Talk:Times - Revision history

Defender1031: keep

Defender1031 — Sun, 16 Aug 2015 05:00:26 GMT

keep

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:00, 16 August 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~{{ttbd}}~~
	== What's the joke? ==		== What's the joke? ==
	Okay, what's the specific running gag here? A page that simply lists instances of the word ''times'' (most of which are either perfectly grammatical or nearly so) is not worthy of inclusion. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 22:19, 5 March 2009 (UTC)		Okay, what's the specific running gag here? A page that simply lists instances of the word ''times'' (most of which are either perfectly grammatical or nearly so) is not worthy of inclusion. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 22:19, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Defender1031: /* What's the joke? */ change to keep.

Defender1031 — Sun, 16 Aug 2015 04:59:47 GMT

What's the joke?: change to keep.

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:59, 16 August 2015
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Okay, what's the specific running gag here? A page that simply lists instances of the word ''times'' (most of which are either perfectly grammatical or nearly so) is not worthy of inclusion. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 22:19, 5 March 2009 (UTC)		Okay, what's the specific running gag here? A page that simply lists instances of the word ''times'' (most of which are either perfectly grammatical or nearly so) is not worthy of inclusion. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 22:19, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
	:I agree. There's nothing particularly unusual about these usages. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.138.223\|132.183.138.223]] 23:54, 5 March 2009 (UTC)		:I agree. There's nothing particularly unusual about these usages. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.138.223\|132.183.138.223]] 23:54, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
-	::I just noticed this. I agree too, there's nothing really special about the word itself. It's used in odd places because of the jokes going on there at the "times", not actually because of anything intrinsic to the word itself. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 18:50, 23 March 2009 (UTC)	+	::<s>I just noticed this. I agree too, there's nothing really special about the word itself. It's used in odd places because of the jokes going on there at the "times", not actually because of anything intrinsic to the word itself. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 18:50, 23 March 2009 (UTC)</s>
	:::<s>Nothing special about the word Times here. '''Delete.''' {{User:The Chort/sig}} 16:56, 11 May 2009 (UTC)</s>		:::<s>Nothing special about the word Times here. '''Delete.''' {{User:The Chort/sig}} 16:56, 11 May 2009 (UTC)</s>
	::::And yet it misses both of the "do you have the times" jokes. For shame. '''Deleted.''' [[4 branches\|Bed, bath and be-yond.]] --{{User:Jay/sig}} 17:01, 11 May 2009 (UTC)		::::And yet it misses both of the "do you have the times" jokes. For shame. '''Deleted.''' [[4 branches\|Bed, bath and be-yond.]] --{{User:Jay/sig}} 17:01, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Line 15:		Line 15:
	:I agree. Conversation needs to rise on this article whether it's needed or not. It's been much longer than a year since Dot com opposed it and added the {{t\|tbd}} in the first place, so I say that either we need to come to a consensus or just plain delete it. Personally, I don't care either way about its existence, but I think the gag is enough to retain its status as a breathing article. It's a tough choice, but I'm ultimately voting '''keep.''' {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 21:46, 29 November 2010 (UTC)		:I agree. Conversation needs to rise on this article whether it's needed or not. It's been much longer than a year since Dot com opposed it and added the {{t\|tbd}} in the first place, so I say that either we need to come to a consensus or just plain delete it. Personally, I don't care either way about its existence, but I think the gag is enough to retain its status as a breathing article. It's a tough choice, but I'm ultimately voting '''keep.''' {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 21:46, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
	::I think we might need to crop this discussion back up, but it seems to me like it's more sided towards deletion than anything. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 22:05, 29 September 2013 (UTC)		::I think we might need to crop this discussion back up, but it seems to me like it's more sided towards deletion than anything. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 22:05, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
		+	:::I think the fact that "times" is consistently used in odd ways, often as a [[plural instead of singular]], makes this more notable than when i originally commented here. I say '''keep''' now. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 04:59, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

MichaelXX2: yeah

MichaelXX2 — Sun, 29 Sep 2013 22:05:23 GMT

yeah

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:05, 29 September 2013
Line 14:		Line 14:
	Since this word has cropped again, perhaps it's times to reconsider if this is a running gag or not. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 02:05, 24 November 2010 (UTC)		Since this word has cropped again, perhaps it's times to reconsider if this is a running gag or not. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 02:05, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
	:I agree. Conversation needs to rise on this article whether it's needed or not. It's been much longer than a year since Dot com opposed it and added the {{t\|tbd}} in the first place, so I say that either we need to come to a consensus or just plain delete it. Personally, I don't care either way about its existence, but I think the gag is enough to retain its status as a breathing article. It's a tough choice, but I'm ultimately voting '''keep.''' {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 21:46, 29 November 2010 (UTC)		:I agree. Conversation needs to rise on this article whether it's needed or not. It's been much longer than a year since Dot com opposed it and added the {{t\|tbd}} in the first place, so I say that either we need to come to a consensus or just plain delete it. Personally, I don't care either way about its existence, but I think the gag is enough to retain its status as a breathing article. It's a tough choice, but I'm ultimately voting '''keep.''' {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 21:46, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
		+	::I think we might need to crop this discussion back up, but it seems to me like it's more sided towards deletion than anything. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 22:05, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

MichaelXX2: /* What's the joke? */ Wow, it sure has been a while.

