Template talk:web-screenshot - Revision history

Tom: /* Update */ Reply for ACupOfCoffee.

Tom — Wed, 01 Nov 2006 03:39:30 GMT

Update: Reply for ACupOfCoffee.

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:39, 1 November 2006
Line 14:		Line 14:
	:::I mean it's not being used for identification and critical commentary relating to the website in question. -- [[User:Tom\|Tom]] 16:19, 31 October 2006 (UTC)		:::I mean it's not being used for identification and critical commentary relating to the website in question. -- [[User:Tom\|Tom]] 16:19, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
	::::Okay, that's what I thought. I just wasn't sure because I don't recall any of us ever actively (as opposed to passively) caring about that point before. {{User:ACupOfCoffee/sig}} 00:26, 1 November 2006 (UTC)		::::Okay, that's what I thought. I just wasn't sure because I don't recall any of us ever actively (as opposed to passively) caring about that point before. {{User:ACupOfCoffee/sig}} 00:26, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	:::::Yeah, that's only in strict terms of the law. Otherwise, it's probably [[Template:don't know]]. -- [[User:Tom\|Tom]] 03:39, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

ACupOfCoffee: /* Update */

ACupOfCoffee — Wed, 01 Nov 2006 00:26:50 GMT

Update

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:26, 1 November 2006
Line 13:		Line 13:

	:::I mean it's not being used for identification and critical commentary relating to the website in question. -- [[User:Tom\|Tom]] 16:19, 31 October 2006 (UTC)		:::I mean it's not being used for identification and critical commentary relating to the website in question. -- [[User:Tom\|Tom]] 16:19, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
		+	::::Okay, that's what I thought. I just wasn't sure because I don't recall any of us ever actively (as opposed to passively) caring about that point before. {{User:ACupOfCoffee/sig}} 00:26, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Tom: /* Update */ Reply for ACupOfCoffee.

Tom — Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:19:29 GMT

Update: Reply for ACupOfCoffee.

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:19, 31 October 2006
Line 11:		Line 11:
	:In the strict terms of the law, that image isn't being used in a manner consistent with Fair Use. In other words, this template doesn't apply to that image. -- [[User:Tom\|Tom]] 06:58, 31 October 2006 (UTC)		:In the strict terms of the law, that image isn't being used in a manner consistent with Fair Use. In other words, this template doesn't apply to that image. -- [[User:Tom\|Tom]] 06:58, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
	::By "not being used in a manner consistent with Fair Use" do you mean that it's not being used fairly or that it has nothing to do with Fair Use? {{User:ACupOfCoffee/sig}} 08:17, 31 October 2006 (UTC)		::By "not being used in a manner consistent with Fair Use" do you mean that it's not being used fairly or that it has nothing to do with Fair Use? {{User:ACupOfCoffee/sig}} 08:17, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	:::I mean it's not being used for identification and critical commentary relating to the website in question. -- [[User:Tom\|Tom]] 16:19, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

ACupOfCoffee: /* Update */ clarification

ACupOfCoffee — Tue, 31 Oct 2006 08:17:08 GMT

Update: clarification

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:17, 31 October 2006
Line 10:		Line 10:

	:In the strict terms of the law, that image isn't being used in a manner consistent with Fair Use. In other words, this template doesn't apply to that image. -- [[User:Tom\|Tom]] 06:58, 31 October 2006 (UTC)		:In the strict terms of the law, that image isn't being used in a manner consistent with Fair Use. In other words, this template doesn't apply to that image. -- [[User:Tom\|Tom]] 06:58, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
		+	::By "not being used in a manner consistent with Fair Use" do you mean that it's not being used fairly or that it has nothing to do with Fair Use? {{User:ACupOfCoffee/sig}} 08:17, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Tom: /* Update */ Reply for Trogga.

Tom — Tue, 31 Oct 2006 06:58:52 GMT

Update: Reply for Trogga.

