Talk:Goofs - Revision history

Trey56: replaced {{talktobediscussed}} with {{deletedtalk}}

Trey56 — Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:37:31 GMT

replaced {{talktobediscussed}} with {{deletedtalk}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:37, 13 June 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	{{~~tobediscussed~~}}	+	{{deletedtalk}}
	This is hardly necessary. Goofs in TBC's toons are not a running gag or anything, they are just tiny mistakes made in most of their cartoons. I say we "'''[[50 emails#Homestar's attempts at DELETED\|DA CHEAT]]'''" it. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 17:08, 25 May 2008 (UTC)		This is hardly necessary. Goofs in TBC's toons are not a running gag or anything, they are just tiny mistakes made in most of their cartoons. I say we "'''[[50 emails#Homestar's attempts at DELETED\|DA CHEAT]]'''" it. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 17:08, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
	:This seems like an obvious candidate for deletion, but is it really? Do we cover this anywhere in an article? Should we? Maybe we could make something where examine notable goofs, and how some goofs become fixed goofs. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 17:10, 25 May 2008 (UTC)		:This seems like an obvious candidate for deletion, but is it really? Do we cover this anywhere in an article? Should we? Maybe we could make something where examine notable goofs, and how some goofs become fixed goofs. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 17:10, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Slipknot6477: delete

Slipknot6477 — Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:17:18 GMT

delete

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:17, 13 June 2008
Line 14:		Line 14:

	::No question whatsoever here. A quick look through the contributor's past edits shows virtually nothing but vandalism, including an edit war with Heimstern over whether or not "Homsar" was spelled "Homestar." This page was clearly an attempt to introduce some bad content to the Wiki while avoiding revert...ing. reversion. This doesn't even deserve a cute alteration on delete, like baleeted. '''Delete.''' --{{User:Onamuji/sig}} 06:16, 5 June 2008 (UTC)		::No question whatsoever here. A quick look through the contributor's past edits shows virtually nothing but vandalism, including an edit war with Heimstern over whether or not "Homsar" was spelled "Homestar." This page was clearly an attempt to introduce some bad content to the Wiki while avoiding revert...ing. reversion. This doesn't even deserve a cute alteration on delete, like baleeted. '''Delete.''' --{{User:Onamuji/sig}} 06:16, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
		+	::: I agree. '''baleeted!''' {{User:Slipknot6477/sig}}

Onamuji: I have no desire to be cutesy in my edit summary for once. Delete.

Onamuji — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 06:16:34 GMT

I have no desire to be cutesy in my edit summary for once. Delete.

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:16, 5 June 2008
Line 12:		Line 12:

	'''Delete''' for all listed reasons. (I can never find anything to add to these discussions!) --[[User:Acam30\|Acam30]] 03:03, 1 June 2008 (UTC)		'''Delete''' for all listed reasons. (I can never find anything to add to these discussions!) --[[User:Acam30\|Acam30]] 03:03, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	::No question whatsoever here. A quick look through the contributor's past edits shows virtually nothing but vandalism, including an edit war with Heimstern over whether or not "Homsar" was spelled "Homestar." This page was clearly an attempt to introduce some bad content to the Wiki while avoiding revert...ing. reversion. This doesn't even deserve a cute alteration on delete, like baleeted. '''Delete.''' --{{User:Onamuji/sig}} 06:16, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Acam30 at 03:03, 1 June 2008

Acam30 — Sun, 01 Jun 2008 03:03:02 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:03, 1 June 2008
Line 10:		Line 10:
	::::::I don't think it should be deleted. Just do what Trey said. {{User:Hrjcm/sig}} 23:12, 25 May 2008 (UTC)		::::::I don't think it should be deleted. Just do what Trey said. {{User:Hrjcm/sig}} 23:12, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
	:::::::What next? An article noting all the Real-world References? '''Delete.''' {{User:The Chort/sig}} 17:57, 29 May 2008 (UTC)		:::::::What next? An article noting all the Real-world References? '''Delete.''' {{User:The Chort/sig}} 17:57, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	'''Delete''' for all listed reasons. (I can never find anything to add to these discussions!) --[[User:Acam30\|Acam30]] 03:03, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

