Talk:Jonathan Howe - Revision history

Bleu Ninja: /* QOTW */ sure why not

Bleu Ninja — Sat, 13 Nov 2021 06:33:06 GMT

QOTW: sure why not

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:33, 13 November 2021
Line 12:		Line 12:
	::::::If no one agrees with me, that's completely fine. But why isn't it worth discussing? There should be a discussion. I'd at least like to know ''why'' no one agrees. The XML refers to the Chaps as "Chapos", implying that it wasn't them. And it says "Love, jonathan" at the end, which is typically something you write at the end of a note, so it seems to be that a person named Jonathan coded this. Why not Howe? He's a good friend of TBC and he knows how to code and Flash. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 18:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)		::::::If no one agrees with me, that's completely fine. But why isn't it worth discussing? There should be a discussion. I'd at least like to know ''why'' no one agrees. The XML refers to the Chaps as "Chapos", implying that it wasn't them. And it says "Love, jonathan" at the end, which is typically something you write at the end of a note, so it seems to be that a person named Jonathan coded this. Why not Howe? He's a good friend of TBC and he knows how to code and Flash. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 18:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
	:::::::In a year and a half, no one has replied, except for one person who said no one agrees with me and didn't even bother to explain why. Again, even if no one agrees, I'd like to know why, and it still warrants a discussion. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 21:55, 11 November 2017 (UTC)		:::::::In a year and a half, no one has replied, except for one person who said no one agrees with me and didn't even bother to explain why. Again, even if no one agrees, I'd like to know why, and it still warrants a discussion. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 21:55, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
		+	::::::::I agree this should be added in. I've noticed that some references throughout the wiki use {{wp\|weasel words}} since a lot of the time we as outsiders can't be ''totally'' sure, so wording like "A signature in the XML seems to imply..." would be fine. --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 06:33, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc: /* QOTW */ replying again

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc — Sat, 11 Nov 2017 21:55:19 GMT

QOTW: replying again

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:55, 11 November 2017
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:::::Because no one else agrees with you or thinks it's even worth discussing, yet you continue to insist on bumping old talk threads. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 20:22, 10 December 2016 (UTC)		:::::Because no one else agrees with you or thinks it's even worth discussing, yet you continue to insist on bumping old talk threads. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 20:22, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
	::::::If no one agrees with me, that's completely fine. But why isn't it worth discussing? There should be a discussion. I'd at least like to know ''why'' no one agrees. The XML refers to the Chaps as "Chapos", implying that it wasn't them. And it says "Love, jonathan" at the end, which is typically something you write at the end of a note, so it seems to be that a person named Jonathan coded this. Why not Howe? He's a good friend of TBC and he knows how to code and Flash. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 18:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)		::::::If no one agrees with me, that's completely fine. But why isn't it worth discussing? There should be a discussion. I'd at least like to know ''why'' no one agrees. The XML refers to the Chaps as "Chapos", implying that it wasn't them. And it says "Love, jonathan" at the end, which is typically something you write at the end of a note, so it seems to be that a person named Jonathan coded this. Why not Howe? He's a good friend of TBC and he knows how to code and Flash. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 18:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
		+	:::::::In a year and a half, no one has replied, except for one person who said no one agrees with me and didn't even bother to explain why. Again, even if no one agrees, I'd like to know why, and it still warrants a discussion. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 21:55, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc: /* QOTW */ not worth discussing?

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc — Sat, 16 Sep 2017 18:13:18 GMT

QOTW: not worth discussing?

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:13, 16 September 2017
Line 10:		Line 10:
	::::It's a bit unfortunate that I'm the only person involved in this discussion for half a year. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 06:49, 10 December 2016 (UTC)		::::It's a bit unfortunate that I'm the only person involved in this discussion for half a year. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 06:49, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
	:::::Because no one else agrees with you or thinks it's even worth discussing, yet you continue to insist on bumping old talk threads. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 20:22, 10 December 2016 (UTC)		:::::Because no one else agrees with you or thinks it's even worth discussing, yet you continue to insist on bumping old talk threads. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 20:22, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
		+	::::::If no one agrees with me, that's completely fine. But why isn't it worth discussing? There should be a discussion. I'd at least like to know ''why'' no one agrees. The XML refers to the Chaps as "Chapos", implying that it wasn't them. And it says "Love, jonathan" at the end, which is typically something you write at the end of a note, so it seems to be that a person named Jonathan coded this. Why not Howe? He's a good friend of TBC and he knows how to code and Flash. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 18:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Defender1031: /* QOTW */ reply

