Talk:Lesser Value - Revision history

Jay at 05:58, 2 March 2023

Jay — Thu, 02 Mar 2023 05:58:04 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:58, 2 March 2023
Line 16:		Line 16:
	::::::As are mine. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 03:37, 1 March 2023 (UTC)		::::::As are mine. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 03:37, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
	::::: yeah, this isn’t a running gag. It was only used 3 times and is something used a lot in conversation. I think I will delete this page. [[User:TMBGLOVER\|TMBGLOVER]] 00:11, 12 October 2022 (UTC)		::::: yeah, this isn’t a running gag. It was only used 3 times and is something used a lot in conversation. I think I will delete this page. [[User:TMBGLOVER\|TMBGLOVER]] 00:11, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
		+	:::::: Three is typically considered the ''minimum'' for a running gag page. The question isn't how often it's used, it's whether it qualifies as a gag. Truth is, if the [[Cool Things]] example was inverted from standard logic as the other two are (what is written on this page at present doesn't make it clear that [[The King of Town Character Video]]'s logic was inverted, but it was) then I'd give a hard "yes". But without that, [[Teen Girl Squad Issue 6\|I'm... hesitant.]] --{{User:Jay/sig}} 05:58, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

RickTommy: /* Relevance? */

RickTommy — Wed, 01 Mar 2023 03:37:51 GMT

Relevance?

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:37, 1 March 2023
Line 14:		Line 14:
	::::Sorry, I've been meaning to reply (after studying your response) but time has flown by. Please give me a few more days (hopefully less) to form a proper response. Thanks for your patience! :) --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 11:23, 27 July 2021 (UTC)		::::Sorry, I've been meaning to reply (after studying your response) but time has flown by. Please give me a few more days (hopefully less) to form a proper response. Thanks for your patience! :) --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 11:23, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
	:::::My thoughts are basically the same as Bleu’s (thank you Bleu for articulating them so well). -[[Special:Contributions/61.204.232.1\|61.204.232.1]] 11:26, 27 July 2021 (UTC)		:::::My thoughts are basically the same as Bleu’s (thank you Bleu for articulating them so well). -[[Special:Contributions/61.204.232.1\|61.204.232.1]] 11:26, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
-	:::::: yeah, this isn’t a running gag. It was only used 3 times and is something used a lot in conversation. I think I will delete this page. [[User:TMBGLOVER\|TMBGLOVER]] 00:11, 12 October 2022 (UTC)	+	::::::As are mine. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 03:37, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
		+	::::: yeah, this isn’t a running gag. It was only used 3 times and is something used a lot in conversation. I think I will delete this page. [[User:TMBGLOVER\|TMBGLOVER]] 00:11, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

RickTommy: moved Talk:lesser value to Talk:Lesser Value: I also agree with delete, but at least have proper capitalisation

RickTommy — Wed, 01 Mar 2023 03:35:26 GMT

moved Talk:lesser value to Talk:Lesser Value: I also agree with delete, but at least have proper capitalisation

← Older revision

Revision as of 03:35, 1 March 2023

TMBGLOVER: /* Relevance? */

TMBGLOVER — Wed, 12 Oct 2022 00:11:19 GMT

Relevance?

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:11, 12 October 2022
Line 14:		Line 14:
	::::Sorry, I've been meaning to reply (after studying your response) but time has flown by. Please give me a few more days (hopefully less) to form a proper response. Thanks for your patience! :) --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 11:23, 27 July 2021 (UTC)		::::Sorry, I've been meaning to reply (after studying your response) but time has flown by. Please give me a few more days (hopefully less) to form a proper response. Thanks for your patience! :) --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 11:23, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
	:::::My thoughts are basically the same as Bleu’s (thank you Bleu for articulating them so well). -[[Special:Contributions/61.204.232.1\|61.204.232.1]] 11:26, 27 July 2021 (UTC)		:::::My thoughts are basically the same as Bleu’s (thank you Bleu for articulating them so well). -[[Special:Contributions/61.204.232.1\|61.204.232.1]] 11:26, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
		+	:::::: yeah, this isn’t a running gag. It was only used 3 times and is something used a lot in conversation. I think I will delete this page. [[User:TMBGLOVER\|TMBGLOVER]] 00:11, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

