Talk:Teddy Grahams - Revision history

Jay at 23:27, 28 January 2010

Jay — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:27:00 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:27, 28 January 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:
	::::They're used pretty unusually and play an important role each time... I see no harm in '''keeping''' this page. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 16:34, 22 May 2009 (UTC)		::::They're used pretty unusually and play an important role each time... I see no harm in '''keeping''' this page. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 16:34, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
	:::::We should wait until there are more references. [[User:StarFox\|StarFox]] 22:47, 28 January 2010 (UTC)		:::::We should wait until there are more references. [[User:StarFox\|StarFox]] 22:47, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
		+	::::::This discussion was closed the better part of a year ago. Unless you can come up with new arguments, please don't bring it back up. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 23:27, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

StarFox at 22:47, 28 January 2010

StarFox — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:47:00 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:47, 28 January 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
-
	== Enough references? ==		== Enough references? ==
	There are only two references. That's not enough for a page. {{User:Thy Not Dennis/sig}} 19:50, 28 April 2009 (UTC)		There are only two references. That's not enough for a page. {{User:Thy Not Dennis/sig}} 19:50, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Line 6:		Line 5:
	:::On further consideration, I agree with Trey. (And yeah, the guidelines are just that, guidelines. Not hard-and-fast rules. Exceptions can certainly be made.) -[[Special:Contributions/170.223.0.54\|170.223.0.54]] 23:56, 28 April 2009 (UTC)		:::On further consideration, I agree with Trey. (And yeah, the guidelines are just that, guidelines. Not hard-and-fast rules. Exceptions can certainly be made.) -[[Special:Contributions/170.223.0.54\|170.223.0.54]] 23:56, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
	::::They're used pretty unusually and play an important role each time... I see no harm in '''keeping''' this page. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 16:34, 22 May 2009 (UTC)		::::They're used pretty unusually and play an important role each time... I see no harm in '''keeping''' this page. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 16:34, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
		+	:::::We should wait until there are more references. [[User:StarFox\|StarFox]] 22:47, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Heimstern Läufer: Rm tag per consensus to keep.

Heimstern Läufer — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:46:46 GMT

Rm tag per consensus to keep.

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:46, 15 July 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~{{ttbd}}~~	+
	== Enough references? ==		== Enough references? ==
	There are only two references. That's not enough for a page. {{User:Thy Not Dennis/sig}} 19:50, 28 April 2009 (UTC)		There are only two references. That's not enough for a page. {{User:Thy Not Dennis/sig}} 19:50, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Defender1031: /* Enough references? */ reply

Defender1031 — Fri, 22 May 2009 16:34:27 GMT

Enough references?: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:34, 22 May 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	::I lean toward keeping it as a separate page — while Teddy Grahams do exist in real life, spitting them is pretty unusual. With only the [[couch patch]] appearance, they should definitely be on [[Minor Foods]], but the second reference adds weight. And sure, [[HRW:IG\|the guidelines]] recommend 3—4 appearances, but this one feels significant enough to me in some intangible way. But it wouldn't be the end of the world if the page is redirected to [[Minor Foods#Teddy Grahams]]. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 22:09, 28 April 2009 (UTC)		::I lean toward keeping it as a separate page — while Teddy Grahams do exist in real life, spitting them is pretty unusual. With only the [[couch patch]] appearance, they should definitely be on [[Minor Foods]], but the second reference adds weight. And sure, [[HRW:IG\|the guidelines]] recommend 3—4 appearances, but this one feels significant enough to me in some intangible way. But it wouldn't be the end of the world if the page is redirected to [[Minor Foods#Teddy Grahams]]. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 22:09, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
	:::On further consideration, I agree with Trey. (And yeah, the guidelines are just that, guidelines. Not hard-and-fast rules. Exceptions can certainly be made.) -[[Special:Contributions/170.223.0.54\|170.223.0.54]] 23:56, 28 April 2009 (UTC)		:::On further consideration, I agree with Trey. (And yeah, the guidelines are just that, guidelines. Not hard-and-fast rules. Exceptions can certainly be made.) -[[Special:Contributions/170.223.0.54\|170.223.0.54]] 23:56, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
		+	::::They're used pretty unusually and play an important role each time... I see no harm in '''keeping''' this page. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 16:34, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

