conversation is over a decade old

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:18, 20 June 2020
Line 82:		Line 82:
	:::Good news! There's a font uncannily similar to VOY DOT LCD called "Bubbledot Fine Positive." Unfortunately, I keep running into font websites where they require you to pay for fonts to download them.		:::Good news! There's a font uncannily similar to VOY DOT LCD called "Bubbledot Fine Positive." Unfortunately, I keep running into font websites where they require you to pay for fonts to download them.
	::::From some research I did some months back, it appears this font was installed with Adobe Audition, Soudbooth, whatever The Brothers Chaps use (because I frankly forgot). So, I'm guessing putting it up would the font would probably be illegal if I'm right. --[[Special:Contributions/69.150.85.66\|69.150.85.66]] 18:17, 4 March 2009 (UTC)		::::From some research I did some months back, it appears this font was installed with Adobe Audition, Soudbooth, whatever The Brothers Chaps use (because I frankly forgot). So, I'm guessing putting it up would the font would probably be illegal if I'm right. --[[Special:Contributions/69.150.85.66\|69.150.85.66]] 18:17, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
-	~~:::::They use flash five. Oh, wait, this is from 2009 :T~~

	== Thousandth article ==		== Thousandth article ==

174.52.25.21: /* VOY DOT LCD */

174.52.25.21 — Sat, 20 Jun 2020 06:40:48 GMT

VOY DOT LCD

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:40, 20 June 2020
Line 82:		Line 82:
	:::Good news! There's a font uncannily similar to VOY DOT LCD called "Bubbledot Fine Positive." Unfortunately, I keep running into font websites where they require you to pay for fonts to download them.		:::Good news! There's a font uncannily similar to VOY DOT LCD called "Bubbledot Fine Positive." Unfortunately, I keep running into font websites where they require you to pay for fonts to download them.
	::::From some research I did some months back, it appears this font was installed with Adobe Audition, Soudbooth, whatever The Brothers Chaps use (because I frankly forgot). So, I'm guessing putting it up would the font would probably be illegal if I'm right. --[[Special:Contributions/69.150.85.66\|69.150.85.66]] 18:17, 4 March 2009 (UTC)		::::From some research I did some months back, it appears this font was installed with Adobe Audition, Soudbooth, whatever The Brothers Chaps use (because I frankly forgot). So, I'm guessing putting it up would the font would probably be illegal if I'm right. --[[Special:Contributions/69.150.85.66\|69.150.85.66]] 18:17, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
		+	:::::They use flash five. Oh, wait, this is from 2009 :T

	== Thousandth article ==		== Thousandth article ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:51, 15 February 2022
Line 402:		Line 402:
	All the Sofontes links seem to no longer lead to actual downloadable fonts, due to the offsite-hosted captcha being absent. Should we start finding other places to link to? I think most of them were pirated anyway and maybe shouldn't have been linked to in the first place. [[User:Octan\|Octan]] 01:10, 4 February 2022 (UTC)		All the Sofontes links seem to no longer lead to actual downloadable fonts, due to the offsite-hosted captcha being absent. Should we start finding other places to link to? I think most of them were pirated anyway and maybe shouldn't have been linked to in the first place. [[User:Octan\|Octan]] 01:10, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
	:You make a good point. A lot of "download free font" and/or "user-uploaded fonts" sites use pirated font files, and have a tendency to go under or have spammy/misleading "DOWNLOAD NOW!" ads on them. Besides, it's easy enough for someone to Google ''download AhnbergHand font'' or whatever without a link from us. I think a better approach would be to link to Wikipedia articles (like {{w\|Arial}}) or official, paid websites (like [https://www.myfonts.com/fonts/urw/baskerville-old-face/ MyFonts]) instead. --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 04:36, 4 February 2022 (UTC)		:You make a good point. A lot of "download free font" and/or "user-uploaded fonts" sites use pirated font files, and have a tendency to go under or have spammy/misleading "DOWNLOAD NOW!" ads on them. Besides, it's easy enough for someone to Google ''download AhnbergHand font'' or whatever without a link from us. I think a better approach would be to link to Wikipedia articles (like {{w\|Arial}}) or official, paid websites (like [https://www.myfonts.com/fonts/urw/baskerville-old-face/ MyFonts]) instead. --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 04:36, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
		+	:{{w\|List of typefaces}} is a good reference for what fonts have Wikipedia links. --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 21:51, 15 February 2022 (UTC)