User talk:KieferSkunk - Revision history

KieferSkunk: /* Voting */ Understood

KieferSkunk — Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:46:02 GMT

Voting: Understood

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:46, 31 March 2009
Line 257:		Line 257:

	Hey there, aside from the conversation being a year old, we tend not to vote on things here, instead opting for discussion and consensus. We decommissioned [[STUFF]] because we've moved away from the system of voting. Just letting you know about the policy change, since i know you haven't been around much recently. And welcome back. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 22:41, 31 March 2009 (UTC)		Hey there, aside from the conversation being a year old, we tend not to vote on things here, instead opting for discussion and consensus. We decommissioned [[STUFF]] because we've moved away from the system of voting. Just letting you know about the policy change, since i know you haven't been around much recently. And welcome back. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 22:41, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
		+	:(nod) Understood. I remember back when I was more active here, sometimes those "voting sections" tended to help clarify the discussion, since having "Well, I hear this" comments spread through a discussion thread could make the information difficult to track and the whole conversation difficult to read. But whatever works. :) And thanks! {{User:KieferSkunk/sig}} 22:46, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Defender1031: /**/Voting

Defender1031 — Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:41:15 GMT

: Voting

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:41, 31 March 2009
Line 253:		Line 253:

	:Thanks for the suggestion. I actually decided to just simplify my sig so it's not so unwieldy, but thanks. :) {{User:KieferSkunk/sig}} 20:45, 25 December 2008 (UTC)		:Thanks for the suggestion. I actually decided to just simplify my sig so it's not so unwieldy, but thanks. :) {{User:KieferSkunk/sig}} 20:45, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Voting ==
		+
		+	Hey there, aside from the conversation being a year old, we tend not to vote on things here, instead opting for discussion and consensus. We decommissioned [[STUFF]] because we've moved away from the system of voting. Just letting you know about the policy change, since i know you haven't been around much recently. And welcome back. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 22:41, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

KieferSkunk: /* */ Thanks for the suggestion - decided to just simplify the sig.

KieferSkunk — Thu, 25 Dec 2008 20:45:40 GMT

: Thanks for the suggestion - decided to just simplify the sig.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:45, 25 December 2008
Line 244:		Line 244:
	:Oh, and I also LOVE electronic music. I get teased about that sometimes. Why? I have no idea! Have you ever been ridiculed because of your musical preference? --Alex H.		:Oh, and I also LOVE electronic music. I get teased about that sometimes. Why? I have no idea! Have you ever been ridiculed because of your musical preference? --Alex H.

-	== ~~<nowiki><span style="white-space: nowrap"></nowiki>~~ ==	+	== Nowrap in signature ==

	Hey there KieferSkunk, I just wanted to see if you wouldn't mind modifying your sig a little bit... currently, if your sig is put into a compressed space, like a table or something, it'll wrap around the two —'s you have, making it two or three lines long. By modifying it to		Hey there KieferSkunk, I just wanted to see if you wouldn't mind modifying your sig a little bit... currently, if your sig is put into a compressed space, like a table or something, it'll wrap around the two —'s you have, making it two or three lines long. By modifying it to
Line 251:		Line 251:

	It'll look totally the same but will no longer wrap. Thanks! {{User:GuardDuck/sig}} 02:33, 25 December 2008 (UTC)		It'll look totally the same but will no longer wrap. Thanks! {{User:GuardDuck/sig}} 02:33, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	:Thanks for the suggestion. I actually decided to just simplify my sig so it's not so unwieldy, but thanks. :) {{User:KieferSkunk/sig}} 20:45, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Guard Duck: /* */ forgot tags

Guard Duck — Thu, 25 Dec 2008 02:33:50 GMT

: forgot <nowiki> tags

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:33, 25 December 2008
Line 248:		Line 248:
	Hey there KieferSkunk, I just wanted to see if you wouldn't mind modifying your sig a little bit... currently, if your sig is put into a compressed space, like a table or something, it'll wrap around the two —'s you have, making it two or three lines long. By modifying it to		Hey there KieferSkunk, I just wanted to see if you wouldn't mind modifying your sig a little bit... currently, if your sig is put into a compressed space, like a table or something, it'll wrap around the two —'s you have, making it two or three lines long. By modifying it to