61.204.232.1 at 11:30, 27 July 2021

61.204.232.1 — Tue, 27 Jul 2021 11:30:55 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:30, 27 July 2021
Line 13:		Line 13:
	:::I feel two instances of a joke doesn't make it notable (and personally I tend to be a little strict when judging "does this deserve an article"). The article for part-time job could have a note about how "the reversed quantities in the phrase ''with the purchase of [...] equal or lesser value'' previously appeared in the King of Town Character Video" in the fun facts. But the fact that people in this very page have overlooked how the phrasing is backwards suggests to me that it was a goof that happened to occur twice rather than a deliberate running gag. And even if "offering combo deals if you buy something cheaper" ''is'' a notable gag, the joke in Cool Things is [[Bubs's Shady Business Practices\|an entirely different joke]] so it doesn't come across as a "strange variant" like the first two. So all in all we have a nonstandard phrasing that popped up twice, in passing, with no images, in an article that is not linked anywhere else, with content that is already covered in the extant Fun Facts sections - to me it doesn't add up to "articleworthy". --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 23:35, 12 July 2021 (UTC)		:::I feel two instances of a joke doesn't make it notable (and personally I tend to be a little strict when judging "does this deserve an article"). The article for part-time job could have a note about how "the reversed quantities in the phrase ''with the purchase of [...] equal or lesser value'' previously appeared in the King of Town Character Video" in the fun facts. But the fact that people in this very page have overlooked how the phrasing is backwards suggests to me that it was a goof that happened to occur twice rather than a deliberate running gag. And even if "offering combo deals if you buy something cheaper" ''is'' a notable gag, the joke in Cool Things is [[Bubs's Shady Business Practices\|an entirely different joke]] so it doesn't come across as a "strange variant" like the first two. So all in all we have a nonstandard phrasing that popped up twice, in passing, with no images, in an article that is not linked anywhere else, with content that is already covered in the extant Fun Facts sections - to me it doesn't add up to "articleworthy". --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 23:35, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
	::::Sorry, I've been meaning to reply (after studying your response) but time has flown by. Please give me a few more days (hopefully less) to form a proper response. Thanks for your patience! :) --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 11:23, 27 July 2021 (UTC)		::::Sorry, I've been meaning to reply (after studying your response) but time has flown by. Please give me a few more days (hopefully less) to form a proper response. Thanks for your patience! :) --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 11:23, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
-	:::::My thoughts are basically the same as Bleu’s (thank you Bleu for articulating them so well. -[[Special:Contributions/61.204.232.1\|61.204.232.1]] 11:26, 27 July 2021 (UTC)	+	:::::My thoughts are basically the same as Bleu’s (thank you Bleu for articulating them so well). -[[Special:Contributions/61.204.232.1\|61.204.232.1]] 11:26, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

