Talk:Tape-leg - Revision history

Stux: /* Name's the same */ fix link and add link to new project

Stux — Sat, 27 Feb 2021 11:48:46 GMT

Name's the same: fix link and add link to new project

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:48, 27 February 2021
Line 38:		Line 38:
	:::Oppose. This wiki differentiates between capital and lowercase page titles. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 23:20, 30 December 2020 (UTC)		:::Oppose. This wiki differentiates between capital and lowercase page titles. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 23:20, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
	::::I feel like using title case to distinguish a running gag from a sbemail, as is the case here, is nowhere near as intuitive as using title case to distinguish a character from a sbemail, for example [[Marzipan]] from [[marzipan]] or [[Pom Pom]] from [[pom pom]]. That said, there are other running gag pages that have a same-named-but-lowercase sbemail, such as [[Crying]] with [[crying]], and [[Making Out]] with [[making out]]. I personally wouldn't be opposed to adding a parenthetical specifically for running gag pages. {{User:DEIDATVM/sig}} 07:46, 31 December 2020 (UTC)		::::I feel like using title case to distinguish a running gag from a sbemail, as is the case here, is nowhere near as intuitive as using title case to distinguish a character from a sbemail, for example [[Marzipan]] from [[marzipan]] or [[Pom Pom]] from [[pom pom]]. That said, there are other running gag pages that have a same-named-but-lowercase sbemail, such as [[Crying]] with [[crying]], and [[Making Out]] with [[making out]]. I personally wouldn't be opposed to adding a parenthetical specifically for running gag pages. {{User:DEIDATVM/sig}} 07:46, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
-	:::::As I mentioned {{pl\|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Stinkoman_20X6_Level_10&diff=prev&oldid=802330 here}}, I think that these items should also be disambiguated. I hadn't realized that [[Marzipan]] and [[Pom Pom]] also had similar issues so they may have to be handled in some special way. But definitely running gag items should be disambiguated. It's too easy to {{pl\|l=http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Puke_Pail&diff=802180&oldid=791086 link to the wrong page}} even if Mediawiki can handle the differences. In any case I still think that a [[HRWiki:Projects\|project section]] should be created for this. Are all the instances of this listed above or are there more? --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 21:12, 25 February 2021 (UTC)	+	:::::As I mentioned {{pl\|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Stinkoman_20X6_Level_10&diff=prev&oldid=802330 here}}, I think that these items should also be disambiguated. I hadn't realized that [[Marzipan]] and [[Pom Pom]] also had similar issues so they may have to be handled in some special way. But definitely running gag items should be disambiguated. It's too easy to {{pl\|l=http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Puke_Pail&diff=802180&oldid=791086 link to the wrong page}} even if Mediawiki can handle the differences. In any case I still think that a [[HRWiki:Projects#Toon Descriptions\|project section]] should be created for this. Are all the instances of this listed above or are there more? --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 21:12, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
-	::::::There's more. I had a discussion about it on [[~~http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/~~Talk:trogday\|another such page]] [[User:Guybrush20X6\|Guybrush20X6]] 01:37, 26 February 2021 (UTC)	+	::::::There's more. I had a discussion about it on [[Talk:trogday\|another such page]] [[User:Guybrush20X6\|Guybrush20X6]] 01:37, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
		+	:::::::I've created a [[HRWiki:Projects#Toon Descriptions\|project entry]] for this task and details should be discussed there. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 11:48, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Guybrush20X6: /* Name's the same */

