Template talk:done - Revision history

Lapper: /* New "Todo" template. */ reply

Lapper — Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:45:59 GMT

New "Todo" template.: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:45, 2 December 2005
Line 37:		Line 37:

	:Two words: sah-weet! --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 19:14, 1 December 2005 (UTC)		:Two words: sah-weet! --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 19:14, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
		+
		+	::Much better. Now <nowiki>{{tick}}</nowiki> and <nowiki>done</nowiki> clearly differenciate. — {{User:Lapper/sig}} 03:45, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

Stux: /* New "Todo" template. */

Stux — Thu, 01 Dec 2005 19:14:17 GMT

New "Todo" template.

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:14, 1 December 2005
Line 35:		Line 35:

	Let me know what you think or if you have any suggestions for improvements. Thanks. — {{User:JoeyDay/sig}} 19:02, 1 December 2005 (UTC)		Let me know what you think or if you have any suggestions for improvements. Thanks. — {{User:JoeyDay/sig}} 19:02, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
		+
		+	:Two words: sah-weet! --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 19:14, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

JoeyDay: New "Todo" template.

JoeyDay — Thu, 01 Dec 2005 19:02:05 GMT

New "Todo" template.

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:02, 1 December 2005
Line 24:		Line 24:

	::::The reasons we have to keep both are the ones It's dot com just mentioned. 1. Both of these templates are actively being used. 2. They mean different things semantically. 3. There's no good reason to force users of one to switch to the other one.[[User:Tom\|<nowiki></nowiki>]] -- [[User:Tom\|Tom]] 14:00, 14 November 2005 (UTC)		::::The reasons we have to keep both are the ones It's dot com just mentioned. 1. Both of these templates are actively being used. 2. They mean different things semantically. 3. There's no good reason to force users of one to switch to the other one.[[User:Tom\|<nowiki></nowiki>]] -- [[User:Tom\|Tom]] 14:00, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
		+
		+	== New "Todo" template. ==
		+
		+	I've updated the image used in this template and added a new [[:Template:todo]]. Here's an example of how you might use them:
		+
		+	:{{done}} Jump over the candle stick
		+	:{{done}} Go up the hill to fetch a pail of water
		+	:{{todo}} Go to the market for roast beef
		+	:{{todo}} Kiss a frog
		+
		+	Let me know what you think or if you have any suggestions for improvements. Thanks. — {{User:JoeyDay/sig}} 19:02, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

Tom: /* This should stay */ Add note.

Tom — Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:00:52 GMT

This should stay: Add note.

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:00, 14 November 2005
Line 22:		Line 22:

	:::I kinda agree with you, but, we really don't have any reason to have both. I'm sure the users using the other template won't mind using this one, and it's not many pages to change if we want to use the new one. {{User:Rainer/sig}} 08:27, 14 November 2005 (UTC)		:::I kinda agree with you, but, we really don't have any reason to have both. I'm sure the users using the other template won't mind using this one, and it's not many pages to change if we want to use the new one. {{User:Rainer/sig}} 08:27, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
		+
		+	::::The reasons we have to keep both are the ones It's dot com just mentioned. 1. Both of these templates are actively being used. 2. They mean different things semantically. 3. There's no good reason to force users of one to switch to the other one.[[User:Tom\|<nowiki></nowiki>]] -- [[User:Tom\|Tom]] 14:00, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

Rob: /* This should stay */

Rob — Mon, 14 Nov 2005 08:27:13 GMT

This should stay

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:27, 14 November 2005
Line 20:		Line 20:

	::Both of these templates are actively being used. They mean different things semantically. There's no good reason to force users of one to switch to the other one. The fact that they look the same is immaterial. To insist on having one or the other is pedantic. I'm not suggesting that we go crazy with duplicate templates, but we are flexible enough in this case to have both. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 06:22, 14 November 2005 (UTC)		::Both of these templates are actively being used. They mean different things semantically. There's no good reason to force users of one to switch to the other one. The fact that they look the same is immaterial. To insist on having one or the other is pedantic. I'm not suggesting that we go crazy with duplicate templates, but we are flexible enough in this case to have both. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 06:22, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
		+
		+	:::I kinda agree with you, but, we really don't have any reason to have both. I'm sure the users using the other template won't mind using this one, and it's not many pages to change if we want to use the new one. {{User:Rainer/sig}} 08:27, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