61.204.232.1: Fix link

61.204.232.1 — Tue, 27 Jul 2021 11:28:36 GMT

Fix link

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:28, 27 July 2021
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:Agree. Vote delete. --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 16:49, 12 July 2021 (UTC)		:Agree. Vote delete. --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 16:49, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
	::If we're "voting" I would like to re-iterate that my points from back in December are, in my opinion, quite valid and constitute good reason to keep the page. I have not read anyone provide any kind of constructive criticism or support of my statement. Is it even being taken into consideration when "voting" delete? Keeping a page shouldn't be a matter of opinion but rather of the page's merit. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 22:44, 12 July 2021 (UTC)		::If we're "voting" I would like to re-iterate that my points from back in December are, in my opinion, quite valid and constitute good reason to keep the page. I have not read anyone provide any kind of constructive criticism or support of my statement. Is it even being taken into consideration when "voting" delete? Keeping a page shouldn't be a matter of opinion but rather of the page's merit. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 22:44, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
-	:::I feel two instances of a joke doesn't make it notable (and personally I tend to be a little strict when judging "does this deserve an article"). The article for part-time job could have a note about how "the reversed quantities in the phrase ''with the purchase of [...] equal or lesser value'' previously appeared in the King of Town Character Video" in the fun facts. But the fact that people in this very page have overlooked how the phrasing is backwards suggests to me that it was a goof that happened to occur twice rather than a deliberate running gag. And even if "offering combo deals if you buy something cheaper" ''is'' a notable gag, the joke in Cool Things is [[\|Bubs's Shady Business Practices\|an entirely different joke]] so it doesn't come across as a "strange variant" like the first two. So all in all we have a nonstandard phrasing that popped up twice, in passing, with no images, in an article that is not linked anywhere else, with content that is already covered in the extant Fun Facts sections - to me it doesn't add up to "articleworthy". --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 23:35, 12 July 2021 (UTC)	+	:::I feel two instances of a joke doesn't make it notable (and personally I tend to be a little strict when judging "does this deserve an article"). The article for part-time job could have a note about how "the reversed quantities in the phrase ''with the purchase of [...] equal or lesser value'' previously appeared in the King of Town Character Video" in the fun facts. But the fact that people in this very page have overlooked how the phrasing is backwards suggests to me that it was a goof that happened to occur twice rather than a deliberate running gag. And even if "offering combo deals if you buy something cheaper" ''is'' a notable gag, the joke in Cool Things is [[Bubs's Shady Business Practices\|an entirely different joke]] so it doesn't come across as a "strange variant" like the first two. So all in all we have a nonstandard phrasing that popped up twice, in passing, with no images, in an article that is not linked anywhere else, with content that is already covered in the extant Fun Facts sections - to me it doesn't add up to "articleworthy". --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 23:35, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
	::::Sorry, I've been meaning to reply (after studying your response) but time has flown by. Please give me a few more days (hopefully less) to form a proper response. Thanks for your patience! :) --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 11:23, 27 July 2021 (UTC)		::::Sorry, I've been meaning to reply (after studying your response) but time has flown by. Please give me a few more days (hopefully less) to form a proper response. Thanks for your patience! :) --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 11:23, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
	:::::My thoughts are basically the same as Bleu’s (thank you Bleu for articulating them so well. -[[Special:Contributions/61.204.232.1\|61.204.232.1]] 11:26, 27 July 2021 (UTC)		:::::My thoughts are basically the same as Bleu’s (thank you Bleu for articulating them so well. -[[Special:Contributions/61.204.232.1\|61.204.232.1]] 11:26, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