Guybrush20X6 — Fri, 26 Feb 2021 01:37:51 GMT

Name's the same

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:37, 26 February 2021
Line 39:		Line 39:
	::::I feel like using title case to distinguish a running gag from a sbemail, as is the case here, is nowhere near as intuitive as using title case to distinguish a character from a sbemail, for example [[Marzipan]] from [[marzipan]] or [[Pom Pom]] from [[pom pom]]. That said, there are other running gag pages that have a same-named-but-lowercase sbemail, such as [[Crying]] with [[crying]], and [[Making Out]] with [[making out]]. I personally wouldn't be opposed to adding a parenthetical specifically for running gag pages. {{User:DEIDATVM/sig}} 07:46, 31 December 2020 (UTC)		::::I feel like using title case to distinguish a running gag from a sbemail, as is the case here, is nowhere near as intuitive as using title case to distinguish a character from a sbemail, for example [[Marzipan]] from [[marzipan]] or [[Pom Pom]] from [[pom pom]]. That said, there are other running gag pages that have a same-named-but-lowercase sbemail, such as [[Crying]] with [[crying]], and [[Making Out]] with [[making out]]. I personally wouldn't be opposed to adding a parenthetical specifically for running gag pages. {{User:DEIDATVM/sig}} 07:46, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
	:::::As I mentioned {{pl\|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Stinkoman_20X6_Level_10&diff=prev&oldid=802330 here}}, I think that these items should also be disambiguated. I hadn't realized that [[Marzipan]] and [[Pom Pom]] also had similar issues so they may have to be handled in some special way. But definitely running gag items should be disambiguated. It's too easy to {{pl\|l=http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Puke_Pail&diff=802180&oldid=791086 link to the wrong page}} even if Mediawiki can handle the differences. In any case I still think that a [[HRWiki:Projects\|project section]] should be created for this. Are all the instances of this listed above or are there more? --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 21:12, 25 February 2021 (UTC)		:::::As I mentioned {{pl\|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Stinkoman_20X6_Level_10&diff=prev&oldid=802330 here}}, I think that these items should also be disambiguated. I hadn't realized that [[Marzipan]] and [[Pom Pom]] also had similar issues so they may have to be handled in some special way. But definitely running gag items should be disambiguated. It's too easy to {{pl\|l=http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Puke_Pail&diff=802180&oldid=791086 link to the wrong page}} even if Mediawiki can handle the differences. In any case I still think that a [[HRWiki:Projects\|project section]] should be created for this. Are all the instances of this listed above or are there more? --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 21:12, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
		+	::::::There's more. I had a discussion about it on [[http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:trogday\|another such page]] [[User:Guybrush20X6\|Guybrush20X6]] 01:37, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Stux: /* Name's the same */ reply

Stux — Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:12:47 GMT

Name's the same: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:12, 25 February 2021
Line 38:		Line 38:
	:::Oppose. This wiki differentiates between capital and lowercase page titles. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 23:20, 30 December 2020 (UTC)		:::Oppose. This wiki differentiates between capital and lowercase page titles. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 23:20, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
	::::I feel like using title case to distinguish a running gag from a sbemail, as is the case here, is nowhere near as intuitive as using title case to distinguish a character from a sbemail, for example [[Marzipan]] from [[marzipan]] or [[Pom Pom]] from [[pom pom]]. That said, there are other running gag pages that have a same-named-but-lowercase sbemail, such as [[Crying]] with [[crying]], and [[Making Out]] with [[making out]]. I personally wouldn't be opposed to adding a parenthetical specifically for running gag pages. {{User:DEIDATVM/sig}} 07:46, 31 December 2020 (UTC)		::::I feel like using title case to distinguish a running gag from a sbemail, as is the case here, is nowhere near as intuitive as using title case to distinguish a character from a sbemail, for example [[Marzipan]] from [[marzipan]] or [[Pom Pom]] from [[pom pom]]. That said, there are other running gag pages that have a same-named-but-lowercase sbemail, such as [[Crying]] with [[crying]], and [[Making Out]] with [[making out]]. I personally wouldn't be opposed to adding a parenthetical specifically for running gag pages. {{User:DEIDATVM/sig}} 07:46, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
		+	:::::As I mentioned {{pl\|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Stinkoman_20X6_Level_10&diff=prev&oldid=802330 here}}, I think that these items should also be disambiguated. I hadn't realized that [[Marzipan]] and [[Pom Pom]] also had similar issues so they may have to be handled in some special way. But definitely running gag items should be disambiguated. It's too easy to {{pl\|l=http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Puke_Pail&diff=802180&oldid=791086 link to the wrong page}} even if Mediawiki can handle the differences. In any case I still think that a [[HRWiki:Projects\|project section]] should be created for this. Are all the instances of this listed above or are there more? --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 21:12, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

