Talk:The - Revision history

Wbwolf: pointer to redirect

Wbwolf — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:17:05 GMT

pointer to redirect

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:17, 19 June 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	{{deletedtalk}}	+	{{deletedtalk\|redirect=Integral Article}}

	== The Delete ==		== The Delete ==

Elcool: switching templates and comment

Elcool — Tue, 04 Nov 2008 20:57:40 GMT

switching templates and comment

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:57, 4 November 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	{{~~ttbd~~}}	+	{{deletedtalk}}

	== The Delete ==		== The Delete ==
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:::::::I'm for redirecting as well. No matter if this article was made as a joke, "the" is easier to remember than "integral article", so it could actually be a useful redirect.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 10:24, 3 November 2008 (UTC)		:::::::I'm for redirecting as well. No matter if this article was made as a joke, "the" is easier to remember than "integral article", so it could actually be a useful redirect.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 10:24, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
	::::::::Since "Integral Article" is basically a sensible equivalent to this article, I propose an immediate '''redirect''' to that article. Perhaps on the next April Fools Day, this article could be brought back for the day! {{User:The Chort/sig}} 20:15, 4 November 2008 (UTC)		::::::::Since "Integral Article" is basically a sensible equivalent to this article, I propose an immediate '''redirect''' to that article. Perhaps on the next April Fools Day, this article could be brought back for the day! {{User:The Chort/sig}} 20:15, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
		+	:::::::::This article is just one big joke... I'm redirecting it to [[Integral Article]]. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 20:57, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

The Chort: /* The Delete */ Let's pretend that mistake didn't happen.

The Chort — Tue, 04 Nov 2008 20:16:45 GMT

The Delete: Let's pretend that mistake didn't happen.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:16, 4 November 2008
Line 10:		Line 10:
	::::::No harm in the redirect, so I say go ahead with that. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 07:40, 3 November 2008 (UTC)		::::::No harm in the redirect, so I say go ahead with that. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 07:40, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
	:::::::I'm for redirecting as well. No matter if this article was made as a joke, "the" is easier to remember than "integral article", so it could actually be a useful redirect.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 10:24, 3 November 2008 (UTC)		:::::::I'm for redirecting as well. No matter if this article was made as a joke, "the" is easier to remember than "integral article", so it could actually be a useful redirect.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 10:24, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
-	::::::::Since "Integral Article" is basically a sensible ~~equivalant~~ to this article, I propose an immediate '''redirect'''. Perhaps on the next April Fools Day, this article could be brought back for the day! {{User:The Chort/sig}} 20:15, 4 November 2008 (UTC)	+	::::::::Since "Integral Article" is basically a sensible equivalent to this article, I propose an immediate '''redirect''' to that article. Perhaps on the next April Fools Day, this article could be brought back for the day! {{User:The Chort/sig}} 20:15, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

The Chort: NOVEMBER FOOL!

The Chort — Tue, 04 Nov 2008 20:15:38 GMT

NOVEMBER FOOL!

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:15, 4 November 2008
Line 10:		Line 10:
	::::::No harm in the redirect, so I say go ahead with that. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 07:40, 3 November 2008 (UTC)		::::::No harm in the redirect, so I say go ahead with that. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 07:40, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
	:::::::I'm for redirecting as well. No matter if this article was made as a joke, "the" is easier to remember than "integral article", so it could actually be a useful redirect.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 10:24, 3 November 2008 (UTC)		:::::::I'm for redirecting as well. No matter if this article was made as a joke, "the" is easier to remember than "integral article", so it could actually be a useful redirect.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 10:24, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
		+	::::::::Since "Integral Article" is basically a sensible equivalant to this article, I propose an immediate '''redirect'''. Perhaps on the next April Fools Day, this article could be brought back for the day! {{User:The Chort/sig}} 20:15, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Loafing: /* The Delete */ redirect

Loafing — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 10:24:10 GMT

The Delete: redirect

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:24, 3 November 2008
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:::::Was this article a joke??! A redirect to [[Integral Article]] would be the ''soft'' option; I'm for '''deleting it outright.''' --{{User:Jay/sig}} 07:38, 3 November 2008 (UTC)		:::::Was this article a joke??! A redirect to [[Integral Article]] would be the ''soft'' option; I'm for '''deleting it outright.''' --{{User:Jay/sig}} 07:38, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
	::::::No harm in the redirect, so I say go ahead with that. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 07:40, 3 November 2008 (UTC)		::::::No harm in the redirect, so I say go ahead with that. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 07:40, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
		+	:::::::I'm for redirecting as well. No matter if this article was made as a joke, "the" is easier to remember than "integral article", so it could actually be a useful redirect.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 10:24, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Heimstern Läufer: /* The Delete */ redirect is fine

Heimstern Läufer — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 07:40:11 GMT

