Talk:time capsule - Revision history

207.229.176.35: /* Viscosity */

207.229.176.35 — Sun, 13 Dec 2009 17:32:18 GMT

Viscosity

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:32, 13 December 2009
Line 134:		Line 134:
	==Viscosity==		==Viscosity==
	Anyone think that "with the viscosity" could be a reference to Black Sheep's song "Strobelite Honey"? It's a stretch for sure, but it wouldn't be the first time Strong Bad has quoted a hip-hop lyric (compare "so fresh and so clean, clean" in [[spring cleaning]]), and I can't think why else anyone other than a chemist would say "with the viscosity." (I don't know what Black Sheep meant by it either.)		Anyone think that "with the viscosity" could be a reference to Black Sheep's song "Strobelite Honey"? It's a stretch for sure, but it wouldn't be the first time Strong Bad has quoted a hip-hop lyric (compare "so fresh and so clean, clean" in [[spring cleaning]]), and I can't think why else anyone other than a chemist would say "with the viscosity." (I don't know what Black Sheep meant by it either.)
		+	: My thoughts exactly. I think Black Sheep might have meant "velocity"...?

	==Con-cord versus Conk-erd==		==Con-cord versus Conk-erd==

Defender1031: /* This deserves to be on the page! Why ISN'T it? */ plus 2... hundred!

Defender1031 — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 16:05:34 GMT

This deserves to be on the page! Why ISN'T it?: plus 2... hundred!

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:05, 8 November 2008
Line 158:		Line 158:
	::I was only saying this would make sense if we were to ASSUME that Stinkoman opens the capsule X0 years from the email. But I get your point. {{User:Neox/sig}} 21:57, 7 November 2008 (UTC)		::I was only saying this would make sense if we were to ASSUME that Stinkoman opens the capsule X0 years from the email. But I get your point. {{User:Neox/sig}} 21:57, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
	::DeFender: It's especially silly when you consider the fact that every relevant scientist agrees that Earth is only a few billion years old; nowhere near 200! ;) I'm just being difficult; I know what you meant. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 22:10, 7 November 2008 (UTC)		::DeFender: It's especially silly when you consider the fact that every relevant scientist agrees that Earth is only a few billion years old; nowhere near 200! ;) I'm just being difficult; I know what you meant. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 22:10, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
		+	:::ESPECIALLY since "00" isn't a substantial number... darn that sticky 2 key. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 16:05, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Jay: /* This deserves to be on the page! Why ISN'T it? */ Me being difficult

Jay — Fri, 07 Nov 2008 22:10:58 GMT

This deserves to be on the page! Why ISN'T it?: Me being difficult

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:10, 7 November 2008
Line 157:		Line 157:

	::I was only saying this would make sense if we were to ASSUME that Stinkoman opens the capsule X0 years from the email. But I get your point. {{User:Neox/sig}} 21:57, 7 November 2008 (UTC)		::I was only saying this would make sense if we were to ASSUME that Stinkoman opens the capsule X0 years from the email. But I get your point. {{User:Neox/sig}} 21:57, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
		+	::DeFender: It's especially silly when you consider the fact that every relevant scientist agrees that Earth is only a few billion years old; nowhere near 200! ;) I'm just being difficult; I know what you meant. --{{User:Jay/sig}} 22:10, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Neox: /* This deserves to be on the page! Why ISN'T it? */

Neox — Fri, 07 Nov 2008 21:57:30 GMT

This deserves to be on the page! Why ISN'T it?

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:57, 7 November 2008
Line 155:		Line 155:
	"If we are to assume that X0 years had passed from the email by the time Stinkoman opened the capsule, then the year he opened it in would be 20X5, not 20X6." That seems like it should go under the Remarks section or something. The only reason I'm not putting it there yet is because I'm afraid the change will get deleted if I don't ask permission. {{User:Neox/sig}} 00:11, 5 November 2008 (UTC)		"If we are to assume that X0 years had passed from the email by the time Stinkoman opened the capsule, then the year he opened it in would be 20X5, not 20X6." That seems like it should go under the Remarks section or something. The only reason I'm not putting it there yet is because I'm afraid the change will get deleted if I don't ask permission. {{User:Neox/sig}} 00:11, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
	:That's a bit nitpicky. When people say that the dinosaurs roamed the earth 00 Billion years ago, are you gonna tell them "no, it's actually 200 billion, 187 million, 522 thousand..."? it's silly. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 03:10, 5 November 2008 (UTC)		:That's a bit nitpicky. When people say that the dinosaurs roamed the earth 00 Billion years ago, are you gonna tell them "no, it's actually 200 billion, 187 million, 522 thousand..."? it's silly. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 03:10, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	::I was only saying this would make sense if we were to ASSUME that Stinkoman opens the capsule X0 years from the email. But I get your point. {{User:Neox/sig}} 21:57, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Defender1031: /* This deserves to be on the page! Why ISN'T it? */ reply

Defender1031 — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 03:10:42 GMT

This deserves to be on the page! Why ISN'T it?: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:10, 5 November 2008
Line 154:		Line 154:

	"If we are to assume that X0 years had passed from the email by the time Stinkoman opened the capsule, then the year he opened it in would be 20X5, not 20X6." That seems like it should go under the Remarks section or something. The only reason I'm not putting it there yet is because I'm afraid the change will get deleted if I don't ask permission. {{User:Neox/sig}} 00:11, 5 November 2008 (UTC)		"If we are to assume that X0 years had passed from the email by the time Stinkoman opened the capsule, then the year he opened it in would be 20X5, not 20X6." That seems like it should go under the Remarks section or something. The only reason I'm not putting it there yet is because I'm afraid the change will get deleted if I don't ask permission. {{User:Neox/sig}} 00:11, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
		+	:That's a bit nitpicky. When people say that the dinosaurs roamed the earth 00 Billion years ago, are you gonna tell them "no, it's actually 200 billion, 187 million, 522 thousand..."? it's silly. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 03:10, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Neox: /**/This deserves to be on the page! Why ISN'T it?

