User talk:75.5.176.233 - Revision history

75.5.176.233: /* piping */ Reply.

75.5.176.233 — Tue, 16 Dec 2008 23:19:17 GMT

piping: Reply.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:19, 16 December 2008
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Hi there, i just wanted you to know, that there's nothing wrong with having redirect links in articles. In fact, pipes are ugly and redirects avoid the need for them. They're not evil. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 22:39, 16 December 2008 (UTC)		Hi there, i just wanted you to know, that there's nothing wrong with having redirect links in articles. In fact, pipes are ugly and redirects avoid the need for them. They're not evil. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 22:39, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
	:Additionally, [[HRWiki:Autopipe/Autoredirect]] eliminates the need for piping something due to lowercases and plurals without causing a redirect at all. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 22:41, 16 December 2008 (UTC)		:Additionally, [[HRWiki:Autopipe/Autoredirect]] eliminates the need for piping something due to lowercases and plurals without causing a redirect at all. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 22:41, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
		+	::Sorry, I thought everyone else along with me was annoyed by the <span style="color:gray;font-size:90%;">(Redirected from [[Special:Random\|whatever]])</span> that shows on the top of the page when something like, from what I recently edited, [[swearing]] redirects to [[Swears]] with that <span style="color:gray;font-size:90%;">(Redirected from <span class="plainlinks">[http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Swearing&redirect=no <span style="color:blue;">Swearing</span>]</span>)</span><!--Yep. I have too much time on my hands. Though it didn't take THAT long to code.--> appearing at the top of the page. Though I am aware that as of the upgrade to MediaWiki 1.9 that case-sensitivity is not a problem, it still bugs me for some reason. But, I guess I've gone too far with this. I shall stop, since I apparently didn't learn earlier when my change on [[comic]], "<nowiki>[[Swears\|swear]]</nowiki>", was reverted. And in my opinion, I don't think the pipes are ''that'' ugly, ha! --[[Special:Contributions/75.5.176.233\|75.5.176.233]] 23:19, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

DorianGray: /* piping */ Also

DorianGray — Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:41:16 GMT

piping: Also

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:41, 16 December 2008
Line 10:		Line 10:

	Hi there, i just wanted you to know, that there's nothing wrong with having redirect links in articles. In fact, pipes are ugly and redirects avoid the need for them. They're not evil. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 22:39, 16 December 2008 (UTC)		Hi there, i just wanted you to know, that there's nothing wrong with having redirect links in articles. In fact, pipes are ugly and redirects avoid the need for them. They're not evil. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 22:39, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
		+	:Additionally, [[HRWiki:Autopipe/Autoredirect]] eliminates the need for piping something due to lowercases and plurals without causing a redirect at all. --[[User:DorianGray\|DorianGray]] 22:41, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Defender1031: /**/piping

Defender1031 — Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:39:13 GMT

: piping

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:39, 16 December 2008
Line 6:		Line 6:

	:Dang. Took me one day just to type up all that? --[[Special:Contributions/75.5.176.233\|75.5.176.233]] 15:55, 15 December 2008 (UTC)		:Dang. Took me one day just to type up all that? --[[Special:Contributions/75.5.176.233\|75.5.176.233]] 15:55, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	== piping ==
		+
		+	Hi there, i just wanted you to know, that there's nothing wrong with having redirect links in articles. In fact, pipes are ugly and redirects avoid the need for them. They're not evil. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 22:39, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

75.5.176.233: Dot Com's long-waited reply.

75.5.176.233 — Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:55:15 GMT

Dot Com's long-waited reply.

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:55, 15 December 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Unsigned ==		== Unsigned ==
	Hey there. You keep adding {{t\|unsigned}} to your own posts, but that's not what it's for. That template is for when ''other'' people forget to sign. If you forget to sign one of your own posts, then you should just go back and sign it like normal (you don't even need to worry about adjusting the timestamp unless a significant amount of time has passed). I've also noticed that your contributions have been split over several IP addresses, with the potential for more. Why don't you go ahead and create an account to alleviate that problem. Thanks one million. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 20:40, 14 December 2008 (UTC)		Hey there. You keep adding {{t\|unsigned}} to your own posts, but that's not what it's for. That template is for when ''other'' people forget to sign. If you forget to sign one of your own posts, then you should just go back and sign it like normal (you don't even need to worry about adjusting the timestamp unless a significant amount of time has passed). I've also noticed that your contributions have been split over several IP addresses, with the potential for more. Why don't you go ahead and create an account to alleviate that problem. Thanks one million. — [[User:It's dot com\|It's dot com]] 20:40, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
		+	:Oh. I see. Sorry, then. I would love to join, as I have said before, but due to a personal issue, I'll say for now, a new account, and getting it set up, isn't the best idea ''right'' now. But, I'm planning to join the Wiki during my winter break and get my userspace settled and out of the way.
		+
		+	:And several? I've been doing self-research so I can note the IPs I've been on on my own user page, and I've spanned about 17 (and for sure probably more, I have questionable gaps in 2007) so far! I know, it's sad.
		+
		+	:Dang. Took me one day just to type up all that? --[[Special:Contributions/75.5.176.233\|75.5.176.233]] 15:55, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

It's dot com: /**/Unsigned

It's dot com — Sun, 14 Dec 2008 20:40:55 GMT

: Unsigned

New page

== Unsigned ==
Hey there. You keep adding {{t|unsigned}} to your own posts, but that's not what it's for. That template is for when ''other'' people forget to sign. If you forget to sign one of your own posts, then you should just go back and sign it like normal (you don't even need to worry about adjusting the timestamp unless a significant amount of time has passed). I've also noticed that your contributions have been split over several IP addresses, with the potential for more. Why don't you go ahead and create an account to alleviate that problem. Thanks one million. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 20:40, 14 December 2008 (UTC)