User talk:209.148.176.136 - Revision history

ColdReactive: fixing link

ColdReactive — Wed, 09 Jun 2010 23:18:36 GMT

fixing link

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:18, 9 June 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	Hey, anonny. Thanks for the revert [http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?	+	Hey, anonny. Thanks for the revert [http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Strong_Bad_Email&curid=732&diff=701700&oldid=701699&rcid=662488 here]. Just one thing: this wasn't spam, but vandalism. It confused me a little to see your edit summary say "spammers"; I was expecting it to be a spam account. So in the future, please use the term "vandalism" instead of "spam" for edits like this. I know it might seem like a petty distinction, but it actually makes a difference in how I go about it. Thanks. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 00:40, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
-	title=Strong_Bad_Email&curid=732&diff=701700&oldid=701699&rcid=662488 here]. Just one thing: this wasn't spam, but vandalism. It confused me a little to see your edit summary say "spammers"; I was expecting it to be a spam account. So in the future, please use the term "vandalism" instead of "spam" for edits like this. I know it might seem like a petty distinction, but it actually makes a difference in how I go about it. Thanks. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 00:40, 11 May 2010 (UTC)	+

	== Account ==		== Account ==

ColdReactive: rv/nn

ColdReactive — Wed, 02 Jun 2010 16:23:52 GMT

rv/nn

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:23, 2 June 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~''This annony is now [[User:Kingdom Stars\|Kingdom Stars]].''~~
-
	Hey, anonny. Thanks for the revert [http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?		Hey, anonny. Thanks for the revert [http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?
	title=Strong_Bad_Email&curid=732&diff=701700&oldid=701699&rcid=662488 here]. Just one thing: this wasn't spam, but vandalism. It confused me a little to see your edit summary say "spammers"; I was expecting it to be a spam account. So in the future, please use the term "vandalism" instead of "spam" for edits like this. I know it might seem like a petty distinction, but it actually makes a difference in how I go about it. Thanks. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 00:40, 11 May 2010 (UTC)		title=Strong_Bad_Email&curid=732&diff=701700&oldid=701699&rcid=662488 here]. Just one thing: this wasn't spam, but vandalism. It confused me a little to see your edit summary say "spammers"; I was expecting it to be a spam account. So in the future, please use the term "vandalism" instead of "spam" for edits like this. I know it might seem like a petty distinction, but it actually makes a difference in how I go about it. Thanks. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 00:40, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Kingdom Stars at 12:29, 2 June 2010

Kingdom Stars — Wed, 02 Jun 2010 12:29:15 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:29, 2 June 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	This annony is now [[User:Kingdom Stars\|Kingdom Stars]].	+	''This annony is now [[User:Kingdom Stars\|Kingdom Stars]].''

	Hey, anonny. Thanks for the revert [http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?		Hey, anonny. Thanks for the revert [http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?

Kingdom Stars at 12:29, 2 June 2010

Kingdom Stars — Wed, 02 Jun 2010 12:29:05 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:29, 2 June 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	Hey, anonny. Thanks for the revert [http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Strong_Bad_Email&curid=732&diff=701700&oldid=701699&rcid=662488 here]. Just one thing: this wasn't spam, but vandalism. It confused me a little to see your edit summary say "spammers"; I was expecting it to be a spam account. So in the future, please use the term "vandalism" instead of "spam" for edits like this. I know it might seem like a petty distinction, but it actually makes a difference in how I go about it. Thanks. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 00:40, 11 May 2010 (UTC)	+	This annony is now [[User:Kingdom Stars\|Kingdom Stars]].
		+
		+	Hey, anonny. Thanks for the revert [http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?
		+	title=Strong_Bad_Email&curid=732&diff=701700&oldid=701699&rcid=662488 here]. Just one thing: this wasn't spam, but vandalism. It confused me a little to see your edit summary say "spammers"; I was expecting it to be a spam account. So in the future, please use the term "vandalism" instead of "spam" for edits like this. I know it might seem like a petty distinction, but it actually makes a difference in how I go about it. Thanks. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 00:40, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

	== Account ==		== Account ==

209.148.176.136: /* Talk page comments on one page */

209.148.176.136 — Thu, 27 May 2010 12:13:03 GMT

Talk page comments on one page

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:13, 27 May 2010
Line 13:		Line 13:

	Hello, anonny. When someone leaves a comment on your talk page, the reply should go on your own talk instead of the other user's talk page. Otherwise, the discussion is fragmented and doesn't make sense. I know some wikis prefer cross-posting, but here, keeping discussions together is the norm. Thanks. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 05:02, 27 May 2010 (UTC)		Hello, anonny. When someone leaves a comment on your talk page, the reply should go on your own talk instead of the other user's talk page. Otherwise, the discussion is fragmented and doesn't make sense. I know some wikis prefer cross-posting, but here, keeping discussions together is the norm. Thanks. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 05:02, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
		+	:A'ight. --[[Special:Contributions/209.148.176.136\|209.148.176.136]] 12:13, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Heimstern Läufer: /**/Talk page comments on one page

Heimstern Läufer — Thu, 27 May 2010 05:02:08 GMT

: Talk page comments on one page

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:02, 27 May 2010
Line 9:		Line 9:
	Sorry, but you're only going to get your way if you CREATE AN ACCOUNT. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 01:22, 27 May 2010 (UTC)		Sorry, but you're only going to get your way if you CREATE AN ACCOUNT. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 01:22, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
	:Um, no. Anyone, including Annonies, can put a page up for deletion. Sure, their opinion may have more weight if they have an account, but you should simply respect his wishes and move on, RickTommy. {{User:StrongAwesome74/sig}} 01:44, 27 May 2010 (UTC)		:Um, no. Anyone, including Annonies, can put a page up for deletion. Sure, their opinion may have more weight if they have an account, but you should simply respect his wishes and move on, RickTommy. {{User:StrongAwesome74/sig}} 01:44, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Talk page comments on one page ==
		+
		+	Hello, anonny. When someone leaves a comment on your talk page, the reply should go on your own talk instead of the other user's talk page. Otherwise, the discussion is fragmented and doesn't make sense. I know some wikis prefer cross-posting, but here, keeping discussions together is the norm. Thanks. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 05:02, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

209.148.176.136: undid revision 702871; And since when were you allowed to delete user talk page posts?

209.148.176.136 — Thu, 27 May 2010 02:00:38 GMT

undid revision 702871; And since when were you allowed to delete user talk page posts?

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:00, 27 May 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:

	You've been editing here for about a month. How about creating an account? {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 12:32, 25 May 2010 (UTC)		You've been editing here for about a month. How about creating an account? {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 12:32, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	== RE: Deletion ==
		+
		+	Sorry, but you're only going to get your way if you CREATE AN ACCOUNT. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 01:22, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
		+	:Um, no. Anyone, including Annonies, can put a page up for deletion. Sure, their opinion may have more weight if they have an account, but you should simply respect his wishes and move on, RickTommy. {{User:StrongAwesome74/sig}} 01:44, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

132.183.138.127: This whole section is unnecessary

132.183.138.127 — Thu, 27 May 2010 01:46:28 GMT

This whole section is unnecessary

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:46, 27 May 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:

	You've been editing here for about a month. How about creating an account? {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 12:32, 25 May 2010 (UTC)		You've been editing here for about a month. How about creating an account? {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 12:32, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
-
-	~~== RE: Deletion ==~~
-
-	~~Sorry, but you're only going to get your way if you CREATE AN ACCOUNT. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 01:22, 27 May 2010 (UTC)~~
-	:Um, no. Anyone, including Annonies, can put a page up for deletion. Sure, their opinion may have more weight if they have an account, but you should simply respect his wishes and move on, RickTommy. {{User:StrongAwesome74/sig}} 01:44, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Strong Awesome: /* RE: Deletion */

Strong Awesome — Thu, 27 May 2010 01:44:22 GMT

RE: Deletion

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:44, 27 May 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Sorry, but you're only going to get your way if you CREATE AN ACCOUNT. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 01:22, 27 May 2010 (UTC)		Sorry, but you're only going to get your way if you CREATE AN ACCOUNT. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 01:22, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
		+	:Um, no. Anyone, including Annonies, can put a page up for deletion. Sure, their opinion may have more weight if they have an account, but you should simply respect his wishes and move on, RickTommy. {{User:StrongAwesome74/sig}} 01:44, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

RickTommy: /**/RE: Deletion

RickTommy — Thu, 27 May 2010 01:22:18 GMT

: RE: Deletion

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:22, 27 May 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:

	You've been editing here for about a month. How about creating an account? {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 12:32, 25 May 2010 (UTC)		You've been editing here for about a month. How about creating an account? {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 12:32, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	== RE: Deletion ==
		+
		+	Sorry, but you're only going to get your way if you CREATE AN ACCOUNT. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 01:22, 27 May 2010 (UTC)