Talk:Wormdingler - Revision history

Defender1031: that's very forummy

Defender1031 — Tue, 04 Mar 2008 22:58:51 GMT

that's very forummy

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:58, 4 March 2008
Line 87:		Line 87:
	::: (note:not being defensive; being optimistic) I was with such a die-vers (just sound it out) I am trying do what i am thinking is best. I am learning the ropes around here. {{User:The-homsarrunner/sig}} 16:39, 2008 Jan 17		::: (note:not being defensive; being optimistic) I was with such a die-vers (just sound it out) I am trying do what i am thinking is best. I am learning the ropes around here. {{User:The-homsarrunner/sig}} 16:39, 2008 Jan 17
	::::I have recategorized Wormdingler as a pseudocharacter, per discussion above. I suggest removing the deletion tag because this page is similar in length to those for other pseudos. [[User:EASports\|EASports]] 19:07, 19 January 2008 (UTC)		::::I have recategorized Wormdingler as a pseudocharacter, per discussion above. I suggest removing the deletion tag because this page is similar in length to those for other pseudos. [[User:EASports\|EASports]] 19:07, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
-
-	~~== Nickname ==~~
-
-	There's this total jackass wimp at my school who thinks he's so tough, (yeah right), and everyone calls him Wormdingler now! I feel so happy, since I started the nickname. what's really funny is that I'm in computer club, and on the sign in sheet, someone acctually wrote "Wormdingler" next to his name. He is the anti-christ, so if any of you live through the tribulation tell him Takeya said he sucks.

169.204.33.237: /**/Nickname

169.204.33.237 — Tue, 04 Mar 2008 22:54:58 GMT

: Nickname

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:54, 4 March 2008
Line 87:		Line 87:
	::: (note:not being defensive; being optimistic) I was with such a die-vers (just sound it out) I am trying do what i am thinking is best. I am learning the ropes around here. {{User:The-homsarrunner/sig}} 16:39, 2008 Jan 17		::: (note:not being defensive; being optimistic) I was with such a die-vers (just sound it out) I am trying do what i am thinking is best. I am learning the ropes around here. {{User:The-homsarrunner/sig}} 16:39, 2008 Jan 17
	::::I have recategorized Wormdingler as a pseudocharacter, per discussion above. I suggest removing the deletion tag because this page is similar in length to those for other pseudos. [[User:EASports\|EASports]] 19:07, 19 January 2008 (UTC)		::::I have recategorized Wormdingler as a pseudocharacter, per discussion above. I suggest removing the deletion tag because this page is similar in length to those for other pseudos. [[User:EASports\|EASports]] 19:07, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Nickname ==
		+
		+	There's this total jackass wimp at my school who thinks he's so tough, (yeah right), and everyone calls him Wormdingler now! I feel so happy, since I started the nickname. what's really funny is that I'm in computer club, and on the sign in sheet, someone acctually wrote "Wormdingler" next to his name. He is the anti-christ, so if any of you live through the tribulation tell him Takeya said he sucks.

Elcool: removing the ttbd template per user consensus

Elcool — Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:02:12 GMT

removing the ttbd template per user consensus

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:02, 24 January 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~{{ttbd}}~~
	== Needed? ==		== Needed? ==
	C'mon now, is this really needed? It isn't really a major part in [[dragon]] or [[Trogday 08]]. I think it still should be a redirect. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 22:37, 14 January 2008 (UTC)		C'mon now, is this really needed? It isn't really a major part in [[dragon]] or [[Trogday 08]]. I think it still should be a redirect. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 22:37, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Justin Master of Nature at 20:47, 23 January 2008

Justin Master of Nature — Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:47:44 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:47, 23 January 2008
Line 43:		Line 43:
	I agree with '''keeping''' the article. Considering some of the other articles here, this doesn't seem to out of place. [[User:Unbalanced\|Unbalanced]] 01:03, 19 January 2008 (UTC)		I agree with '''keeping''' the article. Considering some of the other articles here, this doesn't seem to out of place. [[User:Unbalanced\|Unbalanced]] 01:03, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