61.204.232.1 at 11:26, 27 July 2021

61.204.232.1 — Tue, 27 Jul 2021 11:26:49 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:26, 27 July 2021
Line 13:		Line 13:
	:::I feel two instances of a joke doesn't make it notable (and personally I tend to be a little strict when judging "does this deserve an article"). The article for part-time job could have a note about how "the reversed quantities in the phrase ''with the purchase of [...] equal or lesser value'' previously appeared in the King of Town Character Video" in the fun facts. But the fact that people in this very page have overlooked how the phrasing is backwards suggests to me that it was a goof that happened to occur twice rather than a deliberate running gag. And even if "offering combo deals if you buy something cheaper" ''is'' a notable gag, the joke in Cool Things is [[\|Bubs's Shady Business Practices\|an entirely different joke]] so it doesn't come across as a "strange variant" like the first two. So all in all we have a nonstandard phrasing that popped up twice, in passing, with no images, in an article that is not linked anywhere else, with content that is already covered in the extant Fun Facts sections - to me it doesn't add up to "articleworthy". --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 23:35, 12 July 2021 (UTC)		:::I feel two instances of a joke doesn't make it notable (and personally I tend to be a little strict when judging "does this deserve an article"). The article for part-time job could have a note about how "the reversed quantities in the phrase ''with the purchase of [...] equal or lesser value'' previously appeared in the King of Town Character Video" in the fun facts. But the fact that people in this very page have overlooked how the phrasing is backwards suggests to me that it was a goof that happened to occur twice rather than a deliberate running gag. And even if "offering combo deals if you buy something cheaper" ''is'' a notable gag, the joke in Cool Things is [[\|Bubs's Shady Business Practices\|an entirely different joke]] so it doesn't come across as a "strange variant" like the first two. So all in all we have a nonstandard phrasing that popped up twice, in passing, with no images, in an article that is not linked anywhere else, with content that is already covered in the extant Fun Facts sections - to me it doesn't add up to "articleworthy". --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 23:35, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
	::::Sorry, I've been meaning to reply (after studying your response) but time has flown by. Please give me a few more days (hopefully less) to form a proper response. Thanks for your patience! :) --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 11:23, 27 July 2021 (UTC)		::::Sorry, I've been meaning to reply (after studying your response) but time has flown by. Please give me a few more days (hopefully less) to form a proper response. Thanks for your patience! :) --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 11:23, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
		+	:::::My thoughts are basically the same as Bleu’s (thank you Bleu for articulating them so well. -[[Special:Contributions/61.204.232.1\|61.204.232.1]] 11:26, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Stux: /* Relevance? */ quick note

Stux — Tue, 27 Jul 2021 11:23:25 GMT

Relevance?: quick note

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:23, 27 July 2021
Line 12:		Line 12:
	::If we're "voting" I would like to re-iterate that my points from back in December are, in my opinion, quite valid and constitute good reason to keep the page. I have not read anyone provide any kind of constructive criticism or support of my statement. Is it even being taken into consideration when "voting" delete? Keeping a page shouldn't be a matter of opinion but rather of the page's merit. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 22:44, 12 July 2021 (UTC)		::If we're "voting" I would like to re-iterate that my points from back in December are, in my opinion, quite valid and constitute good reason to keep the page. I have not read anyone provide any kind of constructive criticism or support of my statement. Is it even being taken into consideration when "voting" delete? Keeping a page shouldn't be a matter of opinion but rather of the page's merit. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 22:44, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
	:::I feel two instances of a joke doesn't make it notable (and personally I tend to be a little strict when judging "does this deserve an article"). The article for part-time job could have a note about how "the reversed quantities in the phrase ''with the purchase of [...] equal or lesser value'' previously appeared in the King of Town Character Video" in the fun facts. But the fact that people in this very page have overlooked how the phrasing is backwards suggests to me that it was a goof that happened to occur twice rather than a deliberate running gag. And even if "offering combo deals if you buy something cheaper" ''is'' a notable gag, the joke in Cool Things is [[\|Bubs's Shady Business Practices\|an entirely different joke]] so it doesn't come across as a "strange variant" like the first two. So all in all we have a nonstandard phrasing that popped up twice, in passing, with no images, in an article that is not linked anywhere else, with content that is already covered in the extant Fun Facts sections - to me it doesn't add up to "articleworthy". --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 23:35, 12 July 2021 (UTC)		:::I feel two instances of a joke doesn't make it notable (and personally I tend to be a little strict when judging "does this deserve an article"). The article for part-time job could have a note about how "the reversed quantities in the phrase ''with the purchase of [...] equal or lesser value'' previously appeared in the King of Town Character Video" in the fun facts. But the fact that people in this very page have overlooked how the phrasing is backwards suggests to me that it was a goof that happened to occur twice rather than a deliberate running gag. And even if "offering combo deals if you buy something cheaper" ''is'' a notable gag, the joke in Cool Things is [[\|Bubs's Shady Business Practices\|an entirely different joke]] so it doesn't come across as a "strange variant" like the first two. So all in all we have a nonstandard phrasing that popped up twice, in passing, with no images, in an article that is not linked anywhere else, with content that is already covered in the extant Fun Facts sections - to me it doesn't add up to "articleworthy". --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 23:35, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
		+	::::Sorry, I've been meaning to reply (after studying your response) but time has flown by. Please give me a few more days (hopefully less) to form a proper response. Thanks for your patience! :) --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 11:23, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Bleu Ninja: /* Relevance? */ clarify my point

