Talk:Stylized Character Designs - Revision history

Jeffjman: /* Decemberweenvent calendar */

Jeffjman — Thu, 01 Dec 2022 18:21:19 GMT

Decemberweenvent calendar

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:21, 1 December 2022
Line 66:		Line 66:

	Can someone upload pics of all the chars -[[Special:Contributions/113.37.226.89\|113.37.226.89]] 17:18, 1 December 2022 (UTC)		Can someone upload pics of all the chars -[[Special:Contributions/113.37.226.89\|113.37.226.89]] 17:18, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
		+	:I'm on it ----[[User:Jeffjman\|J∃ffJ]][[User_talk:Jeffjman\|Ma]][[Special:Contributions/Jeffjman\|n]][[File:jeffjsigchrismas.png\|23px]] 18:21, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

113.37.226.89: /**/Decemberweenvent calendar

113.37.226.89 — Thu, 01 Dec 2022 17:18:28 GMT

: Decemberweenvent calendar

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:18, 1 December 2022
Line 62:		Line 62:
	Would Strong Bad and The Cheat with eyeballs (in [[your edge]]) count? Because they don't usually look like that. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 04:39, 3 June 2016 (UTC)		Would Strong Bad and The Cheat with eyeballs (in [[your edge]]) count? Because they don't usually look like that. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 04:39, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
	:You mean the part where it's JUST eyeballs? No. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 09:11, 3 June 2016 (UTC)		:You mean the part where it's JUST eyeballs? No. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 09:11, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Decemberweenvent calendar ==
		+
		+	Can someone upload pics of all the chars -[[Special:Contributions/113.37.226.89\|113.37.226.89]] 17:18, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

110.144.65.118: undo revision 795391;

110.144.65.118 — Sat, 05 Dec 2020 03:11:31 GMT

undo revision 795391;

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:11, 5 December 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~==What==~~
-	~~{{u\|hr\|30px}}: me~~
	==Title==		==Title==
	If this page is going to stay (and I'm tempted to mark it for deletion), it really needs a better name than "Designs That Aren't Counted." Any suggestions? {{User:Homestar Coder/sig}} 21:05, 15 Jul 2005 (UTC)		If this page is going to stay (and I'm tempted to mark it for deletion), it really needs a better name than "Designs That Aren't Counted." Any suggestions? {{User:Homestar Coder/sig}} 21:05, 15 Jul 2005 (UTC)

49.146.40.174: Oooo

49.146.40.174 — Sat, 05 Dec 2020 03:02:01 GMT

Oooo

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:02, 5 December 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	==What==
		+	{{u\|hr\|30px}}: me
	==Title==		==Title==
	If this page is going to stay (and I'm tempted to mark it for deletion), it really needs a better name than "Designs That Aren't Counted." Any suggestions? {{User:Homestar Coder/sig}} 21:05, 15 Jul 2005 (UTC)		If this page is going to stay (and I'm tempted to mark it for deletion), it really needs a better name than "Designs That Aren't Counted." Any suggestions? {{User:Homestar Coder/sig}} 21:05, 15 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc: added discussion title at the top (so TOC is in the right place)

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc — Sun, 16 Jun 2019 22:02:30 GMT

added discussion title at the top (so TOC is in the right place)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:02, 16 June 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	==Title==
	If this page is going to stay (and I'm tempted to mark it for deletion), it really needs a better name than "Designs That Aren't Counted." Any suggestions? {{User:Homestar Coder/sig}} 21:05, 15 Jul 2005 (UTC)		If this page is going to stay (and I'm tempted to mark it for deletion), it really needs a better name than "Designs That Aren't Counted." Any suggestions? {{User:Homestar Coder/sig}} 21:05, 15 Jul 2005 (UTC)
	::I was also tempted to mark this article for deletion. If we ultimately decide to keep this article, I would suggest an improved name: "Character Evolution Irregularities" {{User:The Paper/sig}} 21:13, 15 Jul 2005 (UTC)		::I was also tempted to mark this article for deletion. If we ultimately decide to keep this article, I would suggest an improved name: "Character Evolution Irregularities" {{User:The Paper/sig}} 21:13, 15 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Defender1031: /* Eyes */ if you're referring to what I think you';re referring to, no.

Defender1031 — Fri, 03 Jun 2016 09:11:29 GMT

Eyes: if you're referring to what I think you';re referring to, no.

