Talk:Predictions - Revision history

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc: /* The name? */ unindent

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc — Sat, 18 Aug 2018 04:02:26 GMT

The name?: unindent

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:02, 18 August 2018
Line 29:		Line 29:
	== The name? ==		== The name? ==

-	:I thought the article itself was fine but I'm not sure about the name.Does anyone have any suggestions?I think maybe "Predicting the Future". {{User:Wasd98/sig}} 19:30, 8 October 2009 (UTC)	+	I thought the article itself was fine but I'm not sure about the name.Does anyone have any suggestions?I think maybe "Predicting the Future". {{User:Wasd98/sig}} 19:30, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
	:I don't see a problem with it. "Predictions" is simple, direct, and accurate. "Predicting the Future" is the same thing, but unnecessarily longer. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 04:02, 18 August 2018 (UTC)		:I don't see a problem with it. "Predictions" is simple, direct, and accurate. "Predicting the Future" is the same thing, but unnecessarily longer. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 04:02, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc: /* The name? */ decade-late reply

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc — Sat, 18 Aug 2018 04:02:11 GMT

The name?: decade-late reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:02, 18 August 2018
Line 30:		Line 30:

	:I thought the article itself was fine but I'm not sure about the name.Does anyone have any suggestions?I think maybe "Predicting the Future". {{User:Wasd98/sig}} 19:30, 8 October 2009 (UTC)		:I thought the article itself was fine but I'm not sure about the name.Does anyone have any suggestions?I think maybe "Predicting the Future". {{User:Wasd98/sig}} 19:30, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
		+	:I don't see a problem with it. "Predictions" is simple, direct, and accurate. "Predicting the Future" is the same thing, but unnecessarily longer. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 04:02, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Broncotroll at 20:58, 15 August 2015

Broncotroll — Sat, 15 Aug 2015 20:58:27 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:58, 15 August 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~{{tbd}}~~	+
	== Discussion ==		== Discussion ==
	I'm thinking this is a [[HRWiki:Spoons\|spoon]]. Everyone makes predictions. It's a natural part of living. And categorizing every time a prediction has made on the site would be practically impossible. Plus, it's orphaned. {{User:GuardDuck/sig}} 05:54, 6 February 2009 (UTC)		I'm thinking this is a [[HRWiki:Spoons\|spoon]]. Everyone makes predictions. It's a natural part of living. And categorizing every time a prediction has made on the site would be practically impossible. Plus, it's orphaned. {{User:GuardDuck/sig}} 05:54, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Essence of Ghost Water: /* Discussion */

Essence of Ghost Water — Thu, 08 Apr 2010 22:03:46 GMT

Discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:03, 8 April 2010
Line 21:		Line 21:

	Ok, I've transferred some of the detailed information on "History according to Strong Bad" into this article, copied the way this information was formatted on the former, added some pictures and arranged everything into chronological order. I then transferred anything on this article which was not on HatSB to the latter. Now we have to come to a firm consensus over whether to keep this article or the identical section on [[History according to Strong Bad]], 'cause there's no need to have both of them. '''I prefer [[Predictions]]'''. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 21:31, 4 September 2009 (UTC)		Ok, I've transferred some of the detailed information on "History according to Strong Bad" into this article, copied the way this information was formatted on the former, added some pictures and arranged everything into chronological order. I then transferred anything on this article which was not on HatSB to the latter. Now we have to come to a firm consensus over whether to keep this article or the identical section on [[History according to Strong Bad]], 'cause there's no need to have both of them. '''I prefer [[Predictions]]'''. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 21:31, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
		+	:I prefer [[History according to Strong Bad\|HatSB]], since it seems better there. '''DELARGHT''' --[[User:Essence of Ghost Water\|Essence of Ghost Water]] 22:03, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

	== it is Ok ==		== it is Ok ==

Rondleman: /**/The name?

Rondleman — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 23:33:29 GMT

: The name?

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:33, 8 October 2009
Line 25:		Line 25:

	it is good but we should get rid of the predictions from [[History According to Strong Bad]] --[[Special:Contributions/114.77.41.156\|114.77.41.156]] 06:23, 30 July 2009 (UTC)		it is good but we should get rid of the predictions from [[History According to Strong Bad]] --[[Special:Contributions/114.77.41.156\|114.77.41.156]] 06:23, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	== The name? ==
		+
		+	:I thought the article itself was fine but I'm not sure about the name.Does anyone have any suggestions?I think maybe "Predicting the Future". {{User:Wasd98/sig}} 19:30, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

The Chort: I've improved the article drastically just now. Let's continue the discussion.