The Chort: delete

The Chort — Thu, 29 May 2008 17:57:03 GMT

delete

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:57, 29 May 2008
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:::::Pretty much agree with all the reasons give to ''delete'' the article. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 22:31, 25 May 2008 (UTC)		:::::Pretty much agree with all the reasons give to ''delete'' the article. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 22:31, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
	::::::I don't think it should be deleted. Just do what Trey said. {{User:Hrjcm/sig}} 23:12, 25 May 2008 (UTC)		::::::I don't think it should be deleted. Just do what Trey said. {{User:Hrjcm/sig}} 23:12, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
		+	:::::::What next? An article noting all the Real-world References? '''Delete.''' {{User:The Chort/sig}} 17:57, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

JCM at 23:12, 25 May 2008

JCM — Sun, 25 May 2008 23:12:59 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:12, 25 May 2008
Line 8:		Line 8:
	::::But regardless of whether or not it's understandable that there ''are'' goofs, I don't think there's too much we can say about the topic in general. We can say, "There are goofs in lots of toons." And maybe, "Here are some notable goofs and fixed goofs," and perhaps even, "Such-and-such is the goofiest toon, and So-and-so is the only toon without any goofs." To me, that's not compelling enough information for an article. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 17:37, 25 May 2008 (UTC)		::::But regardless of whether or not it's understandable that there ''are'' goofs, I don't think there's too much we can say about the topic in general. We can say, "There are goofs in lots of toons." And maybe, "Here are some notable goofs and fixed goofs," and perhaps even, "Such-and-such is the goofiest toon, and So-and-so is the only toon without any goofs." To me, that's not compelling enough information for an article. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 17:37, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
	:::::Pretty much agree with all the reasons give to ''delete'' the article. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 22:31, 25 May 2008 (UTC)		:::::Pretty much agree with all the reasons give to ''delete'' the article. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 22:31, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
		+	::::::I don't think it should be deleted. Just do what Trey said. {{User:Hrjcm/sig}} 23:12, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Wbwolf: Not much more to add

Wbwolf — Sun, 25 May 2008 22:31:11 GMT

Not much more to add

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:31, 25 May 2008
Line 7:		Line 7:

	::::But regardless of whether or not it's understandable that there ''are'' goofs, I don't think there's too much we can say about the topic in general. We can say, "There are goofs in lots of toons." And maybe, "Here are some notable goofs and fixed goofs," and perhaps even, "Such-and-such is the goofiest toon, and So-and-so is the only toon without any goofs." To me, that's not compelling enough information for an article. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 17:37, 25 May 2008 (UTC)		::::But regardless of whether or not it's understandable that there ''are'' goofs, I don't think there's too much we can say about the topic in general. We can say, "There are goofs in lots of toons." And maybe, "Here are some notable goofs and fixed goofs," and perhaps even, "Such-and-such is the goofiest toon, and So-and-so is the only toon without any goofs." To me, that's not compelling enough information for an article. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 17:37, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
		+	:::::Pretty much agree with all the reasons give to ''delete'' the article. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 22:31, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Trey56: my thoughts