MichaelXX2 — Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:46:38 GMT

What's the joke?: Wow, it sure has been a while.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:46, 29 November 2010
Line 13:		Line 13:
	::::::::::I think that if we keep [[style]], then times should stay as well. '''K33p. Er, Keep.'''		::::::::::I think that if we keep [[style]], then times should stay as well. '''K33p. Er, Keep.'''
	Since this word has cropped again, perhaps it's times to reconsider if this is a running gag or not. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 02:05, 24 November 2010 (UTC)		Since this word has cropped again, perhaps it's times to reconsider if this is a running gag or not. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 02:05, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
		+	:I agree. Conversation needs to rise on this article whether it's needed or not. It's been much longer than a year since Dot com opposed it and added the {{t\|tbd}} in the first place, so I say that either we need to come to a consensus or just plain delete it. Personally, I don't care either way about its existence, but I think the gag is enough to retain its status as a breathing article. It's a tough choice, but I'm ultimately voting '''keep.''' {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 21:46, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Wbwolf: /* What's the joke? */ Reopening

Wbwolf — Wed, 24 Nov 2010 02:05:45 GMT

What's the joke?: Reopening

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:05, 24 November 2010
Line 12:		Line 12:
	:::::::::On reflection, I now realise that the word Times is a ligitimate word running gag as it comes up enough ''times'' to be considered as one. However, it still seems to be an extention of [[plural instead of singular]] and, like [[O' Dems]] before it, this article should be '''merged''' with that article, perhaps with a subsection if necessary. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 16:30, 12 July 2009 (UTC)		:::::::::On reflection, I now realise that the word Times is a ligitimate word running gag as it comes up enough ''times'' to be considered as one. However, it still seems to be an extention of [[plural instead of singular]] and, like [[O' Dems]] before it, this article should be '''merged''' with that article, perhaps with a subsection if necessary. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 16:30, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
	::::::::::I think that if we keep [[style]], then times should stay as well. '''K33p. Er, Keep.'''		::::::::::I think that if we keep [[style]], then times should stay as well. '''K33p. Er, Keep.'''
		+	Since this word has cropped again, perhaps it's times to reconsider if this is a running gag or not. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 02:05, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Espemon333: /* What's the joke? */

Espemon333 — Wed, 05 Aug 2009 23:27:44 GMT

What's the joke?

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:27, 5 August 2009
Line 11:		Line 11:
	::::::::I think this article should stay. The five uses here are unique enough for this to be a word running gag. Right now I'm also wondering if the Scrolling Shooter Menu caption for Secret Collect "A flashing maze to create many times!", counts. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 19:14, 24 June 2009 (UTC)		::::::::I think this article should stay. The five uses here are unique enough for this to be a word running gag. Right now I'm also wondering if the Scrolling Shooter Menu caption for Secret Collect "A flashing maze to create many times!", counts. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 19:14, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
	:::::::::On reflection, I now realise that the word Times is a ligitimate word running gag as it comes up enough ''times'' to be considered as one. However, it still seems to be an extention of [[plural instead of singular]] and, like [[O' Dems]] before it, this article should be '''merged''' with that article, perhaps with a subsection if necessary. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 16:30, 12 July 2009 (UTC)		:::::::::On reflection, I now realise that the word Times is a ligitimate word running gag as it comes up enough ''times'' to be considered as one. However, it still seems to be an extention of [[plural instead of singular]] and, like [[O' Dems]] before it, this article should be '''merged''' with that article, perhaps with a subsection if necessary. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 16:30, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
		+	::::::::::I think that if we keep [[style]], then times should stay as well. '''K33p. Er, Keep.'''

The Chort: /* What's the joke? */ changing opinion to merge with plural instead of singular