The Delete: redirect is fine

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:40, 3 November 2008
Line 8:		Line 8:
	::::...haw. I was actually considering making this page a long while back out of protest for all the absurdly common things we've been making pages for... of course, I'm tactful enough not to actually do that, heh... Admittedly, seeing that someone did make this page, though, did not stop me from cracking up. =P In all seriousness, though, I guess, '''redirect''' to [[Integral Article]]. -{{User:YK/sig}} 04:48, 3 November 2008 (UTC)		::::...haw. I was actually considering making this page a long while back out of protest for all the absurdly common things we've been making pages for... of course, I'm tactful enough not to actually do that, heh... Admittedly, seeing that someone did make this page, though, did not stop me from cracking up. =P In all seriousness, though, I guess, '''redirect''' to [[Integral Article]]. -{{User:YK/sig}} 04:48, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
	:::::Was this article a joke??! A redirect to [[Integral Article]] would be the ''soft'' option; I'm for '''deleting it outright.''' --{{User:Jay/sig}} 07:38, 3 November 2008 (UTC)		:::::Was this article a joke??! A redirect to [[Integral Article]] would be the ''soft'' option; I'm for '''deleting it outright.''' --{{User:Jay/sig}} 07:38, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
		+	::::::No harm in the redirect, so I say go ahead with that. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 07:40, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Jay: /* The Delete */

Jay — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 07:38:43 GMT

The Delete

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:38, 3 November 2008
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:::I agree, as long as thee redirect is still VERY VERY hard. Hardness is a must. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 04:45, 3 November 2008 (UTC)		:::I agree, as long as thee redirect is still VERY VERY hard. Hardness is a must. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 04:45, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
	::::...haw. I was actually considering making this page a long while back out of protest for all the absurdly common things we've been making pages for... of course, I'm tactful enough not to actually do that, heh... Admittedly, seeing that someone did make this page, though, did not stop me from cracking up. =P In all seriousness, though, I guess, '''redirect''' to [[Integral Article]]. -{{User:YK/sig}} 04:48, 3 November 2008 (UTC)		::::...haw. I was actually considering making this page a long while back out of protest for all the absurdly common things we've been making pages for... of course, I'm tactful enough not to actually do that, heh... Admittedly, seeing that someone did make this page, though, did not stop me from cracking up. =P In all seriousness, though, I guess, '''redirect''' to [[Integral Article]]. -{{User:YK/sig}} 04:48, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
		+	:::::Was this article a joke??! A redirect to [[Integral Article]] would be the ''soft'' option; I'm for '''deleting it outright.''' --{{User:Jay/sig}} 07:38, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

YK at 04:48, 3 November 2008

YK — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 04:48:02 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:48, 3 November 2008
Line 6:		Line 6:
	::I think redirecting it to [[Integral Article]] might also be a good notion. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 04:41, 3 November 2008 (UTC)		::I think redirecting it to [[Integral Article]] might also be a good notion. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 04:41, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
	:::I agree, as long as thee redirect is still VERY VERY hard. Hardness is a must. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 04:45, 3 November 2008 (UTC)		:::I agree, as long as thee redirect is still VERY VERY hard. Hardness is a must. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 04:45, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
		+	::::...haw. I was actually considering making this page a long while back out of protest for all the absurdly common things we've been making pages for... of course, I'm tactful enough not to actually do that, heh... Admittedly, seeing that someone did make this page, though, did not stop me from cracking up. =P In all seriousness, though, I guess, '''redirect''' to [[Integral Article]]. -{{User:YK/sig}} 04:48, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Defender1031: /* The Delete */ reply

Defender1031 — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 04:45:45 GMT

The Delete: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:45, 3 November 2008
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:You know, i think this article illustrates the point better than the word spoons. i move for rewriting the spoons article to be on the word "the" instead... (And yes, '''delete VERY VERY hard'''). ;) {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 04:40, 3 November 2008 (UTC)		:You know, i think this article illustrates the point better than the word spoons. i move for rewriting the spoons article to be on the word "the" instead... (And yes, '''delete VERY VERY hard'''). ;) {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 04:40, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
	::I think redirecting it to [[Integral Article]] might also be a good notion. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 04:41, 3 November 2008 (UTC)		::I think redirecting it to [[Integral Article]] might also be a good notion. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 04:41, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
		+	:::I agree, as long as thee redirect is still VERY VERY hard. Hardness is a must. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 04:45, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Defender1031: /* The Delete */ the moron that i am.

Defender1031 — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 04:44:43 GMT

The Delete: the moron that i am.

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:44, 3 November 2008
Line 3:		Line 3:
	== The Delete ==		== The Delete ==
	The? An article on "The"? Oh, just '''delete''' it. This is such a [[HRWiki: Spoons\|spoon type]] article. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 04:38, 3 November 2008 (UTC)		The? An article on "The"? Oh, just '''delete''' it. This is such a [[HRWiki: Spoons\|spoon type]] article. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 04:38, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
-	:You know, i think this article illustrates the point better than the word spoons. i move for rewriting the spoons article to be on the word "the" instead... (And yes, '''delete ~~VARY VARY~~ hard'''). ;) {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 04:40, 3 November 2008 (UTC)	+	:You know, i think this article illustrates the point better than the word spoons. i move for rewriting the spoons article to be on the word "the" instead... (And yes, '''delete VERY VERY hard'''). ;) {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 04:40, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
	::I think redirecting it to [[Integral Article]] might also be a good notion. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 04:41, 3 November 2008 (UTC)		::I think redirecting it to [[Integral Article]] might also be a good notion. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 04:41, 3 November 2008 (UTC)