Talk:H*R.com updates 2000 - Revision history

Free at 21:41, 16 July 2009

Free — Thu, 16 Jul 2009 21:41:57 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:41, 16 July 2009
Line 20:		Line 20:
	:Agree with move. Stuff like the store, interviews, and other stuff is listed on other pages, so... there you go. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]]		:Agree with move. Stuff like the store, interviews, and other stuff is listed on other pages, so... there you go. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]]
	::Wait, are you suggesting moving all of the articles to "HR updates 200X", or just this page to "HR.com updates 1996-2000"? Moving to "HR updates 200X" is a big change involving several articles. I could see how you'd want to move this to 1996-2000, but the other option would be just to create a new article called "HR.com updates 1990s" or something. Though that still doesn't solve the ".com" problem, especially since 1990's updates don't even involve dot com. I just don't want to see any rash movings just yet, since it's a big job to change everything (epecially the links to H*R.com updates 2006). Personally, I don't see a big need for a move, but I'm open to alternate page titles, since I agree this isn't the best title at current to reflect the scope of these articles. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 19:19, 26 August 2006 (UTC)		::Wait, are you suggesting moving all of the articles to "HR updates 200X", or just this page to "HR.com updates 1996-2000"? Moving to "HR updates 200X" is a big change involving several articles. I could see how you'd want to move this to 1996-2000, but the other option would be just to create a new article called "HR.com updates 1990s" or something. Though that still doesn't solve the ".com" problem, especially since 1990's updates don't even involve dot com. I just don't want to see any rash movings just yet, since it's a big job to change everything (epecially the links to H*R.com updates 2006). Personally, I don't see a big need for a move, but I'm open to alternate page titles, since I agree this isn't the best title at current to reflect the scope of these articles. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 19:19, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Move? (Again) ==
		+	Three years later, this page still hasn't been moved. Should it, and if so, what to? {{User:Theycallmefree/sig}} 21:41, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Thunderbird L17: /* Move? */ Let's think this through first.

Thunderbird L17 — Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:19:21 GMT

Move?: Let's think this through first.

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:19, 26 August 2006
Line 19:		Line 19:
	Propose '''move''' to HR.com updates 1996-2000 reflecting scope of content on page. HR can refer to more than the website, indeed to the phenomenon that began in July/August 1996. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 02:37, 26 August 2006 (UTC)		Propose '''move''' to HR.com updates 1996-2000 reflecting scope of content on page. HR can refer to more than the website, indeed to the phenomenon that began in July/August 1996. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 02:37, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
	:Agree with move. Stuff like the store, interviews, and other stuff is listed on other pages, so... there you go. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]]		:Agree with move. Stuff like the store, interviews, and other stuff is listed on other pages, so... there you go. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]]
		+	::Wait, are you suggesting moving all of the articles to "HR updates 200X", or just this page to "HR.com updates 1996-2000"? Moving to "HR updates 200X" is a big change involving several articles. I could see how you'd want to move this to 1996-2000, but the other option would be just to create a new article called "HR.com updates 1990s" or something. Though that still doesn't solve the ".com" problem, especially since 1990's updates don't even involve dot com. I just don't want to see any rash movings just yet, since it's a big job to change everything (epecially the links to H*R.com updates 2006). Personally, I don't see a big need for a move, but I'm open to alternate page titles, since I agree this isn't the best title at current to reflect the scope of these articles. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 19:19, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

DorianGray: /* Move? */ Agree

DorianGray — Sat, 26 Aug 2006 03:45:08 GMT

Move?: Agree

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:45, 26 August 2006
Line 18:		Line 18:

	Propose '''move''' to HR.com updates 1996-2000 reflecting scope of content on page. HR can refer to more than the website, indeed to the phenomenon that began in July/August 1996. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 02:37, 26 August 2006 (UTC)		Propose '''move''' to HR.com updates 1996-2000 reflecting scope of content on page. HR can refer to more than the website, indeed to the phenomenon that began in July/August 1996. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 02:37, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
		+	:Agree with move. Stuff like the store, interviews, and other stuff is listed on other pages, so... there you go. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]]

Qermaq: Move?