The Chort — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 16:30:46 GMT

What's the joke?: changing opinion to merge with plural instead of singular

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:30, 12 July 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	:I agree. There's nothing particularly unusual about these usages. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.138.223\|132.183.138.223]] 23:54, 5 March 2009 (UTC)		:I agree. There's nothing particularly unusual about these usages. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.138.223\|132.183.138.223]] 23:54, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
	::I just noticed this. I agree too, there's nothing really special about the word itself. It's used in odd places because of the jokes going on there at the "times", not actually because of anything intrinsic to the word itself. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 18:50, 23 March 2009 (UTC)		::I just noticed this. I agree too, there's nothing really special about the word itself. It's used in odd places because of the jokes going on there at the "times", not actually because of anything intrinsic to the word itself. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 18:50, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
-	:::Nothing special about the word Times here. '''Delete.''' {{User:The Chort/sig}} 16:56, 11 May 2009 (UTC)	+	:::<s>Nothing special about the word Times here. '''Delete.''' {{User:The Chort/sig}} 16:56, 11 May 2009 (UTC)</s>
	::::And yet it misses both of the "do you have the times" jokes. For shame. '''Deleted.''' [[4 branches\|Bed, bath and be-yond.]] --{{User:Jay/sig}} 17:01, 11 May 2009 (UTC)		::::And yet it misses both of the "do you have the times" jokes. For shame. '''Deleted.''' [[4 branches\|Bed, bath and be-yond.]] --{{User:Jay/sig}} 17:01, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
	::::: '''Diggity'''. This is more so [[plural instead of singular]], already a page. What's more, the intro sucks. A lot. --[[User:Jellote\|Jellote]] 21:11, 11 June 2009 (UTC)		::::: '''Diggity'''. This is more so [[plural instead of singular]], already a page. What's more, the intro sucks. A lot. --[[User:Jellote\|Jellote]] 21:11, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:::::::I have no reason to say why this should be deleted that has not already been mentioned by another user, so I just will say to '''delete'''. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 02:59, 23 June 2009 (UTC)		:::::::I have no reason to say why this should be deleted that has not already been mentioned by another user, so I just will say to '''delete'''. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 02:59, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
	::::::::I think this article should stay. The five uses here are unique enough for this to be a word running gag. Right now I'm also wondering if the Scrolling Shooter Menu caption for Secret Collect "A flashing maze to create many times!", counts. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 19:14, 24 June 2009 (UTC)		::::::::I think this article should stay. The five uses here are unique enough for this to be a word running gag. Right now I'm also wondering if the Scrolling Shooter Menu caption for Secret Collect "A flashing maze to create many times!", counts. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 19:14, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
		+	:::::::::On reflection, I now realise that the word Times is a ligitimate word running gag as it comes up enough ''times'' to be considered as one. However, it still seems to be an extention of [[plural instead of singular]] and, like [[O' Dems]] before it, this article should be '''merged''' with that article, perhaps with a subsection if necessary. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 16:30, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Elcool: /* What's the joke? */ comment. keep.

Elcool — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:14:45 GMT

What's the joke?: comment. keep.

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:14, 24 June 2009
Line 9:		Line 9:
	::::::I add my support for '''delete''', fully agreeing with.. well.. 100% of the rest that have commented here. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 01:38, 23 June 2009 (UTC)		::::::I add my support for '''delete''', fully agreeing with.. well.. 100% of the rest that have commented here. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 01:38, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
	:::::::I have no reason to say why this should be deleted that has not already been mentioned by another user, so I just will say to '''delete'''. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 02:59, 23 June 2009 (UTC)		:::::::I have no reason to say why this should be deleted that has not already been mentioned by another user, so I just will say to '''delete'''. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 02:59, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
		+	::::::::I think this article should stay. The five uses here are unique enough for this to be a word running gag. Right now I'm also wondering if the Scrolling Shooter Menu caption for Secret Collect "A flashing maze to create many times!", counts. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 19:14, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Homestar-Winner: /* What's the joke? */

Homestar-Winner — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 02:59:22 GMT

What's the joke?

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:59, 23 June 2009
Line 8:		Line 8:
	::::: '''Diggity'''. This is more so [[plural instead of singular]], already a page. What's more, the intro sucks. A lot. --[[User:Jellote\|Jellote]] 21:11, 11 June 2009 (UTC)		::::: '''Diggity'''. This is more so [[plural instead of singular]], already a page. What's more, the intro sucks. A lot. --[[User:Jellote\|Jellote]] 21:11, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
	::::::I add my support for '''delete''', fully agreeing with.. well.. 100% of the rest that have commented here. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 01:38, 23 June 2009 (UTC)		::::::I add my support for '''delete''', fully agreeing with.. well.. 100% of the rest that have commented here. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 01:38, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
		+	:::::::I have no reason to say why this should be deleted that has not already been mentioned by another user, so I just will say to '''delete'''. {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 02:59, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

OptimisticFool: /* What's the joke? */ Delete.

OptimisticFool — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 01:38:10 GMT

What's the joke?: Delete.

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:38, 23 June 2009
Line 7:		Line 7:
	::::And yet it misses both of the "do you have the times" jokes. For shame. '''Deleted.''' [[4 branches\|Bed, bath and be-yond.]] --{{User:Jay/sig}} 17:01, 11 May 2009 (UTC)		::::And yet it misses both of the "do you have the times" jokes. For shame. '''Deleted.''' [[4 branches\|Bed, bath and be-yond.]] --{{User:Jay/sig}} 17:01, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
	::::: '''Diggity'''. This is more so [[plural instead of singular]], already a page. What's more, the intro sucks. A lot. --[[User:Jellote\|Jellote]] 21:11, 11 June 2009 (UTC)		::::: '''Diggity'''. This is more so [[plural instead of singular]], already a page. What's more, the intro sucks. A lot. --[[User:Jellote\|Jellote]] 21:11, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
		+	::::::I add my support for '''delete''', fully agreeing with.. well.. 100% of the rest that have commented here. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 01:38, 23 June 2009 (UTC)