DEIDATVM: /* Name's the same */ Yet another "wouldn't be opposed" argument from me

DEIDATVM — Thu, 31 Dec 2020 07:46:56 GMT

Name's the same: Yet another "wouldn't be opposed" argument from me

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:46, 31 December 2020
Line 37:		Line 37:
	::Nah, the parenthetical is ugly. -[[Special:Contributions/107.77.94.82\|107.77.94.82]] 22:33, 30 December 2020 (UTC)		::Nah, the parenthetical is ugly. -[[Special:Contributions/107.77.94.82\|107.77.94.82]] 22:33, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
	:::Oppose. This wiki differentiates between capital and lowercase page titles. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 23:20, 30 December 2020 (UTC)		:::Oppose. This wiki differentiates between capital and lowercase page titles. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 23:20, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
		+	::::I feel like using title case to distinguish a running gag from a sbemail, as is the case here, is nowhere near as intuitive as using title case to distinguish a character from a sbemail, for example [[Marzipan]] from [[marzipan]] or [[Pom Pom]] from [[pom pom]]. That said, there are other running gag pages that have a same-named-but-lowercase sbemail, such as [[Crying]] with [[crying]], and [[Making Out]] with [[making out]]. I personally wouldn't be opposed to adding a parenthetical specifically for running gag pages. {{User:DEIDATVM/sig}} 07:46, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

RickTommy: /* Names the same */

RickTommy — Wed, 30 Dec 2020 23:20:39 GMT

Names the same

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:20, 30 December 2020
Line 32:		Line 32:
	:In conclusion, just because you don't happen to agree doesn't mean that it isn't well-known for being the terrible episode. Personally, I'm not sure I agree that it's the absolute worst in my opinion either, but the point is that it has the reputation of being such. It's not necessarily about what individual people will respond when you ask them seriously, it's about what the culture as a whole agrees is the worst. A similar example I can give is if you post on an internet forum "who do you think is the most awesome person ever?" I think it's likely that the response will end up being a stream of Chuck Norris jokes. Ask any of those people individually, and in a more serious context, and you'll get answers like "my mom", "my mentor", "Jesus/Moses/Mohammed/Buddha/Satan/Santa/whoever" etc. Even so I would still say that "Chuck Norris is widely considered by the internet to be the most awesome person ever." {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 06:54, 31 December 2014 (UTC)		:In conclusion, just because you don't happen to agree doesn't mean that it isn't well-known for being the terrible episode. Personally, I'm not sure I agree that it's the absolute worst in my opinion either, but the point is that it has the reputation of being such. It's not necessarily about what individual people will respond when you ask them seriously, it's about what the culture as a whole agrees is the worst. A similar example I can give is if you post on an internet forum "who do you think is the most awesome person ever?" I think it's likely that the response will end up being a stream of Chuck Norris jokes. Ask any of those people individually, and in a more serious context, and you'll get answers like "my mom", "my mentor", "Jesus/Moses/Mohammed/Buddha/Satan/Santa/whoever" etc. Even so I would still say that "Chuck Norris is widely considered by the internet to be the most awesome person ever." {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 06:54, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