Bleu Ninja — Tue, 13 Jul 2021 19:19:38 GMT

Relevance?: clarify my point

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:19, 13 July 2021
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:Agree. Vote delete. --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 16:49, 12 July 2021 (UTC)		:Agree. Vote delete. --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 16:49, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
	::If we're "voting" I would like to re-iterate that my points from back in December are, in my opinion, quite valid and constitute good reason to keep the page. I have not read anyone provide any kind of constructive criticism or support of my statement. Is it even being taken into consideration when "voting" delete? Keeping a page shouldn't be a matter of opinion but rather of the page's merit. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 22:44, 12 July 2021 (UTC)		::If we're "voting" I would like to re-iterate that my points from back in December are, in my opinion, quite valid and constitute good reason to keep the page. I have not read anyone provide any kind of constructive criticism or support of my statement. Is it even being taken into consideration when "voting" delete? Keeping a page shouldn't be a matter of opinion but rather of the page's merit. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 22:44, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
-	:::I feel two instances of a joke doesn't make it notable. The article for part-time job could have a note about how "the reversed quantities in the phrase ''with the purchase of [...] equal or lesser value'' previously appeared in the King of Town Character Video" in the fun facts. But the fact that people in this very page have overlooked how the phrasing is backwards suggests to me that it was a goof that happened to occur twice rather than a deliberate running gag. And even if "offering combo deals if you buy something cheaper" ''is'' a notable gag, the joke in Cool Things is an entirely different joke ~~(Bubs is cheap and wants to dissuade refunds)~~ so it doesn't come across as a "strange variant" like the first two. So all in all we have a nonstandard phrasing that popped up twice, in passing, with no images, in an article that is not linked anywhere else, with content that is already covered in the extant Fun Facts sections - to me it doesn't add up to "articleworthy". --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 23:35, 12 July 2021 (UTC)	+	:::I feel two instances of a joke doesn't make it notable (and personally I tend to be a little strict when judging "does this deserve an article"). The article for part-time job could have a note about how "the reversed quantities in the phrase ''with the purchase of [...] equal or lesser value'' previously appeared in the King of Town Character Video" in the fun facts. But the fact that people in this very page have overlooked how the phrasing is backwards suggests to me that it was a goof that happened to occur twice rather than a deliberate running gag. And even if "offering combo deals if you buy something cheaper" ''is'' a notable gag, the joke in Cool Things is [[\|Bubs's Shady Business Practices\|an entirely different joke]] so it doesn't come across as a "strange variant" like the first two. So all in all we have a nonstandard phrasing that popped up twice, in passing, with no images, in an article that is not linked anywhere else, with content that is already covered in the extant Fun Facts sections - to me it doesn't add up to "articleworthy". --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 23:35, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Bleu Ninja: /* Relevance? */

Bleu Ninja — Mon, 12 Jul 2021 23:35:43 GMT

Relevance?

