Talk:Obstacle Course - Revision history

Trey56: +note

Trey56 — Sat, 29 Sep 2007 03:59:52 GMT

+note

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:59, 29 September 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::noted. thanks, bro {{User:TheDude/sig}} 01:45, 13 May 2007 (UTC)		::noted. thanks, bro {{User:TheDude/sig}} 01:45, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
	:::What?! How come this, that's only made one appearance, get its own article, yet the one I created for "We Don't Really Even Care About You" got deleted?! [[User:LongLiveCoachZ\|LongLiveCoachZ]] 22:10, 28 September 2007 (UTC)		:::What?! How come this, that's only made one appearance, get its own article, yet the one I created for "We Don't Really Even Care About You" got deleted?! [[User:LongLiveCoachZ\|LongLiveCoachZ]] 22:10, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
		+	::::I {{p\|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=User_talk:LongLiveCoachZ&diff=502270&oldid=502267 replied}} on your talk page. Hope that helps, {{User:Trey56/sig}} 03:59, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

LongLiveCoachZ at 22:10, 28 September 2007

LongLiveCoachZ — Fri, 28 Sep 2007 22:10:37 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:10, 28 September 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:The "three appearances rule" only applies to running gags. Places and especially items can easily be written up for an article after one appearance. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 01:35, 13 May 2007 (UTC)		:The "three appearances rule" only applies to running gags. Places and especially items can easily be written up for an article after one appearance. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 01:35, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
	::noted. thanks, bro {{User:TheDude/sig}} 01:45, 13 May 2007 (UTC)		::noted. thanks, bro {{User:TheDude/sig}} 01:45, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
-	:::What?! How come this, that's only made one appearance, get its own article, yet the one I created for "We Don't Really Even Care About You" got deleted?!	+	:::What?! How come this, that's only made one appearance, get its own article, yet the one I created for "We Don't Really Even Care About You" got deleted?! [[User:LongLiveCoachZ\|LongLiveCoachZ]] 22:10, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

74.140.218.179 at 01:58, 28 September 2007

74.140.218.179 — Fri, 28 Sep 2007 01:58:51 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:58, 28 September 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:The "three appearances rule" only applies to running gags. Places and especially items can easily be written up for an article after one appearance. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 01:35, 13 May 2007 (UTC)		:The "three appearances rule" only applies to running gags. Places and especially items can easily be written up for an article after one appearance. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 01:35, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
	::noted. thanks, bro {{User:TheDude/sig}} 01:45, 13 May 2007 (UTC)		::noted. thanks, bro {{User:TheDude/sig}} 01:45, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
		+	:::What?! How come this, that's only made one appearance, get its own article, yet the one I created for "We Don't Really Even Care About You" got deleted?!

TheDude at 01:45, 13 May 2007

TheDude — Sun, 13 May 2007 01:45:29 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:45, 13 May 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	isn't there (at least a loose) 3 mentions on the h-star-r website before something minor like this is considered significant enough to merit a page? i don't really feel strongly about it one way or another, but I've seen discussion on other minor talk pages and wanted to know what the official deal is. shouldn't we keep it consistent? {{User:TheDude/sig}} 01:32, 13 May 2007 (UTC)		isn't there (at least a loose) 3 mentions on the h-star-r website before something minor like this is considered significant enough to merit a page? i don't really feel strongly about it one way or another, but I've seen discussion on other minor talk pages and wanted to know what the official deal is. shouldn't we keep it consistent? {{User:TheDude/sig}} 01:32, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
	:The "three appearances rule" only applies to running gags. Places and especially items can easily be written up for an article after one appearance. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 01:35, 13 May 2007 (UTC)		:The "three appearances rule" only applies to running gags. Places and especially items can easily be written up for an article after one appearance. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 01:35, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
		+	::noted. thanks, bro {{User:TheDude/sig}} 01:45, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

DorianGray: Reply

DorianGray — Sun, 13 May 2007 01:35:42 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:35, 13 May 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	isn't there (at least a loose) 3 mentions on the h-star-r website before something minor like this is considered significant enough to merit a page? i don't really feel strongly about it one way or another, but I've seen discussion on other minor talk pages and wanted to know what the official deal is. shouldn't we keep it consistent? {{User:TheDude/sig}} 01:32, 13 May 2007 (UTC)		isn't there (at least a loose) 3 mentions on the h-star-r website before something minor like this is considered significant enough to merit a page? i don't really feel strongly about it one way or another, but I've seen discussion on other minor talk pages and wanted to know what the official deal is. shouldn't we keep it consistent? {{User:TheDude/sig}} 01:32, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
		+	:The "three appearances rule" only applies to running gags. Places and especially items can easily be written up for an article after one appearance. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 01:35, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

TheDude: New page: isn't there (at least a loose) 3 mentions on the h-star-r website before something minor like this is considered significant enough to merit a page? i don't really feel strongly about it ...

TheDude — Sun, 13 May 2007 01:32:54 GMT

New page: isn't there (at least a loose) 3 mentions on the h-star-r website before something minor like this is considered significant enough to merit a page? i don't really feel strongly about it ...

New page

isn't there (at least a loose) 3 mentions on the h-star-r website before something minor like this is considered significant enough to merit a page? i don't really feel strongly about it one way or another, but I've seen discussion on other minor talk pages and wanted to know what the official deal is. shouldn't we keep it consistent? {{User:TheDude/sig}} 01:32, 13 May 2007 (UTC)