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:58, 31 October 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
-
	== Not a notice template: ==		== Not a notice template: ==

Line 9:		Line 8:

	Should we change the text of this template to reflect images like [[:Image:Matt B-day Cover.PNG\|this]]? --[[User:Trogga\|Trogga]] 22:51, 30 October 2006 (UTC)		Should we change the text of this template to reflect images like [[:Image:Matt B-day Cover.PNG\|this]]? --[[User:Trogga\|Trogga]] 22:51, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	:In the strict terms of the law, that image isn't being used in a manner consistent with Fair Use. In other words, this template doesn't apply to that image. -- [[User:Tom\|Tom]] 06:58, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Trogga: Update

Trogga — Mon, 30 Oct 2006 22:51:35 GMT

Update

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:51, 30 October 2006
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:It should be. Rather, it should be in a subcategory of "Image notices" and ''that'' should be in that category. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 20:36, 26 December 2005 (UTC)		:It should be. Rather, it should be in a subcategory of "Image notices" and ''that'' should be in that category. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 20:36, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
	::Ooooo! Great Idear! I'm on it! --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 21:23, 26 December 2005 (UTC)		::Ooooo! Great Idear! I'm on it! --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 21:23, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Update ==
		+
		+	Should we change the text of this template to reflect images like [[:Image:Matt B-day Cover.PNG\|this]]? --[[User:Trogga\|Trogga]] 22:51, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Stux: /* Not a notice template: */ re-ply. tissue.

Stux — Mon, 26 Dec 2005 21:23:14 GMT

Not a notice template:: re-ply. tissue.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:23, 26 December 2005
Line 4:		Line 4:
	I'm curious why this template is not considered a [[:Category:Notice Templates\|notice template]]? --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 20:30, 26 December 2005 (UTC)		I'm curious why this template is not considered a [[:Category:Notice Templates\|notice template]]? --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 20:30, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
	:It should be. Rather, it should be in a subcategory of "Image notices" and ''that'' should be in that category. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 20:36, 26 December 2005 (UTC)		:It should be. Rather, it should be in a subcategory of "Image notices" and ''that'' should be in that category. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 20:36, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
		+	::Ooooo! Great Idear! I'm on it! --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 21:23, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

It's dot com: reply for Stux

It's dot com — Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:36:58 GMT

reply for Stux

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:36, 26 December 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
-

	== Not a notice template: ==		== Not a notice template: ==

	I'm curious why this template is not considered a [[:Category:Notice Templates\|notice template]]? --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 20:30, 26 December 2005 (UTC)		I'm curious why this template is not considered a [[:Category:Notice Templates\|notice template]]? --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 20:30, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
		+	:It should be. Rather, it should be in a subcategory of "Image notices" and ''that'' should be in that category. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 20:36, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Stux: Not a notice template:

Stux — Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:30:57 GMT

Not a notice template:

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:30, 26 December 2005
Line 1:	Line 1:

	+
	+	== Not a notice template: ==
	+
	+	I'm curious why this template is not considered a [[:Category:Notice Templates\|notice template]]? --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 20:30, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Tom: Moved cat to template.

Tom — Fri, 16 Dec 2005 18:34:18 GMT

Moved cat to template.

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:34, 16 December 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~[[Category:Notice Templates]]~~	+

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:23, 26 December 2005
Line 4:		Line 4:
	I'm curious why this template is not considered a [[:Category:Notice Templates\|notice template]]? --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 20:30, 26 December 2005 (UTC)		I'm curious why this template is not considered a [[:Category:Notice Templates\|notice template]]? --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 20:30, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
	:It should be. Rather, it should be in a subcategory of "Image notices" and ''that'' should be in that category. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 20:36, 26 December 2005 (UTC)		:It should be. Rather, it should be in a subcategory of "Image notices" and ''that'' should be in that category. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 20:36, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
		+	::Ooooo! Great Idear! I'm on it! --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 21:23, 26 December 2005 (UTC)