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:35, 12 July 2021
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:Agree. Vote delete. --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 16:49, 12 July 2021 (UTC)		:Agree. Vote delete. --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 16:49, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
	::If we're "voting" I would like to re-iterate that my points from back in December are, in my opinion, quite valid and constitute good reason to keep the page. I have not read anyone provide any kind of constructive criticism or support of my statement. Is it even being taken into consideration when "voting" delete? Keeping a page shouldn't be a matter of opinion but rather of the page's merit. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 22:44, 12 July 2021 (UTC)		::If we're "voting" I would like to re-iterate that my points from back in December are, in my opinion, quite valid and constitute good reason to keep the page. I have not read anyone provide any kind of constructive criticism or support of my statement. Is it even being taken into consideration when "voting" delete? Keeping a page shouldn't be a matter of opinion but rather of the page's merit. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 22:44, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
		+	:::I feel two instances of a joke doesn't make it notable. The article for part-time job could have a note about how "the reversed quantities in the phrase ''with the purchase of [...] equal or lesser value'' previously appeared in the King of Town Character Video" in the fun facts. But the fact that people in this very page have overlooked how the phrasing is backwards suggests to me that it was a goof that happened to occur twice rather than a deliberate running gag. And even if "offering combo deals if you buy something cheaper" ''is'' a notable gag, the joke in Cool Things is an entirely different joke (Bubs is cheap and wants to dissuade refunds) so it doesn't come across as a "strange variant" like the first two. So all in all we have a nonstandard phrasing that popped up twice, in passing, with no images, in an article that is not linked anywhere else, with content that is already covered in the extant Fun Facts sections - to me it doesn't add up to "articleworthy". --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 23:35, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:37, 1 March 2023
Line 14:		Line 14:
	::::Sorry, I've been meaning to reply (after studying your response) but time has flown by. Please give me a few more days (hopefully less) to form a proper response. Thanks for your patience! :) --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 11:23, 27 July 2021 (UTC)		::::Sorry, I've been meaning to reply (after studying your response) but time has flown by. Please give me a few more days (hopefully less) to form a proper response. Thanks for your patience! :) --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 11:23, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
	:::::My thoughts are basically the same as Bleu’s (thank you Bleu for articulating them so well). -[[Special:Contributions/61.204.232.1\|61.204.232.1]] 11:26, 27 July 2021 (UTC)		:::::My thoughts are basically the same as Bleu’s (thank you Bleu for articulating them so well). -[[Special:Contributions/61.204.232.1\|61.204.232.1]] 11:26, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
-	:::::: yeah, this isn’t a running gag. It was only used 3 times and is something used a lot in conversation. I think I will delete this page. [[User:TMBGLOVER\|TMBGLOVER]] 00:11, 12 October 2022 (UTC)	+	::::::As are mine. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 03:37, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
		+	::::: yeah, this isn’t a running gag. It was only used 3 times and is something used a lot in conversation. I think I will delete this page. [[User:TMBGLOVER\|TMBGLOVER]] 00:11, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:11, 12 October 2022
Line 14:		Line 14:
	::::Sorry, I've been meaning to reply (after studying your response) but time has flown by. Please give me a few more days (hopefully less) to form a proper response. Thanks for your patience! :) --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 11:23, 27 July 2021 (UTC)		::::Sorry, I've been meaning to reply (after studying your response) but time has flown by. Please give me a few more days (hopefully less) to form a proper response. Thanks for your patience! :) --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 11:23, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
	:::::My thoughts are basically the same as Bleu’s (thank you Bleu for articulating them so well). -[[Special:Contributions/61.204.232.1\|61.204.232.1]] 11:26, 27 July 2021 (UTC)		:::::My thoughts are basically the same as Bleu’s (thank you Bleu for articulating them so well). -[[Special:Contributions/61.204.232.1\|61.204.232.1]] 11:26, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
		+	:::::: yeah, this isn’t a running gag. It was only used 3 times and is something used a lot in conversation. I think I will delete this page. [[User:TMBGLOVER\|TMBGLOVER]] 00:11, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:30, 27 July 2021
Line 13:		Line 13:
	:::I feel two instances of a joke doesn't make it notable (and personally I tend to be a little strict when judging "does this deserve an article"). The article for part-time job could have a note about how "the reversed quantities in the phrase ''with the purchase of [...] equal or lesser value'' previously appeared in the King of Town Character Video" in the fun facts. But the fact that people in this very page have overlooked how the phrasing is backwards suggests to me that it was a goof that happened to occur twice rather than a deliberate running gag. And even if "offering combo deals if you buy something cheaper" ''is'' a notable gag, the joke in Cool Things is [[Bubs's Shady Business Practices\|an entirely different joke]] so it doesn't come across as a "strange variant" like the first two. So all in all we have a nonstandard phrasing that popped up twice, in passing, with no images, in an article that is not linked anywhere else, with content that is already covered in the extant Fun Facts sections - to me it doesn't add up to "articleworthy". --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 23:35, 12 July 2021 (UTC)		:::I feel two instances of a joke doesn't make it notable (and personally I tend to be a little strict when judging "does this deserve an article"). The article for part-time job could have a note about how "the reversed quantities in the phrase ''with the purchase of [...] equal or lesser value'' previously appeared in the King of Town Character Video" in the fun facts. But the fact that people in this very page have overlooked how the phrasing is backwards suggests to me that it was a goof that happened to occur twice rather than a deliberate running gag. And even if "offering combo deals if you buy something cheaper" ''is'' a notable gag, the joke in Cool Things is [[Bubs's Shady Business Practices\|an entirely different joke]] so it doesn't come across as a "strange variant" like the first two. So all in all we have a nonstandard phrasing that popped up twice, in passing, with no images, in an article that is not linked anywhere else, with content that is already covered in the extant Fun Facts sections - to me it doesn't add up to "articleworthy". --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 23:35, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
	::::Sorry, I've been meaning to reply (after studying your response) but time has flown by. Please give me a few more days (hopefully less) to form a proper response. Thanks for your patience! :) --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 11:23, 27 July 2021 (UTC)		::::Sorry, I've been meaning to reply (after studying your response) but time has flown by. Please give me a few more days (hopefully less) to form a proper response. Thanks for your patience! :) --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 11:23, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
-	:::::My thoughts are basically the same as Bleu’s (thank you Bleu for articulating them so well. -[[Special:Contributions/61.204.232.1\|61.204.232.1]] 11:26, 27 July 2021 (UTC)	+	:::::My thoughts are basically the same as Bleu’s (thank you Bleu for articulating them so well). -[[Special:Contributions/61.204.232.1\|61.204.232.1]] 11:26, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:28, 27 July 2021
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:Agree. Vote delete. --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 16:49, 12 July 2021 (UTC)		:Agree. Vote delete. --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 16:49, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
	::If we're "voting" I would like to re-iterate that my points from back in December are, in my opinion, quite valid and constitute good reason to keep the page. I have not read anyone provide any kind of constructive criticism or support of my statement. Is it even being taken into consideration when "voting" delete? Keeping a page shouldn't be a matter of opinion but rather of the page's merit. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 22:44, 12 July 2021 (UTC)		::If we're "voting" I would like to re-iterate that my points from back in December are, in my opinion, quite valid and constitute good reason to keep the page. I have not read anyone provide any kind of constructive criticism or support of my statement. Is it even being taken into consideration when "voting" delete? Keeping a page shouldn't be a matter of opinion but rather of the page's merit. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 22:44, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
-	:::I feel two instances of a joke doesn't make it notable (and personally I tend to be a little strict when judging "does this deserve an article"). The article for part-time job could have a note about how "the reversed quantities in the phrase ''with the purchase of [...] equal or lesser value'' previously appeared in the King of Town Character Video" in the fun facts. But the fact that people in this very page have overlooked how the phrasing is backwards suggests to me that it was a goof that happened to occur twice rather than a deliberate running gag. And even if "offering combo deals if you buy something cheaper" ''is'' a notable gag, the joke in Cool Things is [[\|Bubs's Shady Business Practices\|an entirely different joke]] so it doesn't come across as a "strange variant" like the first two. So all in all we have a nonstandard phrasing that popped up twice, in passing, with no images, in an article that is not linked anywhere else, with content