Talk:Led Zeppelin - Revision history

Elcool: /* Merge? */ merged

Elcool — Fri, 09 Feb 2007 06:51:23 GMT

Merge?: merged

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:51, 9 February 2007
Line 19:		Line 19:

	:Okay, I added the info into the [[Heavy Metal]] article (one of the two refs was already there). If the change looks satisfactory, this page can be turned into a redirect. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 06:22, 9 February 2007 (UTC)		:Okay, I added the info into the [[Heavy Metal]] article (one of the two refs was already there). If the change looks satisfactory, this page can be turned into a redirect. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 06:22, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	::Done'd. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 06:51, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Trey56: /* Merge? */ done

Trey56 — Fri, 09 Feb 2007 06:22:22 GMT

Merge?: done

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:22, 9 February 2007
Line 17:		Line 17:

	Sorry, but I never listened much the Zeppelin, but it is true that a the subject of the page need to be referenced three times to merit itself. About merge or not, I leave it to the people who enjoys the music to decide. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 06:15, 9 February 2007 (UTC)		Sorry, but I never listened much the Zeppelin, but it is true that a the subject of the page need to be referenced three times to merit itself. About merge or not, I leave it to the people who enjoys the music to decide. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 06:15, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	:Okay, I added the info into the [[Heavy Metal]] article (one of the two refs was already there). If the change looks satisfactory, this page can be turned into a redirect. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 06:22, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Elcool: /* Merge? */ 3 it the magic nimber

Elcool — Fri, 09 Feb 2007 06:15:49 GMT

Merge?: 3 it the magic nimber

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:15, 9 February 2007
Line 15:		Line 15:

	:Yeah, three is pretty standard. And that's awesome you're going to go to one of their concerts — great music. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 02:04, 9 February 2007 (UTC)		:Yeah, three is pretty standard. And that's awesome you're going to go to one of their concerts — great music. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 02:04, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	Sorry, but I never listened much the Zeppelin, but it is true that a the subject of the page need to be referenced three times to merit itself. About merge or not, I leave it to the people who enjoys the music to decide. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 06:15, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Trey56: reply

Trey56 — Fri, 09 Feb 2007 02:04:51 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:04, 9 February 2007
Line 13:		Line 13:

	Is that a standard amount of times? 3? Cuz im cool with that. Led Zep is touring in 07. im going to see them. So, until a third instance comes up, it can be merged with heavy metal. --[[User:Jangles5150\|Jangles5150]] 00:25, 9 February 2007 (UTC)		Is that a standard amount of times? 3? Cuz im cool with that. Led Zep is touring in 07. im going to see them. So, until a third instance comes up, it can be merged with heavy metal. --[[User:Jangles5150\|Jangles5150]] 00:25, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	:Yeah, three is pretty standard. And that's awesome you're going to go to one of their concerts — great music. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 02:04, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Jangles5150 at 00:26, 9 February 2007

Jangles5150 — Fri, 09 Feb 2007 00:26:23 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:26, 9 February 2007
Line 12:		Line 12:
	::If Led Zeppelin actually appeared as a character (or characters) I'd fully support an article on the band. If they were represented in three or more instances, I would as well. However, two mentions of a running gag has historically not been sufficient to merit an article. I suggest '''merge''' with Heavy Metal for the time being. If a third instance of Led Zep is encountered, it can arguably deserve an article as a running gag. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 22:15, 8 February 2007 (UTC)		::If Led Zeppelin actually appeared as a character (or characters) I'd fully support an article on the band. If they were represented in three or more instances, I would as well. However, two mentions of a running gag has historically not been sufficient to merit an article. I suggest '''merge''' with Heavy Metal for the time being. If a third instance of Led Zep is encountered, it can arguably deserve an article as a running gag. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 22:15, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