Qermaq — Sat, 26 Aug 2006 02:37:38 GMT

Move?

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:37, 26 August 2006
Line 14:		Line 14:

	:It's commonly held that the starting point of content was January 1st, 2000, as revealed by The Brothers Chaps' in intervews [[Screen Savers Interview - 24 Jan 2005\|here]] and [[Pulse Interview - 1 Aug 2003\|here]], [[l33t Interview\|here]], [[Adventure Gamers Interview\|here]], [[Tastes Like Chicken Interview\|here]], [[UMFM Interview - 20 May 2003\|here]], and [[Penguin Brothers Interview - 26 May 2003\|here]]. But I am gonna change the page a bit to denote what you've found. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 06:09, 20 February 2006 (UTC)		:It's commonly held that the starting point of content was January 1st, 2000, as revealed by The Brothers Chaps' in intervews [[Screen Savers Interview - 24 Jan 2005\|here]] and [[Pulse Interview - 1 Aug 2003\|here]], [[l33t Interview\|here]], [[Adventure Gamers Interview\|here]], [[Tastes Like Chicken Interview\|here]], [[UMFM Interview - 20 May 2003\|here]], and [[Penguin Brothers Interview - 26 May 2003\|here]]. But I am gonna change the page a bit to denote what you've found. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 06:09, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Move? ==
		+
		+	Propose '''move''' to HR.com updates 1996-2000 reflecting scope of content on page. HR can refer to more than the website, indeed to the phenomenon that began in July/August 1996. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 02:37, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Thunderbird L17: Tweak.

Thunderbird L17 — Tue, 20 Jun 2006 01:43:19 GMT

Tweak.

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:43, 20 June 2006
Line 13:		Line 13:
	Is the date for "Homestarrunner.com started" the date the domain was registered, or the date content was put on it? I ask bbecause whois has the domain as being registered on Dec. 6, 1999. {{User:ACupOfCoffee/sig}} 05:53, 20 February 2006 (UTC)		Is the date for "Homestarrunner.com started" the date the domain was registered, or the date content was put on it? I ask bbecause whois has the domain as being registered on Dec. 6, 1999. {{User:ACupOfCoffee/sig}} 05:53, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

-	:It's commonly held that the starting point of content was January 1st, 2000, as revealed by The Brothers Chaps' in intervews [[Screen Savers Interview - 24 Jan 2005\|here]] and [[Pulse Interview - 1 Aug 2003\|here]], [[l33t Interview\|here]], [[Adventure Gamers Interview\|here]], [[Tastes Like Chicken Interview\|here]], [[UMFM Interview - 20 May 2003\|here]], [[Penguin Brothers Interview - 26 May 2003\|here]]. But I am gonna change the page a bit to denote what you've found. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 06:09, 20 February 2006 (UTC)	+	:It's commonly held that the starting point of content was January 1st, 2000, as revealed by The Brothers Chaps' in intervews [[Screen Savers Interview - 24 Jan 2005\|here]] and [[Pulse Interview - 1 Aug 2003\|here]], [[l33t Interview\|here]], [[Adventure Gamers Interview\|here]], [[Tastes Like Chicken Interview\|here]], [[UMFM Interview - 20 May 2003\|here]], and [[Penguin Brothers Interview - 26 May 2003\|here]]. But I am gonna change the page a bit to denote what you've found. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 06:09, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

Thunderbird L17: /* Date site started */ - Reply.

Thunderbird L17 — Mon, 20 Feb 2006 06:09:22 GMT

Date site started: - Reply.