It's dot com: this should stay

It's dot com — Mon, 14 Nov 2005 06:22:43 GMT

this should stay

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:22, 14 November 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	== This ~~shouldn't be deleted~~ ==	+	== This should stay ==

	I don't agree with the deletion of this template. "Tick" isn't semantic. I know that won't make sense to many of you. What if in the future the check mark is turned into a thumbs-up or something? I realize it's unlikely, but in that event the word "tick" wouldn't make sense anymore, but the word "done" would still be relevant. If anyone has coded in XHTML or CSS you know the importance of semantics. The XHTML spec has <code>em</code> instead of <code>i</code> because some people want to "emphasize" their stuff with something other than "italics". Am I making any sense here? My point is that "done" is semantic while "tick" is not. — {{User:JoeyDay/sig}} 19:39, 12 November 2005 (UTC)		I don't agree with the deletion of this template. "Tick" isn't semantic. I know that won't make sense to many of you. What if in the future the check mark is turned into a thumbs-up or something? I realize it's unlikely, but in that event the word "tick" wouldn't make sense anymore, but the word "done" would still be relevant. If anyone has coded in XHTML or CSS you know the importance of semantics. The XHTML spec has <code>em</code> instead of <code>i</code> because some people want to "emphasize" their stuff with something other than "italics". Am I making any sense here? My point is that "done" is semantic while "tick" is not. — {{User:JoeyDay/sig}} 19:39, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
Line 18:		Line 18:

	:I don't think it really matters, I don't think it's a big deal that the definition of "tick" might change, but I think we should have one or the other. I would prefer "tick" (that's what most people I know call it), but, I think it's called a "check mark" in USA (am I right?), so, maybe it's better to have "done", which means "done" in any English-speaking part of the world. {{User:Rainer/sig}} 06:09, 14 November 2005 (UTC)		:I don't think it really matters, I don't think it's a big deal that the definition of "tick" might change, but I think we should have one or the other. I would prefer "tick" (that's what most people I know call it), but, I think it's called a "check mark" in USA (am I right?), so, maybe it's better to have "done", which means "done" in any English-speaking part of the world. {{User:Rainer/sig}} 06:09, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
		+
		+	::Both of these templates are actively being used. They mean different things semantically. There's no good reason to force users of one to switch to the other one. The fact that they look the same is immaterial. To insist on having one or the other is pedantic. I'm not suggesting that we go crazy with duplicate templates, but we are flexible enough in this case to have both. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 06:22, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

Rob: /* This shouldn't be deleted */

Rob — Mon, 14 Nov 2005 06:09:33 GMT

This shouldn't be deleted

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:09, 14 November 2005
Line 16:		Line 16:
	::::I personally see no problem with having both "tick" and "done". I completely agree with JoeyDay's initial comment and possible scenario. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 20:31, 12 November 2005 (UTC)		::::I personally see no problem with having both "tick" and "done". I completely agree with JoeyDay's initial comment and possible scenario. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 20:31, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
	:::::Unless and until someone else has a problem with this template, I'm removing the TBD tags. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 23:35, 12 November 2005 (UTC)		:::::Unless and until someone else has a problem with this template, I'm removing the TBD tags. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 23:35, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
		+
		+	:I don't think it really matters, I don't think it's a big deal that the definition of "tick" might change, but I think we should have one or the other. I would prefer "tick" (that's what most people I know call it), but, I think it's called a "check mark" in USA (am I right?), so, maybe it's better to have "done", which means "done" in any English-speaking part of the world. {{User:Rainer/sig}} 06:09, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

It's dot com: rm TTBD

It's dot com — Sat, 12 Nov 2005 23:35:28 GMT

rm TTBD

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:35, 12 November 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~{{talktobedeleted}}~~
-
	== This shouldn't be deleted ==		== This shouldn't be deleted ==