that is already covered in the extant Fun Facts sections - to me it doesn't add up to "articleworthy". --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 23:35, 12 July 2021 (UTC)	+	:::I feel two instances of a joke doesn't make it notable (and personally I tend to be a little strict when judging "does this deserve an article"). The article for part-time job could have a note about how "the reversed quantities in the phrase ''with the purchase of [...] equal or lesser value'' previously appeared in the King of Town Character Video" in the fun facts. But the fact that people in this very page have overlooked how the phrasing is backwards suggests to me that it was a goof that happened to occur twice rather than a deliberate running gag. And even if "offering combo deals if you buy something cheaper" ''is'' a notable gag, the joke in Cool Things is [[Bubs's Shady Business Practices\|an entirely different joke]] so it doesn't come across as a "strange variant" like the first two. So all in all we have a nonstandard phrasing that popped up twice, in passing, with no images, in an article that is not linked anywhere else, with content that is already covered in the extant Fun Facts sections - to me it doesn't add up to "articleworthy". --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 23:35, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
	::::Sorry, I've been meaning to reply (after studying your response) but time has flown by. Please give me a few more days (hopefully less) to form a proper response. Thanks for your patience! :) --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 11:23, 27 July 2021 (UTC)		::::Sorry, I've been meaning to reply (after studying your response) but time has flown by. Please give me a few more days (hopefully less) to form a proper response. Thanks for your patience! :) --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 11:23, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
	:::::My thoughts are basically the same as Bleu’s (thank you Bleu for articulating them so well. -[[Special:Contributions/61.204.232.1\|61.204.232.1]] 11:26, 27 July 2021 (UTC)		:::::My thoughts are basically the same as Bleu’s (thank you Bleu for articulating them so well. -[[Special:Contributions/61.204.232.1\|61.204.232.1]] 11:26, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:26, 27 July 2021
Line 13:		Line 13:
	:::I feel two instances of a joke doesn't make it notable (and personally I tend to be a little strict when judging "does this deserve an article"). The article for part-time job could have a note about how "the reversed quantities in the phrase ''with the purchase of [...] equal or lesser value'' previously appeared in the King of Town Character Video" in the fun facts. But the fact that people in this very page have overlooked how the phrasing is backwards suggests to me that it was a goof that happened to occur twice rather than a deliberate running gag. And even if "offering combo deals if you buy something cheaper" ''is'' a notable gag, the joke in Cool Things is [[\|Bubs's Shady Business Practices\|an entirely different joke]] so it doesn't come across as a "strange variant" like the first two. So all in all we have a nonstandard phrasing that popped up twice, in passing, with no images, in an article that is not linked anywhere else, with content that is already covered in the extant Fun Facts sections - to me it doesn't add up to "articleworthy". --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 23:35, 12 July 2021 (UTC)		:::I feel two instances of a joke doesn't make it notable (and personally I tend to be a little strict when judging "does this deserve an article"). The article for part-time job could have a note about how "the reversed quantities in the phrase ''with the purchase of [...] equal or lesser value'' previously appeared in the King of Town Character Video" in the fun facts. But the fact that people in this very page have overlooked how the phrasing is backwards suggests to me that it was a goof that happened to occur twice rather than a deliberate running gag. And even if "offering combo deals if you buy something cheaper" ''is'' a notable gag, the joke in Cool Things is [[\|Bubs's Shady Business Practices\|an entirely different joke]] so it doesn't come across as a "strange variant" like the first two. So all in all we have a nonstandard phrasing that popped up twice, in passing, with no images, in an article that is not linked anywhere else, with content that is already covered in the extant Fun Facts sections - to me it doesn't add up to "articleworthy". --{{User:Bleu Ninja/sig}} 23:35, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
	::::Sorry, I've been meaning to reply (after studying your response) but time has flown by. Please give me a few more days (hopefully less) to form a proper response. Thanks for your patience! :) --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 11:23, 27 July 2021 (UTC)		::::Sorry, I've been meaning to reply (after studying your response) but time has flown by. Please give me a few more days (hopefully less) to form a proper response. Thanks for your patience! :) --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 11:23, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
		+	:::::My thoughts are basically the same as Bleu’s (thank you Bleu for articulating them so well. -[[Special:Contributions/61.204.232.1\|61.204.232.1]] 11:26, 27 July 2021 (UTC)