Talk:Minor Game Characters - Revision history

Jeffjman: /* add the cow */

Jeffjman — Tue, 22 Mar 2022 11:21:14 GMT

add the cow

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:21, 22 March 2022
Line 18:		Line 18:
	==add the cow==		==add the cow==
	do it --[[User:Jeffjman\|J∃ffJ]][[User_talk:Jeffjman\|Man]][[File:jeffjsigchrismas.png\|23px]] 18:18, 21 March 2022 (UTC)		do it --[[User:Jeffjman\|J∃ffJ]][[User_talk:Jeffjman\|Man]][[File:jeffjsigchrismas.png\|23px]] 18:18, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
		+	:did it --[[User:Jeffjman\|J∃ffJ]][[User_talk:Jeffjman\|Man]][[File:jeffjsigchrismas.png\|23px]] 11:21, 22 March 2022 (UTC)~

Jeffjman at 18:18, 21 March 2022

Jeffjman — Mon, 21 Mar 2022 18:18:45 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:18, 21 March 2022
Line 15:		Line 15:

	Should the [[Stinkoman 20X6]] sprite BE a minor video game character? -{{User:Viklas/sig}} 19:02, 12 arch 2007 (UTC)		Should the [[Stinkoman 20X6]] sprite BE a minor video game character? -{{User:Viklas/sig}} 19:02, 12 arch 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	==add the cow==
		+	do it --[[User:Jeffjman\|J∃ffJ]][[User_talk:Jeffjman\|Man]][[File:jeffjsigchrismas.png\|23px]] 18:18, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Viklas: /* S' more peoples? */

Viklas — Tue, 13 Mar 2007 00:01:31 GMT

S' more peoples?

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:01, 13 March 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:

	You guys sure this is all there is? Looks like there could be some more pixelated gamey guys in here. Know whut I mean?--[[User:68.249.185.243\|68.249.185.243]] 00:32, 6 December 2006 (UTC)		You guys sure this is all there is? Looks like there could be some more pixelated gamey guys in here. Know whut I mean?--[[User:68.249.185.243\|68.249.185.243]] 00:32, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+
		+	== Minor Stink? ==
		+
		+	Should the [[Stinkoman 20X6]] sprite BE a minor video game character? -{{User:Viklas/sig}} 19:02, 12 arch 2007 (UTC)

68.249.185.243: /**/S' more peoples?

68.249.185.243 — Wed, 06 Dec 2006 00:32:17 GMT

: S' more peoples?

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:32, 6 December 2006
Line 6:		Line 6:

	:::All it needs is to be cropped down to just the guy. I'd do it, but I'm lazy right now. {{User:Homestar Coder/sig}} 16:49, 2 January 2006 (UTC)		:::All it needs is to be cropped down to just the guy. I'd do it, but I'm lazy right now. {{User:Homestar Coder/sig}} 16:49, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	== S' more peoples? ==
		+
		+	You guys sure this is all there is? Looks like there could be some more pixelated gamey guys in here. Know whut I mean?--[[User:68.249.185.243\|68.249.185.243]] 00:32, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Homestar Coder at 16:49, 2 January 2006

Homestar Coder — Mon, 02 Jan 2006 16:49:28 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:49, 2 January 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:

	::The picture for Duck Pond Guy isn't good. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 16:30, 2 January 2006 (UTC)		::The picture for Duck Pond Guy isn't good. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 16:30, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	:::All it needs is to be cropped down to just the guy. I'd do it, but I'm lazy right now. {{User:Homestar Coder/sig}} 16:49, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Has Matt?: not really

Has Matt? — Mon, 02 Jan 2006 16:30:04 GMT

not really

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:30, 2 January 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:I like this one. The pictures are good and could be useful to someone, at least. {{User:Homestar Coder/sig}} 16:29, 2 January 2006 (UTC)		:I like this one. The pictures are good and could be useful to someone, at least. {{User:Homestar Coder/sig}} 16:29, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	::The picture for Duck Pond Guy isn't good. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 16:30, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Homestar Coder at 16:29, 2 January 2006

Homestar Coder — Mon, 02 Jan 2006 16:29:17 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:29, 2 January 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Although part of me likes the idea of this page, part of me agree's with BazookaJoe's [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Talk:Karen_Chapman&diff=226898&oldid=226892 wish] for no more "Minor ____" pages. If entities truly ''are'' minor—i.e. have little bearing on the H*R universe or little contextual significance, maybe they don't need a page, even a shared one. The litmus test should be: would this page be created to appease some creative urge in us, the wikiers, or would it be created because someone would conceivably look it up and need to read it? —[[User:AbdiViklas\|AbdiViklas]] 16:18, 2 January 2006 (UTC)		Although part of me likes the idea of this page, part of me agree's with BazookaJoe's [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Talk:Karen_Chapman&diff=226898&oldid=226892 wish] for no more "Minor ____" pages. If entities truly ''are'' minor—i.e. have little bearing on the H*R universe or little contextual significance, maybe they don't need a page, even a shared one. The litmus test should be: would this page be created to appease some creative urge in us, the wikiers, or would it be created because someone would conceivably look it up and need to read it? —[[User:AbdiViklas\|AbdiViklas]] 16:18, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	:I like this one. The pictures are good and could be useful to someone, at least. {{User:Homestar Coder/sig}} 16:29, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

AbdiViklas: maybe not this page?

AbdiViklas — Mon, 02 Jan 2006 16:21:33 GMT

maybe not this page?

New page

Although part of me likes the idea of this page, part of me agree's with BazookaJoe's [http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Talk:Karen_Chapman&diff=226898&oldid=226892 wish] for no more "Minor ____" pages. If entities truly ''are'' minor—i.e. have little bearing on the H*R universe or little contextual significance, maybe they don't need a page, even a shared one. The litmus test should be: would this page be created to appease some creative urge in us, the wikiers, or would it be created because someone would conceivably look it up and need to read it? —[[User:AbdiViklas|AbdiViklas]] 16:18, 2 January 2006 (UTC)