Defender1031 — Sat, 10 Dec 2016 20:22:55 GMT

QOTW: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:22, 10 December 2016
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:::It was removed for speculation, but I still think there should be a discussion. Seriously, what are the chances of TBC having another friend named Jonathan who can do XML coding and Flash? Anyone? {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 17:59, 26 September 2016 (UTC)		:::It was removed for speculation, but I still think there should be a discussion. Seriously, what are the chances of TBC having another friend named Jonathan who can do XML coding and Flash? Anyone? {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 17:59, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
	::::It's a bit unfortunate that I'm the only person involved in this discussion for half a year. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 06:49, 10 December 2016 (UTC)		::::It's a bit unfortunate that I'm the only person involved in this discussion for half a year. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 06:49, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
		+	:::::Because no one else agrees with you or thinks it's even worth discussing, yet you continue to insist on bumping old talk threads. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 20:22, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc: /* QOTW */ ...

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc — Sat, 10 Dec 2016 06:49:40 GMT

QOTW: ...

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:49, 10 December 2016
Line 8:		Line 8:
	::I just added it. Is that okay? {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 19:29, 25 September 2016 (UTC)		::I just added it. Is that okay? {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 19:29, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
	:::It was removed for speculation, but I still think there should be a discussion. Seriously, what are the chances of TBC having another friend named Jonathan who can do XML coding and Flash? Anyone? {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 17:59, 26 September 2016 (UTC)		:::It was removed for speculation, but I still think there should be a discussion. Seriously, what are the chances of TBC having another friend named Jonathan who can do XML coding and Flash? Anyone? {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 17:59, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
		+	::::It's a bit unfortunate that I'm the only person involved in this discussion for half a year. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 06:49, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc: /* QOTW */ speculation?

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc — Mon, 26 Sep 2016 17:59:15 GMT

QOTW: speculation?

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:59, 26 September 2016
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:Halosche?!? {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 03:12, 27 August 2016 (UTC)		:Halosche?!? {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 03:12, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
	::I just added it. Is that okay? {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 19:29, 25 September 2016 (UTC)		::I just added it. Is that okay? {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 19:29, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
		+	:::It was removed for speculation, but I still think there should be a discussion. Seriously, what are the chances of TBC having another friend named Jonathan who can do XML coding and Flash? Anyone? {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 17:59, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc: /* QOTW */

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc — Sun, 25 Sep 2016 19:36:29 GMT

QOTW

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:36, 25 September 2016
Line 6:		Line 6:
	He might have also helped make the [[Quote of the Week]] template too, because the [[XML Sources]] say "love, jonathan" at the end. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 04:10, 31 July 2016 (UTC)		He might have also helped make the [[Quote of the Week]] template too, because the [[XML Sources]] say "love, jonathan" at the end. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 04:10, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
	:Halosche?!? {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 03:12, 27 August 2016 (UTC)		:Halosche?!? {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 03:12, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
-	::~~Haldo~~? {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 19:29, 25 September 2016 (UTC)	+	::I just added it. Is that okay? {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 19:29, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc: /* QOTW */

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc — Sun, 25 Sep 2016 19:29:12 GMT

QOTW

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:29, 25 September 2016
Line 6:		Line 6:
	He might have also helped make the [[Quote of the Week]] template too, because the [[XML Sources]] say "love, jonathan" at the end. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 04:10, 31 July 2016 (UTC)		He might have also helped make the [[Quote of the Week]] template too, because the [[XML Sources]] say "love, jonathan" at the end. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 04:10, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
	:Halosche?!? {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 03:12, 27 August 2016 (UTC)		:Halosche?!? {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 03:12, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
		+	::Haldo? {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 19:29, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc at 03:12, 27 August 2016

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc — Sat, 27 Aug 2016 03:12:08 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:12, 27 August 2016
Line 5:		Line 5:

	He might have also helped make the [[Quote of the Week]] template too, because the [[XML Sources]] say "love, jonathan" at the end. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 04:10, 31 July 2016 (UTC)		He might have also helped make the [[Quote of the Week]] template too, because the [[XML Sources]] say "love, jonathan" at the end. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 04:10, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
		+	:Halosche?!? {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 03:12, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc: /**/QOTW

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc — Sun, 31 Jul 2016 04:10:18 GMT

: QOTW

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:10, 31 July 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Where in part-time job is Jonathan Howe?--[[User:Martin925\|Martin925]] 00:29, 1 Oct 2005 (UTC)		Where in part-time job is Jonathan Howe?--[[User:Martin925\|Martin925]] 00:29, 1 Oct 2005 (UTC)
	:He looks a bit like Tony Hawk. --Homestar tiger		:He looks a bit like Tony Hawk. --Homestar tiger
		+
		+	== QOTW ==
		+
		+	He might have also helped make the [[Quote of the Week]] template too, because the [[XML Sources]] say "love, jonathan" at the end. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 04:10, 31 July 2016 (UTC)