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:09, 20 February 2006
Line 12:		Line 12:

	Is the date for "Homestarrunner.com started" the date the domain was registered, or the date content was put on it? I ask bbecause whois has the domain as being registered on Dec. 6, 1999. {{User:ACupOfCoffee/sig}} 05:53, 20 February 2006 (UTC)		Is the date for "Homestarrunner.com started" the date the domain was registered, or the date content was put on it? I ask bbecause whois has the domain as being registered on Dec. 6, 1999. {{User:ACupOfCoffee/sig}} 05:53, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	:It's commonly held that the starting point of content was January 1st, 2000, as revealed by The Brothers Chaps' in intervews [[Screen Savers Interview - 24 Jan 2005\|here]] and [[Pulse Interview - 1 Aug 2003\|here]], [[l33t Interview\|here]], [[Adventure Gamers Interview\|here]], [[Tastes Like Chicken Interview\|here]], [[UMFM Interview - 20 May 2003\|here]], [[Penguin Brothers Interview - 26 May 2003\|here]]. But I am gonna change the page a bit to denote what you've found. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 06:09, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

ACupOfCoffee: Date site started

ACupOfCoffee — Mon, 20 Feb 2006 05:53:25 GMT

Date site started

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:53, 20 February 2006
Line 8:		Line 8:

	This isn't certain. But it's likely. In which case, it puts [[Main Page 12]] likely in 2001. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 21:58, 23 November 2005 (UTC)		This isn't certain. But it's likely. In which case, it puts [[Main Page 12]] likely in 2001. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 21:58, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Date site started ==
		+
		+	Is the date for "Homestarrunner.com started" the date the domain was registered, or the date content was put on it? I ask bbecause whois has the domain as being registered on Dec. 6, 1999. {{User:ACupOfCoffee/sig}} 05:53, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

It's dot com: +navigation template

It's dot com — Sat, 31 Dec 2005 15:30:32 GMT

+navigation template

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:30, 31 December 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	{{updates-talk-box}}
		+
	Here's how I figure the main page 7 was the date I put it at.		Here's how I figure the main page 7 was the date I put it at.

Thunderbird L17: Justification.

Thunderbird L17 — Wed, 23 Nov 2005 21:58:41 GMT

Justification.

New page

Here's how I figure the main page 7 was the date I put it at.

# Obviously it's Halloween themed. Even the Halloween Intro for the site directs you to it. It's most likely added that day.
# It predates [[Main Page 9]]. This one uses the old Homestar Runner design. Most likely they updated the looks of all the Homestars when they changed his look, skipping that one because it's a somewhat harder fix.
# The Yellow Dello is shown in [[Main Page 8]]. Most likely it was referencing The Search for the Yellow Dellow, and likely came out in the same vicinity of time. Which was 2000.

This isn't certain. But it's likely. In which case, it puts [[Main Page 12]] likely in 2001. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 21:58, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:19, 26 August 2006
Line 19:		Line 19:
	Propose '''move''' to HR.com updates 1996-2000 reflecting scope of content on page. HR can refer to more than the website, indeed to the phenomenon that began in July/August 1996. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 02:37, 26 August 2006 (UTC)		Propose '''move''' to HR.com updates 1996-2000 reflecting scope of content on page. HR can refer to more than the website, indeed to the phenomenon that began in July/August 1996. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 02:37, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
	:Agree with move. Stuff like the store, interviews, and other stuff is listed on other pages, so... there you go. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]]		:Agree with move. Stuff like the store, interviews, and other stuff is listed on other pages, so... there you go. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]]
		+	::Wait, are you suggesting moving all of the articles to "HR updates 200X", or just this page to "HR.com updates 1996-2000"? Moving to "HR updates 200X" is a big change involving several articles. I could see how you'd want to move this to 1996-2000, but the other option would be just to create a new article called "HR.com updates 1990s" or something. Though that still doesn't solve the ".com" problem, especially since 1990's updates don't even involve dot com. I just don't want to see any rash movings just yet, since it's a big job to change everything (epecially the links to H*R.com updates 2006). Personally, I don't see a big need for a move, but I'm open to alternate page titles, since I agree this isn't the best title at current to reflect the scope of these articles. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 19:19, 26 August 2006 (UTC)