-	—<span style="white-space: nowrap">[[Image:kskunk_fstandby.gif]] '''[[User:KieferSkunk\|<span style="color:#000">K</span><span style="color:#222">i</span><span style="color:#444">e</span><span style="color:#666">f</span><span style="color:#888">e</span><span style="color:#aaa">r</span><span style="color:#222">S</span><span style="color:#444">k</span><span style="color:#666">u</span><span style="color:#888">n</span><span style="color:#aaa">k</span>]]''' <span style="font-size:smaller; color:#bbf;">([[User talk:KieferSkunk\|<span style="color:#88f">talk</span>]])</span><span style="white-space: nowrap">—	+	<nowiki>—<span style="white-space: nowrap">[[Image:kskunk_fstandby.gif]] '''[[User:KieferSkunk\|<span style="color:#000">K</span><span style="color:#222">i</span><span style="color:#444">e</span><span style="color:#666">f</span><span style="color:#888">e</span><span style="color:#aaa">r</span><span style="color:#222">S</span><span style="color:#444">k</span><span style="color:#666">u</span><span style="color:#888">n</span><span style="color:#aaa">k</span>]]''' <span style="font-size:smaller; color:#bbf;">([[User talk:KieferSkunk\|<span style="color:#88f">talk</span>]])</span><span style="white-space: nowrap">—</nowiki>

	It'll look totally the same but will no longer wrap. Thanks! {{User:GuardDuck/sig}} 02:33, 25 December 2008 (UTC)		It'll look totally the same but will no longer wrap. Thanks! {{User:GuardDuck/sig}} 02:33, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Guard Duck: /**/

Guard Duck — Thu, 25 Dec 2008 02:33:10 GMT

: <nowiki><span style="white-space: nowrap"></nowiki>

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:33, 25 December 2008
Line 243:		Line 243:

	:Oh, and I also LOVE electronic music. I get teased about that sometimes. Why? I have no idea! Have you ever been ridiculed because of your musical preference? --Alex H.		:Oh, and I also LOVE electronic music. I get teased about that sometimes. Why? I have no idea! Have you ever been ridiculed because of your musical preference? --Alex H.
		+
		+	== <nowiki><span style="white-space: nowrap"></nowiki> ==
		+
		+	Hey there KieferSkunk, I just wanted to see if you wouldn't mind modifying your sig a little bit... currently, if your sig is put into a compressed space, like a table or something, it'll wrap around the two —'s you have, making it two or three lines long. By modifying it to
		+
		+	—<span style="white-space: nowrap">[[Image:kskunk_fstandby.gif]] '''[[User:KieferSkunk\|<span style="color:#000">K</span><span style="color:#222">i</span><span style="color:#444">e</span><span style="color:#666">f</span><span style="color:#888">e</span><span style="color:#aaa">r</span><span style="color:#222">S</span><span style="color:#444">k</span><span style="color:#666">u</span><span style="color:#888">n</span><span style="color:#aaa">k</span>]]''' <span style="font-size:smaller; color:#bbf;">([[User talk:KieferSkunk\|<span style="color:#88f">talk</span>]])</span><span style="white-space: nowrap">—
		+
		+	It'll look totally the same but will no longer wrap. Thanks! {{User:GuardDuck/sig}} 02:33, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

99.130.160.6 at 13:12, 19 June 2008

99.130.160.6 — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:12:23 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:12, 19 June 2008
Line 241:		Line 241:

	--[[Special:Contributions/99.130.160.6\|99.130.160.6]] 13:21, 18 June 2008 (UTC), but I'm usually called Alex H.		--[[Special:Contributions/99.130.160.6\|99.130.160.6]] 13:21, 18 June 2008 (UTC), but I'm usually called Alex H.
		+
		+	:Oh, and I also LOVE electronic music. I get teased about that sometimes. Why? I have no idea! Have you ever been ridiculed because of your musical preference? --Alex H.

99.130.160.6: /**/Weird coincidence.

99.130.160.6 — Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:21:30 GMT

: Weird coincidence.