-	Is that a standard? 3 ~~times~~? Cuz im cool with that. Led Zep is touring in 07. im going to see them. So, until a third instance comes up, it can be merged with heavy metal. --[[User:Jangles5150\|Jangles5150]] 00:25, 9 February 2007 (UTC)	+	Is that a standard amount of times? 3? Cuz im cool with that. Led Zep is touring in 07. im going to see them. So, until a third instance comes up, it can be merged with heavy metal. --[[User:Jangles5150\|Jangles5150]] 00:25, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Jangles5150 at 00:25, 9 February 2007

Jangles5150 — Fri, 09 Feb 2007 00:25:55 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:25, 9 February 2007
Line 11:		Line 11:

	::If Led Zeppelin actually appeared as a character (or characters) I'd fully support an article on the band. If they were represented in three or more instances, I would as well. However, two mentions of a running gag has historically not been sufficient to merit an article. I suggest '''merge''' with Heavy Metal for the time being. If a third instance of Led Zep is encountered, it can arguably deserve an article as a running gag. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 22:15, 8 February 2007 (UTC)		::If Led Zeppelin actually appeared as a character (or characters) I'd fully support an article on the band. If they were represented in three or more instances, I would as well. However, two mentions of a running gag has historically not been sufficient to merit an article. I suggest '''merge''' with Heavy Metal for the time being. If a third instance of Led Zep is encountered, it can arguably deserve an article as a running gag. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 22:15, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	Is that a standard? 3 times? Cuz im cool with that. Led Zep is touring in 07. im going to see them. So, until a third instance comes up, it can be merged with heavy metal. --[[User:Jangles5150\|Jangles5150]] 00:25, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Qermaq: /* Merge? */ merge for the time being

Qermaq — Thu, 08 Feb 2007 22:15:18 GMT

Merge?: merge for the time being

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:15, 8 February 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:

	:NO!!! This should not be mergeed with Heavy Metal. Led Zeppelin's music was one-third accoustic, and that is not heavy metal. Also, the members ,in an interview, stated that they hated being labeled heavy metal, for the reason I stated. --[[User:Jangles5150\|Jangles5150]] 21:52, 8 February 2007 (UTC)		:NO!!! This should not be mergeed with Heavy Metal. Led Zeppelin's music was one-third accoustic, and that is not heavy metal. Also, the members ,in an interview, stated that they hated being labeled heavy metal, for the reason I stated. --[[User:Jangles5150\|Jangles5150]] 21:52, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	::While what you say is absolutely true, the fact remains that rock music historians do in fact consider LedZep as in the "heavy metal" stream. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 22:15, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

	Please, just call me Jangles. And, Led Zeppelin has shown up twice. Don Knotts has shown up once, but Knotts has his own article. So, why should he have one, but not Led Zep? And don't say "because Don knotts had a speaking role". --[[User:Jangles5150\|Jangles5150]] 21:59, 8 February 2007 (UTC)		Please, just call me Jangles. And, Led Zeppelin has shown up twice. Don Knotts has shown up once, but Knotts has his own article. So, why should he have one, but not Led Zep? And don't say "because Don knotts had a speaking role". --[[User:Jangles5150\|Jangles5150]] 21:59, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

	:But what if that's the real answer! Don Knotts actually appeared in a toon, unlike Led Zeppelin. Okay, I see your point about not merging the content with [[Heavy Metal]] — I was mostly trying to find another place to include the information to save it from deletion. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 22:02, 8 February 2007 (UTC)		:But what if that's the real answer! Don Knotts actually appeared in a toon, unlike Led Zeppelin. Okay, I see your point about not merging the content with [[Heavy Metal]] — I was mostly trying to find another place to include the information to save it from deletion. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 22:02, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	::If Led Zeppelin actually appeared as a character (or characters) I'd fully support an article on the band. If they were represented in three or more instances, I would as well. However, two mentions of a running gag has historically not been sufficient to merit an article. I suggest '''merge''' with Heavy Metal for the time being. If a third instance of Led Zep is encountered, it can arguably deserve an article as a running gag. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 22:15, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Trey56: /* Merge? */ reply