Line 17:		Line 15:
	:::I agree with once-and-only-once, but this has gone on for several months without complaint. I don't understand why all of a sudden it's a big deal. At any rate, if enough people really want this deleted, I don't mind switching to the more widely adopted standard of "tick" even though I think "done" is more semantically appropriate. — {{User:JoeyDay/sig}} 20:13, 12 November 2005 (UTC)		:::I agree with once-and-only-once, but this has gone on for several months without complaint. I don't understand why all of a sudden it's a big deal. At any rate, if enough people really want this deleted, I don't mind switching to the more widely adopted standard of "tick" even though I think "done" is more semantically appropriate. — {{User:JoeyDay/sig}} 20:13, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
	::::I personally see no problem with having both "tick" and "done". I completely agree with JoeyDay's initial comment and possible scenario. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 20:31, 12 November 2005 (UTC)		::::I personally see no problem with having both "tick" and "done". I completely agree with JoeyDay's initial comment and possible scenario. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 20:31, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
		+	:::::Unless and until someone else has a problem with this template, I'm removing the TBD tags. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 23:35, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

JoeyDay: /* This shouldn't be deleted */ Fixing my grammar.

JoeyDay — Sat, 12 Nov 2005 20:44:12 GMT

This shouldn't be deleted: Fixing my grammar.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:44, 12 November 2005
Line 3:		Line 3:
	== This shouldn't be deleted ==		== This shouldn't be deleted ==

-	I don't agree with the deletion of this template. "Tick" isn't semantic. I know that won't make sense to many of you. What if in the future the check mark is ~~turning~~ into a thumbs-up or something? I realize it's unlikely, but in that event the word "tick" wouldn't make sense anymore, but the word "done" would still be relevant. If anyone has coded in XHTML or CSS you know the importance of semantics. The XHTML spec has <code>em</code> instead of <code>i</code> because some people want to "emphasize" their stuff with something other than "italics". Am I making any sense here? My point is that "done" is semantic while "tick" is not. — {{User:JoeyDay/sig}} 19:39, 12 November 2005 (UTC)	+	I don't agree with the deletion of this template. "Tick" isn't semantic. I know that won't make sense to many of you. What if in the future the check mark is turned into a thumbs-up or something? I realize it's unlikely, but in that event the word "tick" wouldn't make sense anymore, but the word "done" would still be relevant. If anyone has coded in XHTML or CSS you know the importance of semantics. The XHTML spec has <code>em</code> instead of <code>i</code> because some people want to "emphasize" their stuff with something other than "italics". Am I making any sense here? My point is that "done" is semantic while "tick" is not. — {{User:JoeyDay/sig}} 19:39, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

	:I don't think it realy metter, but if you and everyone else want to keep this, then we should get rid of tick. The point is that there shouldn't be two things that are the practically the same. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 19:44, 12 November 2005 (UTC)		:I don't think it realy metter, but if you and everyone else want to keep this, then we should get rid of tick. The point is that there shouldn't be two things that are the practically the same. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 19:44, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

Stux: /* This shouldn't be deleted */

Stux — Sat, 12 Nov 2005 20:31:16 GMT

This shouldn't be deleted

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:31, 12 November 2005
Line 16:		Line 16:

	:::I agree with once-and-only-once, but this has gone on for several months without complaint. I don't understand why all of a sudden it's a big deal. At any rate, if enough people really want this deleted, I don't mind switching to the more widely adopted standard of "tick" even though I think "done" is more semantically appropriate. — {{User:JoeyDay/sig}} 20:13, 12 November 2005 (UTC)		:::I agree with once-and-only-once, but this has gone on for several months without complaint. I don't understand why all of a sudden it's a big deal. At any rate, if enough people really want this deleted, I don't mind switching to the more widely adopted standard of "tick" even though I think "done" is more semantically appropriate. — {{User:JoeyDay/sig}} 20:13, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
		+	::::I personally see no problem with having both "tick" and "done". I completely agree with JoeyDay's initial comment and possible scenario. --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 20:31, 12 November 2005 (UTC)