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:21, 18 June 2008
Line 233:		Line 233:
	:Heya Stux. I'm doing okay - just been really really busy and stuff. :) {{User:KieferSkunk/sig}} 01:25, 7 March 2007 (UTC)		:Heya Stux. I'm doing okay - just been really really busy and stuff. :) {{User:KieferSkunk/sig}} 01:25, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
	::Yeah, me too. I totally feel for you on that one. I'm on Spring Break right now but I'll be going back to the grind soon enough! --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 03:50, 7 March 2007 (UTC)		::Yeah, me too. I totally feel for you on that one. I'm on Spring Break right now but I'll be going back to the grind soon enough! --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 03:50, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Weird coincidence. ==
		+
		+	Hi. I'm a weird IP guy who doesn't bother to make an account, yet helps out anyway. That [[Analysis of Homsar's Speech Patterns]] is pretty helpful. Thanks for making that. I just saw your website yesterday. Your ferret character kind of reminds me of me. I sometimes just randomly pick things up. Sometimes I walk around with them and put them back in a weird place. "Has anyone seen the paperweight?" Sometimes, when I'm really bored or listening to music in my head, I start drumming on everything. That ''really'' bugs everybody else. :) I saw your Livejournal, too. Bean tax dream = HILARIOUS!!! XD
		+
		+	Probably see you around sometime,
		+
		+	--[[Special:Contributions/99.130.160.6\|99.130.160.6]] 13:21, 18 June 2008 (UTC), but I'm usually called Alex H.

Stux: /* Doooood! You're still alive! */ reply

Stux — Wed, 07 Mar 2007 03:50:58 GMT

Doooood! You're still alive!: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:50, 7 March 2007
Line 232:		Line 232:
	Doooood! you're still alive! How are ya!? What's new? What's up? I'm trying not to hide as much. :) --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 00:40, 7 March 2007 (UTC)		Doooood! you're still alive! How are ya!? What's new? What's up? I'm trying not to hide as much. :) --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 00:40, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
	:Heya Stux. I'm doing okay - just been really really busy and stuff. :) {{User:KieferSkunk/sig}} 01:25, 7 March 2007 (UTC)		:Heya Stux. I'm doing okay - just been really really busy and stuff. :) {{User:KieferSkunk/sig}} 01:25, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
		+	::Yeah, me too. I totally feel for you on that one. I'm on Spring Break right now but I'll be going back to the grind soon enough! --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 03:50, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

KieferSkunk: /* Next-gen STUFF */ Hi!

KieferSkunk — Wed, 07 Mar 2007 01:25:00 GMT

Next-gen STUFF: Hi!

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:25, 7 March 2007
Line 228:		Line 228:
	I'm not gonna keep arguing over it in STUFF because it's gonna pass anyway, but I do find it odd that in this case speculative information as to the intent of TBC is being accepted while in alot of cases "Facts" which seem to me to have more evidence than this one are argued against with gusto. I can't for the life of me figure out why everyone is so willing to accept that TBC had Reynolds brother playing video games and said "lets package him with a 'next-gen gamepad' and lets use a SNES pad for our design inspiration" without question or debate, it's not an SNES gamepad, and while it does have simularities, and depending on the age you give to everything may or maynot fit a timeline, it still seems very speculative. There have been a number of much more spirited debates over very simular coincidences, some that have seemed to me to be much more likely to be something that inspired TBC that anything that we have at this time to support this idea. - {{User:Ilko Skevüld's Teh C/Sig}} 21:25, 8 January 2007 (UTC)		I'm not gonna keep arguing over it in STUFF because it's gonna pass anyway, but I do find it odd that in this case speculative information as to the intent of TBC is being accepted while in alot of cases "Facts" which seem to me to have more evidence than this one are argued against with gusto. I can't for the life of me figure out why everyone is so willing to accept that TBC had Reynolds brother playing video games and said "lets package him with a 'next-gen gamepad' and lets use a SNES pad for our design inspiration" without question or debate, it's not an SNES gamepad, and while it does have simularities, and depending on the age you give to everything may or maynot fit a timeline, it still seems very speculative. There have been a number of much more spirited debates over very simular coincidences, some that have seemed to me to be much more likely to be something that inspired TBC that anything that we have at this time to support this idea. - {{User:Ilko Skevüld's Teh C/Sig}} 21:25, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
	:I did not say it WAS a SNES gamepad. I said it LOOKS like a SNES gamepad. The SNES pad has a very distinctive shape and style that TBC have almost completely replicated in the Easter egg. That's why I pointed it out. There is nothing speculative in the fact itself, and the arguments are simply there to support what's written in the fact under debate. Yes, I acknowledge that we don't know what TBC's intent was, but given their history, I believe there's a lot of supporting evidence. {{User:KieferSkunk/sig}} 23:02, 8 January 2007 (UTC)		:I did not say it WAS a SNES gamepad. I said it LOOKS like a SNES gamepad. The SNES pad has a very distinctive shape and style that TBC have almost completely replicated in the Easter egg. That's why I pointed it out. There is nothing speculative in the fact itself, and the arguments are simply there to support what's written in the fact under debate. Yes, I acknowledge that we don't know what TBC's intent was, but given their history, I believe there's a lot of supporting evidence. {{User:KieferSkunk/sig}} 23:02, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
-	::Doooood! you're still alive! How are ya!? What's new? What's up? I'm trying not to hide as much. :) --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 00:40, 7 March 2007 (UTC)	+
		+	==Doooood! You're still alive!==
		+	Doooood! you're still alive! How are ya!? What's new? What's up? I'm trying not to hide as much. :) --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 00:40, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
		+	:Heya Stux. I'm doing okay - just been really really busy and stuff. :) {{User:KieferSkunk/sig}} 01:25, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Stux: /* Next-gen STUFF */ hello!