-	== ~~Names~~ the same ==	+	== Name's the same ==
-		+
	I'm thinking that this page should be renamed to something like "Tape-leg (Running Gag)" to make things a bit clearer. [[User:Guybrush20X6\|Guybrush20X6]] 16:09, 30 December 2020 (UTC)		I'm thinking that this page should be renamed to something like "Tape-leg (Running Gag)" to make things a bit clearer. [[User:Guybrush20X6\|Guybrush20X6]] 16:09, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
	:Yeah, probably. '''Move''' to "Tape-leg (running gag)". {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 22:20, 30 December 2020 (UTC)		:Yeah, probably. '''Move''' to "Tape-leg (running gag)". {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 22:20, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
-	:: Nah, the parenthetical is ugly. -[[Special:Contributions/107.77.94.82\|107.77.94.82]] 22:33, 30 December 2020 (UTC)	+	::Nah, the parenthetical is ugly. -[[Special:Contributions/107.77.94.82\|107.77.94.82]] 22:33, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
		+	:::Oppose. This wiki differentiates between capital and lowercase page titles. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 23:20, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

107.77.94.82: /* Names the same */

107.77.94.82 — Wed, 30 Dec 2020 22:33:06 GMT

Names the same

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:33, 30 December 2020
Line 36:		Line 36:
	I'm thinking that this page should be renamed to something like "Tape-leg (Running Gag)" to make things a bit clearer. [[User:Guybrush20X6\|Guybrush20X6]] 16:09, 30 December 2020 (UTC)		I'm thinking that this page should be renamed to something like "Tape-leg (Running Gag)" to make things a bit clearer. [[User:Guybrush20X6\|Guybrush20X6]] 16:09, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
	:Yeah, probably. '''Move''' to "Tape-leg (running gag)". {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 22:20, 30 December 2020 (UTC)		:Yeah, probably. '''Move''' to "Tape-leg (running gag)". {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 22:20, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
		+	:: Nah, the parenthetical is ugly. -[[Special:Contributions/107.77.94.82\|107.77.94.82]] 22:33, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc: /* Names the same */ agree

Gfdgsgxgzgdrc — Wed, 30 Dec 2020 22:20:11 GMT

Names the same: agree

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:20, 30 December 2020
Line 35:		Line 35:

	I'm thinking that this page should be renamed to something like "Tape-leg (Running Gag)" to make things a bit clearer. [[User:Guybrush20X6\|Guybrush20X6]] 16:09, 30 December 2020 (UTC)		I'm thinking that this page should be renamed to something like "Tape-leg (Running Gag)" to make things a bit clearer. [[User:Guybrush20X6\|Guybrush20X6]] 16:09, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
		+	:Yeah, probably. '''Move''' to "Tape-leg (running gag)". {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 22:20, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Guybrush20X6: /**/Names the same

Guybrush20X6 — Wed, 30 Dec 2020 16:09:31 GMT

: Names the same

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:09, 30 December 2020
Line 31:		Line 31:
	:# "an act that many agree is out-of-character" [citation needed]		:# "an act that many agree is out-of-character" [citation needed]
	:In conclusion, just because you don't happen to agree doesn't mean that it isn't well-known for being the terrible episode. Personally, I'm not sure I agree that it's the absolute worst in my opinion either, but the point is that it has the reputation of being such. It's not necessarily about what individual people will respond when you ask them seriously, it's about what the culture as a whole agrees is the worst. A similar example I can give is if you post on an internet forum "who do you think is the most awesome person ever?" I think it's likely that the response will end up being a stream of Chuck Norris jokes. Ask any of those people individually, and in a more serious context, and you'll get answers like "my mom", "my mentor", "Jesus/Moses/Mohammed/Buddha/Satan/Santa/whoever" etc. Even so I would still say that "Chuck Norris is widely considered by the internet to be the most awesome person ever." {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 06:54, 31 December 2014 (UTC)		:In conclusion, just because you don't happen to agree doesn't mean that it isn't well-known for being the terrible episode. Personally, I'm not sure I agree that it's the absolute worst in my opinion either, but the point is that it has the reputation of being such. It's not necessarily about what individual people will respond when you ask them seriously, it's about what the culture as a whole agrees is the worst. A similar example I can give is if you post on an internet forum "who do you think is the most awesome person ever?" I think it's likely that the response will end up being a stream of Chuck Norris jokes. Ask any of those people individually, and in a more serious context, and you'll get answers like "my mom", "my mentor", "Jesus/Moses/Mohammed/Buddha/Satan/Santa/whoever" etc. Even so I would still say that "Chuck Norris is widely considered by the internet to be the most awesome person ever." {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 06:54, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Names the same ==
		+
		+	I'm thinking that this page should be renamed to something like "Tape-leg (Running Gag)" to make things a bit clearer. [[User:Guybrush20X6\|Guybrush20X6]] 16:09, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Defender1031: /* Overblown */ make this an actual list.