		+	Discuss it on my page [[User:Justin Master of Nature/SATABDATWOAP\|SATABDATWOAP]] {{User:Justin Master of Nature/sig}} 20:47, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
	== Pseudocharacter ==		== Pseudocharacter ==
	I went ahead and deleted from the cast list of the [[dragon\|two]] [[Trogday 08\|pages]] it was on. Treating it as a "cast member" would be akin to putting Marzipan's "Thank You" picture in the cast list whenever it appears. It's still linked in both articles, but isn't treated as a character. -{{User:YK/sig}} 02:49, 16 January 2008 (UTC)		I went ahead and deleted from the cast list of the [[dragon\|two]] [[Trogday 08\|pages]] it was on. Treating it as a "cast member" would be akin to putting Marzipan's "Thank You" picture in the cast list whenever it appears. It's still linked in both articles, but isn't treated as a character. -{{User:YK/sig}} 02:49, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

EASports: /* Stuff it */

EASports — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:07:38 GMT

Stuff it

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:07, 19 January 2008
Line 86:		Line 86:
	::For matters like keeping or deleting articles, we've never used votes. There's a strong base to be made that we shouldn't use votes at all: see [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Polling is not a substitute for discussion]]. Yes, I know we're not Wikipedia, but still, this outlines the case against voting. We have a long-standing tradition of voting in STUFF here, and it's probably not going to stop any time soon (although I rather wish it would, and am glad to see us using it less and less). For matters other than Fun Facts, we've never really used votes, nor should we. A result of "no consensus" means we keep the status quo before the discussion began. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 05:16, 17 January 2008 (UTC)		::For matters like keeping or deleting articles, we've never used votes. There's a strong base to be made that we shouldn't use votes at all: see [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Polling is not a substitute for discussion]]. Yes, I know we're not Wikipedia, but still, this outlines the case against voting. We have a long-standing tradition of voting in STUFF here, and it's probably not going to stop any time soon (although I rather wish it would, and am glad to see us using it less and less). For matters other than Fun Facts, we've never really used votes, nor should we. A result of "no consensus" means we keep the status quo before the discussion began. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 05:16, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
	::: (note:not being defensive; being optimistic) I was with such a die-vers (just sound it out) I am trying do what i am thinking is best. I am learning the ropes around here. {{User:The-homsarrunner/sig}} 16:39, 2008 Jan 17		::: (note:not being defensive; being optimistic) I was with such a die-vers (just sound it out) I am trying do what i am thinking is best. I am learning the ropes around here. {{User:The-homsarrunner/sig}} 16:39, 2008 Jan 17
		+	::::I have recategorized Wormdingler as a pseudocharacter, per discussion above. I suggest removing the deletion tag because this page is similar in length to those for other pseudos. [[User:EASports\|EASports]] 19:07, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Unbalanced: /* Needed? */

Unbalanced — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 01:13:19 GMT

Needed?

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:13, 19 January 2008
Line 41:		Line 41:
	I think this page should '''stay'''. After all, if we're going to rename the page "Trogdor Attempts," we might as well merge it with [[The S is for Sucks Dragon]], because he was also a Trogdor attempt. {{User:Religious Corn/sig}} 20:53, 18 January 2008 (UTC)		I think this page should '''stay'''. After all, if we're going to rename the page "Trogdor Attempts," we might as well merge it with [[The S is for Sucks Dragon]], because he was also a Trogdor attempt. {{User:Religious Corn/sig}} 20:53, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

-	I agree with '''keeping''' the article. ~~It makes more sense~~ to ~~me to keep them grouped on one page~~. [[User:Unbalanced\|Unbalanced]] 01:03, 19 January 2008 (UTC)	+	I agree with '''keeping''' the article. Considering some of the other articles here, this doesn't seem to out of place. [[User:Unbalanced\|Unbalanced]] 01:03, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

	== Pseudocharacter ==		== Pseudocharacter ==

Unbalanced: /* Needed? */

Unbalanced — Sat, 19 Jan 2008 01:03:13 GMT

Needed?

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:03, 19 January 2008
Line 40:		Line 40:

	I think this page should '''stay'''. After all, if we're going to rename the page "Trogdor Attempts," we might as well merge it with [[The S is for Sucks Dragon]], because he was also a Trogdor attempt. {{User:Religious Corn/sig}} 20:53, 18 January 2008 (UTC)		I think this page should '''stay'''. After all, if we're going to rename the page "Trogdor Attempts," we might as well merge it with [[The S is for Sucks Dragon]], because he was also a Trogdor attempt. {{User:Religious Corn/sig}} 20:53, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	I agree with '''keeping''' the article. It makes more sense to me to keep them grouped on one page. [[User:Unbalanced\|Unbalanced]] 01:03, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

	== Pseudocharacter ==		== Pseudocharacter ==

Religious Corn: /* Needed? */ Hey there, Wormdingler! I gotchas this cupcake for your famous I'm-keeping-my-own-page-on-the-wiki-day!