Stux — Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:40:40 GMT

Next-gen STUFF: hello!

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:40, 7 March 2007
Line 228:		Line 228:
	I'm not gonna keep arguing over it in STUFF because it's gonna pass anyway, but I do find it odd that in this case speculative information as to the intent of TBC is being accepted while in alot of cases "Facts" which seem to me to have more evidence than this one are argued against with gusto. I can't for the life of me figure out why everyone is so willing to accept that TBC had Reynolds brother playing video games and said "lets package him with a 'next-gen gamepad' and lets use a SNES pad for our design inspiration" without question or debate, it's not an SNES gamepad, and while it does have simularities, and depending on the age you give to everything may or maynot fit a timeline, it still seems very speculative. There have been a number of much more spirited debates over very simular coincidences, some that have seemed to me to be much more likely to be something that inspired TBC that anything that we have at this time to support this idea. - {{User:Ilko Skevüld's Teh C/Sig}} 21:25, 8 January 2007 (UTC)		I'm not gonna keep arguing over it in STUFF because it's gonna pass anyway, but I do find it odd that in this case speculative information as to the intent of TBC is being accepted while in alot of cases "Facts" which seem to me to have more evidence than this one are argued against with gusto. I can't for the life of me figure out why everyone is so willing to accept that TBC had Reynolds brother playing video games and said "lets package him with a 'next-gen gamepad' and lets use a SNES pad for our design inspiration" without question or debate, it's not an SNES gamepad, and while it does have simularities, and depending on the age you give to everything may or maynot fit a timeline, it still seems very speculative. There have been a number of much more spirited debates over very simular coincidences, some that have seemed to me to be much more likely to be something that inspired TBC that anything that we have at this time to support this idea. - {{User:Ilko Skevüld's Teh C/Sig}} 21:25, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
	:I did not say it WAS a SNES gamepad. I said it LOOKS like a SNES gamepad. The SNES pad has a very distinctive shape and style that TBC have almost completely replicated in the Easter egg. That's why I pointed it out. There is nothing speculative in the fact itself, and the arguments are simply there to support what's written in the fact under debate. Yes, I acknowledge that we don't know what TBC's intent was, but given their history, I believe there's a lot of supporting evidence. {{User:KieferSkunk/sig}} 23:02, 8 January 2007 (UTC)		:I did not say it WAS a SNES gamepad. I said it LOOKS like a SNES gamepad. The SNES pad has a very distinctive shape and style that TBC have almost completely replicated in the Easter egg. That's why I pointed it out. There is nothing speculative in the fact itself, and the arguments are simply there to support what's written in the fact under debate. Yes, I acknowledge that we don't know what TBC's intent was, but given their history, I believe there's a lot of supporting evidence. {{User:KieferSkunk/sig}} 23:02, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
		+	::Doooood! you're still alive! How are ya!? What's new? What's up? I'm trying not to hide as much. :) --[[User:Stux\|Stux]] 00:40, 7 March 2007 (UTC)