Defender1031 — Wed, 31 Dec 2014 06:58:38 GMT

Overblown: make this an actual list.

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:58, 31 December 2014
Line 26:		Line 26:

	I personally think that this article overstates the email's low quality. Considering the fact that its article has the second-least amount of edits of any Sbemail article ([http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Special:MostRevisions&limit=900&offset=0]), I'd say people are ''indifferent'' to it. Which means that the Brothers Chaps probably reference it to make more fans notice it, not because fans dislike it. Plus, while it may have indeed been the worst email back then, there are definitely emails that fans consider worse now (case in point, about half of the [[New Paper]] emails, as well as [[hremail3184]] (due to Strong Bad intentionally destroying the Lappy, an act that many agree is out-of-character) and the [[Compé]] "era" (I use the term lightly because three emails, with an over-five-year gap before a possible fourth one, combined with the aforementioned unnecessary destroying of the Lappy, is not enough)). "Widely considered by fans to be the worst [email] of all time" this is not. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 03:14, 31 December 2014 (UTC)		I personally think that this article overstates the email's low quality. Considering the fact that its article has the second-least amount of edits of any Sbemail article ([http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Special:MostRevisions&limit=900&offset=0]), I'd say people are ''indifferent'' to it. Which means that the Brothers Chaps probably reference it to make more fans notice it, not because fans dislike it. Plus, while it may have indeed been the worst email back then, there are definitely emails that fans consider worse now (case in point, about half of the [[New Paper]] emails, as well as [[hremail3184]] (due to Strong Bad intentionally destroying the Lappy, an act that many agree is out-of-character) and the [[Compé]] "era" (I use the term lightly because three emails, with an over-five-year gap before a possible fourth one, combined with the aforementioned unnecessary destroying of the Lappy, is not enough)). "Widely considered by fans to be the worst [email] of all time" this is not. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 03:14, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
-	:1. The number of edits a page has has no correlation to the toon's popularity. 2. There are numerous occasions and numerous examples of this being the "THAT episode" of the series. 3. Your resistance to change and hatred of the hiatus are well known on the wiki, and you may notice that all of your own opinions of what emails are worse are those which involve change or which occurred sporadically during the hiatus. 4. "an act that many agree is out-of-character" [citation needed]	+	:# The number of edits a page has has no correlation to the toon's popularity.
		+	:# There are numerous occasions and numerous examples of this being the "THAT episode" of the series.
		+	:# Your resistance to change and hatred of the hiatus are well known on the wiki, and you may notice that all of your own opinions of what emails are worse are those which involve change or which occurred sporadically during the hiatus.
		+	:# "an act that many agree is out-of-character" [citation needed]
	:In conclusion, just because you don't happen to agree doesn't mean that it isn't well-known for being the terrible episode. Personally, I'm not sure I agree that it's the absolute worst in my opinion either, but the point is that it has the reputation of being such. It's not necessarily about what individual people will respond when you ask them seriously, it's about what the culture as a whole agrees is the worst. A similar example I can give is if you post on an internet forum "who do you think is the most awesome person ever?" I think it's likely that the response will end up being a stream of Chuck Norris jokes. Ask any of those people individually, and in a more serious context, and you'll get answers like "my mom", "my mentor", "Jesus/Moses/Mohammed/Buddha/Satan/Santa/whoever" etc. Even so I would still say that "Chuck Norris is widely considered by the internet to be the most awesome person ever." {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 06:54, 31 December 2014 (UTC)		:In conclusion, just because you don't happen to agree doesn't mean that it isn't well-known for being the terrible episode. Personally, I'm not sure I agree that it's the absolute worst in my opinion either, but the point is that it has the reputation of being such. It's not necessarily about what individual people will respond when you ask them seriously, it's about what the culture as a whole agrees is the worst. A similar example I can give is if you post on an internet forum "who do you think is the most awesome person ever?" I think it's likely that the response will end up being a stream of Chuck Norris jokes. Ask any of those people individually, and in a more serious context, and you'll get answers like "my mom", "my mentor", "Jesus/Moses/Mohammed/Buddha/Satan/Santa/whoever" etc. Even so I would still say that "Chuck Norris is widely considered by the internet to be the most awesome person ever." {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 06:54, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Defender1031: /* Overblown */ reply