170.223.0.54 at 23:56, 28 April 2009

170.223.0.54 — Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:56:12 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:56, 28 April 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:They're not HR-specific and I'm not convinced they're used in a particularly unusual context (though spitting is arguably so). Thoughts? (note: most of the info on this page appears in the minor food list) -[[Special:Contributions/170.223.0.54\|170.223.0.54]] 20:26, 28 April 2009 (UTC)		:They're not HR-specific and I'm not convinced they're used in a particularly unusual context (though spitting is arguably so). Thoughts? (note: most of the info on this page appears in the minor food list) -[[Special:Contributions/170.223.0.54\|170.223.0.54]] 20:26, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
	::I lean toward keeping it as a separate page — while Teddy Grahams do exist in real life, spitting them is pretty unusual. With only the [[couch patch]] appearance, they should definitely be on [[Minor Foods]], but the second reference adds weight. And sure, [[HRW:IG\|the guidelines]] recommend 3—4 appearances, but this one feels significant enough to me in some intangible way. But it wouldn't be the end of the world if the page is redirected to [[Minor Foods#Teddy Grahams]]. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 22:09, 28 April 2009 (UTC)		::I lean toward keeping it as a separate page — while Teddy Grahams do exist in real life, spitting them is pretty unusual. With only the [[couch patch]] appearance, they should definitely be on [[Minor Foods]], but the second reference adds weight. And sure, [[HRW:IG\|the guidelines]] recommend 3—4 appearances, but this one feels significant enough to me in some intangible way. But it wouldn't be the end of the world if the page is redirected to [[Minor Foods#Teddy Grahams]]. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 22:09, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
		+	:::On further consideration, I agree with Trey. (And yeah, the guidelines are just that, guidelines. Not hard-and-fast rules. Exceptions can certainly be made.) -[[Special:Contributions/170.223.0.54\|170.223.0.54]] 23:56, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Trey56: my thoughts

Trey56 — Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:09:31 GMT

my thoughts

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:09, 28 April 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	{{ttbd}}
	== Enough references? ==		== Enough references? ==
	There are only two references. That's not enough for a page. {{User:Thy Not Dennis/sig}} 19:50, 28 April 2009 (UTC)		There are only two references. That's not enough for a page. {{User:Thy Not Dennis/sig}} 19:50, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
	:They're not HR-specific and I'm not convinced they're used in a particularly unusual context (though spitting is arguably so). Thoughts? (note: most of the info on this page appears in the minor food list) -[[Special:Contributions/170.223.0.54\|170.223.0.54]] 20:26, 28 April 2009 (UTC)		:They're not HR-specific and I'm not convinced they're used in a particularly unusual context (though spitting is arguably so). Thoughts? (note: most of the info on this page appears in the minor food list) -[[Special:Contributions/170.223.0.54\|170.223.0.54]] 20:26, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
		+	::I lean toward keeping it as a separate page — while Teddy Grahams do exist in real life, spitting them is pretty unusual. With only the [[couch patch]] appearance, they should definitely be on [[Minor Foods]], but the second reference adds weight. And sure, [[HRW:IG\|the guidelines]] recommend 3—4 appearances, but this one feels significant enough to me in some intangible way. But it wouldn't be the end of the world if the page is redirected to [[Minor Foods#Teddy Grahams]]. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 22:09, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

170.223.0.54 at 20:26, 28 April 2009

170.223.0.54 — Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:26:10 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:26, 28 April 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Enough references? ==		== Enough references? ==
	There are only two references. That's not enough for a page. {{User:Thy Not Dennis/sig}} 19:50, 28 April 2009 (UTC)		There are only two references. That's not enough for a page. {{User:Thy Not Dennis/sig}} 19:50, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
		+	:They're not HR-specific and I'm not convinced they're used in a particularly unusual context (though spitting is arguably so). Thoughts? (note: most of the info on this page appears in the minor food list) -[[Special:Contributions/170.223.0.54\|170.223.0.54]] 20:26, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Thy Not Dennis: New page: == Enough references? == There are only two references. That's not enough for a page. ~~~~

Thy Not Dennis — Tue, 28 Apr 2009 19:50:31 GMT

New page: == Enough references? == There are only two references. That's not enough for a page. ~~~~

New page

== Enough references? ==
There are only two references. That's not enough for a page. {{User:Thy Not Dennis/sig}} 19:50, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:56, 28 April 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:They're not HR-specific and I'm not convinced they're used in a particularly unusual context (though spitting is arguably so). Thoughts? (note: most of the info on this page appears in the minor food list) -[[Special:Contributions/170.223.0.54\|170.223.0.54]] 20:26, 28 April 2009 (UTC)		:They're not HR-specific and I'm not convinced they're used in a particularly unusual context (though spitting is arguably so). Thoughts? (note: most of the info on this page appears in the minor food list) -[[Special:Contributions/170.223.0.54\|170.223.0.54]] 20:26, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
	::I lean toward keeping it as a separate page — while Teddy Grahams do exist in real life, spitting them is pretty unusual. With only the [[couch patch]] appearance, they should definitely be on [[Minor Foods]], but the second reference adds weight. And sure, [[HRW:IG\|the guidelines]] recommend 3—4 appearances, but this one feels significant enough to me in some intangible way. But it wouldn't be the end of the world if the page is redirected to [[Minor Foods#Teddy Grahams]]. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 22:09, 28 April 2009 (UTC)		::I lean toward keeping it as a separate page — while Teddy Grahams do exist in real life, spitting them is pretty unusual. With only the [[couch patch]] appearance, they should definitely be on [[Minor Foods]], but the second reference adds weight. And sure, [[HRW:IG\|the guidelines]] recommend 3—4 appearances, but this one feels significant enough to me in some intangible way. But it wouldn't be the end of the world if the page is redirected to [[Minor Foods#Teddy Grahams]]. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 22:09, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
		+	:::On further consideration, I agree with Trey. (And yeah, the guidelines are just that, guidelines. Not hard-and-fast rules. Exceptions can certainly be made.) -[[Special:Contributions/170.223.0.54\|170.223.0.54]] 23:56, 28 April 2009 (UTC)