Neox — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 00:11:49 GMT

: This deserves to be on the page! Why ISN'T it?

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:11, 5 November 2008
Line 150:		Line 150:
	:::::IPA is a bit hard to read, but if I'm reading it correctly, it looks like "la-BOR-a-tree" is actually standard in the UK per none other than [http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?dict=CALD&key=44274&ph=on Cambridge]. I think this fact is on very shaky ground. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 04:05, 27 January 2008 (UTC)		:::::IPA is a bit hard to read, but if I'm reading it correctly, it looks like "la-BOR-a-tree" is actually standard in the UK per none other than [http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?dict=CALD&key=44274&ph=on Cambridge]. I think this fact is on very shaky ground. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 04:05, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
	::::::Well, looks like i've been proven wrong. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 04:06, 27 January 2008 (UTC)		::::::Well, looks like i've been proven wrong. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 04:06, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	== This deserves to be on the page! Why ISN'T it? ==
		+
		+	"If we are to assume that X0 years had passed from the email by the time Stinkoman opened the capsule, then the year he opened it in would be 20X5, not 20X6." That seems like it should go under the Remarks section or something. The only reason I'm not putting it there yet is because I'm afraid the change will get deleted if I don't ask permission. {{User:Neox/sig}} 00:11, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

MichaelXX2: /* Chatter and Initial Reactions */

MichaelXX2 — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 23:50:35 GMT

Chatter and Initial Reactions

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:50, 22 July 2008
Line 6:		Line 6:
	--MAX		--MAX
	[[User:Jibney\|Jibney]] 05:04, 24 November 2005 (UTC)		[[User:Jibney\|Jibney]] 05:04, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
		+
	I wouldn't ever stop watching Homestar Runner. Not for a million years! -- [[User:FireBird\|FireBird]]		I wouldn't ever stop watching Homestar Runner. Not for a million years! -- [[User:FireBird\|FireBird]]

Defender1031: /* Luh-BOR-uh-tor-TTATOT / sends up white flag*

Defender1031 — Sun, 27 Jan 2008 04:06:13 GMT

Luh-BOR-uh-tor-TTATOT: *sends up white flag*

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:06, 27 January 2008
Line 148:		Line 148:
	::::Jillions. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 02:37, 27 January 2008 (UTC)		::::Jillions. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 02:37, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
	:::::IPA is a bit hard to read, but if I'm reading it correctly, it looks like "la-BOR-a-tree" is actually standard in the UK per none other than [http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?dict=CALD&key=44274&ph=on Cambridge]. I think this fact is on very shaky ground. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 04:05, 27 January 2008 (UTC)		:::::IPA is a bit hard to read, but if I'm reading it correctly, it looks like "la-BOR-a-tree" is actually standard in the UK per none other than [http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?dict=CALD&key=44274&ph=on Cambridge]. I think this fact is on very shaky ground. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 04:05, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
		+	::::::Well, looks like i've been proven wrong. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 04:06, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Heimstern Läufer: /* Luh-BOR-uh-tor-TTATOT */ looks like it's standard in the UK

Heimstern Läufer — Sun, 27 Jan 2008 04:05:11 GMT

Luh-BOR-uh-tor-TTATOT: looks like it's standard in the UK

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:05, 27 January 2008
Line 147:		Line 147:
	:::How many people started saying it before dexter? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 02:33, 27 January 2008 (UTC)		:::How many people started saying it before dexter? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 02:33, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
	::::Jillions. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 02:37, 27 January 2008 (UTC)		::::Jillions. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 02:37, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
		+	:::::IPA is a bit hard to read, but if I'm reading it correctly, it looks like "la-BOR-a-tree" is actually standard in the UK per none other than [http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?dict=CALD&key=44274&ph=on Cambridge]. I think this fact is on very shaky ground. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 04:05, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

OptimisticFool: /* Luh-BOR-uh-tor-TTATOT */

OptimisticFool — Sun, 27 Jan 2008 02:37:03 GMT

Luh-BOR-uh-tor-TTATOT

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:37, 27 January 2008
Line 146:		Line 146:
	::It did? I'd've thought the German Scientist stereotype would've done that. Dr. Frankenstein and all. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 02:14, 27 January 2008 (UTC)		::It did? I'd've thought the German Scientist stereotype would've done that. Dr. Frankenstein and all. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 02:14, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
	:::How many people started saying it before dexter? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 02:33, 27 January 2008 (UTC)		:::How many people started saying it before dexter? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 02:33, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
		+	::::Jillions. {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 02:37, 27 January 2008 (UTC)