Religious Corn — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:53:30 GMT

Needed?: Hey there, Wormdingler! I gotchas this cupcake for your famous I'm-keeping-my-own-page-on-the-wiki-day!

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:53, 18 January 2008
Line 38:		Line 38:

	:I too vote to '''keep'''. I've seen far less significant pseudo-characters that have their own pages. {{User:Lux Acerbus/sig}} 01:31, 18 January 2008 (UTC)		:I too vote to '''keep'''. I've seen far less significant pseudo-characters that have their own pages. {{User:Lux Acerbus/sig}} 01:31, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	I think this page should '''stay'''. After all, if we're going to rename the page "Trogdor Attempts," we might as well merge it with [[The S is for Sucks Dragon]], because he was also a Trogdor attempt. {{User:Religious Corn/sig}} 20:53, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

	== Pseudocharacter ==		== Pseudocharacter ==

That Guy Over There: /* Needed? */ Keep.

That Guy Over There — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 01:31:53 GMT

Needed?: Keep.

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:31, 18 January 2008
Line 36:		Line 36:

	'''Keep''' the article. Notable, pseudo-character, mentioned by name, described by characters. Also the article is well worded, have good layout and is clean and a read. I see no reason what so ever to merge this with anything, nor any convincing reason suggested above. Anyone objects removing the TBD tags? {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 04:53, 17 January 2008 (UTC)		'''Keep''' the article. Notable, pseudo-character, mentioned by name, described by characters. Also the article is well worded, have good layout and is clean and a read. I see no reason what so ever to merge this with anything, nor any convincing reason suggested above. Anyone objects removing the TBD tags? {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 04:53, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	:I too vote to '''keep'''. I've seen far less significant pseudo-characters that have their own pages. {{User:Lux Acerbus/sig}} 01:31, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

	== Pseudocharacter ==		== Pseudocharacter ==

The-homsarrunner: /* Stuff it */ spell

The-homsarrunner — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:44:03 GMT

Stuff it: spell

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:44, 17 January 2008
Line 79:		Line 79:
	:2 things: First, what are you talking about (merit of the article or pseudocharacter). Second, STUFF is a system for Selecting The Useful Fun Facts, not for deciding the merits of an article or it's category. However, I think that, if a consensus cannot be reached, a <b> vote </b> system should be used to determine the keep-or-delete-itdute of this article. — [[User:Flashfight\|Flashfight]] 05:06, 17 January 2008 (UTC)		:2 things: First, what are you talking about (merit of the article or pseudocharacter). Second, STUFF is a system for Selecting The Useful Fun Facts, not for deciding the merits of an article or it's category. However, I think that, if a consensus cannot be reached, a <b> vote </b> system should be used to determine the keep-or-delete-itdute of this article. — [[User:Flashfight\|Flashfight]] 05:06, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
	::For matters like keeping or deleting articles, we've never used votes. There's a strong base to be made that we shouldn't use votes at all: see [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Polling is not a substitute for discussion]]. Yes, I know we're not Wikipedia, but still, this outlines the case against voting. We have a long-standing tradition of voting in STUFF here, and it's probably not going to stop any time soon (although I rather wish it would, and am glad to see us using it less and less). For matters other than Fun Facts, we've never really used votes, nor should we. A result of "no consensus" means we keep the status quo before the discussion began. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 05:16, 17 January 2008 (UTC)		::For matters like keeping or deleting articles, we've never used votes. There's a strong base to be made that we shouldn't use votes at all: see [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Polling is not a substitute for discussion]]. Yes, I know we're not Wikipedia, but still, this outlines the case against voting. We have a long-standing tradition of voting in STUFF here, and it's probably not going to stop any time soon (although I rather wish it would, and am glad to see us using it less and less). For matters other than Fun Facts, we've never really used votes, nor should we. A result of "no consensus" means we keep the status quo before the discussion began. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 05:16, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
-	::: (note:not be defensive; being optimistic) I was with such a die-vers (just sound it out) I am trying do what i am thinking is best. I am learning the ropes around here. {{User:The-homsarrunner/sig}} 16:39, 2008 Jan 17	+	::: (note:not being defensive; being optimistic) I was with such a die-vers (just sound it out) I am trying do what i am thinking is best. I am learning the ropes around here. {{User:The-homsarrunner/sig}} 16:39, 2008 Jan 17