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:11, 3 June 2016
Line 60:		Line 60:

	Would Strong Bad and The Cheat with eyeballs (in [[your edge]]) count? Because they don't usually look like that. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 04:39, 3 June 2016 (UTC)		Would Strong Bad and The Cheat with eyeballs (in [[your edge]]) count? Because they don't usually look like that. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 04:39, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
		+	:You mean the part where it's JUST eyeballs? No. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 09:11, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc: /**/Eyes

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc — Fri, 03 Jun 2016 04:39:31 GMT

: Eyes

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:39, 3 June 2016
Line 56:		Line 56:
	I don't think the cover of the site's FAQ should be included; the picture on the cover wasn't actually made by TBC, but was a piece of fan art they decided to use. Thus, it shouldn't count as a stylized design because it's someone else's interpretations of the characters and not the Chaps' work at all. I just wanted to see if anyone has a reason it should be kept on there before I delete it. [[User:Lucentas\|Lucentas]] 03:17, 8 April 2008 (UTC)		I don't think the cover of the site's FAQ should be included; the picture on the cover wasn't actually made by TBC, but was a piece of fan art they decided to use. Thus, it shouldn't count as a stylized design because it's someone else's interpretations of the characters and not the Chaps' work at all. I just wanted to see if anyone has a reason it should be kept on there before I delete it. [[User:Lucentas\|Lucentas]] 03:17, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
	:Agree'd [[User:Dr. Savage\|Dr. Savage]] 23:41, 2 November 2008 (UTC)		:Agree'd [[User:Dr. Savage\|Dr. Savage]] 23:41, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Eyes ==
		+
		+	Would Strong Bad and The Cheat with eyeballs (in [[your edge]]) count? Because they don't usually look like that. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 04:39, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Starguy256 at 23:41, 2 November 2008

Starguy256 — Sun, 02 Nov 2008 23:41:05 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:41, 2 November 2008
Line 40:		Line 40:

	Should we have the character designs from [[Exaggerations]] in here? It seems appropriate enough.		Should we have the character designs from [[Exaggerations]] in here? It seems appropriate enough.
		+	:Makes sence. [[User:Dr. Savage\|Dr. Savage]]

	== Alternate Reddest Radish Angles ==		== Alternate Reddest Radish Angles ==
Line 54:		Line 55:

	I don't think the cover of the site's FAQ should be included; the picture on the cover wasn't actually made by TBC, but was a piece of fan art they decided to use. Thus, it shouldn't count as a stylized design because it's someone else's interpretations of the characters and not the Chaps' work at all. I just wanted to see if anyone has a reason it should be kept on there before I delete it. [[User:Lucentas\|Lucentas]] 03:17, 8 April 2008 (UTC)		I don't think the cover of the site's FAQ should be included; the picture on the cover wasn't actually made by TBC, but was a piece of fan art they decided to use. Thus, it shouldn't count as a stylized design because it's someone else's interpretations of the characters and not the Chaps' work at all. I just wanted to see if anyone has a reason it should be kept on there before I delete it. [[User:Lucentas\|Lucentas]] 03:17, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
		+	:Agree'd [[User:Dr. Savage\|Dr. Savage]] 23:41, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Lucentas at 03:17, 8 April 2008

Lucentas — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 03:17:48 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:17, 8 April 2008
Line 50:		Line 50:
	So, how about the storyboards for the [[Sbemail 169 Deleted Scene]] in which Coach Z has a nose, mouth, etc.? {{User:AwkwardFire/sig}} 22:12, 3 February 2008 (UTC)		So, how about the storyboards for the [[Sbemail 169 Deleted Scene]] in which Coach Z has a nose, mouth, etc.? {{User:AwkwardFire/sig}} 22:12, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
	:Yes, I think that could count very well. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 22:14, 3 February 2008 (UTC)		:Yes, I think that could count very well. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 22:14, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	== FAQ Cover ==
		+
		+	I don't think the cover of the site's FAQ should be included; the picture on the cover wasn't actually made by TBC, but was a piece of fan art they decided to use. Thus, it shouldn't count as a stylized design because it's someone else's interpretations of the characters and not the Chaps' work at all. I just wanted to see if anyone has a reason it should be kept on there before I delete it. [[User:Lucentas\|Lucentas]] 03:17, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

DorianGray: /* Sbemail 169 Deleted Scene */ Reply

DorianGray — Sun, 03 Feb 2008 22:14:16 GMT

Sbemail 169 Deleted Scene: Reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:14, 3 February 2008
Line 49:		Line 49:

	So, how about the storyboards for the [[Sbemail 169 Deleted Scene]] in which Coach Z has a nose, mouth, etc.? {{User:AwkwardFire/sig}} 22:12, 3 February 2008 (UTC)		So, how about the storyboards for the [[Sbemail 169 Deleted Scene]] in which Coach Z has a nose, mouth, etc.? {{User:AwkwardFire/sig}} 22:12, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
		+	:Yes, I think that could count very well. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 22:14, 3 February 2008 (UTC)