Trey56 — Sun, 25 May 2008 17:37:34 GMT

my thoughts

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:37, 25 May 2008
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::But it seems to me that it would just be insulting TBC for making mistakes in their cartoons. None of the goofs have anything in common; if their were some goof constantly being repeated, that may be notable. But I cant think of any. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 17:15, 25 May 2008 (UTC)		::But it seems to me that it would just be insulting TBC for making mistakes in their cartoons. None of the goofs have anything in common; if their were some goof constantly being repeated, that may be notable. But I cant think of any. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 17:15, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
	:::Considering goofs and glitches are covered in the Fun Facts section of every article, I fail to see what we'd need a page like this for. Not only, given the sheer number of goofs, would it be a ridiculously huge page, it'd also violate the "Once and Only Once" policy. '''Delete'''. -{{User:YK/sig}} 17:35, 25 May 2008 (UTC)		:::Considering goofs and glitches are covered in the Fun Facts section of every article, I fail to see what we'd need a page like this for. Not only, given the sheer number of goofs, would it be a ridiculously huge page, it'd also violate the "Once and Only Once" policy. '''Delete'''. -{{User:YK/sig}} 17:35, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
		+	::::Well, while TBC have never actually made a mistake, there have been a few, let's call 'em "[[Stnanks]]". Seriously, though, here are my thoughts: it's fine that we note the goofs on toon pages, but I don't think that there really is an overarching trend of goofs throughout the [[Homestar Runner (body of work)\|body of work]] that's easy to document. Yes, there are (usually minor) mistakes in most toons, but that's to be expected when they're churning out 3-5 minutes of animation every week.
		+
		+	::::But regardless of whether or not it's understandable that there ''are'' goofs, I don't think there's too much we can say about the topic in general. We can say, "There are goofs in lots of toons." And maybe, "Here are some notable goofs and fixed goofs," and perhaps even, "Such-and-such is the goofiest toon, and So-and-so is the only toon without any goofs." To me, that's not compelling enough information for an article. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 17:37, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

YK: Mm. Delete.

YK — Sun, 25 May 2008 17:35:41 GMT

Mm. Delete.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:35, 25 May 2008
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:This seems like an obvious candidate for deletion, but is it really? Do we cover this anywhere in an article? Should we? Maybe we could make something where examine notable goofs, and how some goofs become fixed goofs. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 17:10, 25 May 2008 (UTC)		:This seems like an obvious candidate for deletion, but is it really? Do we cover this anywhere in an article? Should we? Maybe we could make something where examine notable goofs, and how some goofs become fixed goofs. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 17:10, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
	::But it seems to me that it would just be insulting TBC for making mistakes in their cartoons. None of the goofs have anything in common; if their were some goof constantly being repeated, that may be notable. But I cant think of any. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 17:15, 25 May 2008 (UTC)		::But it seems to me that it would just be insulting TBC for making mistakes in their cartoons. None of the goofs have anything in common; if their were some goof constantly being repeated, that may be notable. But I cant think of any. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 17:15, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
		+	:::Considering goofs and glitches are covered in the Fun Facts section of every article, I fail to see what we'd need a page like this for. Not only, given the sheer number of goofs, would it be a ridiculously huge page, it'd also violate the "Once and Only Once" policy. '''Delete'''. -{{User:YK/sig}} 17:35, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Homestar-Winner at 17:15, 25 May 2008

Homestar-Winner — Sun, 25 May 2008 17:15:17 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:15, 25 May 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:
	This is hardly necessary. Goofs in TBC's toons are not a running gag or anything, they are just tiny mistakes made in most of their cartoons. I say we "'''[[50 emails#Homestar's attempts at DELETED\|DA CHEAT]]'''" it. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 17:08, 25 May 2008 (UTC)		This is hardly necessary. Goofs in TBC's toons are not a running gag or anything, they are just tiny mistakes made in most of their cartoons. I say we "'''[[50 emails#Homestar's attempts at DELETED\|DA CHEAT]]'''" it. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 17:08, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
	:This seems like an obvious candidate for deletion, but is it really? Do we cover this anywhere in an article? Should we? Maybe we could make something where examine notable goofs, and how some goofs become fixed goofs. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 17:10, 25 May 2008 (UTC)		:This seems like an obvious candidate for deletion, but is it really? Do we cover this anywhere in an article? Should we? Maybe we could make something where examine notable goofs, and how some goofs become fixed goofs. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 17:10, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
		+	::But it seems to me that it would just be insulting TBC for making mistakes in their cartoons. None of the goofs have anything in common; if their were some goof constantly being repeated, that may be notable. But I cant think of any. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 17:15, 25 May 2008 (UTC)