Defender1031 — Wed, 31 Dec 2014 06:54:25 GMT

Overblown: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:54, 31 December 2014
Line 26:		Line 26:

	I personally think that this article overstates the email's low quality. Considering the fact that its article has the second-least amount of edits of any Sbemail article ([http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Special:MostRevisions&limit=900&offset=0]), I'd say people are ''indifferent'' to it. Which means that the Brothers Chaps probably reference it to make more fans notice it, not because fans dislike it. Plus, while it may have indeed been the worst email back then, there are definitely emails that fans consider worse now (case in point, about half of the [[New Paper]] emails, as well as [[hremail3184]] (due to Strong Bad intentionally destroying the Lappy, an act that many agree is out-of-character) and the [[Compé]] "era" (I use the term lightly because three emails, with an over-five-year gap before a possible fourth one, combined with the aforementioned unnecessary destroying of the Lappy, is not enough)). "Widely considered by fans to be the worst [email] of all time" this is not. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 03:14, 31 December 2014 (UTC)		I personally think that this article overstates the email's low quality. Considering the fact that its article has the second-least amount of edits of any Sbemail article ([http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Special:MostRevisions&limit=900&offset=0]), I'd say people are ''indifferent'' to it. Which means that the Brothers Chaps probably reference it to make more fans notice it, not because fans dislike it. Plus, while it may have indeed been the worst email back then, there are definitely emails that fans consider worse now (case in point, about half of the [[New Paper]] emails, as well as [[hremail3184]] (due to Strong Bad intentionally destroying the Lappy, an act that many agree is out-of-character) and the [[Compé]] "era" (I use the term lightly because three emails, with an over-five-year gap before a possible fourth one, combined with the aforementioned unnecessary destroying of the Lappy, is not enough)). "Widely considered by fans to be the worst [email] of all time" this is not. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 03:14, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
		+	:1. The number of edits a page has has no correlation to the toon's popularity. 2. There are numerous occasions and numerous examples of this being the "THAT episode" of the series. 3. Your resistance to change and hatred of the hiatus are well known on the wiki, and you may notice that all of your own opinions of what emails are worse are those which involve change or which occurred sporadically during the hiatus. 4. "an act that many agree is out-of-character" [citation needed]
		+	:In conclusion, just because you don't happen to agree doesn't mean that it isn't well-known for being the terrible episode. Personally, I'm not sure I agree that it's the absolute worst in my opinion either, but the point is that it has the reputation of being such. It's not necessarily about what individual people will respond when you ask them seriously, it's about what the culture as a whole agrees is the worst. A similar example I can give is if you post on an internet forum "who do you think is the most awesome person ever?" I think it's likely that the response will end up being a stream of Chuck Norris jokes. Ask any of those people individually, and in a more serious context, and you'll get answers like "my mom", "my mentor", "Jesus/Moses/Mohammed/Buddha/Satan/Santa/whoever" etc. Even so I would still say that "Chuck Norris is widely considered by the internet to be the most awesome person ever." {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 06:54, 31 December 2014 (UTC)