The Chort — Fri, 04 Sep 2009 21:31:14 GMT

I've improved the article drastically just now. Let's continue the discussion.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:31, 4 September 2009
Line 19:		Line 19:
	::Well, this article is fine by me, it's the better choice. {{User:Theycallmefree/sig}} 15:33, 30 July 2009 (UTC)		::Well, this article is fine by me, it's the better choice. {{User:Theycallmefree/sig}} 15:33, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
	:::I don't really like it, but that's just me. {{User:Espemon333/sig}} 00:17, 1 September 2009 (UTC)		:::I don't really like it, but that's just me. {{User:Espemon333/sig}} 00:17, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	Ok, I've transferred some of the detailed information on "History according to Strong Bad" into this article, copied the way this information was formatted on the former, added some pictures and arranged everything into chronological order. I then transferred anything on this article which was not on HatSB to the latter. Now we have to come to a firm consensus over whether to keep this article or the identical section on [[History according to Strong Bad]], 'cause there's no need to have both of them. '''I prefer [[Predictions]]'''. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 21:31, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

	== it is Ok ==		== it is Ok ==

	it is good but we should get rid of the predictions from [[History According to Strong Bad]] --[[Special:Contributions/114.77.41.156\|114.77.41.156]] 06:23, 30 July 2009 (UTC)		it is good but we should get rid of the predictions from [[History According to Strong Bad]] --[[Special:Contributions/114.77.41.156\|114.77.41.156]] 06:23, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Espemon333: /* Discussion */

Espemon333 — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 00:17:33 GMT

Discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:17, 1 September 2009
Line 18:		Line 18:
	YES! predictions is ok --[[Special:Contributions/114.77.41.156\|114.77.41.156]] 07:52, 30 July 2009 (UTC) P.s the it is Ok is also good to look at.		YES! predictions is ok --[[Special:Contributions/114.77.41.156\|114.77.41.156]] 07:52, 30 July 2009 (UTC) P.s the it is Ok is also good to look at.
	::Well, this article is fine by me, it's the better choice. {{User:Theycallmefree/sig}} 15:33, 30 July 2009 (UTC)		::Well, this article is fine by me, it's the better choice. {{User:Theycallmefree/sig}} 15:33, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
		+	:::I don't really like it, but that's just me. {{User:Espemon333/sig}} 00:17, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

	== it is Ok ==		== it is Ok ==

	it is good but we should get rid of the predictions from [[History According to Strong Bad]] --[[Special:Contributions/114.77.41.156\|114.77.41.156]] 06:23, 30 July 2009 (UTC)		it is good but we should get rid of the predictions from [[History According to Strong Bad]] --[[Special:Contributions/114.77.41.156\|114.77.41.156]] 06:23, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Free: /* Discussion */

Free — Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:33:35 GMT

Discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:33, 30 July 2009
Line 17:		Line 17:

	YES! predictions is ok --[[Special:Contributions/114.77.41.156\|114.77.41.156]] 07:52, 30 July 2009 (UTC) P.s the it is Ok is also good to look at.		YES! predictions is ok --[[Special:Contributions/114.77.41.156\|114.77.41.156]] 07:52, 30 July 2009 (UTC) P.s the it is Ok is also good to look at.
		+	::Well, this article is fine by me, it's the better choice. {{User:Theycallmefree/sig}} 15:33, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
		+
	== it is Ok ==		== it is Ok ==

	it is good but we should get rid of the predictions from [[History According to Strong Bad]] --[[Special:Contributions/114.77.41.156\|114.77.41.156]] 06:23, 30 July 2009 (UTC)		it is good but we should get rid of the predictions from [[History According to Strong Bad]] --[[Special:Contributions/114.77.41.156\|114.77.41.156]] 06:23, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

114.77.41.156 at 07:52, 30 July 2009

114.77.41.156 — Thu, 30 Jul 2009 07:52:58 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:52, 30 July 2009
Line 16:		Line 16:
	::We need more people to weigh in to develop a consensus here, I don't have much of an opinion one way or the other. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 11:37, 22 February 2009 (UTC)		::We need more people to weigh in to develop a consensus here, I don't have much of an opinion one way or the other. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 11:37, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

		+	YES! predictions is ok --[[Special:Contributions/114.77.41.156\|114.77.41.156]] 07:52, 30 July 2009 (UTC) P.s the it is Ok is also good to look at.
	== it is Ok ==		== it is Ok ==

	it is good but we should get rid of the predictions from [[History According to Strong Bad]] --[[Special:Contributions/114.77.41.156\|114.77.41.156]] 06:23, 30 July 2009 (UTC)		it is good but we should get rid of the predictions from [[History According to Strong Bad]] --[[Special:Contributions/114.77.41.156\|114.77.41.156]] 06:23, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

114.77.41.156: /**/it is Ok

114.77.41.156 — Thu, 30 Jul 2009 06:23:45 GMT

: it is Ok

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:23, 30 July 2009
Line 15:		Line 15:
	:I think that's the better option for both pages. -[[Special:Contributions/128.103.10.17\|128.103.10.17]] 20:07, 7 February 2009 (UTC)		:I think that's the better option for both pages. -[[Special:Contributions/128.103.10.17\|128.103.10.17]] 20:07, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
	::We need more people to weigh in to develop a consensus here, I don't have much of an opinion one way or the other. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 11:37, 22 February 2009 (UTC)		::We need more people to weigh in to develop a consensus here, I don't have much of an opinion one way or the other. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 11:37, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	== it is Ok ==
		+
		+	it is good but we should get rid of the predictions from [[History According to Strong Bad]] --[[Special:Contributions/114.77.41.156\|114.77.41.156]] 06:23, 30 July 2009 (UTC)