Trey56 — Thu, 08 Feb 2007 22:02:27 GMT

Merge?: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:02, 8 February 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:

	:NO!!! This should not be mergeed with Heavy Metal. Led Zeppelin's music was one-third accoustic, and that is not heavy metal. Also, the members ,in an interview, stated that they hated being labeled heavy metal, for the reason I stated. --[[User:Jangles5150\|Jangles5150]] 21:52, 8 February 2007 (UTC)		:NO!!! This should not be mergeed with Heavy Metal. Led Zeppelin's music was one-third accoustic, and that is not heavy metal. Also, the members ,in an interview, stated that they hated being labeled heavy metal, for the reason I stated. --[[User:Jangles5150\|Jangles5150]] 21:52, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	Please, just call me Jangles. And, Led Zeppelin has shown up twice. Don Knotts has shown up once, but Knotts has his own article. So, why should he have one, but not Led Zep? And don't say "because Don knotts had a speaking role". --[[User:Jangles5150\|Jangles5150]] 21:59, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	:But what if that's the real answer! Don Knotts actually appeared in a toon, unlike Led Zeppelin. Okay, I see your point about not merging the content with [[Heavy Metal]] — I was mostly trying to find another place to include the information to save it from deletion. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 22:02, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Jangles5150 at 22:00, 8 February 2007

Jangles5150 — Thu, 08 Feb 2007 22:00:48 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:00, 8 February 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:

	:NO!!! This should not be mergeed with Heavy Metal. Led Zeppelin's music was one-third accoustic, and that is not heavy metal. Also, the members ,in an interview, stated that they hated being labeled heavy metal, for the reason I stated. --[[User:Jangles5150\|Jangles5150]] 21:52, 8 February 2007 (UTC)		:NO!!! This should not be mergeed with Heavy Metal. Led Zeppelin's music was one-third accoustic, and that is not heavy metal. Also, the members ,in an interview, stated that they hated being labeled heavy metal, for the reason I stated. --[[User:Jangles5150\|Jangles5150]] 21:52, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
-
-	Please, just call me Jangles. And, Led Zeppelin has shown up twice. Don Knotts has shown up once, but Knotts has his own article. So, why should he have one, but not Led Zep? And don't say "because Don knotts had a speaking role". --[[User:Jangles5150\|Jangles5150]] 21:59, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

DorianGray: Non-pre indent

DorianGray — Thu, 08 Feb 2007 22:00:20 GMT

Non-pre indent

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:00, 8 February 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:NO!!! This should not be mergeed with Heavy Metal. Led Zeppelin's music was one-third accoustic, and that is not heavy metal. Also, the members ,in an interview, stated that they hated being labeled heavy metal, for the reason I stated. --[[User:Jangles5150\|Jangles5150]] 21:52, 8 February 2007 (UTC)		:NO!!! This should not be mergeed with Heavy Metal. Led Zeppelin's music was one-third accoustic, and that is not heavy metal. Also, the members ,in an interview, stated that they hated being labeled heavy metal, for the reason I stated. --[[User:Jangles5150\|Jangles5150]] 21:52, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

-	Please, just call me Jangles. And, Led Zeppelin has shown up twice. Don Knotts has shown up once, but Knotts has his own article. So, why should he have one, but not Led Zep? And don't say "because Don knotts had a speaking role". --[[User:Jangles5150\|Jangles5150]] 21:59, 8 February 2007 (UTC)	+	Please, just call me Jangles. And, Led Zeppelin has shown up twice. Don Knotts has shown up once, but Knotts has his own article. So, why should he have one, but not Led Zep? And don't say "because Don knotts had a speaking role". --[[User:Jangles5150\|Jangles5150]] 21:59, 8 February 2007 (UTC)